SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600HX paired with the AMD Radeon 860M represents a specific laptop configuration where a high-performance 14-core mobile CPU is matched with a modern integrated graphics solution. This combination targets users who prioritize multi-threaded processing power and efficiency, rather than those seeking discrete-level gaming performance. The data indicates a significant performance disparity between the two components, with the CPU ranking in the 86th percentile among all processors and the GPU in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This pairing is best understood as a workstation-oriented platform with moderate gaming capabilities, where the CPU handles heavy computational loads while the GPU provides adequate, though not exceptional, visual output.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a primary use case for this configuration. The AMD Radeon 860M, while a capable integrated solution, lacks the raw power to sustain high frame rates at high refresh rates in demanding titles. Its average benchmark score of 26401 places it in the 72nd percentile, which is modest compared to discrete solutions. Users targeting 144Hz or higher refresh rates in modern games will find this GPU to be a limiting factor, though esports titles and older games may run acceptably at lower settings. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 3306 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU itself will be the primary constraint.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming workloads. The 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and broadcasting simultaneously with gaming or other tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 demonstrates strong parallel processing capabilities, which is essential for x264 encoding at high quality presets. The integrated GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 also allows for hardware-accelerated encoding features, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-based encoding enhancements are not available. Streamers who prioritize CPU-based encoding quality will find this platform capable, provided their games are not too GPU-intensive.

Video Editing: This workload benefits significantly from the CPU’s multi-core strength. The PassMark multi-thread score of 28280 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 indicate that rendering timelines, exporting projects, and applying effects will be efficient. The GPU’s 512 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance can assist with GPU-accelerated effects and previews, but it is not a substitute for a discrete video card in professional editing suites. The system memory is shared with the GPU, which means available RAM for the OS and applications is reduced when the GPU is under load, potentially affecting performance in large projects.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the dominant performer here, and the data confirms it is a rendering powerhouse. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9837 and R15 multi-core score of 2360 are strong indicators of its ability to handle complex 3D scenes in CPU-based render engines. The GPU’s 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs provide some support for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support OpenCL or Vulkan, as evidenced by its Geekbench scores of 22759 (OpenCL) and 30043 (Vulkan). However, professionals relying heavily on GPU rendering will find the 860M insufficient for production-scale work, making this a CPU-centric rendering workstation.

Software Development: The 14-core/20-thread configuration is ideal for compiling code, running virtual machines, and managing multiple containers. The PassMark data encryption score of 19289 and data compression score of 328686 show strong performance in tasks that are common in development workflows, such as package management and code signing. The single-thread performance is also robust, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3684, ensuring snappy response in IDEs and text editors. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provides sufficient bandwidth for most development tasks, though the shared GPU memory could become a constraint in memory-heavy scenarios.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overqualified for standard productivity tasks. Word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing, and presentation creation will run flawlessly, with the CPU’s single-thread performance ensuring a responsive experience. The GPU is more than adequate for 2D acceleration, video playback, and casual photo editing. The 55W TDP of the CPU suggests that laptops with this configuration may have shorter battery life compared to lower-power alternatives, a consideration for students who prioritize all-day portability. However, for those who need a single machine for both coursework and demanding computational tasks, this pairing is highly effective.

FAQ

Q: Does this configuration have measured gaming frame rates available?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600HX has an average benchmark score of 38261, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 250's score of 38221. This makes the two processors statistically equivalent in overall performance.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M ranks in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26401. This places it above the median but well below high-end discrete graphics cards.

Q: Can this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600HX supports ECC memory. This is a notable feature for workstation users who require data integrity in critical applications, though it is dependent on the laptop motherboard's implementation.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for this pair is 79, indicating that this configuration performs better than 79% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU's memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent" because it uses System Shared memory. The actual bandwidth will vary based on the laptop's memory configuration and whether DDR4 or DDR5 is used.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has an average score of 26401, which is 0.1% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce MX550's score of 26421. The two GPUs are essentially tied in raw compute performance.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon 860M, with its 512 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance, is positioned in the lower-midrange of graphics processors. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 indicates reasonable API efficiency, but its 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs limit fillrate and texture throughput, which directly impacts gaming performance.

At 1080p resolution, this GPU can be expected to handle esports titles such as Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and League of Legends at medium to high settings, likely achieving 60-100 FPS depending on the title's optimization. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 3306) ensures that frame pacing remains consistent, avoiding micro-stutters in CPU-bound scenes. For more demanding AAA titles, settings will need to be lowered to low or medium to maintain playable frame rates. Games released in the last few years with heavy graphical demands will likely struggle to exceed 30-40 FPS at 1080p with high settings.

At 1440p, the GPU will be severely tested. The limited 16 ROPs will become a significant bottleneck for pixel fillrate, and the shared system memory bandwidth will further constrain performance. Most modern games will require low settings to achieve 30 FPS, and some may be unplayable at this resolution. The 860M is not designed for high-resolution gaming; it is a productivity-focused integrated GPU that offers modest gaming capabilities as a secondary function.

The CPU will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario. Its 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs and high multi-core scores mean it can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can process it. In CPU-bound titles, the i5-13600HX will deliver frame rates well above what the 860M can output. Users should view this configuration as a gaming-capable laptop for light or older games, but not as a dedicated gaming machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU in this pairing is stark, creating a clear bottleneck scenario. The CPU ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. This 14-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU is the limiting component in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 38261 versus the GPU's 26401 further highlights the imbalance, with the CPU outscoring the GPU by approximately 45%.

In gaming workloads, the GPU is almost always the bottleneck. The CPU can process game logic, physics, and AI calculations far faster than the 860M can render frames. This means that in most games, users will see near-100% GPU utilization while the CPU remains partially idle. The FPS will be determined entirely by the GPU's rendering capabilities, and the CPU will have significant headroom to run background tasks without affecting gaming performance.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU serves as a helper. Applications that leverage GPU acceleration, such as video editing software using OpenCL, will see some benefit from the 860M's 3.072 TFLOPS. However, the CPU will handle the majority of the computational load. The bottleneck shifts from the GPU to the memory subsystem, as the GPU shares system memory, potentially reducing available bandwidth for CPU operations in memory-intensive tasks.

The 55W TDP of the CPU, combined with the 15W TDP of the GPU, suggests a total power draw of around 70W for the compute components. This is a moderate power envelope that allows for adequate cooling in most laptop chassis. The CPU's boost clock of 4.80 GHz and base clock of 2.60 GHz indicate that it can draw significant power under sustained loads, which may lead to thermal throttling in thin-and-light laptops. The GPU's boost clock of 3000 MHz is high for an integrated part, but its low TDP limits sustained performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13600HX delivers impressive benchmark results across multiple suites. In Cinebench R23, it scores 23422 in multi-core and 3306 in single-core, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 9837 multi-core and 1388 single-core. Cinebench R15 results show 2360 multi-core and 333 single-core. The PassMark suite reveals specialized strengths: multi-thread score of 28280, integer math of 97126, floating point math of 70618, data compression of 328686, and data encryption of 19289. The CPU's average benchmark score is 38261, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H.

The AMD Radeon 860M shows more moderate performance. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 22759, and its Vulkan score is 30043. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26401, placing it in the 72nd percentile. It is 0.1% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and 0.3% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, though these are synthetic benchmarks and real-world gaming performance will differ significantly due to driver optimizations and memory bandwidth.

The combined picture is a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is limited in GPU-bound workloads. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance, placing the pair above average but not in the top tier. For users who primarily run CPU-intensive applications and only occasionally play light games, this pair is highly effective. For those who expect modern gaming performance, the GPU will disappoint.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is designed for users who need a powerful mobile CPU for professional or academic work, with gaming as a secondary consideration. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, or software compilation will benefit from the i5-13600HX's 14 cores and 20 threads. The high multi-core scores in Cinebench and PassMark indicate that rendering and encoding tasks will complete quickly. The GPU's support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 makes it useful for previewing GPU-accelerated effects, even if final renders are CPU-bound.

Software developers will find this pair ideal for compiling large codebases, running multiple virtual machines, and containerizing applications. The high data compression and encryption scores are particularly relevant for DevOps workflows. Students in engineering, computer science, or data science programs will appreciate the CPU's power for simulation and analysis tasks, while the GPU handles everyday graphical needs.

Small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for financial modeling, CAD, or database management will perform well with this setup. The ECC memory support is a significant advantage for data integrity in critical business applications. However, users who plan to game at high settings or high resolutions should look elsewhere, as the 860M will not deliver the expected performance.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It features a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 55W TDP. The CPU is built on Intel's 10 nm process and has a die size of 257 mm². It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes for CPU-attached devices. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results show this is a top-tier mobile CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 is strong for a laptop processor, indicating it can handle sustained heavy workloads. The single-core score of 3306 ensures responsive performance in everyday tasks. The PassMark results reveal specific strengths: integer math at 97126 and floating point math at 70618 demonstrate excellent arithmetic throughput, while data compression at 328686 is ideal for file archiving and data processing.

The CPU's 86th percentile ranking places it among the top 14% of all processors tested, including desktop parts. It outperforms the AMD Ryzen 7 250 by a negligible 0.1% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T by 0.2%, while being edged out by the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H by 0.1% and the Intel Core 9 270H by 0.2%. This level of performance is sufficient for professional-grade workloads and will not be a bottleneck in any task. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking in laptops that support it, potentially boosting performance further.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: "laptop") combining the Intel Core i5-13600HX with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU. The CPU is a high-performance mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen series, while the GPU is a modern integrated solution based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. The GPU is part of the Navi III IGP generation and features 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with a boost clock of 3000 MHz.

The combined percentile of 79 indicates that this pair outperforms 79% of all tested CPU+GPU combinations. This places it in the upper-midrange tier of laptop configurations. The CPU's 86th percentile and GPU's 72nd percentile create an asymmetric profile, where the system's overall ranking is pulled down by the GPU. For users who prioritize CPU performance, this is an excellent choice; for those who need balanced performance, the GPU will be a limiting factor.

The GPU's memory is system-shared, meaning it uses the same DDR4 or DDR5 memory as the CPU. This design reduces cost and power consumption but limits gaming performance due to lower bandwidth compared to dedicated VRAM. The GPU supports modern APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current software. The integrated nature of the GPU means no power connectors are required, and the 15W TDP is minimal, making this an efficient configuration for productivity workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed on Intel BGA 1964, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the CPU cannot be upgraded. The GPU is integrated into the system and also cannot be upgraded. This is a sealed laptop configuration, so users should consider their performance needs carefully before purchase, as no component swaps are possible.

The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. Upgrading memory is the primary way to improve performance, especially for the GPU, which shares system memory. Using faster DDR5 memory will increase available bandwidth for the GPU, potentially improving gaming performance. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a rarity in mobile platforms and beneficial for workstation use.

The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is more than sufficient for the GPU (which uses PCIe 4.0 x8) and any other internal devices. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for its performance level. The suggested PSU is null, and the GPU has a 15W TDP, so power supply is not a concern in a laptop context. The CPU's 55W TDP is the primary power consideration, and laptops with this configuration should have adequate cooling for sustained loads.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be adding more system memory, as this directly benefits both CPU and GPU performance. Users with 8GB or 16GB of RAM should consider 32GB or 64GB for demanding workloads. There is no path to a discrete GPU upgrade within this laptop, so users who outgrow the 860M's gaming performance would need to purchase a new laptop with a discrete GPU.