SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600H

30,548 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

63,775 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600H and AMD Radeon RX 7600M combination targets the upper mid-range of laptop performance, as evidenced by its combined percentile of 86 across all recorded builds. The CPU holds an 82nd percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at an 89th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outclasses the other. This analysis relies exclusively on synthetic benchmark data from the FACT PACK, and it must be noted that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussions are therefore estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600H is a 12-core, 16-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node. Its base clock of 2.80 GHz can boost up to 4.80 GHz, which explains its strong single-thread performance in synthetic tests. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast storage for frequently accessed data in compute-heavy workloads.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12402 and a single-core score of 1750, placing this chip in a competitive position against desktop processors from previous generations. The multicore result is particularly telling: the 12-core configuration with 16 threads delivers substantial parallel processing capability, as reflected in the PassMark multithread score of 23304. For real-world workloads, this translates to efficient compilation of large codebases, faster video encoding, and smoother multitasking when running virtual machines or containerized development environments simultaneously.

Single-thread performance, measured at 3631 in PassMark single-thread tests and 735 in Cinebench R20 single-core, remains strong for everyday responsiveness. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz ensures that lightly threaded applications such as web browsers, office suites, and legacy software receive adequate performance without bottlenecking on a single core. The PassMark physics score of 1490 suggests the CPU handles physics simulation reasonably well, which is relevant for gaming and scientific computing tasks that rely on rigid body dynamics.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 30548 places it within 0.3% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-11980HK, 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, and 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U. These deltaPct values indicate that the i5-13600H is statistically indistinguishable from these rivals in aggregate performance, despite architectural differences. The 45 W TDP is typical for high-performance mobile processors, allowing sustained workloads without excessive thermal throttling when paired with a capable cooling solution.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M utilizes the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 6 nm process. This GPU packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory runs on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s, which is adequate for 1080p gaming and entry-level 1440p workloads, though it may become a limiting factor for high-texture packs or ray-traced scenes that demand large VRAM footprints.

Clock speeds are set at a 1500 MHz base, 2070 MHz game clock, and 2410 MHz boost, with memory operating at 2000 MHz base (16 Gbps effective). The GPU contains 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, yielding a pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 269.9 GTexel/s. These specifications translate to a peak FP32 throughput of 17.27 TFLOPS, with FP16 reaching 34.55 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio.

The 28 ray accelerators (RT cores) support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the absence of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated features rely on general-purpose compute. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 reflects strong compute capability, placing it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the RX 7600M trails the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 0.1%, matches the NVIDIA CMP 30HX within 0.1%, leads the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 0.1%, and trails the AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 by 0.7%. These minuscule deltaPct values mean the RX 7600M delivers performance essentially equivalent to those products in OpenCL compute workloads.

For rendering applications that leverage OpenCL, such as Blender’s Cycles engine or Adobe Premiere Pro’s GPU acceleration, this GPU offers solid throughput. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1080p rendering scenes, though complex 3D models with high-resolution textures may require careful memory management. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth supports smooth texture streaming and reduces stutter in open-world games.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform—this means the processor is not user-replaceable in most laptop designs. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, giving system integrators flexibility in cost and performance tuning. The lack of ECC memory support limits this platform for mission-critical server workloads but is standard for consumer mobile systems.

PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU side with Gen 5 support across 8 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This asymmetry is typical for mobile platforms where the CPU’s PCIe lanes are shared between the GPU, storage, and other peripherals. The 45 W CPU TDP combined with the 90 W GPU TDP suggests a total system power draw that requires a robust power delivery system, though the FACT PACK does not specify a suggested PSU for this mobile configuration.

The integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units provides a fallback display output and can handle light 2D workloads when the discrete GPU is idle, potentially extending battery life in office scenarios. For users considering an upgrade path, the soldered CPU and mobile GPU are not replaceable; therefore, the only practical upgrade is increasing RAM capacity or swapping storage drives. The production status of both components is listed as “Active,” indicating they remain in current supply chains as of the FACT PACK data, but the mobile form factor inherently limits component-level upgrades.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing suits laptop builders and buyers targeting high-refresh 1080p gaming, content creation on the go, and software development with moderate parallel workloads. The CPU’s 82nd percentile rank ensures responsive system operation even with multiple background tasks, while the GPU’s 89th percentile provides enough graphical horsepower for modern game titles at medium-to-high settings in the estimated 1080p range.

Gamers playing at 1080p resolution will find this combination well-matched, as the CPU’s strong single-thread performance prevents bottlenecks in most CPU-bound game engines, while the GPU delivers adequate frame rates based on its compute scores. Content creators editing 4K video or working with large RAW photo libraries benefit from the 12-core CPU’s multithreaded rendering and encoding capabilities, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12402 and PassMark integer math score of 78658.

Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the 16 threads and 18 MB L3 cache, which reduce compile times compared to lower-core-count alternatives. Students and small business users running office applications, web browsing, and light programming will find the system overqualified but future-proof. The laptop class designation means this build targets portable use cases, so professionals who need desktop-level performance while traveling are the primary audience.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 30548 places it at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with a composite of Cinebench and PassMark tests. The most representative multicore result, Cinebench R23 at 12402, shows strong parallel throughput, while the single-core score of 1750 indicates excellent per-thread efficiency. PassMark data further breaks down performance: integer math at 78658, floating point at 57618, data compression at 267936, and data encryption at 16061.

The GPU’s sole benchmark score of 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL puts it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. This score is remarkably close to its nearest rivals, with deltaPct values ranging from -0.7% (Radeon Pro WX 9100) to +0.1% (Radeon Pro Vega 56). Combined, the system achieves an 86th percentile rank, indicating that this pairing outperforms roughly 86% of recorded laptop configurations in aggregate benchmark metrics.

The combined picture shows a balanced system where the GPU slightly outranks the CPU in percentile terms (89 vs 82), suggesting that the graphics component is relatively stronger for its class. However, the CPU’s rivals include the Intel Core i9-11980HK, a previous-generation flagship desktop-class mobile chip, which this i5 matches within 0.4%—evidence of the efficiency of Raptor Lake architecture. For estimated gaming performance, the CPU’s single-thread advantage ensures high minimum frame rates, while the GPU’s compute scores suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p with reasonable settings, though exact FPS figures are not measured.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The system holds an 86th percentile rank among all recorded builds, with the CPU at 82nd and the GPU at 89th percentile individually.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T?

A: The i5-13600H has an average benchmark score of 30548, which is 0.3% higher than the Core Ultra 5 225T’s 30468, making the difference negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RX 7600M features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory support is false for this processor, which is standard for consumer mobile chips.

Q: What process node is used for the GPU?

A: The GPU is built on TSMC’s 6 nm process, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 4.80 GHz, while the base clock is 2.80 GHz.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this CPU and GPU pairing, so all gaming performance estimates are derived from benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1750 and the GPU’s 89th percentile ranking suggest this system can drive 1080p displays at high refresh rates in esports titles, though exact FPS is unmeasured. The 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough headroom for competitive settings without texture swapping.

Streaming: The 12-core CPU handles encoding workloads alongside gaming, with a PassMark multithread score of 23304 indicating ample parallel capacity for simultaneous game capture and video encoding. The GPU’s 28 RT cores do not directly aid encoding, but the overall system compute is sufficient for software encoding at moderate bitrates.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12402 supports smooth timeline scrubbing and export rendering in 4K projects, while the GPU’s 17.27 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading. The 8 GB VRAM may limit work with multiple 4K streams simultaneously.

3D rendering: OpenCL score of 63775 puts the GPU near the Radeon Pro WX 9100 within 0.7%, making it viable for GPU-rendering engines that support OpenCL. CPU-based rendering benefits from 16 threads, reducing render times for complex scenes compared to 8-thread processors.

Software development: The 16 threads and 18 MB L3 cache accelerate compilation of large codebases, while the PassMark data encryption score of 16061 supports secure development workflows. The 45 W TDP allows sustained turbo operation during long build sessions without hitting thermal limits in well-designed laptops.

Student and office work: The integrated Iris Xe Graphics provides a power-saving mode for document editing and web browsing, while the discrete GPU remains idle to extend battery life. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 3631 in PassMark ensures snappy application launches and fluid spreadsheet manipulation.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: “laptop”) pairing the Intel Core i5-13600H mobile processor with the AMD Radeon RX 7600M mobile GPU. Both components were released on the same date (2023-01-03) and remain in active production. The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 89th percentile place this system in the upper echelon of mobile configurations, with a combined percentile of 86 confirming its high-tier status.

The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake-H processor with a 45 W TDP, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 part with 8 GB GDDR6 and a 90 W TDP. This pairing represents a mainstream-to-high-end mobile gaming and creator platform, capable of handling most modern workloads without being a flagship extreme offering. The absence of measured FPS data means the system’s gaming potential is inferred from compute benchmarks rather than directly validated, but the percentile ranks suggest strong overall performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a well-balanced system with a slight GPU advantage in relative percentile terms (89 vs 82). In CPU-bound workloads such as software compilation, data compression (PassMark score of 267936), and physics simulation (1490), the i5-13600H is the primary driver, and its performance exceeds that of its closest rivals by less than 1%. This means the CPU is unlikely to be a bottleneck for the GPU in most gaming scenarios, as the single-core performance is strong enough to feed the graphics pipeline.

Conversely, GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering and gaming at higher resolutions will be limited by the RX 7600M’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p but may cause stutters in 1440p with high-texture settings, given that the GPU’s compute score is only 0.1% behind the NVIDIA CMP 30HX—a mining-oriented card. The CPU’s 82nd percentile suggests it can handle most game logic and physics without throttling the GPU, so the bottleneck shifts to the GPU in graphically intensive scenes.

In mixed workloads like game streaming while rendering, the CPU’s 16 threads prevent encoding from starving the game thread, but the GPU’s 90 W TDP limits sustained performance in thin laptops. Overall, this system exhibits balanced performance where neither component dramatically limits the other, with the GPU being the more likely constraint in visually demanding tasks and the CPU being the stronger relative performer for compute-heavy applications.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600H

AMD Radeon RX 7600M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds