SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

77,712 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines Intel’s 14-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with NVIDIA’s flagship Blackwell 2.0 GPU, creating a system that sits at the 90th percentile overall. The CPU and GPU are both high-end parts individually, but the data reveals a significant performance imbalance: the RTX 5090 D is a top-tier compute monster, while the Core i5-13600 is a solid mid-range workhorse. Benchmark results indicate this is a system where the GPU will heavily dictate gaming and rendering outcomes, with the CPU acting as a capable but not equal partner.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the Intel Core i5-13600?

A: The CPU features 14 cores and 20 threads, based on Intel’s Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5090 D have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU is equipped with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this desktop build?

A: The system holds a combined percentile of 90, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of all tracked desktop configurations.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the Core i5-13600 does not support manual overclocking.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and the GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a much higher 575 W TDP, necessitating a robust cooling solution and a suggested 950 W power supply.

Q: What API support does the GPU offer?

A: The RTX 5090 D supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this specific pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from component benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a tale of two very different performers. The Intel Core i5-13600 achieves an average benchmark score of 44,240, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, scores 44,309, a negligible delta of -0.2%, meaning the i5-13600 is effectively on par with that chip. It also trades blows with the Intel Core i9-13950HX, which is only 0.2% faster, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, which leads by 0.5%. The most significant gap is against the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, which is 0.7% ahead. This tight grouping shows the i5-13600 is a competitive mid-range CPU, but it is not a class leader.

In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a behemoth. Its average benchmark score of 77,712 places it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. However, the nearest rivals are surprising: the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT is 1.1% slower, the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is 1.6% faster, and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 variants are 2.1% and 2.4% faster, respectively. This suggests that while the 5090 D is in the top 8% of all GPUs, its raw benchmark average is closely matched by some mobile and data-center parts, though its specific workload characteristics (like its 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 rate) are entirely different.

The combined picture is clear: this build is defined by the GPU. The CPU’s 88th percentile is strong, but the GPU’s 92nd percentile is exceptional. In CPU-bound tasks like data compression (383,972 in Passmark) or integer math (111,044), the i5-13600 performs admirably. Yet, the GPU’s compute score of 28,396 in Passmark and its 14326 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 demonstrate a level of graphical and compute power that dwarfs the CPU’s contribution. The system’s 90th combined percentile is lifted by the GPU, while the CPU keeps it from being a top-5% monster.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK explicitly states there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures here are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the components, not empirical results. The data is not measured, so treat the following as a projection.

Given the RTX 5090 D’s 92nd percentile GPU score and its 32 GB of VRAM, this system is expected to deliver extremely high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The GPU’s raw rasterization power, indicated by its 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, suggests it will crush modern titles at maximum settings. For esports titles, the CPU’s single-core performance of 3,758 in Cinebench R23 and 4,049 in Passmark indicates it can feed the GPU enough data to push well beyond 200 FPS at 1080p, though the exact number is unknown.

However, the imbalance becomes apparent at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely to become a limiting factor, potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU could theoretically achieve. At 4K, the burden shifts entirely to the GPU, and the 5090 D’s massive memory bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s will shine. Expect high-refresh 4K gaming to be this system’s primary strength, with 1440p also being exceptionally strong. The lack of measured data means we cannot provide specific FPS numbers, but the component scores suggest a top-tier gaming experience for high-resolution, high-detail gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck hierarchy. The CPU, while in the 88th percentile, is far outclassed by the GPU in the 92nd percentile. This is not a balanced pairing; the RTX 5090 D is a halo product, while the i5-13600 is a mainstream part. In gaming, this means the GPU will be waiting on the CPU in many scenarios.

Evidence from benchmark scores supports this. The CPU’s multi-core score of 26,620 in Cinebench R23 is strong, but its Passmark single-thread score of 4,049 is not exceptional. When generating frames at high rates, the CPU’s ability to process game logic and draw calls becomes the bottleneck. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 14,326 shows it can render frames faster than the CPU can likely feed it. In GPU-bound workloads like 4K rendering or ray tracing, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU, but even then, the CPU’s lower relative performance means it may not be able to maximize the GPU’s potential in physics-heavy scenes.

The FPS scaling is expected to be uneven. At 1080p, the CPU limits performance, so the GPU’s extra power is wasted. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and the system’s performance scales more predictably with the GPU’s capabilities. This is a common issue with pairing a mid-range CPU with a flagship GPU; the GPU is the star, but the CPU is the supporting actor that can’t quite keep up with the lead’s demands.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is a data-center-adjacent behemoth repurposed for desktop use. It is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process from TSMC, packing 92,200 million transistors into a 750 mm² die. This is an enormous chip, and its specifications reflect that. It features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 1.79 TB/s. The memory clock is rated at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective), and the GPU core runs at a base of 2017 MHz with a boost of 2407 MHz.

The compute resources are staggering. It has 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. For ray tracing, it includes 170 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 680 tensor cores. The raw throughput numbers are headline-grabbing: 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s. This is a rendering monster.

In benchmark terms, its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,915 confirm its dominance. Its Passmark G3D score of 44,065 is strong, though its compute score of 28,396 is lower than expected relative to its TFLOPS, suggesting driver or workload-specific quirks. For rendering, the 32 GB VRAM is a decisive factor, allowing for massive scenes and high-resolution textures without hitting memory limits. The RT and tensor cores make it a top choice for ray-traced workloads and AI-assisted tasks like DLSS.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize GPU compute and high-resolution rendering above all else. The target audience is not the average gamer, but rather a niche group of enthusiasts and professionals.

4K Gamers: Those with high-refresh 4K monitors will benefit most. The GPU’s 92nd percentile and 32 GB VRAM are perfect for maxed-out settings and future titles.
Content Creators: Video editors using GPU-accelerated effects or 3D artists rendering in Blender or similar software will see massive gains from the 5090 D’s compute power.
AI Developers: The 680 tensor cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance make this a viable workstation for local inference and model training.
Small Business Workstations: For tasks like CAD, architectural visualization, or heavy data analysis, the GPU’s parallel processing capabilities are unmatched, though the CPU may be a limiting factor for single-threaded tasks.
Not for Budget Builders: The GPU is a premium component, and pairing it with a mid-range CPU is a specific choice. This is for someone who needs max GPU power and is willing to accept CPU limitations.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5090 D is expected to dominate at 1440p and 4K, delivering frame rates that are likely to saturate most high-refresh monitors. The CPU’s single-core performance is adequate, but the GPU is the clear driver of this experience.

Streaming: The GPU’s NVENC encoder (implied by its modern architecture) offloads video encoding from the CPU, allowing for smooth streaming at high bitrates. The CPU’s 14 cores handle the game and streaming software, though the lower CPU percentile relative to the GPU may cause slight dips in CPU-heavy titles.

Video Editing: The 32 GB VRAM and high compute scores accelerate timeline rendering and effect application. The CPU’s 26,620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score is sufficient for 4K editing, but the GPU will handle the heavy lifting for color grading and exports.

3D Rendering: This is where the system excels. The GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 170 RT cores will render complex scenes in a fraction of the time compared to CPU-only rendering. The 32 GB VRAM allows for massive scenes that would otherwise fail to load.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 31,725. However, the GPU’s compute power is useful for parallel workloads, but for general coding, the CPU is the workhorse and may feel slow compared to the GPU’s dominance.

Student and Office Work: This is severe overkill for document editing and web browsing. The system’s performance is wasted on such tasks, and the high TDP of the GPU (575 W) means it will consume significant power even at idle if not properly managed. The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 is sufficient for these tasks, making the discrete GPU unnecessary.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) that pairs the Intel Core i5-13600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D. The system holds a combined percentile of 90, placing it in the top 10% of all tracked configurations. The overall tier is high-end, driven almost entirely by the GPU’s 92nd percentile ranking. The CPU, at the 88th percentile, is a solid mid-range part that does not match the GPU’s flagship status. This is a lopsided build, optimized for GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming and 3D rendering, rather than a balanced all-rounder. The data shows a machine that is more capable than its CPU suggests, but the CPU prevents it from being a true top-tier powerhouse in all scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename), manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus and includes ECC memory support. The CPU is built on the Intel Socket 1700 platform and has a launch MSRP of $255.

Benchmark results show a capable mid-range chip. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,620 and single-core score of 3,758 are solid, placing it in the 88th percentile. The Passmark results are varied: data compression at 383,972, integer math at 111,044, and floating-point math at 81,892. The single-thread score of 4,049 indicates good responsiveness in everyday tasks. However, its nearest rivals are all within 0.7%, showing it’s not a standout performer but rather a competitive option.

For real workloads, this CPU is a good fit for gaming and productivity. The 14 cores handle multi-tasking well, and the boost clock of 5.00 GHz provides snappy single-thread performance. It is not a top-tier CPU, as indicated by its 88th percentile, and it will bottleneck a GPU like the RTX 5090 D in CPU-bound scenarios. The lack of an unlocked multiplier limits overclocking, so its performance is fixed. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a bonus for basic display output, but it is not meant for gaming. Overall, the i5-13600 is a strong value-oriented CPU, but in this build, it is the weaker link.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds