SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4060 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 17469 places it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, which is sufficient for smooth 1080p high-refresh gaming in most titles. However, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame-rate expectations must be inferred from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 73 and DirectX 11 score of 157 indicate solid API efficiency, but framerates at 1440p or above will likely fall short of high-refresh monitors in demanding games. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provides adequate capacity for current titles, but future games may push beyond this limit.

Streaming: The i5-13600HX’s 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 give substantial headroom for encoding while gaming. The 86th CPU percentile means this processor outperforms roughly 86% of all CPUs in the database, which supports software encoding without crippling gameplay performance. The GPU’s 96 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based encoding features, though the data does not specify which specific encoder hardware is present. PassMark multi-thread score of 28280 reinforces that simultaneous gaming, encoding, and chat applications remain within the CPU’s capacity. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU can also handle light encoding tasks if the discrete GPU is fully loaded.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9837 and PassMark integer math score of 97126 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks. The GPU’s 3072 shading units deliver 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which accelerates GPU-accelerated effects and playback. PassMark GPU compute score of 6816 shows moderate compute capability, enough for hardware-accelerated previews but not top-tier for heavy 3D compositing. The 24 MB shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency during multi-layer edits. For 4K video editing, the combination handles proxy workflows well, but full-resolution multi-stream 4K may stress the 8 GB VRAM.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 places this CPU in strong contention for CPU-based rendering workloads, with the 14-core/20-thread configuration providing parallel throughput for Blender’s Cycles or similar render engines. The GPU’s RT cores (24) and tensor cores (96) support hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the FP32 throughput of 11.61 TFLOPS limits raw GPU rendering performance compared to higher-tier desktop cards. PassMark data compression score of 328686 suggests fast scene file loading and saving. The combined 77th percentile for this build indicates that both components contribute effectively to rendering tasks, but the GPU’s 67th percentile is the more limiting factor in GPU-accelerated renders.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 3684 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3306 provide snappy compilation of single-threaded build steps. The 20 threads accelerate parallel builds, with PassMark extended instructions score of 19720 showing strong SIMD performance for vectorized code. Data encryption score of 19289 indicates adequate performance for secure development workflows including code signing and encrypted repositories. The 10 nm process node and 55 W TDP mean sustained all-core loads remain within thermal budgets for laptop chassis, allowing long compile sessions without throttling. The 86th CPU percentile confirms this processor sits above most laptop CPUs for developer workloads.

Student and office work: The CPU’s PassMark physics score of 1810 and floating-point math score of 70618 handle spreadsheet calculations, document rendering, and statistical analysis with ease. Single-thread performance (3684 PassMark) ensures responsive UI interactions in office suites. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output if the discrete GPU is disabled for battery savings. The 55 W TDP allows fanless or low-noise operation during light loads, which suits classroom and library environments. The 86th CPU percentile means this laptop outperforms the vast majority of machines seen in student settings, making it overkill for basic productivity but future-proof for advanced coursework.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 38261 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 86% of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 250, which scores 38221 (0.1% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H at 38312 (0.1% ahead). This places the i5-13600HX in a dead heat with several newer processors, showing that Raptor Lake-HX remains competitive. The CPU’s strongest showing comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core (23422), while single-core performance is represented by Cinebench R23 single-core at 3306. PassMark multi-thread score of 28280 confirms strong parallel throughput, while single-thread score of 3684 indicates solid per-core performance.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 22729 places it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 at 22895 (0.7% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT at 22549 (0.8% behind), and the Intel Arc B580 at 23021 (1.3% ahead). The RTX 4060 Mobile sits within 1.3% of these desktop cards, which is remarkable for a laptop GPU. PassMark G3D score of 17469 represents the primary gaming performance metric, while Geekbench OpenCL (89420) and Vulkan (89569) scores show strong compute API performance. DirectX 12 score of 73 and DirectX 11 score of 157 indicate better performance in older DirectX 11 titles than newer DirectX 12 titles, which is typical for this GPU class.

The combined percentile of 77 for this CPU+GPU pairing indicates that the build outperforms 77% of all configurations in the database. The CPU is notably stronger (86th percentile) than the GPU (67th percentile), which means the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. However, for CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and productivity, the system punches well above its class. The data confirms this is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) with no measured FPS data available, so all gaming performance estimates derive from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which means the processor is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded independently. This is standard for laptop-class builds (buildClass: laptop), where the entire system is typically replaced rather than upgraded piecemeal. The 14-core processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available for workstation use. This flexibility means the laptop can be configured with either memory generation depending on the OEM’s design, though the data does not specify maximum capacity or speed.

PCIe support includes Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future expansion. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for the RTX 4060 Mobile’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, while the GPU has a 115 W TDP, giving a combined 170 W for the two main power consumers. No suggested PSU is listed in the data, but the 55 W CPU TDP indicates that laptop power adapters in the 180-240 W range would provide adequate headroom, depending on other system components.

The architecture is Raptor Lake-HX with a 10 nm process node, representing Intel’s high-performance mobile lineup. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide substantial memory hierarchy. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the GPU is the more limiting component (67th percentile vs. CPU’s 86th percentile), so users seeking better gaming performance would benefit from a system with a higher-tier GPU rather than a CPU upgrade. Since the CPU is BGA-soldered, any upgrade path involves replacing the entire laptop, which would be justified when moving to a GPU in the 75th percentile or higher.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 86th percentile versus the GPU’s 67th percentile creates a clear imbalance: the processor can feed the graphics card without bottlenecking in most scenarios, but the GPU will limit frame rates before the CPU does. For gaming, this means the RTX 4060 Mobile is the bottleneck at 1080p and above, with the CPU having approximately 19 percentile points of headroom. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 17469, when compared to the CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 28280, suggests that gaming workloads will be GPU-bound in all but the most CPU-intensive titles.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 and PassMark integer math score of 97126 indicate that CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will use the processor effectively. In these scenarios, the GPU’s compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute score of 6816) may become the bottleneck for GPU-accelerated rendering. The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth may also limit large data sets that exceed memory capacity.

FPS scaling is not directly measured in the data, but the benchmark scores allow estimation. The GPU’s DirectX 11 score of 157 is more than double its DirectX 12 score of 73, suggesting that games using DirectX 11 will perform relatively better than DirectX 12 titles. This is unusual and may indicate driver optimization or architectural preferences. The GPU’s 67th percentile means it will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p medium-to-high settings in most games, but the CPU’s higher percentile ensures that frame pacing will be stable rather than CPU-limited. Overall, the system is well-balanced for gaming at 1080p, with the GPU as the primary limiter, and well-balanced for productivity, with the CPU as the primary driver.

# FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 4060 Mobile faster than a desktop RTX 2080?

A: No. The RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729 on average, while the RTX 2080 scores 22895, placing the RTX 2080 0.7% ahead. This is a negligible difference, so they perform essentially identically.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600HX compare to the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The i5-13600HX scores 38261 on average, while the Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, a difference of just 0.1%. These processors are statistically tied in performance.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 77, meaning this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 77% of all builds in the database.

Q: Does this laptop support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, though the data does not specify whether the laptop’s motherboard implements this feature.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 16 Gbps effective speed.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The data contains no measured FPS rows for this combination, so all game performance estimates are based on benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

# Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh gaming will find this build suitable, given the GPU’s 67th percentile and the CPU’s ability to feed it without bottlenecking. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for current titles at this resolution, though 1440p high-refresh may strain the GPU’s 67th percentile positioning. Users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks will be better served: the 86th CPU percentile supports demanding productivity workloads that exceed what most laptops can handle.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 and PassMark multi-thread score of 28280. The GPU’s 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores accelerate ray tracing and AI features, while the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles GPU-accelerated effects. Developers will appreciate the 20 threads and single-thread score of 3684 for fast compilation, plus the extended instruction score of 19720 for SIMD-optimized code. Students and office workers will find this build massively overqualified, but the 55 W TDP allows efficient operation for battery life.

Small business workstations that run accounting software, databases, or data analysis tools will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark data encryption score of 19289 and integer math score of 97126. The ECC memory support adds reliability for critical workloads, assuming the laptop implements it. The combined 77th percentile means this is a mid-to-upper-tier laptop build, suitable for professionals who need one machine for both gaming and work without compromising either.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The die size is 257 mm², and the processor is built on the Intel BGA 1964 socket, confirming its laptop-class positioning.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2360, R20 multi-core of 9837, and R23 multi-core of 23422 show consistent scaling across generations of the Cinebench benchmark. Single-core performance is equally strong: R15 single-core of 333, R20 single-core of 1388, and R23 single-core of 3306. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 28280 and single-thread score of 3684, with integer math at 97126 and floating-point math at 70618.

The 86th CPU percentile places this processor above nearly every laptop CPU in the database, rivaling desktop mid-range processors. Its nearest competitors include the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (0.1% behind) and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (0.1% ahead), showing that the 13th-gen architecture remains competitive against newer designs. The PassMark data compression score of 328686 and random string sorting score of 36783 indicate fast data manipulation, while find prime numbers score of 109 suggests the processor prioritizes integer throughput over specialized prime calculation. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback display output, and the memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with ECC capability.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: laptop). The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 67th percentile combine to yield a 77th percentile overall ranking, placing this system above three-quarters of all builds in the database. The CPU is the stronger component by a significant margin, which shapes the system’s character: it is a productivity-focused laptop that also handles gaming competently.

The 14-core/20-thread CPU with 24 MB of L3 cache provides workstation-level multi-threading in a 55 W envelope, while the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth deliver solid 1080p gaming. The lack of measured FPS data means that all gaming estimates are inferred from benchmark scores, but the GPU’s 67th percentile and DirectX 11 score of 157 suggest it performs similarly to a desktop RTX 2080, which is a strong result for mobile hardware. The CPU’s nearest rival comparison shows it trading blows with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, confirming that Raptor Lake-HX remains relevant.

This is not a top-tier gaming laptop (the GPU’s 67th percentile leaves room for faster options), but it is an excellent all-rounder. The combined 77th percentile means buyers get a machine that excels at CPU-heavy tasks while still delivering smooth gaming at mainstream settings. The laptop-class form factor means no user upgrades are possible for the CPU or GPU, so buyers should choose this config based on its current performance rather than future upgrade potential. The 55 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP give a combined 170 W power draw, which is efficient for the performance delivered.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile uses the AD107 chip based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 118.9M per mm². The GPU has 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units, with 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores. Clock speeds are 1545 MHz base and 1890 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory runs on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU achieves a pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s and texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 11.61 TFLOPS and FP16 of 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The TDP is 115 W with no power connectors listed, consistent with a mobile GPU that draws power from the motherboard. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs are portable device dependent.

Benchmark performance shows a GPU at the 67th percentile, with an average score of 22729. PassMark G3D score of 17469 represents the primary gaming metric, while Geekbench OpenCL (89420) and Vulkan (89569) scores demonstrate strong compute API performance. The DirectX scores are unusual: DirectX 9 at 216, DirectX 10 at 107, DirectX 11 at 157, and DirectX 12 at 73. This pattern suggests the GPU performs best in legacy APIs and struggles with modern DirectX 12 workloads relative to its overall capability. PassMark GPU compute score of 6816 and G2D score of 730 round out the performance picture.

The GPU’s nearest rival is the desktop RTX 2080, which scores 0.7% higher, meaning this mobile GPU effectively matches a last-generation desktop card. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT trails by 0.8%, while the Intel Arc B580 leads by 1.3%. For rendering workloads, the 24 RT cores accelerate ray tracing, and the 96 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based features. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but may limit performance at higher resolutions or with high-resolution textures. The 8 GB VRAM is currently sufficient but may become a bottleneck in future titles.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds