SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13600

44,240 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

27,425 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is a desktop combination that lands in the 80th percentile across all tracked CPU+GPU pairings, built around a mid-range processor that punches well above its class and a graphics card that, while now end-of-life, still delivers upper-mainstream rasterization performance. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 44240, while the GPU occupies the 72nd percentile with an average score of 27425. Together they form a balanced, gaming-capable machine whose CPU is the stronger of the two halves. Note upfront: no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing in the database, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than drawn from recorded game runs.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13600 is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S processor manufactured on Intel's 10 nm node, with a 215 mm² die. It runs a 2.70 GHz base clock and boosts to 5.00 GHz — that boost figure is the standout number here, because it puts the chip's single-threaded output in territory that historically belonged to far more expensive parts. The cache hierarchy backs this up: 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, plus 24 MB of shared L3.

The benchmark data confirms the single-core strength. In Cinebench R23 the chip scores 3758 single-core against 26620 multi-core; in R20 it posts 1578 single-core and 11180 multi-core; in R15 the split is 378 versus 2683. The single-core scores are what make this processor feel fast in everyday desktop use — application launches, browser responsiveness, and game simulation threads all live on the single-thread side. The PassMark single-thread result of 4049 reinforces this.

The multi-core side is where the hybrid core count pays off. A PassMark multithread score of 31725, combined with integer math at 111044, floating point math at 81892, and data compression at 383972, indicates genuine throughput capability for parallel workloads — video encoding, code compilation, and rendering. Extended instructions score 23045, and data encryption reaches 22182. These are workstation-adjacent numbers from a part that carries a launch MSRP of $255 and a modest 65 W TDP.

Against its nearest rivals, the i5-13600 is essentially dead even: it trails the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (avgScore 44309) and the Intel Core i9-13950HX (44342) by just 0.2 percent, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466) by 0.5 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573) by 0.7 percent. What matters is the company it keeps — a mobile i9 and modern AI-accelerated parts are its peers on aggregate score, and a locked, mid-tier desktop chip matching them is the entire story of this CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 80 sits between the CPU's 88 and the GPU's 72, which tells you the shape of this build: the processor is rarely the constraint. In gaming terms, the RX 6700 XT's PassMark G3D score of 19786 will be the limiter at lower resolutions, where the CPU's strong single-thread scores would otherwise allow far higher frame rates. At higher resolutions, the GPU saturates and the CPU's surplus goes unused — the classic resolution-driven shift from CPU-bound to GPU-bound behavior.

For productivity, the relationship inverts. The i5-13600's multithread throughput is the engine, and the GPU contributes through its compute benchmarks: Geekbench OpenCL 44152, Vulkan 93500, Metal 130896, and PassMark GPU Compute at 9336. These are respectable but not rendering-farm numbers, so GPU-accelerated encoding and effects work will be helpful rather than transformative. The CPU will carry most content-creation weight in this pairing.

Memory and platform bandwidth matter for balance too. The chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, so the platform can be built memory-fast or memory-frugal without changing the CPU. PCI Express 5.0 with 16 CPU lanes means the GPU — itself a PCIe 4.0 x16 card — runs at its full intended link speed with headroom to spare. ECC memory support is a genuine differentiator for workstation duty, unusual at this segment.

Gaming Performance

To restate clearly: the database contains no measured FPS rows for this specific CPU+GPU combination, so the following figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not recorded game results.

The RX 6700 XT's profile — 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 40 RT cores, 13.21 TFLOPS FP32, 384 GB/s of memory bandwidth on a 192-bit bus, and 12 GB of GDDR6 — describes a card built for high-quality 1440p gaming. The PassMark G3D score of 19786 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, effectively level with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (avgScore 27435, deltaPct 0), 0.5 percent behind the RTX 3090 (27565), 1.1 percent ahead of the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (27135), and 1.5 percent behind the Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839) on aggregate score.

From that data, expectations can be framed qualitatively: at 1080p and 1440p in modern titles at ultra settings, the card should deliver smooth, high-refresh-rate performance in most games, with the 12 GB frame buffer providing headroom for texture-heavy titles that would choke lesser cards. At 4K ultra, expect playable but not consistently high frame rates in demanding titles — the 72nd-percentile positioning defines that ceiling. Ray tracing is supported through the 40 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, but RT performance should be treated as a secondary strength; rasterization is this card's core competency, consistent with its RDNA 2.0 architecture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2435 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 93500 support the picture of a competent modern-API performer.

The i5-13600 will not hold the card back. With a 4049 single-thread PassMark score and 5.00 GHz boost, CPU-side frame pacing and simulation should remain a non-issue at every resolution this GPU targets.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits several distinct users. Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p high-quality play get the most direct benefit: the GPU percentile defines the experience, and the CPU percentile guarantees no processor-side ceiling. Content creators doing video editing and 3D work will find the 26620 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 31725 PassMark multithread score sufficient for steady project turnaround, with 12 GB of VRAM helping timeline scrubbing and viewport work. Software developers get a compiler-friendly 14-core/20-thread layout with outstanding single-core snappiness for IDE work; the 111044 integer math score is directly relevant here. Students and small-business workstation builders benefit from ECC memory support — rare at this tier — and the platform's dual DDR4/DDR5 flexibility lets builders choose memory by need rather than mandate. What this build is not: a 4K-max-settings flagship rig or a professional rendering node. The percentiles place it firmly as a strong upper-mainstream desktop.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh 1080p gaming. Estimated from the GPU's 19786 G3D score and 72nd percentile: expect high frame rates at ultra settings in esports and most AAA titles, with the CPU's 4049 single-thread score ensuring the processor never becomes the frame-rate limiter.

1440p ultra gaming. This is the card's design target. The 12 GB GDDR6 buffer, 384 GB/s bandwidth, and 2581 MHz boost clock indicate comfortable ultra-quality 1440p play in most titles; the memory capacity in particular provides longevity as texture demands grow.

Streaming while gaming. The 20-thread CPU can absorb encoder and compositor load alongside the game — the 383972 data compression score and 31725 multithread score show the parallel headroom — while the GPU handles render duty.

Video editing. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 26620 and PassMark GPU Compute at 9336 support a workflow with fast CPU-side encoding and useful GPU acceleration, with 12 GB VRAM covering reasonable timeline sizes.

3D rendering and CAD. The CPU's 81892 floating point score handles simulation and mesh work; viewport rendering benefits from the 413.0 GTexel/s texture rate. This is hobbyist-to-semipro territory, not farm-grade.

Software development. Compiling scales with cores and clocks, and this chip has both: 14 cores boosting to 5.00 GHz. Single-core responsiveness at 4049 PassMark points keeps IDEs and debuggers fluid.

Student and office work. The 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool for desk-bound productivity, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 means the system can even boot and display output without the discrete card installed — useful for troubleshooting.

FAQ

Q: Is this a balanced CPU and GPU pairing?

A: Reasonably, yes. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 72nd, with a combined percentile of 80. The GPU is the limiting half for gaming; the CPU is the limiting half for nothing.

Q: What resolution should I target for gaming?

A: 1080p high-refresh and 1440p ultra are the sweet spots based on the RX 6700 XT's benchmark positioning, which puts it level with an RTX 4070 Mobile and half a percent behind an RTX 3090 on aggregate score.

Q: Can the CPU handle content creation, or is it gaming-only?

A: It handles both. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26620 and PassMark multithread score of 31725 place it alongside parts like the Intel Core i9-13950HX in aggregate performance.

Q: Does the build support ECC memory?

A: Yes — the i5-13600 supports ECC, which is a notable feature for workstation and small-business builds at this tier.

Q: Is the RX 6700 XT still in production?

A: No. Its production status is end-of-life, so availability is limited to remaining and second-hand stock. Its successor line is Navi III.

Q: What power supply is recommended?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W. The CPU's TDP is 65 W and the GPU's is 230 W, so a unit at or above the recommendation covers the pairing with headroom.

Q: Can this system run without the graphics card?

A: Yes — the i5-13600 includes Intel UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, sufficient for display output and basic desktop work.

Benchmark Performance

The complete CPU picture: Cinebench R15 multi 2683 / single 378; R20 multi 11180 / single 1578; R23 multi 26620 / single 3758. PassMark: multithread 31725, single-thread 4049, integer math 111044, floating point 81892, data compression 383972, data encryption 22182, extended instructions 23045, physics 1782, find prime numbers 109, string sorting 42040. Average benchmark score: 44240, at the 88th percentile of all CPUs.

The complete GPU picture: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2435, Geekbench Metal 130896, Geekbench OpenCL 44152, Geekbench Vulkan 93500, PassMark G3D 19786, GPU Compute 9336, G2D 951, plus DirectX API tests of 242 (DX9), 173 (DX11), 124 (DX10), and 77 (DX12). Average benchmark score: 27425, at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs.

The combined read: an 80th-percentile desktop overall. The aggregate CPU score sits within a fraction of a percent of the Ryzen AI Max 385, Core i9-13950HX, Core Ultra X9 388H, and Ryzen 5 7500X3D — all within 0.7 percent — meaning buyers are getting near-parity with a tightly bunched competitive cluster. The GPU's rivals are similarly clustered: an exact tie with the RTX 4070 Mobile, and everything from 1.1 percent ahead of the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell to 1.5 percent behind the Radeon Pro Vega 20. Both halves of this build are competitive within their brackets.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1700, which supports the chip's dual DDR4/DDR5 memory compatibility on a dual-channel bus. PCIe 5.0 with 16 CPU lanes means a next-generation graphics card running PCIe 5.0 could be dropped in at full link speed — the current RX 6700 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and is fully served by it. Power planning is straightforward: the GPU's 230 W TDP and 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin connectors call for a 550 W suggested PSU, and the CPU's 65 W TDP leaves clear headroom above the CPU+GPU draw. The card itself is dual-slot, 267 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide — standard mid-tower dimensions, so case compatibility is broad.

A sensible upgrade sequence: because the GPU is the lower percentile of the two, the graphics card is the first and most impactful swap. The CPU, at the 88th percentile with a locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false), is not an overclocking candidate — its performance is what it is, and that performance is high. Since the RX 6700 XT is end-of-life with Navi III as the successor generation, a future GPU replacement on the same PCIe 5.0 platform is the natural path, and memory can move from DDR4 to DDR5 only via a platform change since boards support one or the other, not both simultaneously.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing: a 2023-released, Raptor Lake-S, 14-core/20-thread Intel Core i5-13600 with a launch MSRP of $255, matched with a 2021-released, RDNA 2.0, Navi 22-based AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT with a launch MSRP of 479 USD. The combined 80th-percentile ranking frames it precisely: an upper-mainstream desktop whose CPU competes with mobile flagships and modern AI-branded parts on aggregate score, and whose GPU holds its own against cards from tiers above its original market position. The GPU's end-of-life status is the main caveat for new builds; the performance data shows a machine that remains genuinely capable, with a platform — Socket 1700, PCIe 5.0, 550 W PSU recommendation — that leaves a clear road for a graphics upgrade when the time comes.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13600 + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13600

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds