SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600H

30,548 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

71,768 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600H and AMD Radeon RX 6650M pairing is a laptop configuration that ranks high in the benchmark database, with a combined percentile of 87th. The CPU places in the 82nd percentile of all processors, while the GPU reaches the 91st percentile, indicating a well-balanced system. However, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The Radeon RX 6650M is a RDNA 2.0 mobile GPU built on TSMC's 7 nm process, featuring 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. It carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This capacity is sufficient for high-detail gaming at 1080p and 1440p, but texture-heavy titles at 4K may exceed the VRAM limit. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective, a standard figure for GDDR6.

The GPU operates at a base clock of 2068 MHz, a boost clock of 2416 MHz, and a game clock of 2222 MHz. These are high frequencies for a mobile part, indicating that the cooling solution in a laptop can sustain significant load. The pixel rate is 154.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 270.6 GTexel/s, which are competitive numbers for a mobile GPU. The FP32 throughput is 8.659 TFLOPS, and FP16 reaches 17.32 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. These compute figures suggest strong performance in rasterized rendering and moderate performance in compute-accelerated tasks.

The RDNA 2.0 architecture includes 28 RT cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, there are no tensor cores, so AI-accelerated workloads rely on the CPU's integrated Iris Xe Graphics or the GPU's FP16 compute. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, making it compatible with modern rendering APIs.

Benchmark scores place the RX 6650M in the 91st percentile of all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 65,800, and the Vulkan score is 77,735, with an average benchmark score of 71,768. The nearest rivals are desktop GPUs: the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal is 0.5% faster, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 is 0.8% faster, and the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is 2.2% faster. The RX 6650M is 1.3% faster than the RX 6600 LE. This places the mobile GPU on par with high-end desktop cards from the previous generation, which is a strong indicator of its rendering capability.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU ranks in the 82nd percentile, while the GPU ranks in the 91st percentile. This discrepancy suggests that the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU when compared to their respective peers. In gaming scenarios, the GPU is typically the primary determinant of frame rates, and the RX 6650M's high percentile indicates it can push high FPS at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's single-thread performance, measured by Cinebench R23 at 1,750 and Passmark at 3,631, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most games, but in CPU-bound titles or at very high refresh rates (e.g., 144+ FPS), the CPU could become the limiting factor.

The CPU's multi-thread performance is also strong, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 12,402 and Passmark multi-thread at 23,304. This means that in productivity workloads that use multiple cores, the CPU and GPU work in tandem without a severe bottleneck. The combined TDP is 45W for the CPU and 120W for the GPU, which is typical for a performance laptop. The data suggests that the GPU is the more capable component, but the CPU is not a weak link; it is merely less remarkable relative to its peers. The combined percentile of 87 confirms that the pairing is well-matched, with no single component dragging the system down.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600H is a 13th Generation Raptor Lake mobile processor built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has 12 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes. It includes an integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU for fallback, and the TDP is 45W.

The CPU's benchmark scores show a strong single-thread performance: Cinebench R15 single-core 176, R20 single-core 735, R23 single-core 1,750, and Passmark single-thread 3,631. These values indicate that the CPU is very responsive in daily tasks and games that rely on a few cores. The multi-core results are equally strong: Cinebench R15 multi-core 1,249, R20 multi-core 5,208, R23 multi-core 12,402, and Passmark multi-thread 23,304. The Passmark sub-tests further detail the CPU's capabilities: data compression scores 267,936, integer math 78,658, floating point 57,618, extended instructions 15,817, and random string sorting 29,570. These figures indicate a well-rounded processor for content creation, compilation, and data processing.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 30,548, placing it in the 82nd percentile. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (0.3% higher), Intel Core i9-11980HK (0.4% higher), AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (0.5% higher), and AMD Ryzen 7 7736U (0.6% higher). This means the i5-13600H is within 0.6% of these four competitors, indicating that it is a mid-tier mobile CPU that holds its own against more recent and higher-tier parts.

Upgrade Path and Platform — Socket, memory, PCIe, PSU headroom

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile package. As a result, the CPU is not upgradeable. The GPU is an IGP (integrated graphics) with a slot width of "IGP", meaning it is also soldered and non-upgradeable. Consequently, the entire system is a closed platform, and the only viable upgrade is to replace the entire laptop.

Memory support is flexible, with DDR4 and DDR5 both supported in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. This configuration allows for fast data transfer between the GPU and the rest of the system. The suggested PSU is not provided, but the CPU TDP of 45W and GPU TDP of 120W indicate that the laptop's power delivery is designed for these components. Since the CPU and GPU are both fixed, the sensible next upgrade is to move to a new laptop with a more modern platform. The GPU is already marked as end-of-life, meaning it is no longer in active production, so the platform is reaching the end of its upgrade cycle.

Benchmark Performance — CPU and GPU scores, percentiles, and combined picture

The CPU's key benchmark results are: Cinebench R23 multi-core 12,402 and single-core 1,750; Cinebench R20 multi-core 5,208 and single-core 735; Cinebench R15 multi-core 1,249 and single-core 176. PassMark scores include multi-thread 23,304 and single-thread 3,631. The CPU's average benchmark score is 30,548, with a percentile of 82.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score is 65,800, Vulkan score is 77,735, and its average benchmark score is 71,768. The GPU's percentile is 91. The combined percentile of the system is 87, which places it in the top 13% of all combinations in the database.

The GPU's nearest rivals are all desktop cards, with the RX 6650M being 0.5% slower than the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal, 0.8% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64, and 2.2% slower than the AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition. It is 1.3% faster than the RX 6600 LE. The CPU's rivals are within 0.6% of its score, showing that the CPU is in a tight cluster of similar mobile processors. The combined picture is of a laptop that is slightly stronger on the GPU side but has a CPU that is competitive with the latest mid-range mobile parts.

Gaming Performance — Estimated FPS and expectations

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination. Therefore, all frame-rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RX 6650M's 91st percentile ranking and 8.659 TFLOPS of FP32 compute suggest that it can deliver high frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings in many modern titles. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but 4K gaming may require reduced textures.

The CPU's single-thread score of 3,631 in PassMark ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p (e.g., 144Hz monitors), the system is likely to be capable, but the exact FPS will vary by title and the laptop's cooling solution. At 1440p, the GPU will be the primary driver, and performance is expected to be smooth for most games, though some demanding titles may require lowering settings to high instead of ultra. Since the data is estimated, users should expect performance in line with a high-end mobile GPU of the previous generation.

Who Should Build It — Target users and industries

This laptop combination is suited for gamers who play at 1080p and want a high-performance mobile solution. The GPU's 91st percentile and the CPU's 82nd percentile ensure a smooth gaming experience in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM is enough for 1080p ultra, and the CPU's single-thread strength handles the physics and AI.

For content creators, the CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads, along with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,402, make it a capable platform for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The GPU's FP32 performance also accelerates rendering tasks that use GPU compute.

Developers will benefit from the CPU's strong integer math (78,658) and data compression (267,506) scores, which are useful for compilation and code execution. Students and small business users will find the CPU responsive for productivity tasks, and the GPU can handle occasional photo editing or CAD work. The system is not ideal for 4K gaming due to the VRAM and GPU compute limits, but it is a solid choice for 1080p and 1440p.

FAQ

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i5-13600H?

A: The launch MSRP is $311.

Q: Does the FACT PACK contain any measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate expectations are estimates.

Q: How does the Radeon RX 6650M compare to the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal?

A: The RX 6650M is 0.5% slower than the TITAN X Pascal, based on the average benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's process node?

A: The Intel Core i5-13600H is built on a 10 nm process.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bus width?

A: The GPU uses a 128-bit memory bus with 8 GB of GDDR6.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this system?

A: The combined percentile is 87th, meaning it outperforms 87% of all systems in the database.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 28 RT cores, providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RX 6650M's 91st percentile and the CPU's single-core score of 3,631 (PassMark) suggest that the system can achieve high frame rates, often exceeding 60 FPS in demanding titles. For 144Hz displays, the GPU is capable, but the CPU may be the limiting factor in some games.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 23,304, provide ample headroom for streaming encoding while gaming. The GPU's FP32 compute can handle encoding offloads, though the lack of a dedicated encoder is a consideration.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,402 indicates fast preview and export times in video editing software. The GPU's Vulkan score of 77,735 accelerates effects and transitions.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-core performance and the GPU's 8.659 TFLOPS of FP32 make the system suitable for CPU-based and GPU-based rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for scenes that fit within the limit.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 78,658 and data compression score of 267,936 make it a fast platform for compiling code and handling large data sets.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,631 ensures snappy application performance, while the integrated Iris Xe graphics provide a fallback for tasks that do not require the discrete GPU.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600H

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — Socket, memory, PCIe, PSU headroom

Benchmark Performance — CPU and GPU scores, percentiles, and combined picture

Gaming Performance — Estimated FPS and expectations

Who Should Build It — Target users and industries

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds