SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

90 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600HX

38,261 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600HX paired with the AMD Radeon 740M is a laptop-class combination built around a 14-core Raptor Lake-HX processor and an entry-level integrated RDNA 3.0 GPU. This pairing represents a CPU-heavy configuration where the processor far outpaces the graphics solution in raw compute capability, making it suitable for productivity and multithreaded workloads rather than high-end gaming. The CPU sits in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 53rd percentile, creating a significant performance gap that shapes every workload analysis below. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the data, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600HX is a mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It contains 14 cores and 20 threads, configured with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, though the system under analysis uses the discrete AMD Radeon 740M instead.

Benchmark data shows strong multi-core performance. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 23422 in multi-core and 3306 in single-core. The R20 results are 9837 multi-core and 1388 single-core, while R15 shows 2360 multi-core and 333 single-core. These scores place the i5-13600HX in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38261. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (0.1% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245T (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core 9 270H (0.2% behind). This indicates the processor competes directly with modern mid-range and upper-mid-range mobile chips, delivering balanced single-thread and multi-thread performance.

PassMark results provide additional context. The multithread score is 28280, single-thread is 3684, integer math is 97126, floating point math is 70618, data compression is 328686, and data encryption is 19289. Extended instructions score 19720, find prime numbers is 109, physics is 1810, and random string sorting is 36783. These figures suggest the CPU handles integer-heavy tasks exceptionally well, with floating point operations also strong. The data compression score is particularly high, indicating fast archive handling and database-like workloads. For real-world use, the 14-core/20-thread configuration with a 4.80 GHz boost clock means compiled code, rendering tasks, and parallel processing benefit greatly, while the single-core score of 3306 in R23 ensures responsive everyday applications and gaming physics.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600HX ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38261. This places it above the majority of processors, including many desktop parts.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250?

A: The i5-13600HX scores 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 250, which has an average score of 38221. This difference is negligible, meaning the two processors perform virtually identically in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i5-13600HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for mobile processors and useful for data integrity in workstation tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon 740M has an average benchmark score of 12870 and ranks in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. This places it slightly above the midpoint of all graphics cards, but far below any high-performance discrete solution.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the AMD Radeon 740M uses system shared memory for its video memory. The memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," meaning performance depends on the laptop's system RAM configuration.

Q: What is the CPU's launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600HX has a launch MSRP of $284. This figure reflects the processor's original pricing at release, not the current market price.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. The GPU, however, uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU is stark. The i5-13600HX sits at the 86th percentile among CPUs, while the Radeon 740M sits at the 53rd percentile among GPUs. The combined percentile is 70, reflecting a configuration where the processor is the dominant component. In CPU-bound workloads such as code compilation, data compression, and multithreaded rendering, the CPU delivers near-top-tier performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422. However, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering with ray tracing, the Radeon 740M's limited 256 shading units and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 performance become the limiting factor.

The PassMark physics score of 1810 and CPU multithread score of 28280 indicate the CPU can feed data to the GPU rapidly, but the GPU's 8 ROPs and 16 TMUs restrict pixel and texture throughput. For gaming, this means frame rates will be capped by the GPU's rasterization ability, not the CPU's logical core count. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 15568 and OpenCL score of 10172 suggest it can handle lightweight 3D applications and esports titles at modest settings, but it will bottleneck the CPU in any graphically demanding scenario. Conversely, in office productivity, spreadsheet calculations, and software development, the CPU carries the load entirely, and the GPU remains largely idle, meaning no bottleneck exists in those workloads.

The memory architecture further complicates balance. The GPU's bandwidth is "System Dependent," meaning it relies on the system's DDR4 or DDR5 memory. This shared memory arrangement reduces effective bandwidth compared to dedicated VRAM, compounding the GPU's performance ceiling. For users who prioritize gaming, the CPU's power is wasted, but for multitasking or workstation use, the imbalance is irrelevant because the GPU is not the primary compute engine.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This configuration is not suited for high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The Radeon 740M's 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 and 53rd percentile ranking indicate it will struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern titles, even at lower resolutions. For esports games with light graphics, the CPU's 3306 single-core R23 score helps maintain stable framerates, but the GPU remains the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23422 means the i5-13600HX can handle x264 encoding alongside game logic, making streaming viable if the game itself is not GPU-intensive. However, the GPU's limited performance restricts the types of games that can be streamed smoothly.

Video editing: Video editing benefits from both CPU and GPU. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 328686 and multithread score of 28280 accelerate timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The GPU's 4 RT cores and RDNA 3.0 architecture provide some hardware acceleration for effects, but the 740M's low pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s means 4K playback and complex transitions may stutter. For 1080p projects, this pairing is workable.

3D rendering: In CPU-based rendering engines, this is a strong setup. The i5-13600HX's 23422 Cinebench R23 multi-core score rivals desktop mid-range CPUs, making Blender's Cycles or similar CPU renderers fast. GPU-based rendering (e.g., Octane) will be slow due to the 740M's 2.867 TFLOPS and lack of dedicated VRAM, so users should rely on CPU rendering.

Software development: This is an excellent scenario for the i5-13600HX. The 20-thread processor handles parallel builds efficiently, and the PassMark integer math score of 97126 indicates strong performance in compilation and unit testing. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the imbalance is harmless.

Student and office work: Office applications, web browsing, and document editing are entirely CPU-bound. The single-core R20 score of 1388 and R15 score of 333 ensure smooth responsiveness. The GPU handles 2D desktop rendering easily, and the system's 53rd percentile GPU ranking is more than adequate for spreadsheet and word processing workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the Intel Core i5-13600HX combined with the AMD Radeon 740M. The FACT PACK indicates dataIsMeasured is false, so all frame rate figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 12870 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 580 (0.4% behind) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (0.3% ahead), suggesting performance roughly comparable to those older desktop cards. However, the 740M's system shared memory and lower power envelope of 45 W mean real-world gaming performance will be lower than those desktop counterparts.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the GPU's 8 ROPs and 256 shading units indicate it will deliver playable frame rates only in older or less demanding titles. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 15568 suggests DirectX 12 and Vulkan games can run, but the pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s caps fill-rate-heavy scenarios. At 720p or with reduced settings, the CPU's high single-thread performance (3306 in R23) helps maintain minimum frame rates, but the GPU's 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 is the hard ceiling. Esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends may achieve 60+ FPS at low-to-medium settings, while AAA releases will likely require the lowest settings to approach 30 FPS. These are estimates, not measured results, and actual performance depends on system memory speed and cooling.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The chip, codenamed Phoenix2, contains 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die, with a transistor density of 152.6M per mm². The GPU has 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 raster output units, along with 4 RT cores for ray tracing. Base clock is 800 MHz with a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The FP32 performance is 2.867 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 2.867 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s.

Memory is entirely system shared, with no dedicated VRAM. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," meaning the GPU uses whatever system RAM is available, typically DDR4 or DDR5 in dual-channel. This architecture limits bandwidth compared to dedicated GPUs, which is a primary reason the 740M's benchmark scores are modest. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. Display outputs are motherboard dependent, typical for an IGP.

In benchmark terms, the 740M scores 10172 in Geekbench OpenCL and 15568 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 12870, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Compared to nearest rivals, it is 0.2% ahead of the AMD FirePro W5100, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 455, 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590, and 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon RX 580. This positions the 740M as an entry-level GPU capable of light gaming and hardware-accelerated video decoding, but not suited for heavy rendering. The 4 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low compute throughput means ray-traced effects will be limited to simple scenes or low resolutions.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need substantial CPU power in a laptop but do not prioritize GPU-intensive tasks. The i5-13600HX's 86th percentile CPU ranking and 23422 Cinebench R23 multi-core score make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running complex queries, and students in engineering or computer science programs. The CPU's high data compression score of 328686 also benefits database administrators and users who archive large files frequently.

Content creators working with 1080p video editing or CPU-based 3D rendering will find the processor sufficient, but the GPU's 53rd percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated effects will be slow. Gamers at 720p or low settings in esports titles may find acceptable performance, but this is not a gaming system by any stretch. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, document processing, and accounting software will run smoothly, with the CPU's single-thread score of 3684 in PassMark ensuring snappy user interface responses. The 4 RT cores in the GPU are a token feature rather than a practical capability for this class of GPU.

Build Overview

The build class is laptop, meaning this is a mobile configuration designed for portable use. The pairing combines Intel's Core 13th Gen mobile processor with AMD's integrated RDNA 3.0 graphics. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and boost of 4.80 GHz, while the GPU is a Phoenix2 chip with 256 shading units and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The combined percentile is 70, reflecting a system that is CPU-dominant but overall mid-to-upper tier in the laptop market. The CPU's 86th percentile pulls the combined score up, while the GPU's 53rd percentile drags it down. This is not a balanced gaming laptop, but rather a workstation-oriented laptop with integrated graphics sufficient for basic display output and light acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 38261, with a percentile rank of 86 among all CPUs. Its best-known scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 23422 and single-core at 3306, along with PassMark multithread at 28280 and single-thread at 3684. The GPU's average benchmark score is 12870, with a percentile rank of 53 among all GPUs. Geekbench scores are 10172 for OpenCL and 15568 for Vulkan. Combined, the system's percentile is 70, placing it in the upper-middle range of all laptop configurations. The CPU outperforms its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 250, by 0.1%, while the GPU trails the AMD Radeon RX 580 by 0.4%. This combined picture shows a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, and rendering, but lags in GPU-bound tasks like modern gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform, meaning the processor cannot be upgraded in most laptops. The memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC support available. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, and the system's memory bandwidth is system dependent. The GPU is an integrated part with a TDP of 45 W, and no suggested PSU is listed because the system is a laptop with a shared power delivery. The CPU TDP is 55 W, so the total platform power is modest by desktop standards.

For a sensible next upgrade, users would need to replace the entire laptop since both CPU and GPU are soldered. A future upgrade would involve moving to a newer platform with a higher CPU percentile and a discrete GPU with dedicated VRAM. The memory can be upgraded to faster DDR5 modules, which would improve the GPU's system shared bandwidth and thus its performance, but the CPU and GPU themselves are fixed. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU is forward-looking, but the GPU's Gen 4 interface means no benefit from Gen 5 storage unless the laptop's chipset supports it. Overall, this platform is a dead end for component-level upgrades, but it offers a strong CPU foundation for users who keep their laptops for several years.