SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500TE + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

76%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500TE

5,002 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500TE is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node. It combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 1300 MHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The thermal design power is 35 watts, which is notably low for a desktop chip with this core count. This suggests a processor engineered for power-constrained environments where sustained performance under load matters more than raw peak speeds.

Cache allocation is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache hierarchy is typical of modern desktop processors and supports the chip's ability to handle multi-threaded workloads without constantly stalling on memory fetches. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a significant feature for workstation reliability.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output capability. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. This combination of features makes the chip flexible for a range of system builds.

Benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,294 and a single-core score of 2,441. The R20 scores are 7,263 multi-core and 1,025 single-core, while R15 scores are 1,743 multi-core and 246 single-core. The average benchmark score across all tests is 5,002, placing this CPU at the 59th percentile of all CPUs in the database. This means it outperforms a majority of processors but is not a top-tier performer.

The nearest rivals provide important context. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G matches the i5-13500TE exactly with an identical average score of 5,002 and a 0% delta. The Intel Core i3-12300HE is 0.1% behind at 4,995, the Intel Xeon W-2150B is 0.2% behind at 4,992, and the Intel Core i7-1375PRE is 0.3% behind at 4,985. These are extremely tight margins, indicating that the i5-13500TE sits in a highly competitive cluster where performance differences between chips are negligible in real-world terms.

For real workloads, the multi-core scores suggest strong rendering and compilation capabilities for a low-power chip. The R23 multi-core score of 17,294 indicates the processor can handle demanding productivity tasks, though it will not compete with high-end desktop processors. The single-core score of 2,441 in R23 is respectable and indicates responsive day-to-day operation. The 35-watt TDP is the defining characteristic here — it delivers approximately 80% of the performance of a typical 65-watt desktop chip while consuming nearly half the power budget.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 59th percentile while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile, and the combined percentile is 63. This close alignment suggests a reasonably balanced pairing where neither component dramatically outweighs the other in overall capability. However, the nature of the workloads determines which component becomes the limiting factor.

For CPU-bound tasks such as software compilation, spreadsheet calculations, and database queries, the i5-13500TE will be the primary constraint. Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide solid parallelism, but the low 1.3 GHz base clock means sustained single-threaded performance relies heavily on boost behavior. The 4.5 GHz boost clock helps, but thermal and power limits may prevent sustained operation at that frequency under full multi-core load.

For GPU-bound tasks such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and gaming, the Quadro RTX 5000 will dominate the performance picture. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 11.15 TFLOPS and 448 GB/s memory bandwidth far exceed what the CPU can feed in most scenarios. The GPU's percentile position of 67 is eight points higher than the CPU's 59, indicating the GPU has more headroom relative to its peers.

The FPS scaling picture is incomplete because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, meaning all gaming performance figures presented in this analysis are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. This is an important caveat for interpreting gaming performance.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU's single-core performance will set the ceiling for high-refresh-rate gaming at lower resolutions, where draw call processing and physics calculations become bottlenecks. At higher resolutions, the GPU's rendering workload increases, shifting the bottleneck toward the graphics card. The 35-watt CPU TDP suggests thermal throttling is a possibility under sustained gaming loads, which could affect frame pacing.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 5,002 places it at the 59th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival comparison shows a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G matches exactly, the Intel Core i3-12300HE trails by 0.1%, the Intel Xeon W-2150B trails by 0.2%, and the Intel Core i7-1375PRE trails by 0.3%. This indicates the i5-13500TE is statistically indistinguishable from these competitors in aggregate performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 21,629 places it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals show a wider spread: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB leads by 1% with a score of 21,856, the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile trails by 1.2% at 21,379, the AMD Radeon HD 8970M trails by 1.8% at 21,237, and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL trails by 2.3% at 21,153. The GTX 1060 comparison is notable — a modern workstation GPU trading blows with a much older consumer card in aggregate benchmarks.

Looking at individual GPU benchmark results, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 78,999 and the Vulkan score is 92,309. Passmark scores show 15,616 for G3D, 6,525 for GPU compute, 709 for G2D, and lower scores for specific DirectX versions: 195 for DirectX 9, 140 for DirectX 11, 113 for DirectX 10, and 59 for DirectX 12. The gap between DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 scores is notable — this GPU is significantly stronger in older API workloads than in modern DirectX 12 titles.

The combined picture is a desktop build at the 63rd percentile overall. This places the system in the upper-middle tier of all configurations in the database. The CPU and GPU are closely matched in relative performance, with the GPU having a slight edge. This suggests a system that handles both productivity and graphics workloads competently, without being exceptional at either.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, confirming that frame rates should be treated as approximations.

Based on the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 15,616 and its 67th percentile position, this system is estimated to handle 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory provides ample capacity for modern game textures, and the 448 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution texture streaming. The CPU's single-core performance, evidenced by the R23 single-core score of 2,441, suggests it can maintain adequate frame pacing for most games.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor. The 11.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is moderate by modern standards, and the DirectX 12 Passmark score of 59 is concerning for newer titles that rely heavily on DX12 features. Games built on older APIs such as DirectX 11 should perform better, as indicated by the higher Passmark score of 140 for that API.

At 4K resolution, this system would struggle with demanding titles. The GPU's memory bandwidth and compute throughput are not sufficient for consistent high-refresh-rate gameplay at this resolution, though less demanding or older games may still be playable at medium settings. The CPU's 14 cores provide ample headroom for background tasks while gaming, but the single-threaded performance is not exceptional, which may limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios.

Ray tracing performance is a consideration given the 48 RT cores present on the GPU. However, the DirectX 12 performance gap suggests that ray-traced workloads, which typically use DX12, may not perform as well as the hardware specifications might suggest. The 384 tensor cores provide AI acceleration capabilities that some games use for DLSS-style upscaling, though the Quadro branding suggests this card was not primarily designed for gaming.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals and power users who need a balance of CPU and GPU compute for workstation tasks rather than gaming enthusiasts. The 35-watt CPU and 230-watt GPU combination creates a system that is power-efficient for a desktop while still delivering solid performance.

Content creators working with video editing software will benefit from the 14-core CPU for timeline rendering and the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM for effects processing. The GPU's FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS, achieved with a 2:1 ratio, is useful for AI-assisted editing tools that leverage half-precision compute. The ECC memory support on the CPU adds reliability for long rendering sessions.

3D modelers and animators will find the GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448 GB/s bandwidth adequate for viewport rendering and moderate complexity scenes. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for texture-heavy scenes, and the 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups common in CAD workstations.

Software developers will appreciate the 14 cores for parallel builds and the 20 threads for running multiple virtual machines or containers. The low 35-watt TDP means the CPU can run at sustained loads without excessive cooling requirements, making this suitable for small form factor development machines.

Students and small business workstations can use this build for general productivity, office applications, and light multimedia work. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the discrete GPU is not needed for certain tasks, potentially reducing power consumption. The platform's DDR4 and DDR5 memory support allows flexibility in system configuration.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is built on the Turing architecture using the TU104 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 25.0 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. This configuration delivers a pixel rate of 116.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 348.5 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. This is a substantial amount of VRAM that supports large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-display configurations without running into memory limitations.

Clock speeds are 1620 MHz base and 1815 MHz boost. The FP32 compute throughput is 11.15 TFLOPS, while FP16 is 22.30 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The 48 RT cores provide dedicated ray tracing hardware, and the 384 tensor cores enable AI acceleration for tasks such as denoising and super-resolution.

The GPU includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support. Display outputs include 4x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C. The card is dual-slot, 267 mm long, and 111 mm tall, requiring 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors. The suggested PSU is 550 watts, and the TDP is 230 watts.

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78,999 and Vulkan score of 92,309. Passmark scores are 15,616 for G3D, 6,525 for GPU compute, and 709 for G2D. The DirectX-specific scores are notably lower: 195 for DX9, 140 for DX11, 113 for DX10, and 59 for DX12. This pattern suggests the GPU is significantly better optimized for compute and older graphics APIs than for modern DirectX 12 workloads.

The GPU's percentile position of 67 places it above the majority of GPUs, but the nearest rival comparisons show it trading blows with much older hardware. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB leads by 1%, which is a striking result given the Quadro's workstation positioning and 16 GB VRAM advantage.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for system builders. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is the current generation of PCIe connectivity. The 35-watt TDP leaves significant thermal headroom in most systems, allowing for quieter cooling solutions or smaller form factor builds.

The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots. This means the GPU will function correctly, though it will not take advantage of the newer PCIe generation's higher bandwidth. The GPU is end-of-life, with the successor being Workstation Ampere, so future upgrades would involve moving to a newer architecture.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a more modern workstation card that supports DirectX 12 more effectively, given the poor DX12 Passmark score of 59. The 550-watt suggested PSU provides headroom for a GPU with similar or slightly higher power requirements. The CPU's 35-watt TDP means the PSU is primarily sized for the GPU, leaving room for additional storage or expansion cards.

The CPU supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation reliability. However, ECC support depends on the motherboard chipset, so builders must verify compatibility before purchasing memory. The dual-channel memory bus supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing builders to choose based on budget, availability, and performance requirements.

The platform's production status is active for the CPU, meaning it remains a current product. The GPU is end-of-life, but its performance characteristics are well-documented. The combination of a current CPU with an older GPU is unusual but can be valid for specific workstation applications where the GPU's compute capabilities are sufficient.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i5-13500TE with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35-watt TDP, designed for power efficiency. The GPU is a Turing-architecture workstation card with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 230-watt TDP, engineered for professional rendering and compute workloads.

The combined percentile of 63 places this build in the upper-middle tier of all configurations in the database. The CPU's 59th percentile and GPU's 67th percentile are closely aligned, indicating a balanced pairing. The GPU's higher percentile suggests it is the stronger component relative to its peers, while the CPU's lower percentile reflects its power-constrained design.

This pairing makes sense for workstation tasks that benefit from the GPU's large VRAM and compute capabilities without requiring extreme CPU performance. The system is not designed for high-refresh-rate gaming, given the GPU's DirectX 12 limitations and the CPU's moderate single-core performance. Instead, it targets professional workloads where reliability and memory capacity are more important than raw frame rates.

The launch MSRP values are $235 for the CPU and 2,299 USD for the GPU. These figures reflect the different market positions of the two components — the CPU is a mainstream product while the GPU is a professional workstation card.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500TE has 14 cores and 20 threads, using the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 63, with the CPU at the 59th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile.

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU includes ECC memory support, though motherboard compatibility must be verified.

Q: What is the GPU's DirectX 12 benchmark score?

A: The Passmark DirectX 12 score is 59, which is significantly lower than the DirectX 11 score of 140.

Q: What power supply is suggested for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 watts, with the GPU requiring 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connectors.

Q: Is measured gaming FPS data available for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This build is not ideal for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 59 and the CPU's moderate single-core R23 score of 2,441 suggest frame rates will be limited in modern titles. At 1080p, the system may handle less demanding games, but the 67th percentile GPU position indicates mid-range performance.

Streaming: The 14-core CPU provides enough parallel threads to handle encoding and game streaming simultaneously. The GPU's 384 tensor cores can assist with AI-based encoding features, and the 16 GB VRAM supports running games and streaming software concurrently.

Video editing: The CPU's R23 multi-core score of 17,294 supports efficient timeline rendering, while the GPU's 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 performance accelerates effects processing. The 16 GB VRAM handles 4K video previews without memory constraints.

3D rendering: The GPU's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 and 48 RT cores provide capable rendering performance for moderate complexity scenes. The 448 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large texture sets, and the ECC memory option on the CPU adds reliability.

Software development: The 14 cores and 20 threads speed up parallel builds and test execution. The 35-watt TDP allows for compact cooling solutions, and the Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory for flexible system configuration.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core R23 score of 2,441 ensures responsive operation for everyday tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, and the low power consumption reduces operating costs for always-on workstations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500TE + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500TE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds