SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

91%

GPU

83%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600K

37,685 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score

Top 17% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a study in stark contrast, a pairing that juxtaposes a high-end enthusiast CPU with an entry-level, low-profile GPU. The data shows a desktop build where the processor sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the graphics card languishes in the 35th percentile. This creates a profoundly unbalanced system where the CPU’s immense processing power is effectively held hostage by the GPU’s modest rendering capabilities. The following analysis will explore the implications of this pairing, grounding every statement in the provided benchmark data and hardware specifications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which houses the 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S processor. This CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, offering builders flexibility in choosing a memory kit, though the dual-channel bus remains the standard. The CPU itself provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a forward-looking interface for high-speed storage and future expansion cards. The Radeon RX 6400, however, connects via a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface, which is a significant bottleneck for the GPU itself, as its data pipe to the CPU is narrower than what the platform supports. The CPU’s 125 W TDP is the primary power consideration for the platform, but the GPU’s 53 W TDP is minimal, and the suggested PSU for the entire system is a modest 250 W.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data points overwhelmingly toward replacing the GPU. The CPU is a performance powerhouse, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 and a single-core score of 2000.5, placing it in the top tier of processors. Its 86th percentile ranking against all CPUs means it has years of relevant life left for gaming and productivity. The RX 6400, on the other hand, is an end-of-life product with a 4 GB memory buffer and a 128.0 GB/s bandwidth. Upgrading to a more powerful graphics card would unlock the CPU’s true potential without requiring a platform change, as the Socket 1700 and its PCIe Gen 5 lanes are ready for a much more capable GPU. The 250 W PSU suggestion would need revisiting with a more powerful card, but the CPU and motherboard are not the limiting factors. The platform is solid; the GPU is the clear weak link.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data does not support this scenario. The RX 6400’s PassMark G3D score of 7673 and its 35th percentile ranking indicate it is not designed for high-refresh 1080p gaming, let alone higher resolutions. While the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 9368 shows it can feed frames quickly, the GPU will cap the output rate far below what a high-refresh monitor needs.

Streaming: This is a mixed workload. The CPU’s 20 threads, evidenced by a PassMark multi-thread score of 37680, can easily handle the encoding workload for a stream, but the GPU will struggle with the gaming portion. The RX 6400’s low DirectX 12 score of 30 in PassMark suggests it will bottleneck the entire pipeline, making a smooth stream of modern games unlikely.

Video Editing: The CPU is exceptional here. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 and a PassMark floating-point math score of 90538 provide substantial muscle for rendering and effects. The GPU’s role is less critical but still relevant; its 4 GB VRAM and 3.565 TFLOPS FP32 performance are sufficient for basic hardware acceleration, but complex timelines with heavy GPU effects will likely exceed its capabilities, making the editing experience feel sluggish compared to the CPU’s raw speed.

3D Rendering: The CPU will dominate. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache and high thread count make it a rendering beast, with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 13373 to back it up. The GPU, with a PassMark GPU Compute score of 2812, is not a rendering accelerator; it will be a spectator in this workload. The final render times will be dictated almost entirely by the CPU.

Software Development: This is a strong use case. The CPU’s high single-thread score (PassMark 4124) and multi-thread capacity (PassMark 37680) handle compilation times and code analysis exceptionally well. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the RX 6400 is merely adequate for displaying a desktop and running a few monitors, making this a productive pairing for a developer who does not game.

Student and Office Work: The system is overkill for this scenario, but it functions. The CPU is vastly more powerful than needed for word processing or spreadsheets, but its high performance means no lag. The GPU is perfectly fine for 2D desktop composition, as shown by its PassMark G2D score of 722, but it offers no headroom for anything graphically intensive.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data paints a clear picture of severe imbalance. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 37685, placing it at the 86th percentile, while the GPU’s average score is 6001, at the 35th percentile. This creates a bottleneck where the GPU is the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive workload. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2168 and single-thread score of 1085 indicate it has immense per-core power to process game logic and draw calls, but the RX 6400 will be unable to translate that into high frame rates.

In gaming, the bottleneck is absolute. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 is catastrophically low, suggesting it will struggle with modern game APIs. The CPU will often be waiting for the GPU to finish rendering a frame, leaving its 14 cores underutilized. In productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU becomes the primary engine, and the GPU’s weak compute (2812 in PassMark GPU Compute) means it will not assist much, but it also won't hold the CPU back in pure CPU-bound rendering scenarios. The bottleneck is workload-dependent: the GPU limits gaming, while the CPU handles non-graphics tasks with enormous headroom.

Gaming Performance

The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 7673 and its position near the GeForce GTX 770M in the nearest rivals list suggest it is a low-end part, incapable of delivering high refresh rates at 1080p in modern titles. The 4 GB VRAM is also a limiting factor, likely causing texture pop-in or reduced quality settings in games that require more memory.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the system will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most modern games, with many AAA titles likely falling into the 30-45 FPS range. At 1440p, the RX 6400 is effectively out of its depth, and playable frame rates would require significant reductions in settings, likely to low or medium. At 4K, the GPU is entirely unsuitable, with frame rates dipping into the low 20s or below. The CPU’s performance, such as its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000.5, ensures it is not the cause of frame drops; the GPU is the sole reason for the low graphical performance. The estimated FPS is low because the GPU’s raw compute throughput (3.565 TFLOPS) and memory bandwidth (128.0 GB/s) are insufficient for high-detail rendering.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is not a typical gaming build. The target user is likely a professional or enthusiast who requires the CPU’s massive multi-threaded performance for productivity but has minimal graphical needs. This could be a software developer who needs fast compilation times (PassMark Multi-thread 37680) and a high core count for parallel builds, but only needs a basic display output. Similarly, a student in a STEM field might benefit from the CPU’s power for simulations or data analysis, while the GPU is merely a placeholder for a future upgrade.

It is also a viable platform for a small business workstation focused on CPU-bound tasks like financial modeling or database management. The CPU’s PassMark Data Encryption score of 27075 and Data Compression score of 476394 are exceptional, making it a powerful tool for these tasks. Gamers should avoid this build, as the RX 6400 will severely limit their experience, but a content creator who prioritizes CPU-based rendering over GPU-accelerated effects might find it acceptable, if not ideal. The system is for someone who needs a massive CPU, not a powerful GPU.

FAQ

Q: Is this system good for playing modern AAA games?

A: No, the data indicates it is not. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 7673 and its 35th percentile ranking suggest it is a low-end part. Estimated frame rates in modern games would be low, and the 4 GB VRAM is insufficient for high-detail textures.

Q: What is the main bottleneck in this build?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is the definitive bottleneck. The CPU is in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 35th percentile. In any graphics-intensive task, the GPU will limit performance to a fraction of what the CPU is capable of.

Q: Can the CPU run DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, according to the technical specifications. The memory bus is dual-channel, which means it uses two channels for data transfer.

Q: Is the RX 6400 capable of ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 12 RT cores, but its low overall performance (PassMark G3D score of 7673) suggests that ray tracing performance would be extremely poor, likely making it unusable for this feature in modern games.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 250 W for the entire system. This is due to the CPU’s 125 W TDP and the GPU’s 53 W TDP, which are the primary power consumers.

Q: What is the CPU's integrated graphics performance?

A: The CPU includes UHD Graphics 770. While the data provides no benchmark scores for it, it is present as a fallback, but the discrete RX 6400 is far more capable, despite its low standing.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU has an average score of 37685. It is 0.2% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37762), 0.3% slower than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 (37804), 0.4% slower than the Intel Core 5 211E (37829), and 0.4% faster than the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H (37522). The differences are negligible.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark scores reveal a tale of two components. The CPU is a top-tier performer, with an average benchmark score of 37685, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its multi-threaded might is evident in the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221, while the single-core score of 2000.5 highlights its excellent per-thread performance. These scores place it in direct competition with CPUs like the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, which has an average score of 37762, a mere 0.2% difference.

The GPU, in contrast, is a low-tier part. Its average benchmark score is 6001, putting it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 and the PassMark G3D score of 7673 are indicative of a GPU that is only suitable for light gaming or basic display tasks. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, with an identical average score of 6000 and a deltaPct of 0, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, which scores 5996. The combined picture is a system with a CPU that can handle any workload, paired with a GPU that can barely handle modern games, resulting in a combined percentile of 61.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a high-end, 14-core Intel Core i5-13600K with a low-end, 4 GB AMD Radeon RX 6400. The build class is "desktop," and the overall tier is defined by the combined percentile of 61. This percentile is dragged down significantly by the GPU, as the CPU alone is in the 86th percentile. The pairing is a mismatch of classes: a Raptor Lake CPU designed for overclocking and heavy workloads (with an unlocked multiplier) alongside an entry-level RDNA 2.0 GPU that is already end-of-life. The system is a desktop workstation in nature, with the GPU acting as a basic display adapter rather than a gaming component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. This physical layout is ideal for multi-threaded workloads, and the benchmark data confirms it. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24221 and the PassMark integer math score of 122481 indicate massive parallel processing power.

The single-thread performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2000.5 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4124. This indicates the CPU can handle lightly-threaded tasks like gaming logic or everyday applications with ease. The 3DMark tests show a strong scaling from 2 threads (2168) to 16 threads (9368) and max threads (10157), suggesting that the core count is well-utilized. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in server or workstation parts, further cementing its role as a productivity powerhouse. Its 86th percentile ranking against all CPUs is well-earned.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a low-profile, single-slot GPU based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, specifically the Navi 24 chip, built on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2321 MHz. It also has 12 RT cores for ray tracing, but its compute performance is limited, with an FP32 rating of 3.565 TFLOPS. The GPU’s TDP is a low 53 W, and it requires no external power connectors, drawing all power from the PCIe slot.

The benchmark results show why this is a low-tier part. The PassMark G3D score of 7673 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 176 are the primary indicators of its gaming potential. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 32011 and Vulkan score of 16372 are also low. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 is particularly poor, suggesting the GPU has significant driver or hardware limitations with modern APIs. Its 35th percentile ranking places it in the same league as the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and AMD FirePro W4100, both of which are older or lower-performance parts. This GPU is best suited for basic display output, office work, or as a stopgap measure until a more capable card is installed.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600K + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600K

AMD Radeon RX 6400

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds