SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 is a study in extreme asymmetry. The CPU is a high-end, performance-segment processor that sits at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a low-end, entry-level part languishing at the 17th percentile. This combination creates a system where the processor has massive headroom that the graphics card cannot utilize, making it suitable almost exclusively for CPU-bound tasks and esports-level gaming at lower resolutions. The data indicates a profound bottleneck, and all FPS figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and it also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation use. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, providing a basic display output and a fallback for troubleshooting.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads alike. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24221 points in the multi-core test and 2000.5 points in the single-core test. This single-core result is particularly strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and games that rely on a few fast threads. The multi-core score is also formidable, placing it in the top tier for content creation and rendering. The 3DMark multi-threaded test results show a clear scaling curve: 2168 points with 2 threads, 4283 with 4, 7074 with 8, and 10157 with max threads. This demonstrates that the processor scales effectively with additional threads, though the gains diminish as the thread count increases beyond 8, which is typical of a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores.

In the Geekbench suite, the CPU scores 2297 in single-core and 15575 in multi-core. The PassMark tests further illustrate its capabilities: a single-thread score of 4124, a multi-thread score of 37680, and strong results in specific workloads like integer math (122481) and floating-point math (90538). Data compression (476394) and random string sorting (51073) scores are very high, indicating excellent productivity performance. The average benchmark score of 37685 places it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are a tight cluster of AMD and Intel parts, with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 being just 0.2% slower, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 0.3% slower, the Intel Core 5 211E 0.4% slower, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H 0.4% faster. This shows that the 13600K is a performance leader, slightly ahead of or on par with the latest competing mobile and embedded parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance of this system is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor is at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is at the 17th percentile, a gap of 69 points. This is a severe mismatch. The benchmark data indicates that the CPU can process frames and data much faster than the GPU can render them. In gaming scenarios, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor at any resolution where the graphics load is significant. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish its work, preventing the system from achieving high frame rates in graphically demanding titles.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like data compression, software compilation, or video encoding, the GPU's weakness is irrelevant, and the system will perform at the level of the i5-13600K. The bottleneck is defined by the workload. For light 2D or esports titles at lower settings, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU will still be the cap. The data suggests that the only way to balance this system would be to pair the i5-13600K with a significantly more powerful GPU. The current pairing is only logical if the primary use case is non-graphic, high-performance computing, or if the user plans a near-immediate GPU upgrade to match the CPU's potential.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37685, placing it at the 86th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score is 2467, placing it at the 17th percentile. The combined percentile for the system is 52, which is a middle-of-the-road score that undersells the CPU's potential and oversells the GPU's performance.

Looking at the GPU's specific 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 1103 points. In PassMark tests, the GPU shows a peculiar pattern: DirectX 9 score is 176, DirectX 10 is 59, DirectX 11 is 97, and DirectX 12 is 44. This indicates that the GPU's performance does not scale well with modern APIs, and its DirectX 12 performance is actually its weakest. The G3D score is 11897, and the G2D score is 1209, with a compute score of 5152. The GPU's nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Radeon 8040S, which is 1.1% faster, the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, which is 1.4% faster, the Intel HD Graphics 610, which is 1.8% faster, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M, which is 1.9% faster. This places the RX 7400 in the same performance class as decade-old integrated and entry-level discrete graphics, which is a stark contrast to the CPU's position among modern high-end processors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing for flexibility in system building. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is essential for future high-bandwidth SSDs and the latest graphics cards, though the current GPU only uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the system's suggested PSU is 200 W, which is low due to the GPU's minimal power draw. This leaves a significant amount of headroom in the power supply for a future, more powerful GPU. The most logical upgrade path is to replace the RX 7400 with a higher-tier graphics card. The CPU has the processing power to drive a much faster GPU, and the PCIe Gen 5 slot and PSU headroom suggest the platform is ready for such an upgrade. A user could also upgrade the CPU to a higher-tier 13th Gen part on the same socket, but the 13600K is already a high performer, so the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The memory controller's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that a user can keep existing DDR4 memory for a lower-cost build or invest in DDR5 for optimal performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Navi 33 chip, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 1452 MHz, with a boost clock of 2300 MHz, and a game clock of 2200 MHz. The memory runs at 2250 MHz, and the card has a very low TDP of 43 W, making it power-efficient. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

The benchmark results indicate that the RX 7400 is a very weak performer. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 is low, and its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 is particularly poor, suggesting a severe limitation in modern graphics workloads. The FP32 performance is 16.49 TFLOPS, which sounds respectable on paper, but the actual rendering scores do not reflect this, suggesting that the card is heavily constrained by memory bandwidth or other architectural bottlenecks. The pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s, but these theoretical numbers do not translate into real-world performance. The GPU is positioned in the bottom 17% of all GPUs, placing it alongside ancient integrated graphics solutions from a decade ago.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The following figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's percentile rank suggests it will struggle with modern AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, likely producing frame rates below 30 FPS in demanding games. The DirectX 12 score of 44 is a major red flag for newer titles that rely heavily on this API.

For esports titles like CS2 or Valorant, which are CPU-bound and less demanding on the GPU, the system could perform better. The strong single-thread performance of the i5-13600K could push frame rates to 200+ FPS in these scenarios at 1080p, but the GPU might still be the limiting factor at higher settings. At 1440p, the GPU's weakness becomes more pronounced, and even esports titles might see frame rates drop to the 60-100 FPS range. At 4K, the RX 7400 is not viable for gaming, and the system should be considered a 1080p esports machine at best. The CPU will never be the bottleneck in gaming; the GPU will always be the limiting factor, capping performance at a level far below what the processor can support.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU's low percentile rank will prevent the system from achieving high frame rates in most games, except for the least demanding esports titles at 1080p.
Streaming: The CPU can handle encoding, but the GPU's weak performance will make gaming and streaming simultaneously a poor experience, as the GPU cannot handle the rendering load.
Video editing: Excellent. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 and high PassMark data compression scores indicate fast rendering and export times in software like Premiere Pro.
3D rendering: Excellent. The CPU's multi-threaded performance is superb for CPU-based rendering engines, though GPU-accelerated rendering will be slow due to the RX 7400's low compute score of 5152.
Software development: Excellent. The CPU's high multi-thread score (37680 in PassMark) is ideal for compiling code. The fast single-thread performance (4124) also ensures a responsive IDE.
Student and office work: Overkill. The CPU is far more powerful than needed for document editing and web browsing, and the GPU is adequate for basic 2D tasks, as shown by its G2D score of 1209.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13600K a fast processor?

A: Yes. It has an average benchmark score of 37685, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.4% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H and 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435.

Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 7400 a fast graphics card?

A: No. It has an average benchmark score of 2467, placing it at the 17th percentile of all GPUs. It is only 1.9% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M.

Q: What is the bottleneck in this system?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU is at the 86th percentile, while the GPU is at the 17th percentile, meaning the processor can outpace the graphics card in nearly all tasks.

Q: Can this system play modern games at 1080p?

A: It can run some less demanding esports titles, but for modern AAA games, the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests it will struggle to maintain playable frame rates even at 1080p.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this system?

A: The suggested PSU is 200 W. This is a low figure due to the GPU's 43 W TDP, leaving significant headroom for a future GPU upgrade.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes the UHD Graphics 770, which can be used for basic display output if a discrete GPU is not present or fails.

Who Should Build It

This system is for a niche user. It is suitable for a content creator or software developer who requires the exceptional multi-threaded processing power of the i5-13600K for rendering or compilation but has minimal to no need for 3D graphics acceleration. The CPU's performance in Cinebench R23 (24221 multi-core) and PassMark integer math (122481) makes it a workstation-class processor for these tasks.

It is not suitable for gamers beyond the most casual esports players, as the RX 7400's 17th percentile ranking will severely limit the experience. A student or office worker would be overpaying for the CPU, but they would find the system extremely responsive for everyday tasks. This pairing makes sense only as a high-performance CPU workstation with placeholder graphics, with the expectation that the user will upgrade the GPU in the future to unlock the system's true gaming potential.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

AMD Radeon RX 7400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds