SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination represents a potent pairing of a high-core-count desktop processor with a modern mainstream graphics card. The benchmark data indicates a system that is heavily weighted toward CPU performance, with the processor achieving an 86th percentile ranking against all CPUs while the GPU sits at a 57th percentile against all GPUs. This suggests a configuration designed for productivity, multitasking, and gaming where the CPU is the primary driver of performance, though the GPU remains fully capable for 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming scenarios. The data shows a combined percentile of 72, which places this system above the majority of tested desktop configurations, making it a versatile choice for users who need strong all-around performance without a single dominant bottleneck.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The GPU is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. This bandwidth figure is a critical specification for 1080p gaming, as it allows the GPU to feed its 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units efficiently. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps, which is standard for this class of graphics card and supports the measured texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s.

The clock speeds are structured in three tiers: a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. The boost clock is the maximum achievable under load, and the game clock represents the typical sustained frequency during gaming workloads. With 32 ray accelerators (RT cores) and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), the RX 7600 provides hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the benchmark data does not include specific RT-focused scores. The FP32 performance is rated at 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the GPU does not have dedicated tensor cores but can handle compute tasks through its standard shader units.

In benchmark scores, the RX 7600 achieves a Passmark G3D score of 16634 and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 8790. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 88051, while the Vulkan score is 34401. These numbers indicate solid compute capability for a mid-range card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2310 is a modern DirectX 12 benchmark result, and the Passmark DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores are 226, 84, 172, and 58 respectively. The DirectX 11 score of 172 being higher than the DirectX 12 score of 58 is unusual but reflects the specific workload of the Passmark tests, where older APIs sometimes perform differently. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the database, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with an average score of 15199 (a -0.2% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at 15082 (+0.6%), and the AMD Radeon 680M at 15270 (-0.7%). This puts the RX 7600 essentially at parity with these competitors, making it a strong performer for entry-level 1440p and high-refresh 1080p rendering.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1080p textures and moderate 1440p assets, but the 128-bit bus width will limit performance in memory-heavy scenes. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the GPU's compute capacity, but users pushing high-resolution textures or complex ray-traced scenes may find the memory capacity a limiting factor. The GPU's 165 W TDP and suggested 450 W PSU indicate modest power requirements, making it a flexible option for various system builds.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmark data for the Intel Core i5-13600K is extensive and shows a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 24221 in multi-core and 2000.5 in single-core. The R20 results are 13373 multi-core and 1887 single-core, while R15 shows 3642 multi-core and 287.5 single-core. These scores demonstrate exceptional scaling from single to multi-threaded performance, with the multi-core score being over 12 times the single-core score in R23. The 3DMark CPU tests show a similar pattern: 1085 for single-thread, 2168 for 2 threads, 4283 for 4 threads, 7074 for 8 threads, 9368 for 16 threads, and 10157 for max threads. This scaling from 1 to 20 threads indicates that the processor's hybrid architecture (14 cores, 20 threads) is efficiently utilized across all thread counts.

In Geekbench, the CPU scores 2297 for single-core and 15575 for multi-core. The Passmark suite provides additional granularity: a multithread score of 37680, a single-thread score of 4124, and specialized tests including 122481 for integer math, 90538 for floating-point math, 476394 for data compression, 27075 for data encryption, 28805 for extended instructions, and 51073 for random string sorting. The Passmark physics score is 2258 and the find prime numbers score is 155. These results paint a picture of a CPU that is strong in both general-purpose and specialized compute tasks, with the floating-point and integer math scores indicating robust number-crunching capability.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37685, and its percentile ranking is 86, meaning it outperforms 86% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 has an average score of 37762 (-0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37804 (-0.3%), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829 (-0.4%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scores 37522 (+0.4%). This clustering around the 37685-37829 range shows that the i5-13600K is at the top of its performance tier, with the differences between rivals being within the margin of error for benchmark variation.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 15171, with a percentile of 57. The combined percentile for the system is 72, which indicates that the CPU's high performance (86th percentile) lifts the overall system ranking despite the GPU's more modest 57th percentile. The data shows a clear picture: this is a CPU-dominated system. For users who prioritize processor-heavy tasks like video encoding, software compilation, or scientific computing, this configuration excels. For pure gaming, the CPU provides enough headroom that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most titles, but the RX 7600's performance is still respectable for its class.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13600K and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is asymmetrical, with the CPU significantly outperforming the GPU in their respective percentile standings. The CPU's 86th percentile versus the GPU's 57th percentile creates a situation where the GPU will be the bottleneck in most graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, this means that at 1080p, the RX 7600 will typically be the limiting factor, as the CPU's single-thread score of 4124 (Passmark) and 2000.5 (Cinebench R23) provide ample processing power to feed the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but clear from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 3DMark 2-thread score of 2168 and 4-thread score of 4283 show that even with just a few threads, the processor can handle the demands of game logic and physics. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 16634, while not directly translatable to FPS, indicates a card that can handle modern titles at medium-to-high settings in 1080p. The deltaPct values from the nearest rivals suggest that the RX 7600 is within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon Pro 560X and 0.2% of the NVIDIA RTX 3050 OEM, meaning performance will be similar to those cards.

For CPU-bound workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU is the clear performer, with multi-core scores like 24221 in Cinebench R23 and 15575 in Geekbench multi-core indicating that the i5-13600K can handle heavy parallel tasks. In these scenarios, the GPU's 57th percentile might not be the primary bottleneck, as many productivity applications rely more on CPU compute. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering (e.g., using OpenCL or Vulkan), the RX 7600's scores of 88051 (OpenCL) and 34401 (Vulkan) in Geekbench suggest competent, but not class-leading, performance.

The combined percentile of 72 reflects a system that is well-balanced for general use but leans toward CPU-bound workloads. In gaming, users should expect the GPU to be the limiting factor, meaning FPS will be determined by the RX 7600's capabilities. The CPU will not hold back the GPU in most scenarios, as its single-thread performance is strong enough to avoid bottlenecking even a faster graphics card. For users who plan to upgrade the GPU in the future, the CPU has sufficient headroom to support a more powerful card without needing a processor upgrade.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

The Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance while still requiring a capable discrete GPU. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking and 14 cores/20 threads make it an excellent choice for content creators, software developers, and data analysts who work with multi-threaded applications. The Passmark multithread score of 37680 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 indicate strong performance in video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing tasks.

For gamers, this system targets those playing at 1080p with high refresh rates. The GPU's 57th percentile and 8 GB VRAM are adequate for 1080p ultra settings in most titles, and the CPU's high single-thread performance (2000.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures stable frame pacing. Users who play esports titles or less demanding games will see the CPU's strength shine, as these games are often CPU-bound. For 1440p gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but it can still handle medium-to-high settings in many titles.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-core scores. The Passmark integer math score of 122481 and floating-point math score of 90538 indicate robust performance in rendering and simulation tasks. The GPU's compute scores (Passmark GPU Compute 8790, Geekbench OpenCL 88051) provide acceleration for tasks that leverage GPU compute, though the CPU will handle most of the heavy lifting.

Students and small business workstations can also benefit from this configuration. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 165 W TDP combine for a total system power draw that is manageable for most desktop power supplies with a 450 W rating. The CPU's support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in build cost, though the data does not specify memory prices. The system's 72nd combined percentile indicates it will handle office productivity, web development, and light database work with ease, thanks to the CPU's high single-thread score of 4124 (Passmark) and data compression score of 476394.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 2000.5 (Cinebench R23) and 4124 (Passmark) ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited, allowing the GPU's 16634 Passmark G3D score to deliver smooth gameplay. Users can expect high frame rates in competitive titles, where the CPU's strong performance in 2-thread tests (2168 in 3DMark) minimizes stutter and input lag.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 indicates that the CPU can handle x264 encoding at good quality settings without impacting game performance. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for game capture, and the system's combined percentile of 72 suggests it can manage dual workloads.

Video editing: The Passmark multithread score of 37680 and data compression score of 476394 show strong performance in video editing software that utilizes multi-threading. The CPU's 20 threads will accelerate timeline scrubbing and export times, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 88051 provides hardware acceleration for effects and color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 is excellent for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute and Vulkan score of 34401 enable GPU-accelerated rendering in supported applications, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread performance (1085 in 3DMark single-thread) speeds up compilation of single-threaded build steps, while the 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The Passmark extended instructions score of 28805 indicates strong performance in code that uses SIMD instructions.

Student and office work: The CPU's 86th percentile ranking ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks. The Passmark single-thread score of 4124 and data encryption score of 27075 indicate fast document processing and secure data handling. The system's 57th GPU percentile is more than adequate for spreadsheet, presentation, and web browsing workloads.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2000.5, Passmark single-thread 4124) and the GPU's mid-range capabilities (Passmark G3D 16634, 3DMark Steel Nomad 2310) suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the system should achieve playable frame rates in most modern titles, with esports games likely exceeding 100 FPS due to the CPU's high 2-thread and 4-thread scores (2168 and 4283 in 3DMark).

For 1440p ultra settings, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the limiting factors. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking indicates that this card is positioned for 1080p gaming primarily, and 1440p performance will require lowering settings to high or medium to maintain smooth frame rates. The GPU's nearest rivals, the RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon 680M, have similar average scores, so users can expect performance comparable to those cards.

The data shows no specific game benchmarks, so exact FPS numbers cannot be provided. However, based on the GPU's compute scores (21.75 TFLOPS FP32) and the CPU's high single-thread performance, users can estimate that the system will handle 1080p gaming well, with potential for 1440p in less demanding titles. The CPU will not be a bottleneck in gaming scenarios, as its scores are well above what is needed to drive the RX 7600 to its maximum output.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp

The Intel Core i5-13600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU's memory controller supports both memory types, giving users flexibility in their build. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the primary graphics card slot, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the GPU's bandwidth is limited to x8 lanes of PCIe 4.0, which is sufficient for the RX 7600's 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, but a future GPU upgrade to a card that requires x16 PCIe 4.0 or Gen 5 bandwidth would see some bandwidth limitations if the motherboard only supports x8 on the secondary slot.

The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's TDP is 165 W, for a combined TDP of 290 W. The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, which provides headroom for the CPU and other components. A 450 W PSU would be sufficient for this build, but users who plan to overclock the CPU (which has an unlocked multiplier) or upgrade to a more power-hungry GPU should consider a higher-wattage PSU. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector, and its dual-slot design with a length of 204 mm and height of 115 mm makes it compatible with most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be the GPU, as the CPU's 86th percentile ranking provides ample headroom for a more powerful graphics card. The CPU's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes would support a next-generation GPU without bottlenecking, though the motherboard must support PCIe Gen 5 for full bandwidth. The CPU's support for DDR5 memory means that users who initially built with DDR4 can upgrade to a new motherboard and DDR5 memory in the future without changing the CPU, though this would require a new motherboard. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide strong performance for gaming and productivity, and the 14 cores/20 threads offer long-term viability for multi-threaded workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the processor's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What memory types does this system support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the system can be built with either memory type.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking compared to all CPUs?

A: The CPU is at the 86th percentile, meaning it outperforms 86% of all CPUs in the benchmark database.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 15171 and is at the 57th percentile against all GPUs.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, with the GPU itself rated at 165 W TDP.

Q: Does the system support PCIe Gen 5?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, but the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. The CPU has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors, and it includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not present.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that is exceptionally strong in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000.5 is among the highest for desktop CPUs, indicating excellent performance in lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing, office applications, and older games. The multi-core score of 24221 demonstrates that the 20 threads are well-utilized, making this CPU a strong choice for video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations. The 3DMark tests show near-linear scaling from 2 threads (2168) to 16 threads (9368), with a slight taper to max threads (10157), indicating that the hybrid architecture (performance and efficiency cores) manages thread scheduling effectively.

The Passmark scores provide additional insight into real-world workloads. The integer math score of 122481 and floating-point math score of 90538 indicate strong performance in computational tasks like financial modeling and scientific computing. The data compression score of 476394 suggests fast file archiving and database operations. The data encryption score of 27075 shows the CPU can handle secure communications and VPN traffic without significant performance impact. The extended instructions score of 28805 indicates good performance in SIMD-intensive applications like image processing and audio encoding.

In real workloads, this CPU excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks. Video editors will see faster export times, software developers will experience quicker compilation, and 3D artists will benefit from reduced render times. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking places it above the vast majority of processors, and its nearest rivals are within 0.4% of its average score, indicating that it is at the top of its performance tier. The 125 W TDP is reasonable for the performance level, and the CPU's support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows users to balance performance and cost. For users who need a high-performance CPU without moving to a higher-core-count platform, the i5-13600K offers an excellent balance of price-to-performance, though the data does not include pricing comparisons beyond the launch MSRP of $319.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp

FAQ

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds