SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

131,938 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop combination that sits in the 91st percentile of all tracked builds — a high-tier pairing where a strong mainstream CPU is matched with a former-flagship GPU. The data shows a clear division of labor: the RTX 3090 Ti, in the 95th percentile of all GPUs, carries graphical workloads, while the i5-13600K, in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, delivers balanced multi-core and single-core performance without matching the GPU's elite standing. One caveat applies throughout: no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded game testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With the GPU in the 95th percentile and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 215633, this pairing is estimated to handle high-refresh gameplay comfortably at 1440p and to remain very capable at 4K, where the RTX 3090 Ti's 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth prevents texture-heavy scenes from throttling. The CPU's single-thread results — 1085 in 3DMark single-thread and 4124 in PassMark single-thread — indicate the per-core speed needed to push high frame rates in esports and competitive titles.

Streaming. Streaming while gaming splits the load, and this configuration is built for it. The i5-13600K's 14 cores and 20 threads produce a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221, enough headroom to run an encoder, chat overlays, and a browser alongside a game. The RTX 3090 Ti's 336 tensor cores can also absorb AI-assisted encoding work rather than pushing it entirely onto the CPU.

Video editing. The 24 GB of GDDR6X is the headline here: large timeline projects, 4K footage, and multi-cam edits fit in VRAM without constant proxy workflows. A Geekbench OpenCL score of 174441 indicates strong GPU compute for effects and color grading, while the CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core result of 13373 handles timeline scrubbing and export threading.

3D rendering. GPU rendering is the strong suit — the 40.00 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, 10752 shading units, and 84 RT cores make ray-traced viewport work and production rendering fast, with the 95th-percentile standing confirming near-flagship output. CPU rendering is respectable rather than elite: a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3642 and 3DMark max-threads score of 10157 place the processor in the 86th percentile, suited to mid-scale scene work.

Software development. Compilation, containerized workloads, and testing benefit from the 20 threads and the PassMark multithread score of 37680. The single-core strength — Geekbench single-core at 2297 — keeps IDE responsiveness and branchy code fast. Data-heavy tasks are well covered too: 476394 in PassMark data compression and 27075 in data encryption.

Student and office work. For everyday use this pairing is overkill in the best way. Documents, video calls, and research loads barely register against hardware of this tier, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete card is ever removed. ECC memory support also adds a stability angle for small-business machines.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark profile shows a well-rounded processor with a slight lean toward multi-core throughput. The 3DMark thread scaling tells the story cleanly: 1085 single-thread, 2168 at 2 threads, 4283 at 4 threads, 7074 at 8 threads, and 10157 at maximum threads. Scaling from one to eight threads is nearly ideal, and the jump to maximum threads reflects the hybrid nature of a 14-core, 20-thread design. Cinebench progression confirms it: 3642 in R15 multi-core, 13373 in R20, and 24221 in R23, alongside single-core marks of 287.5, 1887, and 2000.5 respectively. Geekbench lands at 15575 multi-core and 2297 single-core.

The GPU's recorded results are three-fold: 5741 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), 174441 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 215633 in Geekbench Vulkan — the Vulkan figure running 23% ahead of the OpenCL figure, which points to particularly strong performance in Vulkan-native workloads. The average benchmark score of 131938 places it in the 95th percentile of all GPUs.

Against nearest rivals, the CPU trades blows within a fraction of a percent: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 averages 37762 versus the i5-13600K's 37685 (a -0.2% delta), the Ryzen AI Embedded P132 sits at 37804 (-0.3%), the Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 (-0.4%), and the Core Ultra 5 235H at 37522 (+0.4%). In practice these are statistical ties. The GPU's rivals are similarly close: the NVIDIA L4 at 131072 (+0.7%), the RTX 4000 Ada Generation at 135218 (-2.4%), the NVIDIA A10M at 135230 (-2.4%), and the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135396 (-2.6%) — meaning the RTX 3090 Ti scores within roughly 2.6% of professional-tier cards while holding the consumer advantage of 24 GB VRAM. The combined percentile of 91 confirms a high-end build overall.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, giving this build a defined upgrade lane within Intel's desktop ecosystem. Memory flexibility is a genuine strength: the i5-13600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, so builders can carry forward existing DDR4 kits or move to DDR5 without changing the CPU decision. ECC support is available, an unusual consumer-desktop feature that matters for workstation reliability.

For expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, while the RTX 3090 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface — the slot is forward-compatible, and the Gen 5 capability remains available for future cards or fast storage. A single modern GPU gets full bandwidth.

Power is the area that demands respect. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, but the GPU's is 450 W with a single 16-pin power connector and a triple-slot, 336 mm-long, 140 mm-tall physical footprint — case clearance must be checked before anything else. NVIDIA's suggested PSU rating for the card is 850 W, and that figure should be treated as the floor for this pairing since it must absorb both components plus platform draw with headroom for boost transients. On the GPU side specifically, the sensible next upgrade follows the stated successor line — GeForce 40 — while the card itself is marked end-of-life, so future builds should note its production status.

Who Should Build It

1440p and 4K gamers are the primary audience: the 95th-percentile GPU with 24 GB of VRAM and 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth is estimated to deliver high-settings 4K and high-refresh 1440p experiences, per the benchmark scores rather than measured FPS.

Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, streamers — benefit most directly. The VRAM capacity removes the most common rendering and editing bottleneck, the OpenCL and Vulkan compute scores handle GPU-accelerated effects, and the CPU's 24221 Cinebench R23 multi-core result covers CPU-side encoding and simulation.

Developers and data-focused professionals get a machine that compiles quickly (15575 Geekbench multi-core) and crunches datasets efficiently (476394 compression, 122481 integer math, 90538 floating point in PassMark).

Students and small-business workstation users will find this pairing exceeds requirements, but the ECC support and 24 GB VRAM give it a legitimate case in stability-sensitive and visualization-heavy office roles.

CPU Analysis

The i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor (codename Raptor Lake-S) built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. Its clock range spans a 3.50 base to a 5.10 boost, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing tuning. Cache is generous for the class: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3.

The hybrid core arrangement is visible in the benchmark curve. The 3DMark thread test shows 7074 at 8 threads versus 10157 at maximum — strong scaling through the fast cores with an additional, smaller lift from the full thread count. For real workloads, this means applications with heavy 8-to-16 thread demand (most games, most creative apps) run near the chip's peak, while fully threaded rendering and batch jobs extract the remaining headroom. Single-core results — 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 and 2297 in Geekbench — are the numbers that matter for latency-sensitive tasks, and they place the chip firmly in the 86th percentile overall, essentially tied with its nearest rivals (all within 0.4%).

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3090 Ti is the top implementation of NVIDIA's GA102 chip on Samsung's 8 nm process: 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, at a density of 45.1M per mm². It runs a 1560 MHz base and 1860 MHz boost clock, with memory at 21 Gbps effective across a 384-bit bus — yielding 24 GB of GDDR6X and 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

The compute and rasterization hardware is flagship-grade: 10752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, a 208.3 GPixel/s pixel rate, 625.0 GTexel/s texture rate, and 40.00 TFLOPS of FP32 (with FP16 at 1:1). Ray tracing is handled by 84 RT cores, and 336 tensor cores cover AI workloads and DLSS-style upscaling. API support extends to DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6.

What the scores mean for rendering: the 95th-percentile ranking and the 215633 Vulkan score indicate the card renders complex, ray-traced scenes at rates within a few percent of professional alternatives like the RTX 4000 Ada Generation (-2.4%) and Radeon PRO W6800 (-2.6%), while the 5741 Steel Nomad result confirms sustained DX12 performance. For GPU render engines, the tensor core count and 24 GB frame buffer make it well suited to large-scene, high-texture work that smaller-frame-buffer cards cannot hold.

FAQ

Q: Is this build good for 4K gaming? A: The RTX 3090 Ti sits in the 95th percentile of all GPUs with 24 GB of VRAM and 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth, so benchmark scores indicate strong 4K capability — though no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing, so estimates come from the benchmark scores.

Q: How does the i5-13600K compare to its closest rivals? A: It is statistically tied with them: the nearest rivals (Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, Ryzen AI Embedded P132, Core 5 211E, Core Ultra 5 235H) all fall within 0.4% of its average score of 37685.

Q: What power supply does this build need? A: NVIDIA suggests an 850 W PSU for the 450 W RTX 3090 Ti; the 125 W CPU TDP and the rest of the platform must fit within that rating's headroom.

Q: Does the i5-13600K support DDR5? A: Yes — it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: Is the RTX 3090 Ti still in production? A: No. Its production status is end-of-life, with GeForce 40 listed as its successor generation.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked? A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, with a stock boost clock of 5.10.

Q: What display outputs does the GPU have? A: One HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build — a mainstream-high-end 14-core Intel CPU from the 13th Gen Core series (launch MSRP $319) paired with a former-flagship NVIDIA GPU (launch MSRP 1,999 USD). The tier math is straightforward: CPU at the 86th percentile, GPU at the 95th, combined at the 91st. That makes this a GPU-led high-end build, where the processor is strong for its class but the graphics card defines the machine's ceiling. The pairing is coherent: PCIe 4.0 x16 on the GPU runs on a board platform with Gen 5 capability from the CPU, and neither component grossly overshadows the platform around it.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance question here resolves cleanly: the GPU is the stronger component, so the CPU is the limiting side in CPU-bound scenarios. A nine-point percentile gap (95 GPU versus 86 CPU) means that at lower resolutions and higher refresh rates, where frame generation shifts toward the processor, the i5-13600K's ceiling arrives first — its 3DMark single-thread score of 1085 and 4-thread score of 4283 define the per-frame limit. At 1440p and 4K, the workload shifts heavily onto the RTX 3090 Ti, and its 95th-percentile standing plus 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth dominate the outcome.

Because no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, this analysis rests entirely on the benchmark scores: the Vulkan and OpenCL results for the GPU, the thread-scaling and PassMark results for the CPU. The estimate that follows from them is a build that is GPU-forward — ideal for resolution- and fidelity-heavy workloads, and comfortably matched, if not GPU-favored, for high-refresh competitive play where the CPU's excellent single-core numbers keep the frame pipeline fed without becoming the story.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds