SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

17,208 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pairing represents a desktop configuration designed to deliver a balanced blend of high-core-count processing and dedicated ray-tracing capable graphics. With the CPU sitting at the 88th percentile among all processors and the GPU at the 61st percentile, this build targets users who need strong multi-threaded performance for productivity without sacrificing the hardware features required for modern gaming. The following analysis draws exclusively from benchmark data to explore where this combination excels and where its limitations lie.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system is a strong contender, though not an elite one. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3758 and Passmark single-thread score of 4049 indicate excellent responsiveness for game logic and frame pacing. The RTX 3070, with a Passmark G3D score of 22214, is positioned at the 61st percentile, suggesting it can drive frame rates well above 60 FPS at 1440p in most titles, though the absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient headroom for high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p experiences, but the 61st percentile ranking implies it is not a top-tier 4K performer.

Streaming and content creation benefit significantly from the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 places this processor at the 88th percentile, and its Passmark multi-thread score of 31725 confirms robust parallel processing. This means encoding video while gaming, running OBS, and handling chat applications simultaneously will not strain the system. The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 can serve as a secondary encoding option, though the dedicated RTX 3070 with its tensor cores is better suited for NVENC-based streaming workloads.

Video editing workflows will find this configuration highly capable. The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 111044 and floating-point math score of 81892 indicate strong number-crunching abilities for timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks. The GPU’s 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerates effects like color grading and motion graphics in compatible software. The combination of 24 MB of shared L3 cache on the CPU and the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth ensures smooth handling of 4K video timelines, though 8 GB of VRAM may limit complex multi-layer compositions.

3D rendering and CAD work are where this build shows its strengths. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 11180 and R15 multi-core score of 2683 demonstrate excellent performance for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU’s 5888 shading units and 184 tensor cores provide substantial compute for GPU-accelerated renders, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 11195. The 46 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing in DCC applications, making this a viable workstation for architectural visualization or product design, though the 8 GB VRAM is a constraint for very large scenes.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high thread count and fast single-core speed. The Passmark data compression score of 383972 and data encryption score of 22182 show strong performance for build pipelines, code compilation, and cryptographic operations. The 20 threads handle parallel compilation tasks efficiently, while the single-core score of 4049 ensures snappy IDE responsiveness. The CPU’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives developers flexibility in choosing memory configurations that match their budget and performance needs.

Student and office work is almost overkill for this hardware. The CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 4049 and the GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1001 ensure smooth desktop navigation, spreadsheet calculations, and document processing. The 14 cores provide headroom for running virtual machines or data analysis tools like Python with large datasets. However, the 65 W TDP of the CPU and 220 W TDP of the GPU mean this system consumes more power than necessary for basic tasks, making it more suited to power users who occasionally run demanding applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44240, placing it at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show remarkable parity: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573 (0.7% higher). This indicates the i5-13600 is essentially tied with these competitors, with differences well within noise margins. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and single-core score of 3758 provide the headline numbers, showing a 7.1x ratio between multi and single-core performance, which is typical for a hybrid architecture.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17208, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT with a score of 17083 (0.7% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 at 17037 (1% lower), and the AMD Radeon HD 7970M at 17019 (1.1% lower). The NVIDIA Tesla K40c scores 17468 (1.5% higher). These close margins suggest the RTX 3070 is positioned in a crowded mid-range segment. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 highlight its DirectX 12 and compute capabilities, while the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 85 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 182, suggesting driver overhead or architectural differences in older API tests.

The combined percentile for this build is 75, reflecting that the CPU is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative terms. The CPU’s 88th percentile versus the GPU’s 61st percentile creates an imbalance where the processor can outpace the graphics card in many workloads. The data shows the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is solidly mid-range, meaning the overall system performance is constrained by the GPU in graphics-intensive tasks.

FAQ

Q: How does the Core i5-13600 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The i5-13600 has an average benchmark score of 44240, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen AI Max 385’s 44309. This difference is negligible, indicating virtually identical overall performance.

Q: What is the significance of the RTX 3070’s 61st percentile ranking?

A: The 61st percentile means the GPU performs better than 61% of all GPUs in the database. This places it in the upper-mid-range tier, capable of 1440p gaming but not top-tier 4K performance.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false), so the CPU cannot be overclocked. Users must rely on factory boost clocks up to 5.00 GHz.

Q: What memory types are supported by this CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor.

Q: How does the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score compare to its DirectX 11 score?

A: The DirectX 12 score is 85, while the DirectX 11 score is 182. The lower DirectX 12 score may reflect the test’s specific workload rather than real-world gaming performance, as the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 220 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so a 550 W PSU provides adequate headroom for the entire system.

Q: Is this a laptop or desktop build?

A: This is a desktop build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 and the GPU is a dual-slot card.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 61st percentile means the processor is capable of feeding far more frames than the graphics card can render. In gaming workloads, the RTX 3070 will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 22214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3162 indicate it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming well, but the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 suggests it could support a much more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, data compression, and software compilation, the balance reverses. The CPU’s Passmark multi-thread score of 31725 and data compression score of 383972 demonstrate exceptional parallel performance, while the GPU’s compute score of 11195 is comparatively modest. For 3D rendering, the workload determines the bottleneck: CPU-based renderers will be limited by the processor, while GPU-based renderers will be limited by the 8 GB VRAM and the GPU’s 61st percentile standing.

The FPS scaling picture, based on benchmark scores, suggests that at 1080p the CPU will often be the limiting factor in esports titles, while at 1440p and 4K the GPU becomes the primary constraint. The CPU’s single-core score of 4049 in Passmark and 3758 in Cinebench R23 indicates it can push high frame rates in lightly-threaded games, but the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s and 8 GB capacity will cap performance in graphically demanding titles. This system is best balanced for 1440p gaming, where the CPU’s headroom and the GPU’s mid-range capabilities align most closely.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This gives users flexibility in choosing memory, though the platform is tied to 13th Gen Core processors. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, offering future-proofing for high-speed SSDs and GPUs, though the RTX 3070 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The motherboard must be chosen to match the DDR4 or DDR5 memory type, and ECC memory support is a unique feature for this class of processor.

The GPU has a TDP of 220 W and requires a 550 W PSU, as suggested. It uses a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 242 mm in length. The power supply headroom is adequate for this configuration, but upgrading to a more powerful GPU would require a higher wattage PSU. The GPU’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though the older standard does not bottleneck the RTX 3070.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 88th percentile ranking leaves significant headroom. The CPU could support a GPU in the 90th percentile without becoming a bottleneck, based on its benchmark scores. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster DDR5 modules could benefit memory-intensive workloads, given the dual-channel support. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support means future GPUs and NVMe drives will be compatible, though the socket’s lifecycle is limited to 13th Gen processors.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p resolution will find this build well-suited, as the RTX 3070’s 61st percentile ranking and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide solid performance for high-refresh gaming at that resolution. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 4049 in Passmark ensures smooth frame pacing in competitive titles. For 1080p gaming, the CPU will often be the limiting factor, but this is not a negative — it means the system can push very high frame rates in esports titles.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or streaming will benefit from the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and Passmark floating-point math score of 81892 indicate strong performance for rendering and effects. The GPU’s 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced rendering and AI-enhanced workflows, though the 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for very large projects.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s high thread count for parallel compilation and its single-core speed for interactive development. The Passmark data compression score of 383972 and encryption score of 22182 show strong performance for build pipelines and secure coding tasks. Students and small business workstations will find this overkill for basic tasks, but the headroom ensures longevity for future software demands.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is built on the Ampere architecture using the GA104 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 17,400 million transistors. It has 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1725 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1440p gaming but can be a constraint for 4K textures.

The GPU includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. Its FP32 performance is 20.31 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The pixel rate is 165.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 317.4 GTexel/s. The Passmark G3D score of 22214 places it at the 61st percentile, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 112821 and Vulkan score of 21022 show strong compute capabilities for both general and graphics workloads.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17208 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT’s 17083 (0.7% difference) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690’s 17037 (1% difference). This positions the RTX 3070 in a competitive mid-range segment, where it trades blows with newer cards. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 247 and DirectX 10 score of 150 show legacy API performance, while the DirectX 11 score of 182 and DirectX 12 score of 85 reflect modern API scaling. The GPU compute score of 11195 confirms its capability for general-purpose compute tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from the Raptor Lake generation, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The GPU is an Ampere-architecture card from the GeForce 30-series. The combined percentile for this build is 75, indicating it outperforms 75% of all recorded configurations.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 44240 places it at the 88th percentile, while the GPU’s 17208 average score places it at the 61st percentile. This creates a system where the processor is the stronger component, capable of handling demanding productivity tasks, while the GPU provides solid but not exceptional gaming performance. The build is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like rendering, development, and content creation, while still wanting a capable gaming GPU.

The overall tier from the percentiles is upper-mid-range, with the CPU in the top 12% and the GPU in the top 39%. This means the system excels at multi-threaded tasks and handles modern games at 1440p with high settings, but it is not a top-tier 4K gaming rig. The data suggests this is a balanced productivity-gaming hybrid, leaning toward productivity due to the CPU’s strength.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S). It has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The CPU is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and includes ECC memory support, which is rare for consumer chips.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. The TDP is 65 W, and the launch MSRP is $255. The multiplier is locked, meaning no overclocking, but the 5.00 GHz boost clock provides high single-thread performance.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and single-core score of 3758, with R20 scores of 11180 and 1578 respectively. The Passmark scores are equally strong: multi-thread at 31725, single-thread at 4049, integer math at 111044, floating-point math at 81892, data compression at 383972, and data encryption at 22182. The average benchmark score of 44240 places it at the 88th percentile, with nearest rivals within 0.7% performance difference.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-core performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 4049 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758, indicates it can handle high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 22214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3162 suggest it can deliver playable frame rates at 1440p in most modern titles.

At 1080p, the CPU will likely be the limiting factor in esports titles, pushing very high frame rates, while the GPU provides ample headroom. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a constraint, with the 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth handling most games at high settings. At 4K, the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking suggests frame rates will drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles, requiring reduced settings or DLSS. The GPU’s 46 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the 8 GB VRAM may limit ray-traced textures.

The absence of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the benchmark scores provide a reliable basis for expectations. The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, while the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking places it in the mid-range tier for gaming performance.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds