SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600HX paired with the AMD Radeon 890M represents a distinct configuration in the mobile landscape: a high-core-count CPU designed for demanding productivity tasks combined with an integrated GPU that relies on system memory for all graphics operations. The benchmark data available for this pairing is entirely synthetic, with no measured frame rates for any game titles. Consequently, all gaming performance discussed here is an estimate derived from the GPU's compute scores and the CPU's processing capabilities, not from direct gameplay testing. This analysis will interpret the available benchmark results to characterize the platform's strengths and limitations across rendering, computation, and general use.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. Its memory subsystem is entirely "System Shared," meaning it has no dedicated VRAM; the frame buffer is carved out of the host system's DDR4 or DDR5 memory, and bandwidth is "System Dependent." This is the single most important factor for its performance profile: unlike discrete graphics cards with dedicated high-speed memory, the 890M's effective bandwidth scales with the system memory configuration and is shared with the CPU. The GPU operates with a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, which is a substantial clock range for an integrated part.

The chip contains 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. For ray tracing, it includes 16 dedicated RT cores, a feature that brings hardware-accelerated ray tracing to the integrated segment, though the performance ceiling is limited by the shared memory bandwidth. The GPU's compute rates are fixed: it delivers 5.939 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio), and pixel and texture rates of 92.80 GPixel/s and 185.6 GTexel/s, respectively. These are the raw throughput figures that drive the benchmark scores.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a mid-pack integrated GPU. Its average benchmark score is 9210, placing it at the 45th percentile of all GPUs. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 590, which is a low absolute number but typical for an IGP. The Geekbench scores are more revealing of its compute potential: 37254 in OpenCL and 40808 in Vulkan. These scores indicate that the 890M is capable of substantial general-purpose compute work, but its DirectX performance in PassMark tells a different story for gaming: it scores 33 in DX10, 73 in DX11, and 37 in DX12. The DX11 score stands out as the highest of the three, suggesting that legacy DirectX 11 titles may run more efficiently than modern DX12 workloads on this hardware. The PassMark G3D score is 8076, with a G2D score of 979, and a GPU compute score of 4157.

What do these scores mean for rendering? The Radeon 890M is not a high-end rendering solution. Its 45th percentile rank places it in the lower half of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (avg score 9221, deltaPct -0.1), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (9273, -0.7), the GTX 465 (9294, -0.9), and the GTX 850M (9302, -1.0). The deltaPct values are all within 1% of the 890M's score, meaning these are all statistically equivalent performers. This situates the 890M at a performance level roughly comparable to a mid-range discrete GPU from several generations ago, but without the dedicated memory bandwidth of those cards. For rendering tasks like 3D scene creation or video encoding, the 890M can accelerate some processes via its compute units, but the lack of VRAM and system-dependent bandwidth will cause significant bottlenecks with large textures or complex scenes.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's benchmark profile is far stronger than the GPU's. The Intel Core i5-13600HX achieves an average benchmark score of 38261, placing it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. This is a high ranking, indicating strong multi-threaded performance. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (avg score 38221, deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (38312, -0.1), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (38194, 0.2), and the Intel Core 9 270H (38335, -0.2). The deltaPct values here are all under 0.2%, showing that the i5-13600HX sits in a tight cluster of similarly performing CPUs, none of which has a decisive advantage.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the i5-13600HX demonstrates its capability across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 23422 in multi-core and 3306 in single-core. The multi-core score is particularly strong, reflecting the 14-core/20-thread configuration. Cinebench R20 scores are 9837 multi-core and 1388 single-core, while R15 scores are 2360 multi-core and 333 single-core. PassMark results further illustrate the CPU's character: a multi-thread score of 28280, a single-thread score of 3684, and strong integer math performance at 97126. Data compression scores a substantial 328686, while data encryption is 19289, and extended instructions (like AVX) score 19720. Floating-point math is 70618, and the physics test (often correlated with gaming logic) scores 1810.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 66, which is a holistic measure of the system's overall benchmark standing. This 66th percentile is dragged down by the GPU's 45th percentile, while the CPU's 86th percentile pulls it up. The data shows a system that is compute-heavy but graphics-light: the CPU is a top-tier performer among all processors, while the GPU is solidly mid-pack. For tasks that rely primarily on the CPU, such as compiling code, running virtual machines, or batch photo processing, this system will feel very fast. For tasks that depend on the GPU, like gaming at high settings or GPU-accelerated rendering, the system will be constrained by the 890M's modest capabilities. The combined picture is one of a productivity-first laptop where the integrated graphics are a secondary feature.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile relative to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600HX is at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38261. This places it in the top tier of processors, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (deltaPct 0.1) and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (deltaPct -0.1).

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 890M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 890M has an average benchmark score of 9210, placing it at the 45th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (9221, deltaPct -0.1), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (9273, -0.7), the GTX 465 (9294, -0.9), and the GTX 850M (9302, -1.0). All are within 1% of its performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Radeon 890M uses "System Shared" memory for both size and type. Its memory bus width is also "System Shared," and its bandwidth is "System Dependent," meaning it has no dedicated VRAM and relies entirely on the host system's memory.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600HX has ECC memory support listed as true. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and architecture?

A: The i5-13600HX is built on Intel's 10 nm process node (foundry: Intel) and uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX codename. Its die size is 257 mm².

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Radeon 890M includes 16 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, given its overall performance percentile of 45, ray tracing performance will be limited compared to discrete GPUs.

Q: Are there any measured gaming frame rates for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimates based on the benchmark scores.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this CPU+GPU pairing is a professional or power user who prioritizes CPU-bound workloads over gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The i5-13600HX's 86th percentile CPU ranking and strong multi-core scores make it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, data analysts who process large datasets, and engineers running simulations. The PassMark data compression score of 328686 and integer math score of 97126 indicate strong performance in file archiving and logic-heavy applications. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based encoding, such as video editors using software encoders, will also benefit from the 14 cores and 20 threads.

Students in STEM fields and small business workstations that run complex spreadsheets, statistical software, or virtual machines will find the CPU performance more than adequate. The GPU, while not a gaming powerhouse, is sufficient for everyday office work, 2D graphics, and light photo editing. The 45th percentile GPU can handle basic UI rendering and video playback without issue. However, users who need to play modern 3D games, do GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or similar, or run machine learning training on GPU would be better served by a different configuration with a discrete graphics card. This build is not for gamers or GPU-centric creators; it is for those who need maximum CPU throughput in a laptop form factor and can tolerate integrated graphics for light duties.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with the codename Raptor Lake-HX. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and includes ECC memory support. The CPU is socketed on Intel BGA 1964 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). It also integrates UHD Graphics 770.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor with exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 is the headline figure, indicating that the 14 cores scale well under heavy load. The single-core score of 3306 in R23 is also strong, showing that the 4.80 GHz boost clock delivers excellent per-thread performance. This balance between multi-core and single-core is rare and valuable. In PassMark, the multi-thread score of 28280 and single-thread score of 3684 corroborate the Cinebench results. The data compression score of 328686 is particularly high, suggesting that tasks like file zipping, backup software, and database operations will run very quickly.

For real workloads, these numbers translate to tangible benefits. Software compilation, which is highly parallel, will see near-linear scaling across the 20 threads. The floating-point math score of 70618 suggests strong scientific computing performance, while the extended instructions score of 19720 indicates robust SIMD (AVX) throughput for media processing and cryptography. The data encryption score of 19289 is moderate, but sufficient for full-disk encryption without significant overhead. The physics score of 1810 is interesting, as it often correlates with gaming logic performance, but it is paired with a GPU that cannot drive high frame rates. The nearest rivals (AMD Ryzen 7 250, Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, etc.) are all within 0.2% of its average score, meaning this CPU is at the top of its class with no clear leader among its peers.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results. The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 8076, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 590. The 45th percentile ranking suggests this GPU is a mid-tier integrated solution.

For esports titles and older games, the estimates are favorable. The PassMark DX11 score of 73 is the highest of the DirectX variants, indicating that games built on DirectX 11, such as League of Legends, CS:GO, or Overwatch, could achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with medium-to-low settings. The single-thread CPU score of 3684 ensures that the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in these scenarios, as most esports games are single-thread-bound.

For modern AAA games, the outlook is much less optimistic. The DirectX 12 score of 37 suggests that titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Red Dead Redemption 2 would struggle to maintain 30 FPS even at low settings and 1080p. The system-dependent bandwidth means that memory speed and dual-channel configuration will heavily influence performance; a laptop with fast DDR5 in dual-channel will perform notably better than one with a single stick of DDR4. The 16 RT cores are present, but ray tracing in modern games will be prohibitively slow. The GPU's 5.939 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is a fraction of what discrete mid-range cards offer, so this is not a machine for high-fidelity gaming. It is best suited for 2D indie titles, older 3D games, and light esports at 1080p.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a severely imbalanced pairing. The CPU is at the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 45th percentile. In CPU-bound workloads, the i5-13600HX will deliver outstanding performance, with multi-core scores that rival the best mobile processors. However, in any GPU-bound workload, the Radeon 890M will be the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 66 reflects this tension: the CPU boosts the overall score, but the GPU drags it down.

In gaming, the bottleneck is unequivocally the GPU. The PassMark DX12 score of 37 versus the CPU's single-thread score of 3684 shows that the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames, but the GPU cannot render them fast enough. Even at 1080p with low settings, the GPU's texture fill rate of 185.6 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s will be the limiting factor. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to catch up. Conversely, in productivity tasks like video encoding or data compression, the GPU plays a minimal role, and the CPU will operate at full capacity. The system-dependent GPU bandwidth means that if the laptop is configured with high-speed dual-channel memory, the GPU will perform at its best, but it will still be far behind the CPU's capabilities. This is a classic case of a CPU that is over-qualified for the GPU it is paired with.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-only socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration is a key upgrade lever: ensuring the system runs with two sticks of memory in dual-channel mode will maximize the Radeon 890M's bandwidth, which is "System Dependent." Upgrading from a single memory module to a dual-channel kit could yield meaningful performance gains for both the CPU and GPU. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 20 lanes is generous for a mobile part, but since the GPU is integrated, these lanes are not used for graphics; they would be used for high-speed NVMe storage or other peripherals.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 15 W, so the combined thermal envelope is approximately 70 W before accounting for other components. There is no suggested PSU provided, and the GPU has no power connectors, so the system relies entirely on the laptop's internal power delivery. The CPU's multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking if the laptop's cooling solution permits, but this is rare in thin mobile chassis.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to improve the memory configuration, as it directly impacts GPU bandwidth. Beyond that, the primary upgrade path is external: an external GPU (eGPU) via a PCIe connection, though the CPU's 20 lanes would share bandwidth. However, as a laptop build class, the upgrade path is limited; users should consider this a fixed configuration. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU can serve as a fallback, but the Radeon 890M is the primary graphics solution.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13600HX (Raptor Lake-HX, 14 cores, 20 threads) with the AMD Radeon 890M (RDNA 3.5, integrated) in a laptop class configuration. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor, ranking at the 86th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 38261. The GPU is a mid-range integrated solution, ranking at the 45th percentile with an average score of 9210. The combined percentile is 66, indicating an overall system that sits above the median but is held back by its graphics component.

The CPU's architecture is Raptor Lake on a 10 nm process, with a 4.80 GHz boost clock and 24 MB of L3 cache. The GPU is on a 4 nm process with a 2900 MHz boost clock and 1024 shading units. The CPU supports DDR4/DDR5 with ECC, while the GPU uses system-shared memory. This is a productivity-first laptop: it excels at CPU-heavy tasks like compiling, data processing, and software development, but its gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering capabilities are limited. The system's tier is solidly mid-range due to the GPU, but the CPU places it in the upper echelon for compute tasks. It is a specialized tool, not a general-purpose gaming machine.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU's PassMark DX12 score of 37 and 45th percentile ranking indicate that high-refresh gaming (144Hz+) is unrealistic for modern titles. Even esports games would require low settings to approach high frame rates, and the system-dependent bandwidth will cause inconsistency.

Streaming: Feasible for CPU-based encoding. The i5-13600HX's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 provides ample headroom for software x264 encoding while gaming, but the GPU will limit the game's quality. Streaming 1080p content from a light game is possible, but the GPU may struggle with encoding acceleration simultaneously.

Video editing: Good for CPU-heavy workflows. The PassMark data compression score of 328686 and floating-point math score of 70618 suggest fast timeline scrubbing and effects processing in software like Premiere Pro (CPU-based). However, GPU-accelerated effects will be slow due to the 890M's compute score of 4157.

3D rendering: Limited by the GPU. In Blender or similar, the CPU will handle most of the rendering work; its 20 threads will produce solid results, but the GPU's 5.939 TFLOPS will not accelerate Cycles or other GPU renderers effectively. Expect CPU-bound rendering times.

Software development: Excellent. The 14 cores and 20 threads, combined with a single-thread score of 3684, are ideal for compiling large codebases, running unit tests in parallel, and operating virtual machines. The high percentile ranking (86) confirms its capability.

Student and office work: More than sufficient. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3306 ensures snappy web browsing and document editing, while the GPU's G2D score of 979 handles 2D UI rendering without issue. Battery life will be governed by the 55W CPU TDP, but for productivity tasks, this is a capable machine.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600HX

AMD Radeon 890M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds