SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
91%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

26,011 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis — Intel Core i5-13600K

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on Raptor Lake-S architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node with a 257 mm² die size. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration positions the chip as a high-core-count mainstream part, blending 6 performance cores with 8 efficiency cores to deliver strong parallel throughput while maintaining respectable single-thread performance.

Benchmark data confirms the CPU's standing. In Cinebench R23, the 13600K scores 24,221 in multi-core and 2,000.5 in single-core. The multi-core result places it firmly in the upper echelon for consumer desktop processors, while the single-core score indicates excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded workloads. The Geekbench scores of 15,575 multi-core and 2,297 single-core reinforce this profile. In 3DMark threading tests, the scaling is telling: 2,168 for 2 threads, 4,283 for 4 threads, 7,074 for 8 threads, 9,368 for 16 threads, and 10,157 for max threads. The incremental gains from 8 to 16 threads (roughly 32% improvement) and from 16 to max threads (about 8%) show that the efficiency cores contribute meaningfully but with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads — a pattern typical of hybrid architectures where the 8 E-cores provide supplementary throughput rather than linear scaling.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 37,685, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tightly clustered competitive set: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37,762 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829 (0.4% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H scores 37,522 (0.4% lower). These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the 13600K trades blows with modern mid-range and upper-mid-range competitors within a 0.4% band. The practical implication is that for productivity workloads, the 13600K remains competitive with much newer designs, though it lacks a decisive edge.

PassMark results provide workload-specific insight. Integer math scores 122,481, floating-point math scores 90,538, and extended instructions score 28,805. Data compression hits 476,394, while data encryption scores 27,075. The multithread score is 37,680, and single-thread is 4,124. These figures suggest strong performance in compression, encryption, and scientific computing tasks. The find prime numbers score of 155 is notably low, indicating a relative weakness in that specific algorithm, likely due to the hybrid core scheduling. For video encoding, 3D rendering, and general compilation workloads, the 13600K's combination of high core count and solid single-thread performance makes it a versatile choice.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600K uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The memory controller also supports ECC memory, a feature that appeals to workstation users seeking data integrity. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. Integrated graphics are included in the form of UHD Graphics 770, providing a basic display output capability for systems without a discrete GPU.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, requiring a capable cooling solution — the data does not specify a cooler size, but the thermal load is substantial for a mainstream chip. The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, has a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU rating of 600 W. This means a build with both components should plan for a power supply that comfortably exceeds the combined 375 W of component TDP, with headroom for transient spikes and system peripherals. The GPU draws power via one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, so the PSU must offer those connectors.

A sensible next upgrade path from this platform would involve moving to a higher-tier Intel processor on the same socket, since the 13600K's 14 cores and 20 threads represent a mid-range configuration within Socket 1700's ecosystem. Alternatively, users could upgrade the GPU to a more powerful model, given that the CPU's 86th percentile standing suggests it can feed faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 means future storage and GPU upgrades will not be interface-limited. However, the platform is mature, and users considering a long-term path might look toward newer sockets, but within the current build, the 13600K offers ample headroom.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for the Intel Core i5-13600K and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT places the build at the 79th percentile overall. The CPU's average benchmark score is 37,685, and the GPU's average is 26,011. These are distinct performance tiers: the CPU sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 71st percentile among all GPUs. This gap suggests the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU within this pairing.

The CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 10,157 and single-thread score of 1,085 show strong scaling in threaded workloads. The Cinebench R20 scores of 13,373 multi-core and 1,887 single-core align with the R23 results, confirming consistency across rendering benchmarks. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,548, which is a measure of DirectX 12 gaming performance. The Geekbench results for the GPU — Metal at 137,249, OpenCL at 16,360, and Vulkan at 98,089 — indicate that the GPU performs best under Metal (Apple's API) and Vulkan, with OpenCL lagging significantly. This is typical for AMD GPUs, which often show strong Vulkan performance.

The PassMark GPU scores provide further granularity: G3D at 20,700, G2D at 972, and GPU compute at 9,550. DirectX 11 scores 180, DirectX 12 scores 80, DirectX 10 scores 125, and DirectX 9 scores 263. The lower DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 is notable, though the Steel Nomad result (which is DX12-based) suggests the card handles modern APIs adequately. The GPU's nearest rivals are all close: the AMD Radeon R9 M395X scores 25,891 (0.5% higher), the AMD FirePro W7100 scores 25,856 (0.6% higher), the AMD FirePro D700 scores 25,842 (0.7% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile scores 25,740 (1.1% higher). These deltas are all within 1.1%, meaning the RX 6750 XT performs nearly identically to these older or mobile counterparts in average benchmark terms.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. Consequently, all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than tested results.

Based on the CPU's 86th percentile ranking and the GPU's 71st percentile ranking, this pairing is expected to deliver solid 1440p gaming performance and capable 4K playability in less demanding titles. The CPU's strong single-thread score (4,124 in PassMark, 2,000.5 in Cinebench R23) ensures that frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios will be smooth. The GPU's 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth provide ample memory for modern textures at high resolutions.

At 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread performance should prevent bottlenecks, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. The GPU's pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s suggest it can handle high-detail 1080p rendering at high refresh rates in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the more likely limiting factor, but the 12 GB VRAM buffer helps maintain stable frame times in VRAM-heavy scenarios. At 4K, expectations should be tempered to medium or high settings for AAA titles, with the GPU's 71st percentile positioning indicating it is not a top-tier 4K card.

The GPU's Vulkan score of 98,089 suggests strong performance in Vulkan-based games, which are common in both AAA and esports titles. The DirectX 12 score of 80 in PassMark is modest, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,548 provides a more contemporary reference point. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is that of a well-balanced mid-range system, capable of high-refresh 1080p, solid 1440p, and acceptable 4K at reduced settings.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates an asymmetry: the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers (86th percentile) than the GPU (71st percentile). This creates a GPU-limited pairing for most gaming workloads, where the CPU has headroom to spare while the GPU is the constraining factor. In CPU-bound scenarios — such as high-frame-rate esports at 1080p, or simulation games with heavy AI calculations — the 13600K's single-thread and multi-thread strength will be the primary driver.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this view. The CPU's 3DMark threading results show strong scaling up to 16 threads (9,368) with a modest gain to max threads (10,157), meaning the CPU can handle complex game logic and background tasks without compromising frame times. The GPU's compute score of 9,550 in PassMark is respectable but not exceptional, indicating that heavily GPU-bound workloads like ray tracing or high-resolution rendering will expose the GPU's limitations.

For content creation and productivity, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,221 and PassMark multithread score of 37,680 indicate that video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will be CPU-limited, and the GPU's role is secondary. In such workloads, the pairing is balanced because the GPU provides adequate acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects without bottlenecking the CPU's output. The combined 79th percentile ranking reflects a system that is well-above average but not top-tier, with the CPU carrying more weight in overall performance.

The practical bottleneck analysis: for gaming at 1080p, the CPU may occasionally limit frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU will be the limiter at 1440p and above. For productivity, the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU's 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most creative workloads. The system's balance is therefore workload-dependent, leaning GPU-limited for gaming and CPU-limited for compute-heavy tasks.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance without sacrificing gaming capability. The 86th percentile CPU ranking makes it ideal for content creators — video editors, 3D artists, and software developers — who will benefit from the 24,221 Cinebench R23 multi-core score for rendering and compilation tasks. The 20 threads handle concurrent workloads efficiently, as shown by the 37,680 PassMark multithread score.

Gamers at 1440p resolution are a primary audience. The GPU's 71st percentile ranking and 12 GB VRAM provide a smooth experience at high settings for most titles, while the CPU ensures that frame times remain consistent. Gamers at 1080p with high-refresh monitors will find the CPU's single-thread performance (4,124 PassMark) sufficient to drive high frame rates, though the GPU may cap performance in demanding titles.

Students and small business workstation users benefit from the platform's ECC memory support and integrated graphics, which provide a fallback display output and data integrity features. The CPU's data encryption score of 27,075 and compression score of 476,394 indicate strong performance for file archiving, database tasks, and security-related workloads. The platform's DDR4/DDR5 flexibility allows builders to choose memory based on budget and availability, though pricing is not discussed here.

The build is less suitable for users seeking top-tier 4K gaming or extreme compute performance, as the GPU's 71st percentile places it below enthusiast-class cards. However, for a balanced desktop that handles both gaming and productivity with aplomb, this pairing is well-matched, with the CPU providing headroom for future GPU upgrades.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the Navi 22 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. It features 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2150 MHz, a game clock of 2495 MHz, and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, with memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This capacity is sufficient for high-resolution textures and modern game assets, though the 192-bit bus width is narrower than higher-end cards, which can limit bandwidth-bound scenarios. The compute throughput is 13.31 TFLOPS for FP32 and 26.62 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its mid-range positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,548 places it in a competitive range for 1440p gaming. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 98,089 is strong, indicating good performance in Vulkan-based games and applications. The OpenCL score of 16,360 is comparatively weak, which may affect GPU compute workloads in applications that rely on OpenCL rather than Vulkan or DirectX. The PassMark G3D score of 20,700 and GPU compute score of 9,550 reinforce the mid-range assessment.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 26,011, placing it at the 71st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a 1.1% delta: the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (0.5% higher), AMD FirePro W7100 (0.6% higher), AMD FirePro D700 (0.7% higher), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (1.1% higher). This clustering indicates that the RX 6750 XT's performance is comparable to older workstation cards and a mobile flagship from a previous generation, though direct architectural comparisons are not possible from the data.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 40 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the performance level is moderate given the 71st percentile ranking. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support (feature level 12_2) ensures compatibility with modern game features. The dual-slot design with a 267 mm length and 110 mm height requires adequate case clearance, and the 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600K has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the 13600K supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data-integrity-focused workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The build is at the 79th percentile overall, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 71st percentile.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested power supply rating?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 250 W and a suggested PSU rating of 600 W. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W.

Q: What API does the GPU support for modern games?

A: The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (feature level 12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the 13600K includes UHD Graphics 770, providing basic display output without a discrete GPU.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 4,124 in PassMark ensures high frame rates in esports and competitive titles, while the GPU's pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s supports smooth rendering. The GPU's 71st percentile ranking means settings may need adjustment for the most demanding titles, but the system is well-suited for 1080p high-refresh play.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads and 24,221 Cinebench R23 multi-core score provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 37,680 indicates that simultaneous game and stream encoding workloads are manageable, though the GPU's OpenCL score of 16,360 suggests hardware encoding via other APIs may be preferable.

Video Editing: The CPU's data compression score of 476,394 and integer math score of 122,481 support fast video encoding and decoding. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM handles large timelines and effects, though the 71st percentile ranking means 4K editing with heavy effects may require proxy workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,221 is strong for CPU-based rendering, and the GPU's 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers. The 40 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support, though performance is mid-range.

Software Development: The CPU's high core count and strong single-thread performance (2,000.5 Cinebench R23 single-core) speed up compilation and code analysis. The 20 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running processes.

Student and Office Work: The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display, and the CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures snappy application responsiveness. The data encryption score of 27,075 supports secure file operations, while the platform's DDR4/DDR5 flexibility allows memory configuration to suit needs.