SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
80%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score
Top 20% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Performance Analysis: Intel Core i5-13600HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

This build pairing combines Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake-HX mobile processor with NVIDIA's RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation GPU, targeting the professional laptop workstation segment. The CPU holds an 86th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 21st percentile among all GPUs based on available benchmark data. The combined system percentile is 54, placing this configuration in the mid-range tier of laptop builds. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the fact pack, so all gaming performance figures discussed below are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Gaming Performance

The fact pack contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, meaning there are zero verified frame rate figures across any game titles or resolutions. Consequently, all gaming performance assessments must be treated as estimates based on the underlying benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596 places it at the 21st percentile overall, which is notably low for a card bearing the RTX 5000 naming scheme. This score aligns closely with legacy desktop GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (3594, +0.1% delta) and the GTX 1050 (3629, -0.9% delta), suggesting that in raw DX12 rasterization workloads, this mobile Ada GPU performs at roughly the level of an entry-level desktop card from several generations ago.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the estimated frame rates would likely fall into the 30-60 FPS range for modern AAA titles, given the GPU's benchmark position near the GTX 1050 class. Esports titles with lighter rendering demands could potentially push higher frame rates, but the data does not support claims of high-refresh gaming capability beyond 60 FPS in demanding scenarios. At 1440p resolution, the estimated performance would drop further, with many titles likely struggling to maintain playable frame rates above 30 FPS. At 4K, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM capacity and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient memory resources, but the raw compute throughput of 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 is not competitive with modern gaming GPUs, making 4K ultra settings largely impractical for smooth gameplay.

The CPU side presents a different story. The i5-13600HX's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 indicates strong computational capability that would not bottleneck modern game engines, which increasingly utilize multiple threads. However, gaming performance is ultimately limited by the GPU's modest rasterization capabilities relative to its class. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, combined with the GPU's 21st percentile ranking, suggests that this pairing is not optimized for gaming workloads, and prospective users should expect frame rates consistent with entry-level desktop GPUs rather than the professional workstation performance the RTX 5000 name might imply.

Benchmark Performance

Examining the CPU benchmarks first, the Intel Core i5-13600HX demonstrates solid multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 and a single-core score of 3306. The R20 results show 9837 multi-core and 1388 single-core, while R15 yields 2360 multi-core and 333 single-core. These scores place the CPU at the 86th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 38261. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221, +0.1% delta), Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (38312, -0.1% delta), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194, +0.2% delta), and Intel Core 9 270H (38335, -0.2% delta). This indicates the i5-13600HX performs essentially identically to these competing mobile and desktop processors, with deltas under 1% in either direction.

PassMark results reinforce this picture: multi-thread score of 28280, single-thread of 3684, integer math at 97126, floating-point math at 70618, data compression at 328686, data encryption at 19289, extended instructions at 19720, find prime numbers at 109, physics at 1810, and random string sorting at 36783. These figures demonstrate balanced performance across varied computational workloads, with particularly strong integer and floating-point throughput that would benefit compilation, scientific computing, and data processing tasks.

The GPU benchmark situation is starkly different. The only available score is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3596, placing the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada at just the 21st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the GeForce GT 545 (3594, +0.1%), GT 735M (3616, -0.6%), GTX 1050 (3629, -0.9%), and Radeon HD 6770 (3649, -1.5%). This places the GPU in the company of decade-old entry-level cards, suggesting its benchmark performance is dramatically below what its name and specifications would suggest. The combined picture is one of a powerful CPU paired with a surprisingly weak GPU in terms of benchmark scores, creating a significant performance imbalance that favors compute-heavy workloads over graphics-intensive applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation features the AD103 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². Memory configuration includes 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth with memory clocks at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU operates at a base clock of 1425 MHz with a boost clock of 2115 MHz, drawing 120 W TDP. Compute resources include 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores, yielding peak rates of 236.9 GPixel/s pixel fill, 643.0 GTexel/s texture fill, and 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute (with FP16 at 41.15 TFLOPS 1:1).

Despite these substantial specifications, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596 indicates that real-world rendering performance is far lower than the hardware specifications would suggest. This discrepancy could stem from thermal constraints in a mobile form factor, driver limitations, or the benchmark's specific workload characteristics. The GPU sits at the 21st percentile, with its nearest rivals being legacy cards from the early 2010s, which is an extraordinary result for a chip with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. For rendering workloads, the high FP32 throughput and 16 GB VRAM would theoretically support large scenes and complex shading, but the benchmark data does not validate this capability in practice.

The RT and tensor core counts suggest strong ray tracing and AI acceleration potential, but without measured gaming or rendering benchmarks to confirm this, these remain theoretical advantages. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is respectable for a mobile GPU and would support high-resolution textures, but the low benchmark percentile undermines confidence in real-world graphics performance. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface provides adequate bandwidth for data transfer, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support indicates modern feature compatibility, but the measured performance does not align with these capabilities.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a pronounced imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU's 86th percentile ranking against all processors stands in sharp contrast to the GPU's 21st percentile, creating a scenario where the processor vastly outpaces the graphics subsystem in relative performance. In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded productivity tasks, the i5-13600HX would be the primary driver of performance, with the GPU playing little to no role. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 and PassMark multi-thread score of 28280 indicate robust capability that would saturate many professional applications.

Conversely, in graphics-bound workloads such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada would be the limiting factor. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, near the GTX 1050's 3629 (-0.9% delta), suggests that any graphics-intensive task would be constrained by the GPU's actual rendering throughput, not the CPU's computational headroom. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 3306, PassMark single-thread 3684) would not compensate for the GPU's low benchmark standing in gaming scenarios.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured frame data, but the percentile gap alone indicates that balancing upgrades should prioritize the GPU. A more capable GPU would allow the i5-13600HX to fully express its potential in gaming and graphics workloads, while the current GPU leaves significant CPU performance idle in such tasks. For compute workloads that leverage the CPU exclusively, the balance is appropriate, but for any graphics-dependent application, the GPU represents a severe bottleneck that limits overall system performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile platform with the CPU soldered to the motherboard, meaning processor upgrades are not feasible in the traditional sense. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available, providing flexibility for memory choices depending on the laptop's motherboard design. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-speed storage and peripheral connectivity. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output when the discrete GPU is not in use or for power-saving scenarios.

The GPU has a 120 W TDP with no power connectors listed, suggesting it draws power through the motherboard slot or a proprietary mobile connection. The suggested PSU is not specified in the fact pack, which is typical for mobile configurations where power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal power supply and battery system. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is standard for mobile discrete graphics. Given the mobile form factor, a sensible next upgrade would involve replacing the entire laptop rather than individual components, as both the CPU and GPU are likely soldered. Users seeking better graphics performance would need to select a different laptop configuration with a more powerful GPU, while keeping the same or similar CPU could be achieved through a vendor configurable option.

The platform's support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 demonstrates forward-looking connectivity, but the GPU's benchmark performance at the 21st percentile suggests that any upgrade path should focus on achieving better graphics capability, either through a different laptop model or an external GPU solution if supported. The 55 W CPU TDP combined with the 120 W GPU TDP indicates a total thermal envelope that requires adequate cooling, which is the responsibility of the laptop chassis design.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets professional laptop users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over graphics performance. The i5-13600HX's 86th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 23422, PassMark multi-thread 28280) make it well-suited for developers compiling large codebases, data scientists running numerical analysis, and students in engineering or computer science programs who need heavy computational power for coursework. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample parallelism for such tasks, and its near-identical performance to rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221, +0.1%) and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (38312, -0.1%) ensures competitive processing capability.

Small business workstations could benefit from the CPU's performance for office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and database management, where multi-threaded throughput translates into faster processing of large datasets. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth could support light to moderate GPU-accelerated workloads, but the 21st percentile benchmark score cautions against relying on it for demanding graphics applications. Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering or video encoding would find the processor capable, but 3D artists and video editors relying on GPU acceleration would likely be disappointed by the graphics performance relative to the RTX 5000 branding.

Gamers at 1080p with low to medium settings might find acceptable performance in less demanding titles, but the GPU's proximity to the GTX 1050 (3629, -0.9%) suggests that high-refresh or high-detail gaming is not a realistic expectation. This build is not recommended for gamers seeking modern gaming performance, nor for professionals whose workflows depend heavily on GPU compute, such as deep learning training or real-time 3D visualization.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not viable with this configuration. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, near the GTX 1050 (3629, -0.9%), indicates that achieving frame rates above 60 FPS at 1080p ultra settings is unlikely in most modern titles, and high-refresh monitors (144Hz+) would remain underutilized.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 23422) provides ample headroom for software encoding via x264, while the GPU's 304 tensor cores and 76 RT cores could support NVENC-based encoding, though the GPU's low benchmark percentile raises questions about its real-time encoding throughput. Streaming at 1080p60 with CPU encoding is feasible, but the GPU's gaming limitations would constrain the gameplay quality.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows would perform well given the PassMark integer math score of 97126 and multi-thread score of 28280, enabling smooth timeline scrubbing and export rendering. GPU-accelerated effects and color grading would be limited by the GPU's 21st percentile performance, potentially causing slower previews and renders for GPU-dependent operations.

3D rendering: CPU rendering engines like Blender Cycles (CPU mode) would benefit from the 14-core processor, but GPU rendering with CUDA or OptiX would be hindered by the RTX 5000 Mobile's benchmark position near the GTX 1050 (3629, -0.9%), despite its 16 GB VRAM and 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 theoretical peak.

Software development: This is a strong scenario for the i5-13600HX. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 accelerates compilation of large projects, the PassMark data compression score of 328686 speeds up build artifacts packaging, and the single-thread score of 3684 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The GPU's performance is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's 86th percentile ranking ensures snappy performance for multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and data analysis in spreadsheets. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a power-efficient display output for basic tasks, while the discrete GPU remains available for occasional acceleration needs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600HX sits at the 86th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 38261, placing it within 0.2% of rivals like the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and Intel Core Ultra 5 245T.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada scores 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 0.1% above the GeForce GT 545 (3594) and 0.9% below the GeForce GTX 1050 (3629), placing it at the 21st percentile.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the fact pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores, not direct gameplay measurements.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-13600HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available, providing flexibility for the laptop's memory design.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 2250 MHz memory clock (18 Gbps effective).

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The i5-13600HX has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.80 GHz, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: What is the combined system percentile for this build?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 54, indicating mid-range overall performance that is dragged down by the GPU's 21st percentile ranking despite the CPU's strong 86th percentile.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It operates at a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boosts to 4.80 GHz, consuming 55 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode with ECC capability, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers basic display output, while the CPU's multiplier is unlocked for potential overclocking in supported systems.

The benchmark data reveals strong computational performance across the board. Cinebench R23 scores of 23422 multi-core and 3306 single-core demonstrate excellent scaling with the 20 threads, while the R20 scores of 9837 multi-core and 1388 single-core, and R15 scores of 2360 multi-core and 333 single-core, show consistent performance across benchmark generations. PassMark results add depth: multi-thread 28280, single-thread 3684, integer math 97126, floating-point math 70618, data compression 328686, data encryption 19289, extended instructions 19720, find prime numbers 109, physics 1810, and random string sorting 36783.

These scores indicate that the i5-13600HX excels in multi-threaded productivity tasks, with the 23422 Cinebench R23 multi-core score placing it in the top 14% of all processors. The near-identical performance to the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (+0.1%), Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (-0.1%), and Intel Core 9 270H (-0.2%) shows that this CPU remains competitive with newer mobile processors. The high integer and floating-point math scores (97126 and 70618 respectively) translate directly into faster code compilation, scientific simulations, and data processing. The data compression score of 328686 is particularly strong, benefiting file archival and database workloads. For real-world applications, this CPU handles software development, content creation, and office productivity with ample headroom, while its single-thread performance ensures responsive interaction in everyday tasks.

Build Overview

This laptop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600HX with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation, representing a mobile workstation class configuration. The CPU's 14 cores, 20 threads, and 86th percentile ranking (average benchmark score 38261) establish it as a high-performance processor competitive with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (38221, +0.1%) and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (38312, -0.1%). The GPU, despite its RTX 5000 branding, holds only a 21st percentile ranking with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, matching the performance level of legacy cards like the GeForce GTX 1050 (3629, -0.9%).

The combined system percentile of 54 reflects this imbalance, placing the overall build in the mid-tier range for laptops. The CPU's 86th percentile is dragged down by the GPU's 21st percentile, resulting in a configuration that is far stronger for CPU-bound workloads than graphics-intensive tasks. The build class is laptop, indicating a mobile form factor with soldered components and limited upgradeability. The 55 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP together define a thermal envelope that requires adequate laptop cooling.

Overall, this pairing offers robust processor performance suitable for professional and developer workloads, but the GPU's benchmark scores do not justify the RTX 5000 naming. Users should view this build as a CPU-centric mobile workstation with basic graphics capability, not as a gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering system. The 16 GB VRAM and modern feature set (DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4) provide theoretical headroom, but the measured performance places the GPU firmly in entry-level territory, making this a specialized configuration for users who prioritize processing power over graphics.