SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 7400: A Desktop Pairing with an Extreme Performance Divide

This desktop build pairs Intel's 14-core Raptor Lake processor with a low-power RDNA 3 graphics card, creating one of the most lopsided CPU-to-GPU performance ratios in the benchmark database. The Core i5-13600 sits in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the Radeon RX 7400 languishes in the 17th percentile among all GPUs, a gap that defines every possible use case for this system. The combined percentile of 53 reflects this stark division, placing the overall build squarely in the middle of the database despite the CPU's top-tier standing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which anchors this build to the 13th generation Core lineup. The socket supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older, more established memory modules or newer high-frequency DDR5 kits. The processor also supports ECC memory, a feature uncommon in mainstream desktop CPUs that may appeal to users running long-duration compute tasks where data integrity is paramount.

PCIe connectivity comes via Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU alone. This forward-looking interface means the motherboard can accommodate modern Gen 5 NVMe storage drives and future expansion cards, though the GPU in this build only uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and hardware acceleration even if the discrete GPU is removed, which is a useful troubleshooting feature.

Power requirements for this pairing are modest. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU draws just 43 W, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 200 W. This means a typical 300-400 W power supply would provide ample headroom for the entire system, including drives, fans, and motherboard components. The GPU requires a single 6-pin power connector, and its dual-slot cooler design suggests it will fit in most mid-tower and even some compact cases.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a more powerful GPU, as the current Radeon RX 7400 leaves enormous CPU headroom unused. The 65 W TDP of the processor also leaves room for a future CPU upgrade within the same socket generation, though the Core i5-13600's 88th percentile standing means most users would not need to do so for several years. The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means memory can be carried forward or upgraded independently of the rest of the system.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark results for the Core i5-13600 are consistently strong across both synthetic and real-world workloads. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 26620 in multi-core and 3758 in single-core, placing it well above the average desktop processor. The R20 results show 11180 multi-core and 1578 single-core, while the older R15 test yields 2683 multi-core and 378 single-core. These scores demonstrate scaling that holds up well as thread counts increase, indicating efficient utilization of all 20 threads.

The PassMark suite paints a similar picture. The multithread score of 31725 and single-thread score of 4049 both exceed typical desktop results. Data compression scores 383972, integer math reaches 111044, and floating-point math hits 81892, all indicating strong computational throughput. The extended instructions score of 23045 and data encryption score of 22182 show capable cryptography and SIMD performance. The find prime numbers test scores 109, and random string sorting reaches 42040.

The GPU benchmark results tell a very different story. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test scores 1103, while PassMark DirectX tests show 176 for DX9, 97 for DX11, 59 for DX10, and 44 for DX12. The PassMark G3D score of 11897 and G2D score of 1209 reflect the GPU's limited rendering capabilities. GPU compute scores 5152, which is modest but present. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 2467, placing it in the 17th percentile among all GPUs.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU's 88th percentile position means it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database, while the GPU's 17th percentile means it is outperformed by the vast majority of graphics cards. This creates a system where CPU-bound tasks will feel responsive and fast, while GPU-bound tasks will feel constrained and limited.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is built on the Navi 33 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1452 MHz, a boost clock of 2300 MHz, and a game clock of 2200 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed across an 8 GB GDDR6 interface with a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute configuration includes 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU has 28 ray tracing cores, though no tensor cores are listed, indicating that the architecture focuses on traditional rasterization and RT workloads rather than AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance reaches 16.49 TFLOPS, while FP16 doubles to 32.97 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The benchmark scores reveal the practical impact of this configuration. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 is low in absolute terms, and the PassMark DirectX scores are all below 100 except for DX9 at 176. The G3D score of 11897 and G2D score of 1209 suggest that 2D desktop work is handled adequately, but 3D rendering performance is limited. The GPU compute score of 5152 indicates some capability for general-purpose compute, but the absence of tensor cores means AI-specific workloads will not see acceleration.

For rendering tasks, the RX 7400's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p textures and moderate detail settings, but the low shading unit count and modest FP32 throughput will limit complex scenes. The ray tracing cores exist but are few in number, so RT effects will carry a heavy performance penalty. The GPU's dual-slot cooler and single 6-pin power connector suggest it is designed for low-power, space-constrained builds rather than high-end gaming rigs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU in this build is extreme. The Core i5-13600 ranks in the 88th percentile among CPUs, while the Radeon RX 7400 ranks in the 17th percentile among GPUs. This means the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive workload, while the CPU will sit largely idle waiting for the GPU to complete its work.

In gaming, the FPS will be dictated almost entirely by the GPU's capabilities. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4049 in PassMark and 3758 in Cinebench R23 means it can feed frames to the GPU faster than the GPU can render them, even at lower resolutions and detail settings. This creates a scenario where the GPU is at 100% utilization while the CPU remains below 50% in most games.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the Core i5-13600 will perform at a high level, and the GPU's limitations will not matter. However, in GPU-accelerated applications like photo editing with hardware acceleration or video effects rendering, the RX 7400 will become the bottleneck. The PassMark GPU compute score of 5152 is low enough that any task offloaded to the GPU will take noticeably longer than with a higher-tier graphics card.

The combined percentile of 53 reflects this split personality. The system is neither a high-performance gaming rig nor a workstation-class compute machine, but rather a desktop with a top-tier CPU and an entry-level GPU that serve different purposes depending on the workload.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not suitable for high-refresh gaming at 1080p or above. The GPU's 17th percentile standing and low DirectX benchmark scores mean frame rates will be modest even in esports titles. The CPU can handle high FPS calculations, but the GPU cannot render frames fast enough to take advantage of a 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitor.

Streaming: The CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, with a PassMark multithread score of 31725 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620, makes software encoding viable. The GPU's limited encoding capabilities are a drawback, but the CPU can handle both game encoding and streaming overhead in most titles at reduced graphics settings.

Video editing: The Core i5-13600 is well-suited for video editing, with high scores in data compression (383972) and integer math (111044) that speed up timeline scrubbing and export. However, the GPU's low compute score of 5152 will slow down effects rendering and color grading that rely on GPU acceleration. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p projects but may be limiting for 4K timelines.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will perform well, as the 14 cores and 20 threads handle ray tracing and path tracing efficiently. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 places this CPU in the upper tier for rendering. GPU-based rendering will be slow due to the RX 7400's modest FP32 and RT performance, so users should plan for CPU-centric workflows.

Software development: The CPU's high single-thread score of 4049 and multi-thread score of 31725 make compilation fast and responsive. The GPU's capabilities are largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a solid choice for developers who also game occasionally.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for typical student and office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's 88th percentile performance is far beyond what these workloads require, and the GPU's 17th percentile is sufficient for 2D desktop work, as evidenced by the PassMark G2D score of 1209.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, and the figures should be treated as approximations rather than definitive results.

The GPU's benchmark scores suggest that 1080p gaming at low to medium settings is the realistic target. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 and PassMark DirectX 11 score of 97 indicate that modern titles will require significant compromises in visual fidelity to maintain playable frame rates. The DirectX 12 score of 44 is particularly concerning, as most modern games use DX12, and this low score suggests poor performance in current-generation titles.

Esports and older games may run at playable frame rates. The DirectX 9 score of 176 and DirectX 10 score of 59 suggest that titles from a decade ago will run smoothly, and the 8 GB VRAM is more than enough for older textures. However, the GPU's low shading unit count and modest bandwidth will limit performance even in these lighter titles when compared to higher-tier GPUs.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance will ensure that frame pacing is consistent and that no CPU-related stuttering occurs, but the GPU will be the primary constraint. Users should expect to run games at 720p or 1080p with low settings for modern titles, and medium settings for slightly older games. The 17th percentile GPU ranking places this build in the entry-level gaming tier.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity tasks but have minimal GPU requirements. The Core i5-13600's 88th percentile standing makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, students running data analysis in Python or R, and office workers who run multiple virtual machines. The GPU's 17th percentile is adequate for 2D desktop work, as shown by the G2D score of 1209, and for basic video playback.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound applications like video encoding, 3D rendering with CPU-based renderers, or music production will find the processor's 20 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache well-suited to their needs. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute jobs where a memory error could corrupt hours of work.

Gamers should only consider this build if they play older or less demanding titles, as the GPU's low DirectX benchmark scores will limit modern gaming performance. Small business workstations that run office software, accounting tools, and database applications will benefit from the CPU's speed, and the low power draw of both components keeps operating costs minimal.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 53, placing it in the middle of the database despite the CPU ranking in the 88th percentile and the GPU ranking in the 17th percentile.

Q: Does this build support DDR4 or DDR5 memory?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 43 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 200 W.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Core i5-13600 includes UHD Graphics 770, which can serve as a fallback display output.

Q: What socket does this CPU use?

A: The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, and it has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size. It has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3758 and PassMark single-thread score of 4049 are both strong, indicating excellent per-core performance. The multi-core scores of 26620 in Cinebench R23 and 31725 in PassMark multithread demonstrate that the 14 cores scale well under parallel workloads.

PassMark tests show specialized strengths: data compression scores 383972, indicating efficient memory and cache utilization; integer math reaches 111044, suggesting strong general-purpose arithmetic; and floating-point math scores 81892, which is solid but not exceptional. The extended instructions score of 23045 and data encryption score of 22182 show capable SIMD and cryptographic performance. The find prime numbers score of 109 is a weaker point, but this test is not representative of typical workloads.

The CPU's 88th percentile ranking places it above most processors in the database, and the nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (0.2% lower average score), Intel Core i9-13950HX (0.2% lower), Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (0.5% lower), and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (0.7% lower). This puts the Core i5-13600 in elite company, with only 12% of CPUs scoring higher.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines the Intel Core i5-13600, a 14-core Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP and 88th percentile CPU ranking, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, an RDNA 3 GPU with 8 GB VRAM, a 43 W TDP, and a 17th percentile GPU ranking. The combined percentile of 53 places the overall system in the middle of the database, reflecting a significant performance imbalance between components.

The CPU is a high-end desktop processor, as indicated by its 88th percentile score and its ability to match or exceed the average benchmark scores of CPUs like the Core i9-13950HX and Ryzen 5 7500X3D. The GPU, by contrast, is an entry-level component whose 17th percentile ranking puts it in the same performance class as the Radeon 8040S, GeForce 710M, HD Graphics 610, and GeForce GT 710M.

The system's desktop class means it is intended for stationary use, and its low power draw (65 W CPU, 43 W GPU) makes it easy to cool and power. The 200 W suggested PSU for the GPU leaves ample headroom for the rest of the system. This build is best understood as a productivity-focused desktop with a capable CPU and a GPU that is adequate for basic tasks but not for demanding graphics workloads. The 53rd combined percentile indicates a system that is neither high-end nor low-end overall, but rather one that excels in specific use cases while remaining limited in others.