SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

48,477 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT combination is a high-performance desktop pairing that delivers a strong balance of CPU and GPU capability, placing in the 86th percentile overall. The data indicates a system built for demanding 1440p and 4K gaming, as well as serious content creation workloads, though it is not without its bottlenecks. This analysis will break down the components' strengths, their interaction, and the platform's potential based solely on the provided benchmark data.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is a formidable graphics card built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, utilizing the Navi 21 chip manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It is equipped with a substantial 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, which provides a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This large memory pool and high bandwidth are critical for 4K texture-heavy workloads and future-proofing against increasingly demanding game assets. The card's clock speeds are aggressive, with a base clock of 1825 MHz, a game clock of 2015 MHz, and a boost clock of 2250 MHz. The memory operates at an effective speed of 16 Gbps.

The GPU's compute core is robust, featuring 4608 shading units, 288 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 128 render output units (ROPs). This configuration yields a pixel rate of 288.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 648.0 GTexel/s, which are strong indicators of its ability to handle high-resolution rasterization. For compute performance, the card delivers 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 41.47 TFLOPS of FP16 performance. In terms of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, it includes 72 dedicated RT cores, a feature that allows it to handle DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) workloads, though the RDNA 2.0 implementation is generally considered a first-generation effort. The card also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6, ensuring broad API compatibility.

The benchmark scores for the GPU paint a clear picture of its capabilities. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 3689 points, which is a demanding test that stresses modern rendering pipelines. More telling are the Geekbench compute scores: it achieves 181337 in Metal, 171304 in OpenCL, and 136875 in Vulkan. The high Metal and OpenCL scores indicate excellent raw compute throughput, which is beneficial for rendering tasks in applications like Blender or video editing software that leverage GPU acceleration. The PassMark G3D score of 24980 is another strong indicator of its overall graphics performance, placing the GPU in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. The GPU compute score of 13245 further reinforces its capability as a compute workhorse, not just a gaming-focused part. The DirectX 12 score of 100 and DirectX 11 score of 264 are relative baseline metrics, but the overall data shows a card that is well-suited for high-fidelity rendering and compute-intensive tasks.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined system performance is strong, with a combined percentile of 86, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of desktop configurations. The CPU, an Intel Core i5-13600K, achieves an average benchmark score of 37685, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its multi-threaded performance is exceptional for its class, as evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 15575. Single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000.5 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2297. This combination of high multi-core and single-core scores makes it a versatile processor for both productivity and gaming.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 48477, placing it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very high ranking, indicating that the RX 6800 XT is a top-tier performer. When looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the data shows a tight cluster at the top. The i5-13600K is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, and 0.4% behind the Intel Core 5 211E, while being 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H. These negligible deltas (all within 0.4%) mean that in practical terms, the i5-13600K is performance-equivalent to these other high-end processors, and its ranking is essentially a statistical tie.

For the GPU, the comparison shows a different story. The RX 6800 XT is 1.5% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile, but it trails the Intel Arc A550M by 2.5%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 3%, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 by 3%. This indicates that while the RX 6800 XT is a high performer, it is slightly outclassed by a few of the very latest or most powerful competitors in this specific benchmark set. The combined picture is one of a balanced, high-end system where the CPU and GPU are both in the top 15% of their respective categories, ensuring that neither component is a significant weak link for most workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system is generally well-balanced, but the data reveals specific workload-dependent bottlenecks. The CPU, with a percentile of 86, and the GPU, with a percentile of 85, are closely matched in their relative standing. This suggests that for many tasks, they can feed each other adequately. However, the nature of the workloads dictates which component is the limiting factor. For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance becomes the primary constraint. With a 3DMark single-thread score of 1085 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4124, the CPU is strong, but it will likely be the first to reach its limit as frame rates climb into the hundreds, preventing the GPU from being fully utilized. In this scenario, the GPU's potential is capped by the CPU's ability to issue draw calls.

Conversely, at higher resolutions like 4K, the bottleneck shifts decisively to the GPU. The RX 6800 XT's 512.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and 20.74 TFLOPS of compute power become the limiting factor, as the rendering load increases exponentially. The CPU, with its strong multi-core score of 24221 in Cinebench R23, has more than enough headroom to keep up with the GPU's demands. The data shows a clear scaling pattern: as resolution increases, the GPU's relative load increases, and the system becomes more GPU-bound. For content creation and productivity tasks, the balance is again different. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, which deliver a PassMark multi-thread score of 37680, are crucial for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. In these tasks, the GPU's compute power (171304 in OpenCL) can also be leveraged for acceleration, but the CPU is often the primary engine. The data suggests that in multi-threaded productivity, the CPU is the main driver, and the GPU assists where applicable, but neither is a severe bottleneck for the other in typical mixed-use scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built on the Intel Socket 1700, which is the foundation for the Core 13th Gen series. This socket offers a defined upgrade path, though it is limited to the 13th generation (and potentially 12th generation) of Intel processors. The motherboard must support the CPU's dual-channel memory interface, which is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in their memory choice. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a significant feature for future high-bandwidth devices like NVMe SSDs and, eventually, GPUs. However, the RX 6800 XT itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is more than sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

Power delivery is a critical consideration for this build. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 300 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 700 W. This means a high-quality 700 W power supply is the minimum recommended, and it provides a reasonable amount of headroom for the combined 425 W of component power draw. This headroom allows for some overclocking of the unlocked CPU (multiplier unlocked) and potentially minor power tuning for the GPU, but it would not support a significant upgrade to a more power-hungry GPU without also upgrading the PSU. A sensible next upgrade path would be to maximize the CPU platform's potential by moving to a higher-core-count 13th Gen processor, such as an i7 or i9, which would drop into the same Socket 1700. This would improve multi-threaded performance for productivity without requiring a motherboard change. For the GPU, the next logical step would be a more powerful card, but that would necessitate a PSU upgrade to maintain a safe power margin. The presence of 16 GB of VRAM on the current GPU, however, means that a GPU upgrade is not urgent for most users.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The CPU features a hybrid architecture, though the fact pack does not specify the core type split. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which drives its exceptional single-thread performance. The cache hierarchy is generous, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a large 24 MB shared L3 cache. This large cache is crucial for gaming performance and helps to reduce memory latency.

The benchmark scores for the CPU demonstrate its strength across a variety of workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 is a clear indicator of its prowess in heavily threaded tasks like 3D rendering and video encoding. This is supported by a Geekbench multi-core score of 15575. For less parallelized tasks, the single-core performance is top-tier, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000.5 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2297. The PassMark scores provide a more granular view of its capabilities. It excels in integer math with a score of 122481 and floating-point math with 90538, which are critical for scientific computing and financial modeling. Its data compression score of 476394 and encryption score of 27075 are also very high, making it suitable for file archiving and security tasks. The extended instructions score of 28805 indicates strong SIMD performance for multimedia applications. These results show a CPU that is not just a gaming champion but also a serious productivity tool, capable of handling complex, multi-threaded workloads with ease while maintaining excellent responsiveness in single-threaded applications.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p, this system is exceptional. The CPU's single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2000.5 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1085, ensures high frame rates are achievable, while the GPU's 20.74 TFLOPS of compute power and 16 GB of VRAM will handle the graphics load, though the CPU may become the limiting factor at very high frame rates.

Streaming: This system is well-equipped for streaming. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221, provide ample headroom to encode a video stream using the x264 encoder while simultaneously playing a game. The GPU's strong compute scores, such as 171304 in OpenCL, can also be used for hardware encoding, further offloading the CPU.

Video Editing: Video editing is a strong suit for this build. The CPU's multi-threaded performance (PassMark multi-thread score of 37680) will accelerate timeline scrubbing and export times, while the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and high compute throughput (Geekbench OpenCL score of 171304) will accelerate effects rendering and color grading, making for a fluid editing experience.

3D Rendering: In 3D rendering, the system is a capable workhorse. The CPU's 24221 score in Cinebench R23 multi-core is directly relevant to CPU-based rendering engines, while the GPU's 20.74 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 41.47 TFLOPS of FP16 performance will be leveraged by GPU-accelerated renderers, offering two distinct and powerful paths to rendering final frames.

Software Development: For software development, the CPU is the star. The high multi-threaded score (Geekbench multi-core of 15575) will drastically reduce compilation times for large projects, and the strong single-thread performance ensures a snappy IDE. The data encryption score of 27075 and integer math score of 122481 are also relevant for running complex simulations and data processing tasks.

Student and Office Work: For student and office work, this system is vastly overqualified. The single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4124) ensures that everyday applications like web browsers, word processors, and spreadsheets run instantly. The high core count means that even with dozens of tabs open and multiple productivity apps running, there will be no slowdown, making it a very smooth, if excessive, experience.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pair. Therefore, all FPS discussions here are estimates based on the components' individual benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than precise figures.

Given the GPU's 85th percentile ranking and strong raw compute metrics (20.74 TFLOPS FP32, 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth), the RX 6800 XT is expected to deliver very high frame rates in most modern games at 1440p with ultra settings. At 4K, the expectation is for high frame rates in less demanding titles, while the most graphically intensive games may see frame rates dip below 60 FPS at ultra settings, requiring some settings adjustments. The CPU's strong single-thread score (3DMark single-thread score of 1085) ensures that it will not be a major bottleneck at these resolutions, allowing the GPU to perform to its full potential. In competitive esports titles, which are typically CPU-bound, the high single-thread performance should allow for extremely high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 240 FPS. In AAA single-player games, the GPU will be the primary driver, and the 16 GB of VRAM will provide ample space for high-resolution textures, making the system well-suited for a smooth, high-fidelity gaming experience at 1440p and a very good one at 4K.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU-GPU combination?

A: The combined system is in the 86th percentile of all desktop configurations, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of systems. The CPU itself is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 85th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: How much VRAM does the Radeon RX 6800 XT have, and what does that mean for gaming?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 512.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This large amount of VRAM is well-suited for high-resolution gaming at 4K and for using high-resolution texture packs without running out of memory.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance, and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i5-13600K has an average benchmark score of 37685. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 24221. It is performance-equivalent to its nearest rivals, being only 0.2% to 0.4% behind or ahead of processors like the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.

Q: What are the power requirements for this system?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 300 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W, which provides sufficient headroom for the combined power draw of these components.

Q: What is the upgrade path for this platform?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with other 13th Gen (and likely 12th Gen) Intel processors. A sensible CPU upgrade would be to a higher-core-count model on the same socket. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, so a future GPU upgrade is possible, but a more powerful GPU would likely require a PSU upgrade as well.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600K supports ECC memory, which can be important for workstation builds that require high data integrity.

Q: Is the measured FPS data available for this specific build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. Any FPS figures are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This system is designed for users who demand high performance across a range of tasks. The primary target is the enthusiast gamer who plays at 1440p or 4K resolution. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking and 16 GB of VRAM, combined with the CPU's 86th percentile ranking, ensure a high-quality experience in the most demanding titles. The system is also an excellent fit for content creators, including video editors and 3D artists, who will benefit from the CPU's high multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221) for rendering and the GPU's substantial compute power (Geekbench OpenCL score of 171304) for GPU-accelerated effects.

Software developers will find the CPU's compilation speeds (Geekbench multi-core score of 15575) a significant asset, making this a powerful workstation for coding and testing. For students and small business owners, this system is overkill for basic tasks, but its performance ensures it will handle any future, more demanding software with ease, making it a long-lasting investment. The data shows that the i5-13600K and RX 6800 XT combination is a high-end, balanced platform that is best suited for power users who require top-tier performance for gaming, content creation, and productivity. It is not a budget-oriented build but rather a performance-focused one, ideal for those who want a system that can handle any workload thrown at it without compromise.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds