SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. Its hybrid configuration pairs performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes 24 MB of shared L3 cache along with 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The processor also carries UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, which provides a fallback display output for systems without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that scales strongly with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the i5-13600K scores 2,168 with 2 threads, 4,283 with 4 threads, 7,074 with 8 threads, 9,368 with 16 threads, and 10,157 with max threads. The scaling from 2 to 4 threads is nearly linear (98% improvement), and from 4 to 8 threads it adds another 65%. However, the jump from 8 to 16 threads yields only 32% more performance, and from 16 to max threads just 8% more. This indicates that the processor's 14 cores — with only 8 performance cores — begin to saturate beyond 16 threads, as the efficiency cores contribute diminishing returns in heavily threaded workloads.

The Cinebench results reinforce this picture. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 24,221 in multicore and 2,000.5 in single-core. The ratio of multicore to single-core performance is roughly 12:1, which is substantial but not class-leading. For comparison, the average benchmark score of 37,685 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors but is not at the absolute top tier. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (average score 37,762, a 0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37,804, -0.3%), the Intel Core 5 211E (37,829, -0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (37,522, +0.4%). These deltas are all within 0.4%, indicating that the i5-13600K sits in a tightly contested performance band where no single processor holds a decisive advantage.

Geekbench scores show 15,575 multicore and 2,297 single-core, which aligns with the pattern of strong multithreaded performance. PassMark tests further detail the chip's character: integer math scores 122,481, floating-point math scores 90,538, and extended instructions score 28,805. Data compression is a standout at 476,394, while data encryption reaches 27,075. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,124 confirms that the architecture's per-core efficiency is solid, though not exceptional. The 125 W TDP is moderate for a desktop chip with this core count, suggesting that sustained all-core workloads will require capable cooling but not exotic solutions.

The architecture's hybrid design is the key to its behavior. Raptor Lake's combination of performance and efficiency cores allows the chip to deliver high single-thread responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks while marshaling all cores for rendering or compilation. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,368 versus the max-thread score of 10,157 shows that the efficiency cores add roughly 8% headroom, which is meaningful for background tasks but not transformative for primary workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i5-13600K's single-core performance — a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,085 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,000.5 — is strong enough to feed high-end GPUs in CPU-bound scenarios. The RTX 3080 Ti's GPU-centric benchmarks, combined with this CPU's 86th percentile standing, suggest the pairing is well-suited for 1440p and 4K gaming, where GPU load dominates. However, without measured FPS data, exact frame rates remain estimates.

Streaming: The processor's 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 37,680 and the 3DMark 16-thread score of 9,368 indicate that simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding should not cause significant frame drops. The efficiency cores can handle encoding tasks while performance cores focus on game logic.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore at 24,221 and Geekbench multicore at 15,575 show that the i5-13600K can handle timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks in consumer video editors. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with large media files, and the dual-channel memory bus supports either DDR4 or DDR5, giving builders flexibility. The 86th percentile CPU score suggests export times will be competitive with most desktop systems.

3D rendering: The max-thread 3DMark score of 10,157 and Cinebench R20 multicore of 13,373 indicate the processor is capable for CPU-based rendering. The PassMark physics score of 2,258 further confirms that the chip can manage physics simulations in 3D applications. However, the modest scaling beyond 16 threads means that pure CPU render farms will find better options elsewhere.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from the processor's multithreaded scores. PassMark integer math at 122,481 and data compression at 476,394 suggest fast builds and quick package management. The single-thread score of 4,124 in PassMark means that interactive editing in IDEs will remain responsive, while the 14 cores handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: For typical productivity tasks, the processor's single-thread performance is more than adequate. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,297 and PassMark single-thread of 4,124 ensure snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The 125 W TDP is manageable for standard desktop cases, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display solution.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600K achieves an average benchmark score of 37,685, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, scores 37,762, a mere 0.2% higher, making the two effectively identical in overall performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scores 37,522 (0.4% lower). These margins are negligible in real-world use, meaning the i5-13600K is positioned in an extremely competitive mid-to-high tier.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti posts an average benchmark score of 41,187, which places it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40,870, a 0.8% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB (41,707, -1.2%), the NVIDIA Tesla M40 (41,897, -1.7%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40,377, +2.0%). The RTX 3080 Ti outperforms the RTX 5070 by 2% in aggregate benchmark scores, which is notable given the generational gap between the two architectures.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the RTX 3080 Ti scores 5,077 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 170,037 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 192,697 in Geekbench Vulkan. PassMark results show 26,896 in G3D and 15,282 in GPU compute. The DirectX 12 PassMark score of 110 is low relative to the G3D score, suggesting that the card's raw compute power is more impressive than its API-specific optimization in older tests. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 85, indicating that this system sits above the vast majority of desktop configurations.

The combined picture is one of balance: the CPU at the 86th percentile and GPU at the 83rd percentile are well-matched in performance tier. Neither component dramatically outstrips the other, which is ideal for avoiding bottlenecks in most workloads.

# Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need strong performance across both CPU- and GPU-intensive tasks without venturing into extreme enthusiast territory. Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit from the RTX 3080 Ti's 83rd percentile GPU performance, which delivers high frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU's 86th percentile standing ensures that it will not hold back the GPU in these scenarios.

Content creators working with video editing software will appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,221 and the GPU's compute capabilities, which accelerate effects and exports. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on the GPU provides sufficient VRAM for 4K video timelines and complex compositions.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the 20-thread CPU a capable workhorse. The PassMark integer math score of 122,481 and data compression score of 476,394 indicate strong performance in build systems and package management.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can use this system for coursework ranging from CAD modeling to machine learning experiments. The GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 320 tensor cores enable hands-on experience with AI frameworks.

Small business workstations running office productivity suites, financial modeling, or database applications will find the CPU's single-thread performance more than adequate. The 86th percentile CPU score ensures smooth operation of standard business software, while the GPU provides headroom for occasional rendering or data visualization tasks.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process node. The GA102 chip contains 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.1 million per square millimeter. The GPU features 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It includes 80 RT cores for ray tracing and 320 tensor cores for AI acceleration, making it a formidable compute device beyond just gaming.

Memory specifications are substantial: 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus delivers 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads that access large datasets. The base clock is 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and the card's pixel rate is 186.5 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 34.10 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), which is a significant capability for scientific computing and machine learning inference. The 320 tensor cores accelerate matrix operations, making the card useful for AI workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench scores of 170,037 in OpenCL and 192,697 in Vulkan show strong cross-API compute ability.

The card consumes 350 W TDP and requires a 750 W suggested PSU, with a single 12-pin power connector. It occupies a dual-slot form factor at 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern high-refresh monitors. The GPU is rated at the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41,187, placing it slightly below the CPU in relative standing.

# Gaming Performance

Important note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct game testing.

The RTX 3080 Ti's 83rd percentile GPU score of 26,896 in PassMark G3D suggests strong performance in modern titles at high settings. The combined system percentile of 85 indicates that this build should handle demanding games at 1440p and 4K with high frame rates, though exact numbers cannot be stated. The CPU's 86th percentile single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,000.5) ensures that it can keep up with game logic and physics in CPU-bound scenarios.

The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are well-suited for high-resolution textures and ray tracing effects. The 80 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting, shadows, and reflections, while the 320 tensor cores can enable DLSS for performance boosts in supported titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 suggests that DirectX 12 games will run efficiently, and the Vulkan score of 192,697 indicates strong performance in Vulkan-based titles.

For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread strength will be the primary driver, and the i5-13600K's scores are more than sufficient for high-refresh monitors. For AAA titles at 1440p or 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the RTX 3080 Ti's performance tier places it well within the range of smooth gameplay at high settings. Users should expect playable frame rates across most titles, but the absence of measured data means these are qualitative expectations rather than verified numbers.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility means builders can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 depending on their budget and performance needs. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for the RTX 3080 Ti's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

The CPU's 125 W TDP is modest, and the GPU's 350 W TDP with a suggested 750 W PSU leaves headroom for additional components. The system's power envelope is manageable for a standard desktop setup, and the dual-slot GPU fits in most mid-tower cases. The 12-pin power connector on the GPU may require an adapter for older PSUs, but the 750 W suggested PSU rating ensures stable operation under load.

A sensible next upgrade would be to move to a newer generation CPU on a different socket, as the Socket 1700 platform is tied to the 13th-gen architecture. However, within the current platform, users could upgrade to a higher-core-count processor if CPU-bound workloads become the bottleneck. The GPU, now end-of-life, could be replaced by a newer generation card when ray tracing performance or VRAM capacity becomes insufficient, but the 12 GB of GDDR6X is currently ample for most applications.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i5-13600K scores 37,685 on average, which is within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, Intel Core 5 211E, and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H. The performance differences are negligible.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth at 19 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: What PCIe version does the GPU support?

A: The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 85, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 83rd percentile of all components.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU pairing, so frame rates are estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 750 W, which accounts for the GPU's 350 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. The CPU's 86th percentile and the GPU's 83rd percentile are close in relative performance, meaning that in most workloads, the bottleneck will shift depending on the task. In CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or data compression, the processor's PassMark physics score of 2,258 and integer math score of 122,481 will be the limiting factor. In GPU-bound scenarios like high-resolution gaming or compute-heavy rendering, the GPU's 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance will dominate.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured directly, can be inferred from the benchmark scores. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,000.5) is strong enough to avoid holding back the GPU in most gaming scenarios, but at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU could become the limiting factor in high-refresh-rate situations. At 1440p and above, the GPU's 83rd percentile performance will be the primary determinant of frame rates.

For compute workloads, the GPU's 15,282 PassMark GPU compute score and 170,037 OpenCL score indicate that it will accelerate parallel tasks significantly. The CPU's 20 threads will handle the serial portions of these workloads, and the 24 MB L3 cache will help with data locality. The overall balance is such that users will need to identify their primary workload to determine which component to upgrade first.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. The CPU, from the Core 13th Gen series, is an active-production processor with a launch MSRP of $319. The GPU, from the GeForce 30-series, is end-of-life with a launch MSRP of 1,199 USD. The combined system sits at the 85th percentile of all builds, placing it in the upper tier of desktop configurations.

The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide robust multithreaded performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,221 and the PassMark multithread score of 37,680. The GPU's 10,240 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6X memory deliver strong graphics and compute capabilities, with a PassMark G3D score of 26,896. This pairing is suitable for a wide range of tasks, from gaming at high resolutions to content creation and software development, and it represents a capable, well-rounded desktop system for enthusiasts and professionals alike.