SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600HX paired with the AMD Radeon 780M is a laptop-class configuration that targets a specific niche: systems that prioritize strong CPU throughput for productivity and content creation while relying on an integrated GPU for graphics. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not directly observed data. The CPU’s high multi-core performance and the GPU’s mid-range percentile ranking suggest a machine that can handle esports and older titles comfortably but will struggle with demanding AAA games at high settings.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK lists no measured FPS values for this CPU+GPU pairing, any discussion of gaming frame rates is estimated from the benchmark scores. The Radeon 780M’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 places it in the 61st percentile among all GPUs, indicating it is an entry-level to mid-range integrated solution. For 1080p gaming, this translates to playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but modern AAA releases will likely require significant graphical compromises.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated performance is modest. The GPU’s FP32 throughput of 8.909 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s suggest it can handle games like Fortnite, Rocket League, or CS2 at high refresh rates, potentially exceeding 60 FPS in these lighter titles. However, for graphically intensive games such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the expectation is sub-60 FPS at medium settings, with ultra settings being largely unplayable. The 780M’s lack of dedicated VRAM (system shared memory) compounds this, as bandwidth is system-dependent and can become a bottleneck in texture-heavy scenes.

At 1440p, the estimated performance drops significantly. The GPU’s 61st percentile ranking and its position near the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in average benchmark score (deltaPct of 0.2% and -0.3%, respectively) suggest that 1440p ultra gaming is not viable. Most modern titles would need to be run at low or medium settings to achieve 30-60 FPS, and even then, frame pacing may suffer due to shared memory bandwidth. For 4K, the configuration is not recommended for gaming, as the estimated frame rates would fall below 30 FPS in almost all scenarios.

The CPU side, however, ensures that frame rates are not limited by processor performance in most games. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 and single-core score of 3306, the i5-13600HX sits in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. This means that in CPU-bound scenarios, such as high-AI-count games or simulation titles, the processor will maintain high minimum frame rates. The bottleneck will consistently be the GPU, not the CPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The chip includes 12 ray tracing cores, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated features are absent. The GPU operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with a pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s.

The memory configuration is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM. This means the memory size, type, and bus width are all dependent on the host system’s RAM, and bandwidth is listed as system-dependent. For rendering workloads, this is a significant limitation. The FP32 performance of 8.909 TFLOPS is respectable for an integrated part, but the shared memory architecture means that large textures or complex 3D scenes will suffer from memory bandwidth constraints. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

In benchmark terms, the 780M scores 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 18602 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 33683 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score of 17588 places it in the 61st percentile, with its closest rivals being the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.2% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.3% higher), and AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.4% higher). This clustering indicates that the 780M performs similarly to a mix of older and newer discrete GPUs, but it is not in the same class as modern mid-range dedicated cards. For rendering tasks, the GPU can accelerate some workflows via OpenCL, but the lack of dedicated VRAM and tensor cores makes it unsuitable for professional 3D rendering or machine learning inference.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are strong across the board. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2360 multi-core and 333 single-core. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 9837 multi-core and 1388 single-core. Moving to Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 23422 and the single-core score is 3306. The Passmark suite shows a single-thread score of 3684, a multi-thread score of 28280, and an average benchmark score of 38261. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 86, meaning it outperforms 86% of all processors in the database.

The GPU, by contrast, scores 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 18602 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 33683 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 17588, and its percentile vs all GPUs is 61. The combined percentile for this pairing is 74, reflecting a system that is above average overall but heavily skewed toward CPU performance.

Interpreting these numbers, the CPU is a high-end mobile processor that rivals the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (deltaPct 0.1%), Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (deltaPct -0.1%), Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (deltaPct 0.2%), and Intel Core 9 270H (deltaPct -0.2%). These are all recent or high-end parts, and the i5-13600HX sits within a 0.2% margin of each, indicating it is at the top of its class. The GPU, on the other hand, is mid-range, with its average score nearly identical to the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is overqualified for the GPU’s capabilities, leading to a significant imbalance in many workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate that the Intel Core i5-13600HX is the dominant component in this pairing, with its 86th percentile ranking far exceeding the GPU’s 61st percentile. In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, or multi-threaded productivity tasks, the processor will deliver excellent performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 and Passmark multi-thread score of 28280 demonstrate substantial parallel processing capability.

However, in GPU-bound workloads, the Radeon 780M becomes the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 is a low result, and the estimated FPS scaling in games confirms that the GPU cannot keep pace with the CPU. For example, in a game that is well-optimized for multi-threading, the CPU might be capable of delivering 120 FPS, but the GPU’s rendering throughput would cap the actual frame rate at 40-50 FPS. The FPS scaling in this configuration is therefore heavily constrained by the GPU’s pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s.

The shared memory architecture exacerbates this imbalance. Since the GPU uses system RAM, memory bandwidth is shared with the CPU, which can cause contention in memory-intensive tasks. In gaming, this manifests as stuttering or frame drops when the system is under load. The CPU’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory means that using faster DDR5 modules could alleviate some bandwidth pressure, but the FACT PACK does not specify a maximum supported speed. Overall, the bottleneck is clearly the GPU, and any upgrade path should prioritize a discrete GPU before considering a CPU upgrade.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific solder mount, meaning it is not user-upgradeable in a traditional sense. However, the platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the CPU includes ECC memory support, which is unusual for a consumer mobile part. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, though the GPU in this configuration is integrated and uses PCIe 4.0 x8 via the chipset.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 15 watts, bringing the total package to approximately 70 watts for the core components. The suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK, so no specific wattage recommendation can be made, but the low combined TDP means that a modest power supply is sufficient. The GPU has no power connectors and is listed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor), so it draws power from the motherboard.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests adding a discrete GPU, though the FACT PACK does not list specific compatible models. Given the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support and 20 lanes, there is ample bandwidth for a high-end discrete GPU. The CPU’s high single-core score of 3684 in Passmark ensures that it will not bottleneck a modern graphics card. The platform’s memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 offers flexibility, but users should prioritize faster memory to feed both the CPU and the integrated GPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present but is far less capable than the Radeon 780M, so it is not a meaningful upgrade path.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong CPU performance for productivity and are willing to accept integrated graphics for light gaming or general computing. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older games will find the estimated frame rates acceptable, though they will need to lower settings for newer AAA releases. Content creators, particularly those working on video editing or 3D rendering, will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422, which accelerates encoding and compilation tasks. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant speedups from the 14 cores and 20 threads.

Students and small business workstations are also well-suited, as the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3684 ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, and the integrated GPU is sufficient for spreadsheets, document editing, and web browsing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-intensive work. However, users who require high-end gaming or professional GPU acceleration should look elsewhere, as the Radeon 780M’s 61st percentile ranking is a clear limitation.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, indicating the system is above average overall, but the CPU’s 86th percentile far exceeds the GPU’s 61st percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13600HX compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 38261, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 250, 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, 0.2% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T, and 0.2% lower than the Intel Core 9 270H.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the AMD Radeon 780M?

A: The GPU uses system-shared memory, with the size, type, and bus width all listed as “System Shared,” and bandwidth is system-dependent.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13600HX has ECC memory support, which is a feature not commonly found in consumer mobile processors.

Q: What is the pixel rate of the AMD Radeon 780M?

A: The GPU has a pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s.

Q: What is the TDP for the CPU and GPU in this configuration?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 15 watts, totaling approximately 70 watts for the core components.

Q: What is the process node for the GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 780M is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the CPU uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration featuring the Intel Core i5-13600HX and the AMD Radeon 780M. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with 14 cores and 20 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture, and it ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an integrated RDNA 3.0 part with 768 shading units, ranking in the 61st percentile. The combined percentile of 74 places this build in the upper-middle tier of systems. It is a CPU-heavy pairing, where the processor is the primary strength and the GPU is a secondary component for basic graphics tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture and codenamed Raptor Lake-HX. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 55 watts. The process node is 10 nm, and the die size is 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 and a single-core score of 3306. The Passmark single-thread score is 3684, and the multi-thread score is 28280. The average benchmark score of 38261 places it in the 86th percentile, with its nearest rivals all within a 0.2% margin. This indicates that the i5-13600HX is at the top of its performance tier, suitable for demanding multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The Passmark data compression score of 328686 and encryption score of 19289 further highlight its capability in data-intensive tasks. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and it has 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, making it a versatile platform for mobile systems.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: For esports titles at 1080p, the estimated frame rates are likely to exceed 60 FPS, but the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking means that competitive gamers may need to lower settings in more demanding games to maintain high refresh rates. The CPU’s single-core score of 3684 ensures minimal frame drops in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming: The CPU’s multi-core strength, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 score of 23422, can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously. However, the GPU’s lack of dedicated VRAM may struggle with overlays and compositing, so streaming at high quality settings is not recommended without a discrete GPU.

Video Editing: The 14 cores and 20 threads provide substantial horsepower for timeline editing and rendering. The Passmark multi-thread score of 28280 indicates that 4K video exports will be reasonably fast, though the integrated GPU’s OpenCL score of 18602 means that GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on discrete graphics.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422. However, the GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.909 TFLOPS is insufficient for real-time viewport rendering or GPU-accelerated ray tracing, making this a poor choice for professional 3D work.

Software Development: Compilation times will be short due to the high multi-threaded performance. The Passmark integer math score of 97126 and floating point math score of 70618 suggest strong arithmetic capabilities, which are beneficial for code compilation and testing.

Student and Office Work: The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3684 ensures fast boot times and responsive applications. The integrated GPU is more than adequate for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The ECC memory support adds data integrity for long-running tasks, making this a reliable workstation for academic or administrative use.