SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 9060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9060

16,014 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is a desktop combination that lands in the 73rd percentile overall. The data indicates a high-performing CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, creating a system where the processor significantly outclasses the graphics card in relative standing. This pairing is best understood as a CPU-forward build, where the 86th percentile processor provides massive headroom for productivity, while the 59th percentile GPU handles 1080p and 1440p gaming. For this analysis, it is critical to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK; all FPS-related discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture using the Navi 44 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The GPU's base clock is 1700 MHz, with a game clock of 2400 MHz and a boost clock of 2990 MHz. These clocks are relatively high, and the 2990 MHz boost figure suggests the card can sustain rapid operation in burst workloads.

The compute configuration includes 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU also features 28 ray tracing cores. The texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 21.43 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, with a 1:1 ratio. The absence of a tensor core field in the data means that AI acceleration is not quantified here, but the presence of dedicated RT cores does support ray-traced workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern rendering APIs.

Benchmark results for the RX 9060 show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3322. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 88183 in OpenCL and 39476 in Vulkan. Passmark results include a G3D score of 17631 and a GPU compute score of 9919. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 16014, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 9060 sits nearly level with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, which has an average score of 16129, representing a deltaPct of -0.7. It is also 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 370X and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7700. The data shows the RX 9060 is a capable mid-range card, but its 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will be the limiting factor for high-resolution texture-heavy workloads. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it may constrain performance at 4K or in compute tasks that require large data sets.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark performance is consistently strong across multiple suites. In 3DMark, the Intel Core i5-13600K scores 10157 in the max threads test and 9368 in the 16 threads test. The 8-thread score is 7074, the 4-thread score is 4283, and the 2-thread score is 2168. The single-thread score is 1085. Cinebench results show a multicore score of 24221 in R23, 13373 in R20, and 3642 in R15. The single-core scores are 2000.5 in R23, 1887 in R20, and 287.5 in R15. Geekbench reports 15575 for multicore and 2297 for single-core. Passmark shows a multithread score of 37680 and a single-thread score of 4124.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37685, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-13600K is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, which scores 37762, and 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, which scores 37804. It is 0.4% behind the Intel Core 5 211E, which scores 37829, and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H, which scores 37522. This clustering indicates that the i5-13600K is performance-competitive with newer mobile and embedded chips, despite being a desktop part from an earlier generation.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 16014, which is the 59th percentile. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73. The data shows a significant gap: the CPU sits in the top 14% of all processors, while the GPU sits in the lower half of the top 60%. This creates a system where the CPU is the dominant component in terms of relative performance. For gaming, the combined picture suggests that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most scenarios, while for productivity and multitasking, the CPU will provide exceptional throughput.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13600K and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 86th percentile rank versus the GPU's 59th percentile rank indicates that the processor is substantially more capable relative to its peers. In gaming workloads, the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor. The RX 9060's average benchmark score of 16014 is close to the RTX 3060 Ti's 16129, which is a card known for 1080p and 1440p performance. With only 8 GB of VRAM and a 128-bit bus, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions or with maximum texture quality.

For CPU-bound workloads, the i5-13600K shows no such limitation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and the Passmark multithread score of 37680 indicate that the CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded tasks without breaking a sweat. The single-thread score of 2000.5 in R23 and 4124 in Passmark single-thread further demonstrate strong per-core performance. In gaming, this means the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p, where frame rates are often CPU-limited; instead, the GPU will be the constraint. At higher resolutions, the GPU will still be the limiting factor, but the CPU's headroom ensures consistent frame pacing.

The FPS scaling, which is estimated from benchmark scores, suggests that the RX 9060 will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in most titles, but the 8 GB VRAM may cause stuttering in newer games with high-resolution textures. The data indicates that this is not a balanced pairing for high-refresh 1440p gaming, as the GPU's 59th percentile rank is too low to fully utilize the CPU's 86th percentile potential. For content creation, the balance is reversed: the CPU handles rendering and encoding, while the GPU accelerates effects and previews. In this scenario, the CPU is the engine, and the GPU is a capable co-processor.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. The 86th percentile CPU rank makes it ideal for professionals who run multi-threaded applications. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 14 cores and 20 threads, as the Passmark data compression score of 476394 and data encryption score of 27075 indicate strong throughput for repetitive, parallel tasks. Students in engineering or data science fields will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 useful for simulation and analysis workloads.

For gamers, the RX 9060's 59th percentile rank means this system is suited for 1080p gaming. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3322 and Passmark G3D score of 17631 suggest it can handle esports titles and older AAA games at high settings. Gamers targeting 1440p should look elsewhere, as the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and frame rates. Small business workstations running office productivity suites will benefit from the CPU's single-thread score of 4124 in Passmark, which ensures snappy application responsiveness.

Content creators who edit video will find the CPU's 20 threads useful for timeline scrubbing and export rendering, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 88183 in Geekbench helps with effects and color grading. The 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power supports GPU-accelerated filters in Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve. However, 3D artists working with large scenes may hit the GPU's 8 GB VRAM limit, forcing them to reduce texture sizes. This build is not for high-end 4K gaming or professional 3D rendering, but it excels as a CPU-centric productivity machine.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RX 9060's 59th percentile rank and Passmark G3D score of 17631 indicate it can drive high refresh rates in competitive titles. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7074 ensures that frame times remain consistent, but the 8 GB VRAM may cause dips in texture-heavy games. Estimated FPS will be solid for esports, but not for maxed-out AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and Passmark multithread score of 37680 allow for software encoding without a significant performance hit. The GPU's 28 RT cores and 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can handle hardware encoding for streaming. The combined 73rd percentile rank suggests a smooth streaming experience at 1080p, with the CPU managing the encode and the GPU managing the game.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 provides fast export times in editing software. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 88183 accelerates effects rendering and previews. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p timelines, but 4K projects with heavy color grading may exceed this limit, causing slower performance.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar apps will benefit from the Passmark integer math score of 122481, which handles geometry calculations. The GPU's 28 RT cores assist with ray-traced previews, but the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity. The 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 power is useful for final renders, but the 128-bit bus will bottleneck large data transfers.

Software development: The Passmark data compression score of 476394 and data encryption score of 27075 are excellent for build pipelines and code compilation. The CPU's 86th percentile rank ensures that multi-threaded compilers are fully utilized. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, but its presence does not hinder development tasks.

Student and office work: The Passmark single-thread score of 4124 ensures responsive web browsing and document editing. The 14-core CPU handles background tasks like antivirus scans and cloud syncs without lag. The GPU's 1002 Passmark G2D score supports dual-monitor setups for research and writing, making this a reliable workhorse.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the Intel Core i5-13600K and AMD Radeon RX 9060?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73, indicating it outperforms 73% of all tested desktop combinations.

Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16014, while the RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, putting the AMD card 0.7% behind the NVIDIA card.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K scores 24221 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the RX 9060 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 9060 includes 28 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 9060?

A: The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Which CPU is the i5-13600K closest to in performance?

A: The i5-13600K is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, which has an average score of 37762 versus the Intel's 37685.

Q: What is the Passmark multithread score of the i5-13600K?

A: The Passmark multithread score is 37680, which is the same as the CPU's average benchmark score of 37685, rounded to the nearest integer.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it offers ECC memory support. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. It also includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, making it a fallback option for basic display output.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The 3DMark max threads score of 10157 and the 16 threads score of 9368 demonstrate strong scaling across cores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 is particularly impressive, indicating that the CPU can sustain heavy all-core loads. The single-thread score of 2000.5 in R23 and 1085 in 3DMark single-thread show that the 5.10 GHz boost clock is effective for latency-sensitive tasks. The Passmark scores for specific workloads are telling: integer math at 122481, floating-point math at 90538, and extended instructions at 28805. These numbers suggest the CPU is well-suited for scientific computing, financial modeling, and video encoding.

The CPU's 86th percentile rank places it near the top of the processor hierarchy. Its nearest rivals are all newer or embedded parts, but the i5-13600K holds its own. The 0.2% deltaPct behind the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 is negligible in real-world terms. For software development, the Passmark random string sorting score of 51073 indicates efficient handling of data structures, while the find prime numbers score of 155 is a measure of raw integer throughput. The data compression score of 476394 is notably high, making this CPU a strong choice for file archiving and database workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-13600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders flexibility: they can reuse existing DDR4 memory to save costs or invest in DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The CPU's dual-channel memory bus is standard for this class. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU ensures that the system is ready for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future GPUs. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU fails or for troubleshooting.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 132 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, which is relatively modest. This means a 300 W power supply is sufficient for the GPU alone, but the total system draw will be higher with the CPU. A sensible power supply for this build would be one that covers the combined TDP of 257 W plus headroom for other components. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is common and easy to accommodate.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the weak link. The CPU's 86th percentile rank leaves significant headroom for a more powerful graphics card. Upgrading to a GPU with a higher percentile rank than 59 would better balance the system. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface ensures that any modern GPU will not be bottlenecked by the bus. Alternatively, adding more system memory or faster DDR5 could improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads, though the CPU's existing 24 MB of L3 cache mitigates this need. The platform is mature, so a GPU upgrade is the most impactful change.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build that pairs the 86th percentile Intel Core i5-13600K with the 59th percentile AMD Radeon RX 9060. The combined percentile is 73, placing this system in the upper-middle tier of all tested configurations. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 4 nm RDNA 4.0 card with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 28 ray tracing cores. The pairing is CPU-heavy, meaning that the processor will not be the limiting factor in most workloads.

The build class is desktop, and the data shows it is suitable for a wide range of tasks, from high-refresh 1080p gaming to multi-threaded productivity. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24221 and the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 17631 indicate a system that can handle both gaming and content creation. However, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus are the primary constraints, limiting performance at higher resolutions and in VRAM-intensive applications. The 73rd percentile overall rank means this system outperforms most pre-built desktops, but it is not a top-tier enthusiast machine. For users who need CPU grunt for development, rendering, or simulation, this is a strong choice. For gamers seeking maximum frame rates at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will need to be upgraded. The data supports a verdict of a well-balanced productivity machine with a gaming capability that is solid but not outstanding.