SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + AMD Radeon RX 6550M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600H

30,548 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6550M

46,702 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600H is a mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake-H architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. It packs 12 cores and 16 threads, a configuration that combines performance cores with efficiency cores to balance heavy workloads against battery-conscious tasks. The base clock sits at 2.80 GHz, with a boost clock reaching 4.80 GHz, allowing the chip to scale up significantly when single-threaded performance is needed. This CPU belongs to the Core 13th Gen series, was released on January 3, 2023, and remains in active production. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving laptop OEMs flexibility in memory choice. It also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for CPU-attached devices, and integrates Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units for cases where the discrete GPU is not engaged.

The cache hierarchy is notable for a mobile part: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial L3 pool helps feed the 12 cores during multi-threaded operations, reducing reliance on slower memory accesses. The CPU's TDP is rated at 45 W, which positions it as a performance-oriented mobile processor rather than an ultra-low-power part. Benchmark results place this chip in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms a strong majority of processors currently tracked. Its average benchmark score is 30,548.

Looking at specific workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,402 and single-core score of 1,750 reveal a processor that excels in both parallel and lightly-threaded tasks. The multi-core figure is particularly strong, suggesting that content creation applications which utilize all 12 cores will see substantial throughput. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23,304 further confirms this, while the single-thread score of 3,631 indicates snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. Data compression performance is exceptional at 267,936 in PassMark, making this CPU well-suited for file archiving and backup workflows. Encryption performance is also solid at 16,061, which matters for VPN usage and secure file transfers.

The nearest rivals paint a picture of tight competition. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T scores 30,468, a mere 0.3% behind. The Intel Core i9-11980HK, a previous-generation flagship, scores 30,422, trailing by 0.4%. AMD's Ryzen 5 7640HS sits at 30,390, which is 0.5% behind, while the Ryzen 7 7736U scores 30,364, a 0.6% deficit. These margins are razor-thin, indicating that the i5-13600H is squarely in the middle of a competitive pack of mobile processors. The 82nd percentile ranking underscores that this CPU delivers performance that rivals much more expensive chips from just a generation ago.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for the Intel Core i5-13600H paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6550M is strong, with the system landing in the 84th combined percentile. The CPU's average benchmark score of 30,548 is complemented by the GPU's average score of 46,702, and together they form a capable laptop platform. The CPU's individual percentile of 82 places it above most processors, while the GPU's percentile of 85 is even more impressive, suggesting that the graphics component is the stronger half of this pairing relative to their respective markets.

The CPU delivers a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5,208 and a single-core score of 735. In the older R15 test, it scores 1,249 multi-core and 176 single-core. These numbers indicate consistent scaling across Cinebench versions, with the multi-core advantage being roughly seven times the single-core score in R20, reflecting the benefit of 12 cores and 16 threads. The PassMark suite shows a similar pattern: integer math at 78,658, floating-point math at 57,618, and extended instructions at 15,817. The physics score of 1,490 and prime number finding score of 87 are lower, but these are less representative of real-world productivity tasks.

The GPU's Geekbench scores are 42,536 for OpenCL and 50,867 for Vulkan. The higher Vulkan score suggests that the RDNA 2.0 architecture scales well with modern graphics APIs, which is relevant for gaming and compute workloads that leverage Vulkan. The gap between OpenCL and Vulkan — roughly 20% — indicates that the GPU benefits significantly from lower-level API access, which is common for AMD architectures.

Comparing the GPU to its nearest rivals, the AMD Radeon RX 5600M scores 46,601, just 0.2% behind the RX 6550M's 46,702. The Intel Arc A530M is similarly close at 46,614, also 0.2% behind. NVIDIA's RTX A2000 scores 46,043, trailing by 1.4%, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45,972, a 1.6% deficit. These small deltas suggest that the RX 6550M sits at the top of a tightly clustered group of mid-range mobile GPUs. The 85th percentile ranking for the GPU further emphasizes that this is a well-above-average graphics solution for laptops.

The combined picture is one of balance: the CPU is slightly above average among all processors, and the GPU is even more strongly positioned. This suggests that the system as a whole is well-matched, with neither component dramatically outpacing the other in terms of relative market position. The data indicates a laptop that can handle demanding workloads without a significant bottleneck on either side.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-13600H's position among all CPUs?

A: The i5-13600H ranks in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30,548. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, scores 30,468, just 0.3% behind.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 6550M compare to similar GPUs?

A: The RX 6550M is in the 85th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 46,702. It edges out the AMD Radeon RX 5600M and Intel Arc A530M by 0.2%, and leads the NVIDIA RTX A2000 by 1.4%.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-13600H with the AMD Radeon RX 6550M is 84, indicating that this laptop configuration outperforms 84% of all tracked systems.

Q: What memory types does the i5-13600H support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This gives laptop manufacturers flexibility to use either memory standard depending on cost and performance targets.

Q: What is the TDP of the i5-13600H and the RX 6550M?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 80 W. Combined, this suggests a cooling solution capable of handling roughly 125 W of sustained thermal output.

Q: Does the RX 6550M support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU features 16 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes DirectX Raytracing. The GPU also supports Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the i5-13600H?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-13600H is $311. The GPU has no listed launch MSRP in the data.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 6550M's 85th percentile ranking and its Vulkan score of 50,867 indicate strong graphics throughput for competitive titles. The CPU's single-core score of 3,631 in PassMark ensures that game logic and physics calculations keep pace with the GPU. The 4 GB VRAM may limit texture quality at higher resolutions, but for 1080p competitive gaming, this pairing should deliver high frame rates.

Streaming: The i5-13600H's 12 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23,304 suggests that the CPU can handle both game rendering and stream encoding without significant frame drops, though dedicated encoding hardware on the GPU may offer better efficiency.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,402 indicates strong performance in rendering timelines and exporting video. The GPU's OpenCL score of 42,536 can accelerate effects and color grading. The 18 MB of L3 cache helps keep large media files flowing through the CPU.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5,208 and the GPU's 5.816 TFLOPS FP32 performance combine for respectable rendering throughput. The 16 ray tracing cores on the GPU support hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible renderers, though the 4 GB VRAM may be limiting for complex scenes.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 267,936 accelerates build times for large codebases, while the encryption score of 16,061 supports secure development workflows. The single-thread score of 3,631 ensures fast compilation of individual files and responsive IDE interactions.

Student and office work: With a 45 W CPU TDP and an 80 W GPU TDP, this laptop will require a power adapter, but the performance is overkill for typical office tasks. The i5-13600H's integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units can handle basic display output when the discrete GPU is idle, potentially saving battery life.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU when compared to their respective markets. The GPU sits at the 85th percentile while the CPU is at the 82nd, a modest difference that suggests the GPU is slightly less likely to be the limiting factor. In gaming workloads, the GPU will typically be the bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU may become the constraint at lower resolutions where frame rates are very high.

The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 144.0 GB/s memory bandwidth could become a bottleneck in memory-intensive games or at higher texture settings. The 64-bit memory bus is narrow, which limits bandwidth compared to wider-bus GPUs, even if the effective speed is 18 Gbps. This means that at 1080p with high texture quality, the GPU may run out of VRAM before it runs out of compute throughput.

The CPU's 45 W TDP and 12 cores provide a solid foundation, but the single-thread performance, while good, is not top-tier. In games that are heavily single-threaded, the CPU may limit frame rates. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,631 is respectable but not exceptional, so esports titles at very high frame rates may be CPU-bound.

The combined 84th percentile suggests that for most workloads, this pairing is well balanced. The bottleneck will shift depending on the specific application: GPU-bound in 3D rendering and high-resolution gaming, CPU-bound in physics simulations and data compression tasks. The lack of measured FPS data means these observations are inferred from benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need strong performance in both CPU and GPU workloads without stepping into the highest tiers of mobile hardware. Gamers playing at 1080p will find the RX 6550M's 85th percentile ranking sufficient for high settings in most titles, though the 4 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in the latest AAA games. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core strength, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,402, and the GPU's compute capabilities.

Software developers will appreciate the data compression and encryption scores, which speed up build and deployment processes. The 12 cores handle parallel compilation well, and the single-thread performance keeps interactive tools responsive. Students and small business users who occasionally engage in creative work will find this system more than capable, though the power requirements of the 45 W CPU and 80 W GPU mean battery life will be shorter than ultraportable alternatives.

The 84th combined percentile indicates that this laptop sits in the upper tier of mobile computing performance. It is a suitable choice for users who want a single device that can handle gaming, content creation, and productivity without notable compromises. The active production status of both components suggests ongoing availability and driver support.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 85th percentile ranking and Vulkan score of 50,867 suggest strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan game performance. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,631 indicates it can keep feeding the GPU in most scenarios.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the high single-thread performance and the GPU's 2,840 MHz boost clock should deliver frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. The 5.816 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is ample for these lighter workloads. At 1440p, frame rates would drop but likely remain above 100 FPS in less demanding competitive titles.

For AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, the 4 GB VRAM and 144.0 GB/s bandwidth may become limiting. Games that require more than 4 GB of VRAM at ultra textures could see stuttering or texture pop-in. The GPU's 16 ray tracing cores can handle some ray-traced effects at 1080p, but the 5.816 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests that heavy ray tracing will require reduced settings or lower resolutions.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle with ultra settings in demanding titles, likely requiring medium to high settings for playable frame rates. The 90.88 GPixel/s pixel rate and 181.8 GTexel/s texture rate provide a baseline for fill-rate-bound scenarios. The 4 GB VRAM is the primary concern at this resolution, as even medium texture settings in modern games can approach or exceed this limit.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13600H processor with the AMD Radeon RX 6550M discrete GPU. The system sits at the 84th combined percentile, meaning it outperforms 84% of all tracked laptop configurations. The CPU, with 12 cores and 16 threads, provides strong multi-threaded performance, while the GPU's 85th percentile ranking places it above most mobile graphics solutions.

The build class is explicitly laptop, meaning the components are soldered or otherwise non-upgradeable in most cases. The CPU's 45 W TDP and the GPU's 80 W TDP combine for a total thermal envelope of approximately 125 W, which requires a robust cooling solution in the laptop chassis. The system supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory, and the CPU integrates Iris Xe Graphics for power-saving modes.

This pairing represents a mid-to-upper tier mobile configuration, suitable for users who need more than integrated graphics but do not require the highest-end mobile workstation or gaming laptop components. The combined percentile of 84 indicates that this laptop will handle demanding applications with ease, though it is not at the very top of the performance spectrum.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6550M is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 24 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 6 nm process node. The chip contains 5,400 million transistors on a 107 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 50.5 million per square millimeter. This compact design allows for a 80 W TDP, making it suitable for thinner laptops while still delivering discrete-level graphics performance.

The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, delivering 144.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory runs at 2,250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is modest by modern standards, and the 64-bit bus is a limiting factor for memory-intensive workloads. The 4 GB capacity may also constrain texture-heavy games at higher resolutions or with ultra-quality settings.

Compute resources include 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The GPU also includes 16 ray tracing cores, providing hardware acceleration for DirectX Raytracing. Clock speeds are aggressive for a mobile part: a base clock of 2,000 MHz, a game clock of 2,560 MHz, and a boost clock of 2,840 MHz. These high clocks help compensate for the relatively low core count.

The GPU's pixel rate is 90.88 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 181.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 5.816 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 11.63 TFLOPS through 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 42,536 and Vulkan score of 50,867 indicate that the GPU performs better with modern APIs, which aligns with the RDNA 2.0 architecture's design priorities.

In the 85th percentile among all GPUs, the RX 6550M outperforms its nearest rivals by narrow margins: 0.2% over the Intel Arc A530M and AMD Radeon RX 5600M, 1.4% over the NVIDIA RTX A2000, and 1.6% over the RTX 5880 Ada Generation. This suggests that the GPU is competitive with a range of mid-range mobile and workstation GPUs, though the 4 GB VRAM limits its suitability for the most demanding workloads.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; any CPU upgrade would require replacing the entire motherboard or laptop. The system supports DDR4 or DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and the memory is likely upgradeable in the laptop, though this depends on the specific chassis design.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for CPU-attached devices, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x4 interface. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x4 connection is narrower than the typical x8 or x16, which could limit performance in some scenarios, though the impact is generally minimal for gaming workloads. The system's memory bandwidth is not specified in the data, but dual-channel DDR5 support would provide ample bandwidth for both CPU and GPU operations.

The GPU has a TDP of 80 W and no power connectors listed, indicating it draws power directly from the motherboard. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and the suggested PSU field is null, meaning no specific power supply recommendation is provided. In a laptop context, the power delivery is handled by the OEM's design, and there is no user upgrade path for the power supply.

For a sensible next upgrade, the primary options are increasing memory capacity or swapping the storage drive, assuming the laptop allows access to these components. The CPU and GPU are fixed, so performance upgrades would require a new laptop. The active production status of both components suggests that driver support and software optimization will continue, but hardware improvements would necessitate a platform change. The 84th combined percentile indicates that this system remains competitive, but users seeking significantly higher performance would need to move to a higher-tier laptop configuration.