SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600HX paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S represents a high-midrange mobile configuration, placing in the 88th combined percentile across all laptop builds. The CPU alone sits in the 86th percentile of all CPUs tested, while the GPU reaches the 89th percentile of all GPUs, making this pairing notably balanced in overall capability. Because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, all gaming frame rate discussion below is estimated from the synthetic benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay results.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a 14-core, 20-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock sits at 2.60 GHz, boosting to 4.80 GHz under load. This is an unlocked multiplier part, allowing for overclocking in systems that support it, though the BGA 1964 socket limits such flexibility in most laptop designs.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC support enabled—a feature rarely found in consumer mobile CPUs. The processor also carries 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, which is a strong asset for high-speed storage and discrete GPU connectivity. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, providing a fallback display output when the discrete Radeon GPU is idle or unavailable.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23422 in multi-core and 3306 in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly strong, placing it among the top 14% of all CPUs. Single-core performance is also competitive, with the R20 single-core score of 1388 indicating strong per-thread responsiveness. PassMark integer math reaches 97126, floating-point math hits 70618, and the multithread score is 28280. Data compression scores 328686, while encryption reaches 19289, suggesting strong throughput for archival and secure communication tasks. The extended instructions score of 19720 shows solid SIMD performance, and the physics score of 1810 indicates competent simulation capability for lightweight physics engines.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the i5-13600HX is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (deltaPct 0.1), the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (deltaPct -0.1), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (deltaPct 0.2), and the Intel Core 9 270H (deltaPct -0.2). The differences are within a fraction of a percent, meaning the i5-13600HX sits at the very core of a tightly clustered high-end mobile CPU segment. The 24 MB L3 cache helps in latency-sensitive tasks, and the 20 threads provide ample parallelism for rendering, compilation, and scientific computation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined 88th percentile ranking suggests that neither component dramatically outclasses the other, but the data does reveal a slight tilt. The GPU’s 89th percentile is marginally higher than the CPU’s 86th percentile, meaning the CPU is the more likely limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios. However, the gap is small enough that the bottleneck shifts depending on workload type.

For gaming at high frame rates, the CPU’s single-core performance—Cinebench R23 single-core of 3306—is sufficient to drive most titles, but the GPU will typically saturate first at higher resolutions. The CPU’s 20-thread throughput allows it to handle background tasks, streaming overlays, and game logic simultaneously without dropping frames. In contrast, for productivity workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU becomes the primary engine, and the GPU’s compute capabilities (11.47 TFLOPS FP32) add acceleration where supported.

The PassMark multithread score of 28280 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 both indicate that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately in most gaming scenarios. The physics score of 1810 is lower relative to the other PassMark metrics, which hints that CPU-bound physics simulations in games may be a minor constraint, but modern titles rarely rely heavily on CPU physics alone. Overall, the balance favors the GPU slightly, but the system delivers consistent performance across a wide range of mixed workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The AMD Radeon 8050S achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and a Vulkan score of 58398, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. With a boost clock of 2800 MHz and 2048 shading units, this GPU is positioned to handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high to ultra settings in most titles.

At 1080p ultra, the GPU’s 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate suggest smooth performance in fast-paced shooters and action games, with frame rates likely exceeding 60 FPS in well-optimized titles. The CPU’s single-core strength (Cinebench R23 single-core 3306) prevents significant frame pacing issues, so the system should maintain consistent frame delivery. At 1440p, the GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute becomes the primary driver, and frame rates will depend heavily on the game’s optimization for RDNA 3.5 architecture. Some demanding titles may see frame rates dip below 60 FPS at ultra settings, requiring a reduction to high or medium presets.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. Ray tracing is supported through 32 dedicated RT cores, though the FP32 performance suggests ray-traced workloads will be playable only at lower resolutions or with upscaling. Esports titles and older games will run at very high frame rates, likely exceeding 100 FPS at 1080p. The estimated figures are based on the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 86th percentile, which together suggest a system capable of high-refresh 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets laptop buyers who need a single machine for both gaming and productivity. The CPU’s 86th percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators who compile code, render video, or process large datasets. The 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache provide the parallel headroom needed for multi-tasking, while the single-core score of 3306 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application responsiveness.

Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU’s ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 capability, which is useful for data integrity in long computation runs. Small business workstations that handle virtualization, database queries, or spreadsheet-heavy workloads will find the PassMark data compression score of 328686 and integer math score of 97126 indicative of strong throughput.

Gamers at 1080p high-refresh will see the best value, as the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking supports high frame rates in competitive titles. For 1440p gaming, the system is adequate but may require settings adjustments in the most demanding releases. The combination is less ideal for 4K gaming, where the GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS would be stretched thin. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 23422, which shortens build times compared to lower-tier mobile CPUs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38261, placing it in the 86th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250, scores 38221 (deltaPct 0.1), while the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H scores 38312 (deltaPct -0.1). The Intel Core Ultra 5 245T scores 38194 (deltaPct 0.2), and the Intel Core 9 270H scores 38335 (deltaPct -0.2). These results indicate the i5-13600HX is statistically indistinguishable from its closest competition, with all four rivals within a 0.4% spread.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 62108, placing it in the 89th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, scores 61896 (deltaPct 0.3), showing the 8050S is 0.3% faster. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693 (deltaPct -2.5), meaning the 8050S trails by 2.5%. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775 (deltaPct -2.6), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830 (deltaPct -2.7). These deltas show the 8050S sits just below a cluster of higher-scoring GPUs, but still comfortably in the top 11% of all GPUs.

The combined percentile of 88 reflects a system where both components are in the upper echelon of their respective categories. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 together suggest a machine that handles both compute-heavy and graphics-heavy tasks with similar efficiency. The pairRankByFps field is null, confirming the absence of measured FPS data, but the synthetic scores paint a picture of balanced high-end performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile package, meaning the processor itself is not upgradable in most laptop designs. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC capability, allowing for future memory upgrades if the laptop’s firmware permits. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide bandwidth for high-end NVMe storage and potentially a faster discrete GPU in future system revisions, though the integrated nature of the Radeon 8050S (classified as an IGP with slot width "IGP") means the GPU is not field-replaceable.

The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, and the GPU’s TDP is also 55 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of 110 W for the compute components. This is moderate for a laptop, leaving headroom for system memory, storage, and display backlighting within a typical high-performance chassis. The suggested PSU field is null, so no specific power supply recommendation exists, but the 55 W TDP on each component suggests a total system power draw that is manageable for a modern 100 W+ laptop adapter.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the shared memory architecture of the Radeon 8050S means the GPU draws from system RAM. More memory would directly benefit GPU performance in texture-heavy games. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also yield tangible gains in load times and data throughput, given the CPU’s 20 Gen 5 lanes. The platform is otherwise fixed, with no socket or GPU upgrade path beyond what the laptop manufacturer offers.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600HX has 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture with a 10 nm process.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The i5-13600HX scores 38261 on average, while the Ryzen 7 250 scores 38221, a delta of 0.1%, meaning the two are effectively tied in overall benchmark performance.

Q: What memory types does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support enabled, allowing for both standard and error-correcting RAM configurations.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the AMD Radeon 8050S uses System Shared memory, with the size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as System Shared or System Dependent, meaning it draws from the system’s main RAM.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU includes 32 dedicated RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but its FP32 performance of 11.47 TFLOPS suggests ray tracing will be limited to lower resolutions or reduced settings.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, though the BGA 1964 socket in a laptop chassis typically limits practical overclocking headroom.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The build sits in the 88th combined percentile across all laptop configurations, with the CPU at the 86th percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13600HX with the AMD Radeon 8050S. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is a RDNA 3.5 architecture chip from the Navi Mobile generation, also running at a 55 W TDP. The GPU is built on a 4 nm TSMC process with a 308 mm² die, and it uses System Shared memory, meaning performance scales with the laptop’s RAM configuration.

The combined 88th percentile ranking places this system in the upper tier of laptops, with the GPU slightly ahead of the CPU in relative performance. This is a balanced pairing where neither component is a clear weak link. The CPU’s 86th percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile together indicate a machine that can handle demanding workloads in both productivity and gaming, though it is not at the extreme top end of either category.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a mobile GPU built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi Mobile generation (RX 8000M series). It uses a 4 nm TSMC process with a 308 mm² die size. The GPU has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. Clock speeds range from a base of 1295 MHz to a boost of 2800 MHz.

Memory is System Shared, meaning the GPU has no dedicated VRAM; instead, it uses the laptop’s main system memory. The memory bus width and bandwidth are also System Shared, making performance directly dependent on the system’s RAM speed and configuration. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio of 11.47 TFLOPS.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and a Vulkan score of 58398, placing the GPU in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. The average benchmark score is 62108. Compared to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61896 (deltaPct 0.3), meaning the 8050S is 0.3% faster. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 scores 63693 (deltaPct -2.5), showing the 8050S trails by 2.5%. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63775 (deltaPct -2.6), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP scores 63830 (deltaPct -2.7), both landing just above the 8050S.

For rendering workloads, the 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for real-time 3D previews and moderate GPU-accelerated rendering, though heavy production renders will rely more on CPU performance. The 32 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but given the 2.5-2.7% deficit to the RX 7600M and RX 9060 XT LP, ray-traced scenes will run at lower performance than those GPUs. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering all modern graphics APIs. The lack of dedicated VRAM means performance scales linearly with system memory bandwidth, so laptops with faster DDR5 memory will see proportionally better GPU results.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking and 2800 MHz boost clock support frame rates above 100 FPS in esports titles, with the CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3306 preventing CPU-side bottlenecks. At 1440p, frame rates will be lower but still playable in most titles, with settings adjustments required for the most demanding releases.

Streaming: The CPU’s 20 threads and PassMark multithread score of 28280 provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 58398 indicates solid Vulkan-based capture and encode paths, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means no AI-assisted encoding acceleration.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 and PassMark floating-point score of 70618 support smooth 4K timeline scrubbing and fast export times. The GPU’s 11.47 TFLOPS add GPU-accelerated effects rendering where the software supports it, and the 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate handles compositing tasks efficiently.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be strong, with the 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads handling complex scenes. GPU-based rendering via OpenCL (score 65818) or Vulkan (score 58398) is viable for preview and interactive work, but for production output, the CPU’s multi-core performance is the primary driver.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the high integer math score of 97126 and the 20 threads, reducing build times for large codebases. The ECC memory support adds data integrity for long-running test suites, and the single-core score of 3306 ensures fast IDE responsiveness.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 86th percentile and the system’s 88th combined percentile place it well above the requirements for typical productivity software. Spreadsheets, document processing, and web browsing will run with no performance concerns, and the UHD Graphics 770 provides a power-efficient display output for battery savings when the discrete GPU is idle.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600HX

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds