SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

76%

GPU

98%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500TE

5,002 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500TE sits in the 13th generation Core family, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. This desktop processor packs 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that pairs performance cores with efficiency cores to balance throughput and power draw. The base clock runs at 1300.00 MHz, which is modest, but the boost clock reaches 4.50 GHz when workload demands it. The 35 W TDP is notably low for a desktop chip, indicating a thermally constrained design that prioritizes efficiency over raw sustained performance.

Cache hierarchy matters for real workloads. Each core gets 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2, while 24 MB of shared L3 cache provides a sizable pool for frequently accessed data across all cores. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel bus, and ECC memory is supported, which is a meaningful feature for workstation reliability. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, offering a fallback display output when a discrete GPU is not installed.

Benchmark results show a processor that performs competently but not spectacularly. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score reaches 1743 and single-core hits 246. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score climbs to 7263 with single-core at 1025. The more demanding Cinebench R23 workload yields a multicore score of 17294 and single-core score of 2441. The average benchmark score across all tests is 5002, placing this CPU at the 59th percentile among all processors in the database. That percentile means it outperforms roughly half of the CPUs tracked, but it is not in the upper echelon. The nearest rivals illustrate this positioning: the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G matches it exactly with an average score of 5002 and a delta of 0%, while the Intel Core i3-12300HE trails by just 0.1% at 4995. The Intel Xeon W-2150B and Intel Core i7-1375PRE are similarly close at 4992 and 4985, with deltas of 0.2% and 0.3% respectively. This clustering within a 0.3% band shows that the 13500TE is in a tightly contested performance tier where minor architectural differences decide rank.

For real workloads, the single-core scores matter for day-to-day responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2441 indicates solid performance for tasks like web browsing, office applications, and general system interaction. The multicore score of 17294 suggests that heavily threaded workloads such as video encoding, compilation, and 3D rendering will see reasonable throughput, though the low TDP may limit sustained all-core boosting under prolonged load. The 14-core, 20-thread arrangement provides good parallelism for production tasks, but the clock behavior constrained by the 35 W envelope means peak multicore performance may not be maintainable indefinitely.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 represents the flagship of the GeForce 50-series, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB202 chip manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. The die is massive at 750 mm², housing 92,200 million transistors with a density of 122.9 million per square millimeter. Clock speeds run at 2017 MHz base and 2407 MHz boost, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz, translating to 28 Gbps effective. The memory subsystem is extraordinary: 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus delivers 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth is critical for high-resolution textures, large datasets, and compute workloads that stream data through the GPU.

Compute resources are extensive. The GPU contains 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 170 dedicated RT cores, while 680 tensor cores accelerate AI and deep learning tasks. Pixel rate reaches 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate hits 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 104.8 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. These numbers indicate a GPU that excels at both traditional rasterization and compute-heavy workloads. The 575 W TDP is substantial, requiring a 950 W suggested PSU and a single 16-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot with dimensions of 304 mm length, 137 mm height, and 40 mm width.

Benchmark scores confirm the GPU's elite status. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score reaches 18355. Geekbench OpenCL yields 334370 and Vulkan hits 376728. Passmark results vary by test: DirectX 10 scores 226, DirectX 11 scores 341, DirectX 12 scores 185, and DirectX 9 scores 395. The Passmark G2D score is 1413, which is modest, but G3D reaches 39650 and GPU compute hits 26756. The average benchmark score is 79842, placing this GPU at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. That is a top-tier position, outperforming the vast majority of graphics cards tracked.

Nearest rivals show interesting comparisons. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79605, which is 0.3% lower, and the 12 GB version scores 79396 at 0.6% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78940, 1.1% lower, while the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959, which is 1.4% higher. These deltas are small, but they place the RTX 5090 in a cluster where the top competitor is only slightly ahead. The 92nd percentile, however, means that the RTX 5090 sits above nearly all consumer GPUs in the database. For rendering workloads, the combination of 32 GB VRAM, 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicates it can handle massive scenes, complex shading, and high-resolution output without memory bottlenecks. The RT and tensor cores provide dedicated acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI denoising, which are increasingly standard in professional workflows.

# Benchmark Performance

The data shows a pronounced asymmetry between CPU and GPU performance. The Intel Core i5-13500TE achieves an average benchmark score of 5002, placing it at the 59th percentile among CPUs. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 achieves an average benchmark score of 79842, placing it at the 92nd percentile among GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 76, which reflects the CPU holding back the overall system potential relative to the GPU's dominance.

Looking at specific CPU scores, the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 17294 demonstrates solid multithreaded capability, but the single-core score of 2441 is more modest. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18355 and Passmark G3D score of 39650 are indicative of extreme graphics performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 376728 shows strong compute and graphics API utilization. The combination paints a picture of a system where the GPU far outclasses the CPU in relative performance. The CPU's 59th percentile means it is average-to-slightly-above-average, while the GPU's 92nd percentile places it in the top decile of graphics hardware.

The nearest rival deltas reinforce this imbalance. The CPU's closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, matches its score exactly, indicating the 13500TE is not a standout in its class. The GPU's closest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X, is only 1.4% ahead, showing the RTX 5090 is competitive at the very top. When paired, the CPU becomes the limiting factor in most scenarios. The combined percentile of 76 sits between the two individual percentiles, but the GPU's high position suggests that workloads leveraging the GPU heavily will see exceptional performance, while CPU-bound tasks will be constrained to the 59th percentile level.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-13500TE compare to its closest rival?

A: The CPU matches the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G exactly with an average benchmark score of 5002 for both, showing a 0% delta. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i3-12300HE, 0.2% ahead of the Intel Xeon W-2150B, and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1375PRE.

Q: What is the RTX 5090's position relative to other GPUs?

A: The GPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 79842. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X, is 1.4% ahead, while the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB is 0.3% behind.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500TE supports ECC memory, which is listed in the specifications. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types through a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5090 has 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, which translates to 28 Gbps effective.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1300.00 MHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. It has 24 MB of shared L3 cache and a 35 W TDP.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 76, which is between the CPU's 59th percentile and the GPU's 92nd percentile. This reflects the CPU limiting the overall system performance.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i5-13500TE with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. All FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly identifies the CPU as the bottleneck in this pairing. The Intel Core i5-13500TE sits at the 59th percentile among CPUs, while the RTX 5090 sits at the 92nd percentile among GPUs. This 33-percentile-point gap means that in most workloads, the CPU will reach its limit before the GPU is fully utilized. The CPU's average benchmark score of 5002 is minuscule compared to the GPU's 79842, but these scores measure different things. The relevant comparison is the percentile positions, which show the GPU is far more capable relative to its peers.

For CPU-bound workloads like gaming at lower resolutions, physics calculations, and single-threaded applications, the 13500TE's 59th percentile performance will cap frame rates. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2441 indicates that the CPU cannot feed the GPU fast enough in scenarios that depend on per-core performance. For GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming, ray tracing, and 3D rendering, the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile performance will dominate, and the CPU's limitations become less relevant because the GPU is the primary executor.

The TDP differential is stark. The CPU has a 35 W TDP, while the GPU has a 575 W TDP. This 16-fold difference in power envelope reflects the GPU's immense compute capacity and the CPU's efficiency-focused design. In practice, this means the GPU will not be starved for power, but the CPU may throttle under sustained all-core loads, reducing its ability to keep up with the GPU's output. The suggested PSU of 950 W provides ample headroom for both components, so power delivery is not a bottleneck. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface for the GPU and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU ensure data transfer is not a limiting factor. The bottleneck is purely computational: the CPU's 59th percentile cannot match the GPU's 92nd percentile in most scenarios.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5090's 92nd percentile performance is exceptional for high-refresh gaming at any resolution, but the CPU's 59th percentile will limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenes. At lower resolutions where the CPU must process more frames per second, the 13500TE's single-core score of 2441 in Cinebench R23 will be the limiting factor. At higher resolutions, the GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth will handle textures and geometry easily, shifting the bottleneck to the CPU less often.

Streaming: The GPU's 680 tensor cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance can handle encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features simultaneously. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide adequate multitasking headroom for running a game and encoding software, though the 35 W TDP may limit sustained performance. The 59th percentile CPU position means streaming software competing with game threads could cause frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's multicore score of 17294 in Cinebench R23 provides solid performance for timeline scrubbing, effects, and export in mainstream editing tools. The GPU's 92nd percentile and 32 GB VRAM accelerate GPU-accelerated effects, color grading, and rendering. The combination is capable for professional video work, with the GPU handling heavy compute and the CPU managing serial tasks.

3D rendering: The RTX 5090 excels here, with 170 RT cores and 32 GB VRAM enabling complex ray-traced scenes. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 39650 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18355 indicate top-tier rendering throughput. The CPU's role in scene preparation and geometry processing is adequate at the 59th percentile, but render times will be GPU-dominated.

Software development: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads handle compilation and parallel build tasks reasonably well, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17294. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, but its compute capability is available for machine learning and data processing workloads. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds and server-like workloads.

Student and office work: This pairing is massively overprovisioned for typical office tasks. The CPU's 59th percentile and single-core score of 2441 are more than sufficient for spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing. The GPU's 92nd percentile and 575 W TDP are wasted on such workloads, making this a poor fit for basic productivity from an efficiency standpoint.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a content creator or professional who needs the RTX 5090's extreme GPU performance and can tolerate the CPU's mid-range capability. Gamers at 4K resolution will benefit from the GPU's 92nd percentile and 32 GB VRAM, which handle the most demanding titles at high settings. Those gaming at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates will find the CPU's 59th percentile limiting in CPU-bound games, so this build favors resolution over frame rate.

Content creators working in 3D rendering, video editing, or AI workloads will see the GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 680 tensor cores accelerate their pipelines significantly. The 32 GB VRAM allows for massive scenes and high-resolution textures without swapping. Software developers running parallel builds will appreciate the CPU's 14 cores, though the 35 W TDP means sustained all-core performance is limited. Students and small business workstations would be better served by a less powerful GPU, as this pairing's GPU is overkill for office tasks and the power draw is substantial.

The CPU's ECC memory support makes it viable for workstation use where data integrity is critical. The GPU's display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, supporting multi-monitor setups for professionals. This build is for those who prioritize GPU compute and rendering above all else and accept the CPU as a secondary component.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500TE uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus. The CPU has 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion. The GPU uses PCIe 5.0 x16, so the platform can fully utilize the RTX 5090's bus interface. The 35 W TDP of the CPU and 575 W TDP of the GPU require a 950 W suggested PSU, which provides headroom for both components and potential upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful CPU on the same socket to better match the GPU's 92nd percentile. Since the current CPU sits at the 59th percentile, upgrading to a higher-tier 13th generation processor with more cores or higher clocks would reduce the bottleneck. The platform's support for DDR5 allows for faster memory, which could improve CPU performance further. The GPU has no immediate upgrade path within the same generation, but the PCIe 5.0 interface ensures compatibility with future GPUs. The power supply's 950 W rating provides room for a more power-hungry CPU, though the current 35 W TDP is at the low end. Memory can be expanded or upgraded to DDR5 for better bandwidth, and storage can leverage the PCIe Gen 5 lanes for fast NVMe drives.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i5-13500TE with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, positioned at the 59th percentile among CPUs. The GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 flagship with 32 GB GDDR7 memory, 21,760 shading units, and a 575 W TDP, positioned at the 92nd percentile among GPUs. The combined percentile is 76, indicating an overall system that is above average but not at the top tier due to the CPU's relative weakness.

The CPU's launch MSRP is $235, and the GPU's launch MSRP is $1,999 USD. The pairing is fundamentally unbalanced: the GPU is a top-tier component while the CPU is a mid-range efficiency-focused part. This makes the build suitable for GPU-dominated workloads like rendering and AI, but less ideal for CPU-intensive tasks. The combined percentile of 76 reflects a system that is stronger than the majority of builds but held back from the highest tier by the CPU's 59th percentile.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13500TE and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries and no pairRankByFps value. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions.

The GPU's 92nd percentile and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2441 for the CPU suggest that gaming performance will be strong at high resolutions. At 4K, the RTX 5090's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth will handle ultra textures and high-detail geometry, and the GPU's compute power will drive high frame rates in most titles. The CPU's 59th percentile may cause frame dips in CPU-heavy scenes, especially in open-world games with many NPCs or physics calculations.

At 1440p, the balance shifts. The GPU can produce very high frame rates, but the CPU may struggle to keep up, leading to potential bottlenecking in esports titles or games with poor multithreading. The 13500TE's multicore score of 17294 in Cinebench R23 provides reasonable performance for modern games that use multiple cores, but the low 35 W TDP could cause thermal throttling in sustained gaming sessions, reducing frame rate consistency.

At 1080p, the CPU bottleneck becomes pronounced. The GPU is capable of frame rates far beyond what the CPU can feed, so the 13500TE's single-core performance will cap the maximum FPS. Gamers targeting 1080p with high refresh rates will see the CPU limit performance, while those at 4K will see the GPU dominate. The estimated figures place this build as a 4K gaming system where the GPU is the star, with the CPU providing adequate but not exceptional support. For competitive gaming at lower resolutions, a stronger CPU would be necessary to fully utilize the RTX 5090's potential.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds