SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
CPU Bottleneck
CPU
76%
VS
GPU
97%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500TE

5,002 Benchmark Score
Top 24% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a desktop pairing of Intel’s 14-core Raptor Lake embedded/energy-efficient processor and NVIDIA’s flagship Blackwell GPU. The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct testing. The GPU’s 87th percentile ranking versus all GPUs and the CPU’s 59th percentile ranking versus all CPUs provide the basis for these projections.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK lacks any `measuredFpsUltraByGame` entries, this section cannot report verified frame rates for specific titles. The `dataIsMeasured` field is false, meaning all gaming expectations must be inferred from the raw benchmark scores. The RTX 5080’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8637 and its PassMark G3D score of 36565 place it in the top 13% of all GPUs, indicating it has the raw geometry and rasterization horsepower for high-refresh 1440p and 4K gaming. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17294 and single-core score of 2441 suggest it can feed the GPU at high resolutions but may become a limiting factor at lower settings.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated bottleneck shifts heavily toward the CPU. The i5-13500TE’s single-core performance, while respectable at the 59th percentile, will likely cap frame rates in esports titles where the GPU is underutilized. The 4.5 GHz boost clock helps, but the 35W TDP base design limits sustained all-core frequency. Expect frame rates in competitive shooters to be good but not class-leading, with the GPU’s 10752 shading units largely idle waiting for CPU instructions.

At 1440p ultra, the balance improves significantly. The RTX 5080’s 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput become the dominant factors, pushing frame rates that are consistently high across AAA titles. The GPU’s 87th percentile ranking suggests it outperforms 87% of all GPUs, meaning it should handle demanding titles like cyberpunk-style RPGs or open-world action games with ray tracing enabled, though the CPU’s 59th percentile position will occasionally cause dips in CPU-heavy scenes with many NPCs or physics calculations.

At 4K ultra, the pairing becomes strongly GPU-bound, which is the ideal scenario for this combination. The RTX 5080’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 256-bit bus provide ample capacity and bandwidth for 4K textures, while the CPU’s multi-core score of 17294 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to maintain playable frame rates in most scenarios. The estimated 4K performance is where this system shines, with the GPU delivering the majority of the visual fidelity and the CPU providing adequate background processing.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5080 is built on NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm TSMC process, housing 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. The GPU’s memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial amount of memory bandwidth for 4K texture streaming and high-resolution rendering workloads, directly supporting the high frame rate estimates discussed earlier.

Clock speeds are set at 2295 MHz base and 2617 MHz boost, with memory running at 1875 MHz or 30 Gbps effective. The GPU contains 10752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s. Raw compute performance is rated at 56.28 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), which explains the strong PassMark G3D score of 36565 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 8637.

For ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, the RTX 5080 includes 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores. The RT cores handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the tensor cores process DLSS and other neural network tasks. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 255450 and OpenCL score of 235901 indicate the GPU excels at compute-heavy tasks beyond gaming, including rendering and machine learning inference. The PassMark GPU compute score of 21789 further confirms its strength in parallel processing.

The GPU’s 87th percentile ranking places it near the top of the database, with nearest rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (which scores 57367, 2.2% higher) and the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757, 0.6% lower). This puts the RTX 5080 in a competitive position, slightly behind one high-end AMD offering but ahead of others. The launch MSRP is 999 USD, and the card is rated for a 360 W TDP with a suggested 750 W PSU, dual-slot cooling, and a single 16-pin power connector.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73, indicating it outperforms 73% of all recorded system combinations. The GPU is the dominant component, sitting at the 87th percentile versus all GPUs, while the CPU sits at the 59th percentile versus all CPUs. This asymmetry is the defining characteristic of the build.

In CPU-specific benchmarks, the i5-13500TE scores 1743 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 246 in single-core, 7263 in R20 multi-core and 1025 in single-core, and 17294 in R23 multi-core with 2441 in single-core. The average benchmark score is 5002, which exactly matches the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G (5002, 0% delta). Other close rivals include the Intel Core i3-12300HE (4995, 0.1% slower), the Intel Xeon W-2150B (4992, 0.2% slower), and the Intel Core i7-1375PRE (4985, 0.3% slower). This places the CPU in a tight cluster of mid-range processors.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 8637, Geekbench OpenCL is 235901, and Geekbench Vulkan is 255450. PassMark scores include 208 for DirectX 10, 324 for DirectX 11, 151 for DirectX 12, 389 for DirectX 9, 1415 for G2D, 36565 for G3D, and 21789 for compute. The average GPU benchmark score is 56083, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S (55757) but 2.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (57367). The GPU also trails the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB by 0.7% (55698) and leads the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X by 2.3% (54828).

The combined picture is a system where the GPU provides high-end rasterization and compute performance, while the CPU delivers mid-range multi-threaded capability. The 73rd combined percentile reflects this: the build is not a top-tier all-around workstation, but it offers exceptional graphics performance for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score and how does it compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500TE scores 17294 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its average benchmark score of 5002 exactly matches the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, with a 0% delta, indicating identical overall CPU performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5080 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5080 has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 960.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is sufficient for high-resolution textures and compute workloads.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and which rival is closest in performance?

A: The RTX 5080 ranks at the 87th percentile versus all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, which scores 57367 compared to the RTX 5080’s 56083, a 2.2% difference.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory and what memory types are compatible?

A: Yes, the i5-13500TE supports ECC memory. It is compatible with both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU and its TDP?

A: The RTX 5080 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD and a TDP of 360 W, with a suggested PSU rating of 750 W.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts?

A: The i5-13500TE has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1300 MHz and a boost clock of 4.5 GHz. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface.

Q: How does the GPU perform in compute benchmarks like Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 5080 scores 235901 in Geekbench OpenCL and 255450 in Geekbench Vulkan, indicating strong compute performance for rendering and AI tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500TE is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The base clock is 1300 MHz, which is low for a desktop processor, but the boost clock reaches 4.5 GHz. This wide frequency range is characteristic of the 35W TDP design, which prioritizes energy efficiency over sustained all-core performance.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This L3 capacity is moderate for a 14-core chip, and the memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support included. The processor’s integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which provide basic display output but are not intended for gaming. PCIe support includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The CPU’s benchmark scores reveal its positioning. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 17294 is respectable for a 35W part, while the single-core score of 2441 indicates decent but not exceptional per-thread performance. The average benchmark score of 5002 places it at the 59th percentile, meaning it outperforms 59% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, has an identical average score of 5002, suggesting the two are interchangeable in raw throughput.

For real workloads, the i5-13500TE’s strength lies in multi-threaded productivity at moderate power draw. The 20 threads handle compilation, video encoding, and 3D rendering tasks competently, as evidenced by the R23 multi-core score. However, the low base clock and 35W TDP limit sustained all-core boost frequencies, meaning long-running workloads may see performance degrade as the chip hits thermal or power limits. The single-core performance is adequate for general desktop use and light gaming, but it will not match higher-wattage desktop CPUs in latency-sensitive tasks. The launch MSRP is $235, positioning it as a mid-range offering.

Who Should Build It

The primary target user for this CPU+GPU pairing is the enthusiast gamer who prioritizes GPU performance over CPU headroom. The RTX 5080’s 87th percentile ranking makes it a top-tier graphics solution, suitable for 4K gaming with ultra settings and ray tracing. The CPU’s 59th percentile is sufficient to avoid major bottlenecks at 4K, where the GPU is the limiting factor, making this a sensible choice for gamers who play at high resolutions and do not require extreme frame rates in CPU-bound esports titles.

Content creators who work primarily with GPU-accelerated applications will also benefit. The RTX 5080’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 336 tensor cores accelerate video rendering, 3D scene compositing, and AI-based effects in editing software. The CPU’s 20 threads provide enough multi-threaded capacity for background tasks while the GPU handles the heavy lifting, making this a capable workstation for video editors and 3D artists working with 4K or higher resolution assets.

Developers and engineers who use GPU compute for simulation, machine learning inference, or rendering will find the RTX 5080’s 235901 OpenCL score and 21789 PassMark compute score valuable. The CPU’s support for ECC memory and dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 provides stability for workstation use, though the 35W TDP means it is not ideal for heavily multithreaded CPU-only workloads. Students and small business users who need a system that can handle occasional gaming, productivity software, and moderate multi-tasking will find the CPU adequate, though the GPU is overkill for office tasks alone.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1440p, the RTX 5080’s 36565 PassMark G3D score and 8637 Steel Nomad score provide the raw performance to drive 144Hz or higher monitors in most titles. The CPU’s 2441 single-core score in R23 supports this, though frame rates may fluctuate in CPU-heavy scenes. At 4K, the GPU’s 960.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures textures stream quickly, and the 16 GB VRAM capacity prevents memory-related stutters in modern titles.

Streaming while gaming is a mixed scenario. The GPU’s tensor cores can handle encoding via NVENC, offloading this task from the CPU. However, the i5-13500TE’s 20 threads are only at the 59th percentile, so running a game, streaming software, and a browser simultaneously may cause occasional frame drops. The 17294 multi-core score in R23 gives some headroom, but it is not a high-end streaming CPU.

Video editing in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefits from the GPU’s 56.28 TFLOPS FP16 performance, which accelerates effects and color grading. The 16 GB VRAM allows for large timelines and 4K previews without memory pressure. The CPU handles timeline scrubbing and export encoding; its 17294 multi-core score suggests 4K export times will be moderate, not exceptional.

3D rendering in tools like Blender or Octane will favor the GPU heavily. The RTX 5080’s 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and denoising, with the 255450 Vulkan score indicating strong compute throughput. The CPU assists with scene preparation and physics, but the 35W TDP limits its sustained performance in long renders.

Software development workloads, including compilation and testing, rely on the CPU’s 20 threads. The 7263 R20 multi-core score shows the chip can handle parallel builds, but the low base clock means single-threaded compile steps will be slower than higher-clocked desktop CPUs. The ECC memory support is valuable for server-side development or data integrity.

Student and office work is a straightforward fit. The CPU’s single-core score of 2441 in R23 handles web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets with ease. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides display output without the discrete GPU active, saving power. The 35W TDP makes this an energy-efficient system for daily use, though the GPU’s 360W TDP negates efficiency when gaming or rendering.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13500TE with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 in a desktop configuration, as indicated by the build class of "desktop". The CPU is a 14-core Raptor Lake part with a 35W TDP designed for efficiency, while the GPU is a flagship Blackwell 2.0 card with a 360W TDP. The combined percentile of 73 places this system above 73% of recorded builds, but the component split is uneven.

The GPU is the clear performance leader, ranking at the 87th percentile with an average benchmark score of 56083. The CPU ranks at the 59th percentile with an average score of 5002. This creates a system that is exceptional for graphics-intensive tasks but only mid-range for CPU-heavy workloads. The overall tier is therefore defined by the GPU: this is a high-end gaming and GPU-compute system with a modest CPU underneath.

The RTX 5080’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE (2.2% faster) and the AMD Radeon 8060S (0.6% slower), placing it in the upper echelon of available GPUs. The CPU’s rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G and Intel Core i3-12300HE, are all within 0.3% of its performance, confirming its mid-range status. The launch MSRP of the GPU is 999 USD, and the CPU is $235, though the total build cost is not discussed here.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is clear: the GPU is the star, and the CPU is the limiting factor in CPU-bound workloads. At 1080p and 1440p with low to medium settings, the CPU’s 59th percentile ranking will cap frame rates, as the GPU’s 87th percentile has more than enough headroom to render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls. This is evidenced by the CPU’s single-core score of 2441 in R23, which is modest compared to high-end desktop CPUs.

At 4K ultra settings, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU. The RTX 5080’s 36565 PassMark G3D score and 8637 Steel Nomad score are high, but 4K resolution demands significant fill rate and bandwidth. The GPU’s 293.1 GPixel/s pixel rate and 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are sufficient, but the CPU’s 17294 multi-core score is enough to keep the GPU fed at this resolution, making the system GPU-bound as desired.

In CPU-heavy workloads like software compilation, 3D scene simulation, or multi-tasking, the CPU is the clear bottleneck. Its 7263 R20 multi-core score is mid-range, and the 35W TDP limits sustained boost clocks. The GPU’s compute capabilities, while strong, cannot compensate for CPU thread limitations in these tasks. For GPU-compute workloads like rendering or machine learning, the GPU is not a bottleneck at all—it is the primary accelerator, and the CPU merely feeds data.

The pair rank by FPS is null, meaning no direct frame rate comparison exists. Based on the percentile data, the system is unbalanced: the GPU outperforms the CPU by 28 percentile points. This imbalance is acceptable for 4K gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, where the GPU does the heavy lifting, but it is suboptimal for competitive 1080p gaming or CPU-intensive productivity tasks where a stronger CPU would yield better results.