SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600H

30,548 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a mobile integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node. The chip, codenamed Strix Halo, belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and carries a die size of 308 mm². Its compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, producing a pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s. Peak floating-point performance is rated at 11.47 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio).

Memory architecture is entirely system-shared, meaning the GPU draws from the host system's RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," which indicates that the effective memory performance will vary based on the laptop's installed DDR4 or DDR5 configuration. Because there is no dedicated VRAM pool, the GPU's memory throughput is constrained by the CPU's dual-channel memory bus and the specific memory speed the laptop manufacturer implements. This is a notable departure from discrete GPUs with fixed VRAM capacities and bandwidth figures.

For ray tracing, the Radeon 8050S includes 32 RT cores, which are dedicated hardware units for accelerating ray-intersection calculations. The GPU does not list tensor cores, but it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is compliant with modern graphics API features including hardware-accelerated ray tracing and variable-rate shading where the API mandates them. The absence of tensor cores suggests that AI-accelerated workloads such as DLSS-style upscaling are not hardware-accelerated on this GPU, though the 11.47 TFLOPS of FP16 throughput can still handle general compute tasks.

Benchmark results for the Radeon 8050S show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 58398. The average benchmark score across these tests is 62108, placing the GPU in the 89th percentile of all GPUs tracked. This is a high percentile ranking, indicating that the GPU outperforms the vast majority of tested graphics hardware. Relative to its nearest rivals, the Radeon 8050S is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (average score 61896), 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (average score 63693), 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (average score 63775), and 2.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (average score 63830). These deltas are small, placing the 8050S in a tightly contested performance band where differences of a few percent separate competitors.

For rendering workloads, the 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is the key figure. This level of raw throughput, combined with 32 RT cores, indicates that the GPU can handle real-time 3D rendering and moderate ray-traced effects, but the system-shared memory will bottleneck scenes that require large texture buffers or high-resolution geometry. The 89th percentile ranking suggests that the GPU is well above average for integrated graphics and competes with entry-level discrete GPUs, making it suitable for light-to-moderate 3D rendering tasks in laptop form factors.

# Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU and GPU in this pairing occupy different performance tiers. The Intel Core i5-13600H sits in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 30548, while the AMD Radeon 8050S sits in the 89th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 62108. The combined percentile for this pairing is 86, which indicates that the GPU is the higher-performing component relative to its own comparison pool. This gap suggests that in most gaming and graphics-heavy workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as it is the component with the lower relative headroom within its peer group.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance position. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (average score 30468) is 0.3% behind, the Intel Core i9-11980HK (average score 30422) is 0.4% behind, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (average score 30390) is 0.5% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7736U (average score 30364) is 0.6% behind. These extremely small deltas (all under 1%) indicate that the i5-13600H is clustered tightly with several other mobile CPUs, meaning that CPU-bound tasks will not see dramatic differences between these processors.

In CPU-bound workloads — such as physics calculations, data compression, and single-threaded applications — the i5-13600H's Passmark physics score of 1490 and single-thread score of 3631 will dictate performance. In GPU-bound workloads — such as high-resolution gaming with ultra settings — the Radeon 8050S will be the constraint, since its memory bandwidth is system-dependent and its FP32 throughput is fixed at 11.47 TFLOPS. The balance is therefore workload-dependent: the CPU can feed the GPU adequately for most tasks, but the GPU's shared-memory architecture will cap frame rates in graphically intensive scenarios.

The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that scaling cannot be quantified directly. However, the percentile disparity (82nd CPU vs. 89th GPU) suggests that for gaming, the GPU will typically be the bottleneck at higher resolutions where pixel throughput dominates, while at lower resolutions or in CPU-limited esports titles, the CPU's 12 cores and 4.80 GHz boost clock can become the limiting factor. For productivity workloads like video encoding or compilation, the CPU is the primary engine, and its 82nd percentile ranking indicates it will handle these tasks competently without the GPU becoming a constraint.

# CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13600H is a Raptor Lake-H mobile processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features 12 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though it does not support ECC memory. The CPU is socketed on Intel BGA 1744 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are handled by Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units. The part number is SRMHZ, and it was released on January 3, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $311. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is not supported.

Benchmark scores for the i5-13600H show a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1249 and a single-core score of 176. Cinebench R20 results are 5208 multicore and 735 single-core. Cinebench R23 results are 12402 multicore and 1750 single-core. Passmark tests reveal a multithread score of 23304, single-thread score of 3631, integer math score of 78658, floating-point math score of 57618, data compression score of 267936, data encryption score of 16061, extended instructions score of 15817, physics score of 1490, random string sorting score of 29570, and find prime numbers score of 87. The average benchmark score is 30548, placing the CPU in the 82nd percentile.

These scores translate to real-world performance as follows. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12402 indicates strong multi-threaded rendering capability for a mobile CPU, suitable for video editing, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The single-core score of 1750 in the same test shows solid per-thread performance for legacy or lightly threaded applications. The Passmark data compression score of 267936 is particularly high, suggesting excellent performance in file archiving and compression workloads. Data encryption at 16061 indicates capable AES and similar cryptographic operations. The floating-point math score of 57618 and integer math score of 78658 both point to robust general-purpose compute for scientific and financial applications. The physics score of 1490 is moderate, reflecting the CPU's ability to handle game physics calculations without being a top-tier performer in that specific area.

The i5-13600H sits within 0.6% of its nearest rivals (Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, Intel Core i9-11980HK, AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7736U), meaning that for most workloads, users will not perceive meaningful differences between this CPU and those alternatives. The 82nd percentile ranking across all CPUs indicates that this processor outperforms 82% of tracked CPUs, making it a strong mid-to-high-range mobile option for productivity and gaming alike.

# Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This laptop-class pairing is targeted at users who need a balanced mobile platform with strong CPU and GPU performance. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 89th percentile ranking mean that this system sits above average in both dimensions, making it suitable for a range of demanding applications.

Gamers who play at 1080p with high settings will find the Radeon 8050S's 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 32 RT cores capable of handling modern titles, though the system-shared memory may limit texture-heavy scenes. The CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and 16 threads ensure that frame pacing remains stable in CPU-bound game logic. For 1440p gaming, the GPU's performance is adequate for medium-to-high settings, but the lack of dedicated VRAM and system-dependent bandwidth will cap ultra settings in many titles.

Content creators — specifically video editors and 3D artists — will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12402 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 65818. These numbers indicate that video encoding, rendering, and effects processing are viable on this platform, though long 4K renders will be slower than on higher-tier desktop parts. The 18 MB of L3 cache and 16 threads help with timeline scrubbing and preview generation.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's Passmark integer math score of 78658 and data compression score of 267936, which accelerate code compilation, unit testing, and package management. The 16 threads allow parallel build systems to operate efficiently, and the 82nd percentile ranking ensures that most development workloads will not feel sluggish.

Students and small business users who run office applications, web browsing, and light multitasking will find this system overqualified. The single-thread score of 3631 in Passmark ensures snappy application launches, while the 12 cores provide headroom for background tasks like antivirus scans or system backups without impacting foreground work.

# Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i5-13600H achieves an average benchmark score of 30548, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225T (30468, 0.3% slower), Intel Core i9-11980HK (30422, 0.4% slower), AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS (30390, 0.5% slower), and AMD Ryzen 7 7736U (30364, 0.6% slower). This clustering means the i5-13600H is effectively at parity with these alternatives, with differences well within noise margins.

The AMD Radeon 8050S achieves an average benchmark score of 62108, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61896, 0.3% slower), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63693, 2.5% faster), AMD Radeon RX 7600M (63775, 2.6% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63830, 2.7% faster). The GPU is therefore at the lower edge of a performance band where the top competitor is less than 3% faster.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 86, which reflects a system that is well above average in both processor and graphics performance. The GPU's percentile (89) is higher than the CPU's (82), indicating that the graphics component is relatively stronger within its own comparison pool. This combined picture suggests a balanced system with a slight lean toward graphics capability, making it suitable for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads while still delivering strong CPU performance for productivity.

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, and therefore all frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

# Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There are no measured FPS figures available for this CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

The Radeon 8050S's Geekbench Vulkan score of 58398 and OpenCL score of 65818 indicate that the GPU can handle DirectX 12 Ultimate titles with hardware-accelerated ray tracing enabled. At 1080p with high settings, the 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should deliver playable frame rates in most modern games, though the system-shared memory will limit performance in titles that require large texture caches or high-resolution assets. At 1440p, frame rates will drop, and ultra settings may be unattainable in demanding titles. The 32 RT cores provide ray-traced effects capability, but the shared memory will constrain the complexity of ray-traced scenes.

The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1750 and Passmark single-thread score of 3631 indicate that the i5-13600H can keep up with GPU demands in most gaming scenarios. The 16 threads and 4.80 GHz boost clock ensure that game logic, physics, and AI calculations do not become the bottleneck in typical gaming sessions. For esports titles such as competitive shooters or MOBAs, the CPU is strong enough to drive high frame rates, though the GPU's shared memory will still cap performance at higher settings.

In summary, gaming performance is expected to be solid for 1080p high-refresh gaming, adequate for 1440p medium-to-high settings, and limited by the shared memory architecture at 4K or with ultra settings in graphically intensive titles. These are estimates, not measured values.

# Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute support 1080p gaming at high refresh rates, though the system-shared memory will limit ultra settings. The CPU's 4.80 GHz boost clock and 16 threads ensure frame pacing stability, making this a viable platform for 144Hz displays at 1080p in competitive titles.

Streaming: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12402 provides enough headroom to encode video while gaming, and the 18 MB of L3 cache helps maintain low latency. The GPU's Vulkan score of 58398 indicates that GPU-accelerated encoding is possible, though the shared memory may introduce additional latency in simultaneous workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's Passmark multithread score of 23304 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 65818 combine to accelerate timeline rendering and effects. The 16 threads handle multi-track timelines, while the GPU's 32 RT cores assist with real-time previews of effects that use ray tracing.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12402 handles CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerates GPU-based renderers. The 32 RT cores enable ray-traced rendering in supported applications, though the system-shared memory will cap texture sizes and scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 78658 and data compression score of 267936 accelerate compilation and build processes. The 16 threads allow parallel builds, and the 82nd percentile CPU ranking ensures that most development tools run without noticeable delays.

Student and office work: The CPU's Passmark single-thread score of 3631 ensures responsive application launches, while the 12 cores handle multitasking across office suites, browsers, and communication tools. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but its presence does not detract from the system's usability in these workloads.

# Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This pairing combines the Intel Core i5-13600H, a mobile Raptor Lake-H processor, with the AMD Radeon 8050S, a mobile integrated GPU based on RDNA 3.5. The build class is laptop, indicating that this is a mobile platform designed for portable use. The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread part with a 45 W TDP, and the GPU is an integrated solution with a 55 W TDP, meaning the combined thermal envelope is modest for a laptop.

The overall tier of this pairing is high-mid-range. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 89th percentile place both components above the majority of their peers, and the combined percentile of 86 reinforces this assessment. This is not a flagship configuration, but it is a well-above-average mobile platform that can handle demanding productivity, gaming, and creative workloads without being the fastest option available.

The CPU's nearest rivals (Intel Core Ultra 5 225T, Intel Core i9-11980HK, AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS, AMD Ryzen 7 7736U) are all within 0.6% in average score, indicating that this CPU is competitively positioned in its segment. The GPU's nearest rivals (AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, AMD Radeon RX 7600M, AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP) are within 2.7%, showing that the Radeon 8050S is at the lower edge of its immediate performance band.

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-13600H's core and thread count?

A: The CPU has 12 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: What architecture is the AMD Radeon 8050S based on?

A: The GPU is based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with a chip codenamed Strix Halo.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon 8050S have?

A: The GPU has no dedicated VRAM; its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system-shared and system-dependent, meaning they rely on the host laptop's RAM.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 12402, and the single-core score is 1750.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The Geekbench OpenCL score is 65818, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 58398.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile socket, confirming this is a laptop-class processor.

# Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i5-13600H is soldered to the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile platform socket. This means the CPU is not user-upgradeable in the traditional sense; the entire laptop would need to be replaced to change the processor. The socket supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes from the CPU, which provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage devices. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, meaning a laptop with this CPU can be configured with either memory generation depending on the motherboard design.

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU (IGP) with a slot width of "IGP" and no power connectors. Its TDP is 55 W, and the CPU's TDP is 45 W, giving a combined thermal design power of 100 W for the core components. The suggested PSU field is null, meaning there is no specific power supply recommendation for this integrated configuration. Since this is a laptop, the PSU is a fixed internal component, and there is no upgrade path for the power supply. The GPU's memory is system-shared, so increasing the laptop's RAM capacity or speed will directly improve GPU memory bandwidth, subject to the dual-channel memory bus limit.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform is increasing the system RAM to the maximum supported capacity and speed, since the GPU's performance is directly tied to system memory bandwidth. For the CPU, there is no upgrade path because of the BGA socket. For the GPU, there is no discrete upgrade option because it is integrated. The only meaningful hardware upgrade is therefore memory, which will benefit both the CPU's dual-channel memory bandwidth and the GPU's system-shared memory pool. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives are also possible, leveraging the 8 CPU lanes for high-throughput storage.