SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

22,549 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop pairing that sits in the 77th combined percentile against all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 67th percentile among all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame-rate discussion in this analysis is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, using the percentile positions and deltaPct values from nearestRivals as the reference frame.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU-heavy balance. The Core i5-13600K’s 86th percentile placement is well above the RX 7700 XT’s 67th percentile, meaning the GPU is the more likely constraint in most gaming workloads. In CPU-bound scenarios, the processor’s multi-threaded strength — a 3DMark max-threads score of 10157 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 24221 — leaves headroom that the GPU will not always fill.

Frame-rate scaling, estimated from benchmark scores, suggests that at lower resolutions where CPU work dominates, the i5-13600K will keep up with the GPU’s output. At higher resolutions, the RX 7700 XT’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 12 GB GDDR6 memory become the limiting factor, as the GPU’s 67th percentile position indicates it trails the CPU’s relative standing. The deltaPct values in the GPU’s nearestRivals list are tight — within 1.7% of the RX 5700 and 1.5% of the RTX 2080 — so the GPU’s performance class is well-defined, but it does not match the CPU’s top-tier status.

For productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 37680 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15575 indicate strong parallel compute, while the GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 12912 is less dominant. Encoding, compilation, and rendering tasks that use many threads will run on the CPU with the GPU rarely bottlenecking. Conversely, GPU compute tasks like OpenCL workloads — where the RX 7700 XT scores 138383 in Geekbench OpenCL — will be limited by the GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

The bottleneck profile is workload-dependent. Gaming at 1080p or 1440p will be GPU-limited after the CPU delivers its frames; the i5-13600K’s single-thread score of 1085 in 3DMark and 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensures the CPU can feed the GPU without holding back. For heavily multi-threaded tasks like 3D rendering, the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads will dominate, and the GPU’s role shrinks unless the software uses GPU acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600K delivers an average benchmark score of 37685, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, scores 37762 — a delta of -0.2%, meaning the i5-13600K is effectively tied with that chip. The Intel Core 5 211E sits 0.4% ahead at 37829, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H trails by 0.4% at 37522. These margins are negligible in real-world terms; the i5-13600K sits in a dense pack of comparable processors.

Specific CPU scores show a strong scaling pattern. The 3DMark suite goes from 1085 single-thread to 2168 for 2 threads, 4283 for 4 threads, 7074 for 8 threads, and 10157 for max threads — a near-linear gain from 4 to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that. Cinebench R20 multi-core hits 13373, while R23 multi-core reaches 24221, indicating sustained all-core performance. Geekbench single-core at 2297 and multi-core at 15575 confirm the processor’s balance of single-thread agility and multi-thread capacity.

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT posts an average benchmark score of 22549, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, scores 22435 — a delta of 0.5%, meaning the RX 7700 XT is slightly ahead. The RTX 4060 Mobile is 0.8% ahead at 22729, the RTX 2080 is 1.5% ahead at 22895, and the RX 5700 trails by 1.7% at 22170. The RX 7700 XT thus sits in a tight cluster, with no rival more than 1.7% away.

In GPU-specific tests, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 indicates modern DirectX 12 performance, while Geekbench Vulkan at 46443 shows strong API efficiency. PassMark G3D at 22547 and GPU compute at 12912 round out the picture. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 9 score of 294 and DirectX 10 score of 119 are legacy metrics, less relevant to current workloads.

Combined, the CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 67th percentile produce a 77th combined percentile. This means the pairing outperforms roughly three-quarters of all desktop CPU+GPU combinations, but the GPU drags the overall tier down from what the CPU alone would suggest. The data indicates a system where the processor outclasses the graphics card — a configuration that suits CPU-heavy productivity tasks better than pure GPU-bound gaming at maximum settings.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600K uses the Intel Socket 1700, a platform that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The memory support is flexible, allowing builders to choose between the two standards. ECC memory is supported, which is a notable feature for workstation-adjacent use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, a forward-looking interface that accommodates modern GPUs and NVMe storage.

The RX 7700 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes — the GPU will run at its full x16 bandwidth without issue. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 550 W, while the CPU’s TDP is 125 W. This leaves headroom for a typical desktop system; a 550 W power supply covers the GPU and CPU, though additional components like drives and fans will draw from that budget. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, which must be available on the PSU.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, since the CPU has more performance headroom. The i5-13600K’s 86th percentile and the RX 7700 XT’s 67th percentile mean the CPU can drive a more powerful graphics card without becoming the bottleneck. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a future GPU using that interface will be accommodated. Memory upgrades are also possible, given the dual-channel support for either DDR4 or DDR5.

The CPU’s socket, Intel Socket 1700, limits the upgrade path to 13th Gen or compatible processors in that socket family — the FACT PACK does not list other compatible generations, so the path is constrained to what the socket supports. The GPU, by contrast, can be swapped freely, as it uses a standard PCIe interface. The platform’s 125 W CPU TDP and 550 W PSU suggestion provide a reasonable baseline for future changes, but any significant GPU upgrade should consider the PSU’s capacity.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1085 in 3DMark and 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The GPU’s 67th percentile and 12 GB VRAM will handle 1080p and 1440p gaming well, but the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates are estimates. The GPU’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth supports modern textures without stutter, though the GPU’s position near the RTX 2080 (1.5% delta) suggests it will not dominate at 4K.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and multi-core scores — 24221 in Cinebench R23 and 37680 in PassMark multithread — provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The GPU’s RDNA 3.0 architecture includes hardware for video encoding, though the FACT PACK does not list specific encoder specs. The combination can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding, with the CPU taking on the encode load if needed.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 476394 and integer math score of 122481 indicate strong throughput for codec and filter work. The GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 549.5 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate effects and color grading. A 12 GB frame buffer is adequate for 1080p and 1440p timelines, with the CPU driving timeline scrubbing and export.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads shine in CPU-based renderers, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24221 showing sustained all-core performance. The GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 and 54 RT cores (listed as rtCores) support GPU-accelerated rendering, though the FACT PACK does not specify renderer compatibility. The pairing handles both CPU and GPU render paths, with the CPU taking the lead in pure CPU workloads.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark find prime numbers score of 155 and random string sorting score of 51073 indicate strong integer and sorting performance, which benefits compilation. The 20 threads allow parallel builds, and the 24 MB shared L3 cache reduces memory latency. The GPU is less relevant here, but its compute capability can accelerate test suites if used.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than sufficient for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 1161 covers 2D acceleration. The system is overprovisioned for these tasks, but the headroom means it will not age quickly. The CPU’s UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm². It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC support enabled.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1085 single-thread to 2168 for 2 threads, 4283 for 4 threads, 7074 for 8 threads, and 10157 for max threads. The gain from 4 to 8 threads is roughly 65%, while the jump from 8 to max threads is about 44% — indicating that the 14-core design provides diminishing returns beyond 8 threads, but the extra cores still matter for heavily threaded workloads.

Cinebench R15 multi-core at 3642 and R20 multi-core at 13373 show strong scaling across generations of the test. The R23 multi-core score of 24221 is a key indicator for rendering and encoding work. Single-core scores of 287.5 (R15), 1887 (R20), and 2000.5 (R23) confirm the processor’s high clock speed translates into excellent per-core performance.

The PassMark suite adds more texture. Multithread at 37680 and integer math at 122481 are strong, while floating-point math at 90538 and extended instructions at 28805 round out the compute profile. Data compression at 476394 and data encryption at 27075 indicate the CPU handles both throughput and cryptographic workloads well. The single-thread score of 4124 is competitive, and find prime numbers at 155 is a low but typical result for this type of test.

The processor’s 86th percentile placement among all CPUs means it outperforms most desktop and mobile processors. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.4% in average score, which means the i5-13600K is at the center of a performance cluster rather than a clear leader. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps with gaming and productivity, and the dual-channel memory support, while not exceptional, is standard for this class.

For real workloads, the i5-13600K excels at multi-threaded productivity — rendering, compiling, and encoding — while its single-thread performance keeps it relevant for gaming and everyday tasks. The 20 threads provide enough parallelism for modern applications, and the unlocked multiplier allows tuning for those who want more.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is a desktop GPU based on the Navi 32 chip, using RDNA 3.0 architecture on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The die contains 28,100 million transistors across a 346 mm² die, with a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². It has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, effective at 18 Gbps. The GPU’s base clock is 1435 MHz, with a game clock of 2171 MHz and a boost clock of 2544 MHz.

Compute resources include 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. There are 54 ray tracing cores, though the FACT PACK does not list tensor cores. The GPU outputs 244.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 549.5 GTexel/s texture rate, with FP32 performance at 35.17 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 35.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results place the GPU in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 shows modern DX12 performance, while Geekbench OpenCL at 138383 and Vulkan at 46443 indicate strong compute and API efficiency. PassMark G3D at 22547 is the primary gaming metric, with PassMark GPU compute at 12912 for compute tasks. The DirectX 9 score of 294, DirectX 10 at 119, DirectX 11 at 232, and DirectX 12 at 79 are legacy metrics with limited relevance to current software.

The GPU’s nearest rivals show a tight competitive field. The RTX 5060 Mobile is 0.5% behind, the RTX 4060 Mobile is 0.8% ahead, the RTX 2080 is 1.5% ahead, and the RX 5700 is 1.7% behind. This means the RX 7700 XT performs nearly identically to a range of GPUs from different generations and segments — a mobile card, a previous-gen desktop card, and an older AMD card are all within 1.7% of its average score.

For rendering, the 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is the key number for raw compute, while the 54 RT cores handle ray tracing workloads. The 12 GB VRAM with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming with high textures, and for moderate GPU rendering tasks. The 192-bit bus is narrower than higher-tier cards, but the bandwidth is adequate for the GPU’s performance class. The dual-slot design and 267 mm length (10.5 inches) make it compatible with most mid-tower cases, and the 2x 8-pin power connectors match the 550 W suggested PSU.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p will find the CPU’s single-thread strength and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM well matched for high-refresh gaming, though the GPU’s 67th percentile means it will not push extreme frame rates at 4K. The CPU’s 86th percentile ensures it will not hold back the GPU in most titles.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache. The GPU’s 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates GPU-based renderers, while the 12 GB VRAM handles typical project sizes. The combination supports both CPU and GPU render paths.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s strong integer math (122481 in PassMark) and data compression (476394), which speed up compilation and build processes. The 20 threads allow parallel compilation, and the CPU’s high single-thread score handles interactive workloads.

Students and office workers are overserved by this pairing, but the headroom means the system will remain responsive for years. The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback, and the discrete GPU accelerates any 2D or compute tasks that arise.

Small business workstations that run databases, virtualization, or complex spreadsheets will use the CPU’s multi-thread capacity. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for data integrity, though the FACT PACK does not specify whether ECC requires specific motherboard support.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i5-13600K and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT form a desktop-class build with a combined percentile of 77. The CPU ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. This places the pairing in the upper-middle tier of desktop systems, with a clear CPU advantage.

The build is a CPU-first configuration. The i5-13600K’s 14 cores, 20 threads, and 5.10 GHz boost clock make it a strong productivity processor, while the RX 7700 XT’s 12 GB VRAM and 35.17 TFLOPS FP32 provide solid gaming and compute performance. The platform supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU, and a 125 W TDP that pairs with a 550 W suggested PSU for the GPU.

The overall tier, based on the 77th combined percentile, is above average but not top-tier. The GPU’s 67th percentile pulls the system down from what the CPU alone could achieve, making this a balanced mid-high-end desktop that excels at multi-threaded work and handles modern gaming well. The build class is desktop, and the data indicates a system that will serve users who prioritize CPU performance without sacrificing GPU capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning it outperforms 77% of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone ranks in the 86th percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 67th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600K compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435?

A: The i5-13600K has an average benchmark score of 37685, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762, a delta of -0.2%. The i5-13600K is effectively tied with that rival, trailing by less than a percent.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, effective at 18 Gbps.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600K supports ECC memory, which is noted in its specifications. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the suggested PSU wattage for the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, so the PSU must cover both components plus the rest of the system.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080?

A: The RX 7700 XT scores 22549 on average, while the RTX 2080 scores 22895, a delta of -1.5%. The RTX 2080 is slightly ahead, but the margin is within 1.5%.

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K scores 24221 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its single-core score in the same test is 2000.5.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds