SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070: A Balanced 1440p Desktop Pairing

This desktop build pairs Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake processor with NVIDIA's Ampere-generation RTX 3070, a combination that lands at the 74th percentile overall against all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. The CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a configuration where the processor holds a clear performance advantage over the graphics subsystem. This asymmetry is not a flaw but a deliberate characteristic—the i5-13600K provides substantial headroom for GPU upgrades, while the RTX 3070 currently acts as the primary constraint in graphics-bound workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The chip uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor integrates UHD Graphics 770 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $319, this chip remains in active production and features an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark results demonstrate a processor that scales exceptionally well across thread counts. In 3DMark, the single-thread score of 1085 rises to 2168 with 2 threads, 4283 with 4 threads, 7074 with 8 threads, 9368 with 16 threads, and 10157 with maximum threads. This scaling pattern reveals near-linear gains through 8 threads (a 6.5x increase from single-thread to 8-thread) before diminishing returns set in beyond 16 threads, where the hybrid core arrangement's efficiency cores contribute additional throughput but at a reduced rate per thread. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 against a single-core score of 2000.5 confirms this behavior, showing a 12.1x multiplier that is typical for a 14-core hybrid design.

The PassMark suite provides workload-specific context. The processor achieves 476394 in data compression, 27075 in data encryption, 28805 in extended instructions, 90538 in floating-point math, and 122481 in integer math. The multithread score of 37680 positions this chip at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the single-thread score of 4124 indicates strong per-core performance. The physics score of 2258 and the prime number finding score of 155 round out the compute profile. Geekbench results show 15575 multicore and 2297 single-core, reinforcing the pattern of a processor that excels in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.

The nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scores 37522 (0.4% lower). The i5-13600K's average benchmark score of 37685 places it within a statistical dead heat with all four rivals, none of which deviate by more than 0.4% from this processor's output. This clustering indicates that the i5-13600K remains competitive with newer mid-range processors despite being from an earlier generation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance distribution between CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck hierarchy. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile ranking means that in most gaming and graphics workloads, the RTX 3070 will be the limiting factor. The CPU can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them, particularly at lower resolutions where the graphics workload is lighter. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 2000.5, multicore 24221) will push frame rates upward, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 22214 will cap maximum throughput in graphically intensive scenes.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts entirely toward the CPU. The processor's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and Geekbench multicore score of 15575 indicate that rendering, compilation, and data processing tasks will be CPU-limited, with the GPU contributing only in specific compute-accelerated applications. The GPU's compute capabilities, measured at 11195 in PassMark GPU Compute and 112821 in Geekbench OpenCL, are substantial but secondary to the CPU's processing power in most non-graphics workloads.

The bottleneck analysis also reveals headroom for future upgrades. Because the CPU outperforms the GPU by 25 percentile points, replacing the RTX 3070 with a more powerful graphics card would yield immediate performance gains without requiring a processor upgrade. Conversely, upgrading the CPU while keeping the RTX 3070 would produce negligible improvements in graphics-bound scenarios. This pairing is therefore well-balanced for current use but biased toward CPU-heavy tasks, making it a sensible foundation for users who anticipate a GPU upgrade within the system's lifetime.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 37685 places it at the 86th percentile among all processors. Its Cinebench R23 results of 24221 multicore and 2000.5 single-core demonstrate strong rendering performance, while the 3DMark max-thread score of 10157 shows sustained multi-core throughput. The PassMark multithread score of 37680 corroborates these findings, with the integer math score of 122481 indicating particularly strong general-purpose compute.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17208 places it at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 3070 scores 3162. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 22214, with DirectX 11 scoring 182, DirectX 12 scoring 85, and DirectX 10 scoring 150. The DirectX 9 score of 247 and G2D score of 1001 round out the legacy and 2D performance metrics. Geekbench results show 112821 in OpenCL and 21022 in Vulkan, indicating strong compute performance for a graphics card of this class.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU operates at near-flagship levels while the GPU performs as a solid mid-to-high-range component. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this asymmetry. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT with an average score of 17083 (0.7% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 at 17037 (1% lower), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M at 17019 (1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c at 17468 (1.5% higher). These margins are tight, placing the RTX 3070 in a competitive cluster where no single card dominates by more than 1.5%.

Who Should Build It

This desktop configuration targets users who need substantial CPU throughput without sacrificing graphics capability. Gamers playing at 1440p will find the combination well-matched, as the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2000.5, 3DMark single-thread 1085) prevents frame pacing issues while the GPU handles the rendering load. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering applications will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and PassMark multithread score of 37680, which accelerate export times and render previews.

Software developers will appreciate the processor's 14 cores and 20 threads for parallel compilation, with the PassMark integer math score of 122481 indicating strong throughput for build processes. Students and small business workstations gain from the combination's versatility—the CPU handles office productivity and multitasking efficiently, while the GPU accelerates GPU-accelerated applications like CAD previews or data visualization. The system's DDR4 and DDR5 memory support offers flexibility in platform choice, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output for troubleshooting or power-saving scenarios.

Users who prioritize CPU-bound workloads over gaming should consider this pairing favorably, as the 86th percentile CPU ranking substantially exceeds the 61st percentile GPU ranking. Those who primarily game at 4K or with ray tracing enabled may find the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth limiting, but for 1440p and 1080p gaming, the balance is appropriate.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1085 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000.5 ensure high frame rates in CPU-light scenarios, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 22214 provides the rendering horsepower. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, but the combination remains capable of high refresh rates in esports titles and medium-to-high settings in AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample resources for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multithread score of 37680 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 indicate that software encoding on the CPU is viable, while the GPU's NVENC capabilities (implied by the architecture, not directly benchmarked here) offer an alternative encoding path without consuming CPU cycles.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 accelerates timeline rendering and export operations. The GPU's OpenCL score of 112821 supports GPU-accelerated effects and color grading in compatible applications. The 8 GB VRAM may limit working with very long timelines or high-resolution source footage, but for typical 1080p and 1440p projects, this system is well-suited.

3D rendering: The CPU's 24221 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles CPU-based render engines efficiently, while the GPU's FP32 performance of 20.31 TFLOPS supports GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender Cycles or OctaneRender. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for moderate scene complexity but may require optimization for large scenes.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 122481 and data encryption score of 27075 indicate strong performance for code compilation and cryptography workloads. The 14 cores and 20 threads allow parallel builds to complete quickly, and the single-thread performance prevents bottlenecks in serial compilation phases.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4124 handles everyday productivity tasks with ease, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output without requiring the discrete GPU to be active. The system's DDR4 and DDR5 memory support allows cost-effective RAM configurations, and the overall performance envelope is far beyond what typical office applications require.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-13600K compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The i5-13600K's average benchmark score of 37685 is within 0.4% of four rivals: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37762, 0.2% higher), AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37804, 0.3% higher), Intel Core 5 211E (37829, 0.4% higher), and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (37522, 0.4% lower). All five processors are statistically equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the RTX 3070's percentile ranking and nearest competitors?

A: The RTX 3070 ranks at the 61st percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 17208. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083, 0.7% lower), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037, 1% lower), AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019, 1.1% lower), and NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17468, 1.5% higher).

Q: Does this build support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This provides flexibility in motherboard and memory selection, though the actual supported memory type depends on the specific motherboard chosen.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what cooling might be required?

A: The CPU has a 125 W TDP, which is typical for a desktop processor in this class. A capable air cooler or liquid cooler would be appropriate to handle the thermal output, especially given the unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Q: What APIs does the RTX 3070 support?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern games and applications that utilize these graphics APIs.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this build?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads, as it ranks at the 61st percentile compared to the CPU's 86th percentile. In CPU-bound tasks like rendering or compilation, the processor is the primary performer and the GPU plays a secondary role.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile ranking is 74, placing this desktop configuration above 74% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database. This reflects the CPU's strong performance partially offset by the GPU's more modest standing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU features 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, 96 raster output units, 46 ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. The base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1725 MHz, and the memory operates at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs across a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU's compute capabilities include 20.31 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1) operations, with a pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s.

The power profile includes a 220 W TDP with a suggested 550 W power supply and a single 12-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot and measures 242 mm in length and 112 mm in height. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The GPU has a production status of end-of-life, was released on 2020-08-31 with a launch MSRP of 499 USD, and sits between the GeForce 20 series as predecessor and GeForce 40 series as successor.

Benchmark scores indicate a capable mid-range graphics solution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 demonstrates solid directx 12 rendering performance. The PassMark G3D score of 22214 places the card at the 61st percentile, with the DirectX 12 score of 85 and DirectX 11 score of 182 showing expected generational differences in API efficiency. The GPU compute score of 11195 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 indicate strong compute throughput for a card in this class.

The ray tracing and tensor cores, while not directly benchmarked in the provided data, are present in counts of 46 and 184 respectively, supporting hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS features in compatible games. The 8 GB VRAM with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, though future titles with large texture requirements may approach this limit.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor from Intel's 13th generation, released in September 2022 with a launch MSRP of $319. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card from NVIDIA's GeForce 30 series, released in August 2020 with a launch MSRP of 499 USD. The combined percentile ranking of 74 places this pairing in the upper quartile of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

The system occupies a clear mid-to-high-end tier for desktop computing. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking puts it near the top of processor performance charts, while the GPU's 61st percentile ranking places it in the upper-middle range of graphics cards. This asymmetry defines the system's character: it is a CPU-forward build that can handle demanding compute workloads while providing solid, though not class-leading, gaming performance. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering users choice in memory configuration, and the unlocked CPU multiplier allows for overclocking to extract additional performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this pairing, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components. These estimates should be treated as approximations based on the CPU's and GPU's relative performance positions.

For 1080p gaming, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1085, Cinebench R23 single-core of 2000.5) should prevent CPU bottlenecks in most titles, allowing the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 22214 to be the determining factor. At 1440p, the GPU's 61st percentile ranking suggests solid performance at high settings in most games, with the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth providing adequate memory bandwidth for modern titles. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 indicates that DirectX 12 games should perform well. Ray tracing workloads will rely on the 46 RT cores, while DLSS support from the 184 tensor cores can boost frame rates in compatible titles. Given the CPU's 86th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile, frame rates in almost all gaming scenarios will be limited by the GPU rather than the processor.