SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE form a desktop pairing that sits comfortably in the upper tier of the benchmark database, with a combined percentile of 85. This is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor from Intel’s 13th Gen family, built on a 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm², paired with an RDNA 3.0 graphics card using the Navi 33 chip on TSMC’s 6 nm node. The CPU’s base clock is 3.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, and it carries a 125 W TDP. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2350 MHz, and a boost clock of 2695 MHz, drawing 170 W. Together, these components target a desktop class build that is well above average in the database, but the exact nature of that performance requires a close look at the benchmark scores, the architectural strengths, and the platform constraints.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a Raptor Lake-S part with a hybrid architecture that combines performance and efficiency cores. The data shows 14 cores and 20 threads, which means the configuration is six performance cores and eight efficiency cores, though the fact pack does not specify the core type split. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This arrangement supports heavy multi-threaded workloads while maintaining strong single-thread responsiveness. The process node is listed as 10 nm, fabricated by Intel, and the die size is 257 mm².

Benchmark results confirm the CPU’s dual nature. In 3DMark tests, the single-thread score is 1085, the 2-thread score is 2168, the 4-thread score is 4283, the 8-thread score is 7074, and the max-thread score is 10157. The scaling from 2 to 8 threads is nearly linear, but the jump from 8 threads to max threads adds only about 44% more performance, which reflects the efficiency cores contributing to the 20-thread total without matching the performance cores’ throughput per thread. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore is 3642, R20 multicore is 13373, and R23 multicore is 24221, while single-core scores are 287.5, 1887, and 2000.5 respectively. The R23 single-core score of 2000.5 indicates that the boost clock of 5.10 GHz is effectively utilized for lightly threaded tasks. Geekbench shows a single-core score of 2297 and a multi-core score of 15575, which places the chip in a strong position for both responsive desktop use and heavy parallel processing.

For real workloads, the PassMark suite provides practical insight. Integer math scores 122481, floating-point math scores 90538, and extended instructions score 28805. These numbers suggest the CPU handles spreadsheet calculations, financial modeling, and scientific computations with ease. Data compression scores 476394, while encryption scores 27075, indicating that archiving and secure communications are not bottlenecks. The find prime numbers test scores 155, which is a lower score but typical for a test that stresses specific integer operations. Random string sorting scores 51073, which reflects sorting and database-style operations. The multithread score is 37680, and the single-thread score is 4124, with physics at 2258.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 37685, and it sits at the 86th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762 with a deltaPct of -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804 with -0.3%, the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829 with -0.4%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scores 37522 with +0.4%. This means the i5-13600K is essentially tied with these parts, within a half percent in either direction. For a builder, this indicates that the CPU is not a differentiator by raw average score, but its specific strengths in single-thread and multi-thread balance make it versatile for mixed workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. The fact pack also lists ECC memory support as true, which is notable for workstation reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 170 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 450 W, which leaves headroom for the CPU and other components. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory, given that the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5. If the current build uses DDR4, moving to DDR5 could improve memory bandwidth-sensitive tasks, though the fact pack does not provide memory bandwidth figures. Another upgrade path is storage: the PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU allow for high-speed NVMe drives, which would accelerate load times and data-intensive workloads. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, meaning overclocking is possible, but the fact pack does not provide overclocking results, so any gains are speculative. The production status is active, and the release date is 2022-09-26, so the platform is mature with established BIOS support. The launch MSRP is $319 for the CPU, stated once here.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in gaming scenarios, so a future GPU swap would be the primary move. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is not a limitation for the current card, but a newer GPU with PCIe 5.0 would still work within the CPU’s 16 lanes. The socket 1700 platform is at the end of its generation, so a CPU upgrade would likely require a new motherboard, but the current CPU’s performance is strong enough that such an upgrade is not urgent.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a RDNA 3.0 part with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. It includes 32 ray tracing cores, and the pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 345.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 22.08 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 22.08 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, which indicates no dedicated tensor cores but strong general compute. The process node is 6 nm from TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

Benchmark data for the GPU is limited to two tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2336, and in Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 83109. The average benchmark score is 42723, placing it at the 83rd percentile against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER with a score of 43223 and a deltaPct of -1.2%, the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262 with -1.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 43268 with -1.3%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 at 43301 with -1.3%. This means the RX 7650 GRE is about 1.2% to 1.3% slower than these rivals in average score, which is a negligible difference. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a higher-tier card in most respects, but the average score puts them in the same ballpark, so the RX 7650 GRE is competitive in this specific benchmark metric.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for large textures and complex scenes, but the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p rendering. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the fact pack does not provide ray tracing benchmark scores. The FP32 throughput of 22.08 TFLOPS is solid for compute tasks like Blender rendering or video encoding, but the lack of tensor cores means AI acceleration relies on the same FP32 units, which is slower than dedicated tensor hardware. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, which supports modern high-refresh monitors and multi-display setups. The GPU is dual-slot, 204 mm in length, and uses a single 8-pin power connector.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-13600K and the RX 7650 GRE depends on the workload. The CPU’s 86th percentile against all CPUs and the GPU’s 83rd percentile against all GPUs indicate they are closely matched in overall tier. For gaming, the GPU is typically the limiting factor at higher resolutions because the CPU’s single-thread score of 1085 in 3DMark and 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 is strong enough to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU’s multi-thread scores, such as the max-thread 3DMark score of 10157 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 24221, ensure that background tasks and streaming do not cause frame drops.

For content creation, the CPU is the stronger component. The PassMark multithread score of 37680 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 indicate that video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation tasks will be CPU-bound, while the GPU handles GPU-accelerated effects. The GPU’s FP32 of 22.08 TFLOPS is adequate for preview renders, but the 8 GB VRAM may cause out-of-memory errors in complex scenes, shifting the bottleneck to the GPU’s memory capacity rather than its compute throughput. In mixed workloads, the balance is good, but the data shows that the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in gaming, while the CPU is the more likely bottleneck in pure compute tasks.

The combined percentile of 85 reflects that this pairing is above average but not top-tier. The FPS scaling, which is not measured for this exact combination, would depend on the game and resolution, but based on the GPU’s 83rd percentile, it should handle 1080p ultra settings in most titles, with 1440p requiring some settings adjustments. The CPU’s 86th percentile ensures that it will not hold back the GPU at those resolutions.

Benchmark Performance

The exact benchmark scores for the CPU are as follows: 3DMark 16 threads scores 9368, 2 threads scores 2168, 4 threads scores 4283, 8 threads scores 7074, max threads scores 10157, and single thread scores 1085. Cinebench R15 multi-core is 3642 and single-core is 287.5, R20 multi-core is 13373 and single-core is 1887, and R23 multi-core is 24221 and single-core is 2000.5. Geekbench multi-core is 15575 and single-core is 2297. PassMark tests include data compression at 476394, data encryption at 27075, extended instructions at 28805, find prime numbers at 155, floating-point math at 90538, integer math at 122481, multithread at 37680, physics at 2258, random string sorting at 51073, and single-thread at 4124. The average CPU score is 37685, and the percentile is 86.

For the GPU, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 2336, and Geekbench OpenCL scores 83109. The average GPU score is 42723, and the percentile is 83. The combined percentile is 85. The CPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, scores 37762, which is 0.2% higher, meaning the i5-13600K is essentially identical in average performance. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, scores 43223, which is 1.2% higher, again a negligible difference.

The combined picture is a system that performs in the upper 15% of all desktop configurations in the database. The CPU is a strong multi-threaded workhorse with excellent single-thread response, and the GPU is a capable 1080p and entry 1440p card. The pairing is balanced, with no single component dragging the other down significantly.

Who Should Build It

This build is suitable for gamers who play at 1080p with ultra settings and are willing to adjust settings for 1440p. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for current titles at these resolutions, and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound games like esports titles. For content creators, the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads excel in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 and the PassMark multithread score of 37680. The GPU accelerates effects and previews, but the 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for large 4K projects.

Developers will benefit from the CPU’s multi-thread performance for building large codebases, and the ECC memory support is a plus for stability. Students can use this for coursework, including CAD, programming, and data analysis, with the CPU’s integer math score of 122481 handling calculations efficiently. Small business workstations can rely on the CPU for spreadsheet and database tasks, with the data compression score of 476394 indicating strong performance in archiving and data manipulation. The GPU is not necessary for these tasks but provides display outputs for multi-monitor setups.

The CPU’s launch MSRP is $319, and the GPU’s launch MSRP is 279 USD, but pricing is not discussed further. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 85 indicates it is a high-midrange to upper-midrange system.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bus width?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The CPU is at the 86th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37685.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile compared to all GPUs?

A: The GPU is at the 83rd percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42723.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the fact pack lists ECC memory support as true for the Intel Core i5-13600K.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, indicating the build is in the upper tier of desktop configurations.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this exact combination?

A: No, the fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this CPU and GPU pairing, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13600K with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part with a 125 W TDP, and the GPU is an 8 GB RDNA 3.0 card with a 170 W TDP. The combined percentile of 85 places this system above 85% of all configurations in the database, making it a high-midrange desktop. The CPU’s 86th percentile and the GPU’s 83rd percentile are closely aligned, indicating a balanced pairing. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 from the CPU, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The suggested PSU is 450 W, which is adequate for both components. This is a versatile desktop for gaming, content creation, and professional workloads, with the CPU leading in compute and the GPU handling graphics.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i5-13600K and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE combination in the fact pack. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2336 and its 83rd percentile against all GPUs indicate it is capable of running most modern games at 1080p with ultra settings, achieving playable frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for typical titles. At 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle many games at high settings, but ultra settings may cause frame rates to drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1085 in 3DMark and 2000.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU at these resolutions, so the GPU is the primary determinant of frame rates. For esports games with lower graphical demands, the CPU’s high single-thread performance will drive very high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p. For AAA titles, the GPU’s 22.08 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient, but ray tracing performance is unknown from the data, so enabling ray tracing may require lower resolutions or reduced settings. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization.