SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

76%

GPU

97%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500TE

5,002 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

60,347 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500TE and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 represent one of the most extreme pairings in the desktop market: a low-power, efficiency-focused 14-core processor coupled with NVIDIA’s flagship consumer GPU. This combination is unusual, as the CPU is designed for thermal and power constraints while the GPU demands massive power and cooling. The benchmark data shows a system that is heavily GPU-bound in most scenarios, but with enough CPU headroom to avoid severe bottlenecks in many productivity tasks. This analysis relies strictly on the provided specification and benchmark data to explain where this build excels, where it struggles, and who should consider it.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500TE is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture. Its physical configuration is a hybrid design, though the core type split is not specified here; it operates on a 10 nm process node from Intel. The base clock is notably low at 1300.00 MHz, but the boost clock reaches 4.50 GHz, indicating a wide dynamic range. This is a low-power part with a 35 W TDP, which is a fraction of what a typical desktop CPU consumes, yet it still offers substantial multi-threaded capability.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 17294 points in multi-core and 2441 points in single-core. The single-core score of 2441 is strong for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The multi-core score of 17294 suggests that the 14 cores can handle heavy parallel workloads such as video encoding and 3D rendering, though it is not in the top tier for those tasks. The Cinebench R20 results show a similar pattern: 7263 multi-core and 1025 single-core. The R15 scores are 1743 multi-core and 246 single-core.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 5002, placing it in the 59th percentile among all CPUs. This means it outperforms more than half of all processors tested, but it is not a high-end enthusiast part. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G (same score of 5002, 0% delta), the Intel Core i3-12300HE (4995, 0.1% ahead), the Intel Xeon W-2150B (4992, 0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-1375PRE (4985, 0.3% ahead). The performance gap between this CPU and these rivals is negligible, all within 0.3%, meaning the 13500TE is effectively in a dead heat with these mid-range processors. The data suggests that for multi-threaded workloads, the 13500TE trades blows with a Ryzen 5 PRO part and a mobile-tuned Core i7, indicating it is a solid but not exceptional workstation CPU.

The cache structure includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. This is a modern layout that helps with data-heavy tasks. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it supports ECC memory, which is a feature often sought after for small business workstations and file servers. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770, which can drive displays but is not meant for gaming. The CPU also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is essential for connecting the high-bandwidth GPU.

The launch MSRP for the 13500TE is $235, and it was released in early 2023. The production status is Active, and it is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an option. For real workloads, the data shows a CPU that can handle compilation, rendering, and office tasks with ease. The low TDP makes it interesting for small form factor builds, but its performance ceiling is set by the 35 W power limit, which will cap sustained all-core boost clocks under heavy load.

Balance and Bottleneck

The RTX 4090 is a GPU with a 450 W TDP and a 1.01 TB/s memory bandwidth, while the 13500TE has a 35 W TDP. This creates a massive power and performance imbalance. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60347, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The CPU’s average score is 5002, in the 59th percentile. The combined percentile for this build is 74, which indicates that the overall system is above average but heavily weighted by the GPU’s dominance.

In gaming scenarios, the data indicates that the RTX 4090 will be the limiting factor only at extremely high resolutions or with ray tracing. At 1080p or 1440p, the CPU is likely to be the bottleneck in frame rate generation, because the GPU can render frames faster than the CPU can feed it draw calls. The CPU’s single-core score of 2441 in Cinebench R23 is respectable, but it is not a top-tier gaming chip like a high-clocked 13900K. The lack of a measured FPS data set means we cannot show exact numbers, but the benchmark scores suggest that in CPU-intensive games, the 13500TE will limit the 4090’s output. In contrast, for GPU-bound workloads like 4K gaming or 3D rendering, the RTX 4090 will be the primary driver of performance, and the CPU will have enough headroom to keep up.

For productivity, the bottleneck shifts based on the task. In multi-threaded rendering, the CPU’s 14 cores will be fully utilized, and the GPU’s compute power (82.58 TFLOPS FP32) may be idle if the software does not use GPU acceleration. In video editing with GPU effects, the 4090 will accelerate exports, but the CPU will handle timeline scrubbing and encoding. The data shows a system where the GPU is the star, but the CPU is not a weak link; it is merely a mid-range part paired with a top-tier component. The percentile difference (59 vs 88) is significant, indicating the CPU will often be the first to saturate in mixed workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core i5-13500TE and its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G?

A: The average benchmark scores are identical at 5002 points, with a 0% delta. The two processors are statistically tied in overall performance, meaning users should not expect a meaningful difference in day-to-day tasks based on the data.

Q: Does the RTX 4090 support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the GPU’s API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU, and what PSU is suggested?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, and the GPU has a 450 W TDP. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 850 W, which accounts for the system’s total draw.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, and the part number is SRMFZ. The data lists the multiplierUnlocked field as false.

Q: What kind of memory does the build support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature for error-correcting workloads.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The RTX 4090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU’s single-core performance compare to its multi-core performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2441, and the multi-core score is 17294. The multi-core score is roughly seven times higher, reflecting the benefit of 14 cores over a single core.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need maximum GPU compute and do not prioritize CPU-intensive gaming. The RTX 4090’s 88th percentile ranking makes it ideal for 4K gamers who want to max out settings, as the GPU will be the primary driver of frame rates. The CPU’s 59th percentile is sufficient for modern games at high resolutions, but not for competitive 1080p e-sports titles where high frame rates depend on CPU single-thread speed. The 24 GB of VRAM is suited for 3D artists and video editors working with large textures and timelines, while the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads handle rendering and encoding tasks, albeit not at the level of a 16-core or 24-core workstation chip.

Content creators who use GPU-accelerated renderers like Octane or Blender Cycles will see massive performance, as the 4090’s 128 RT cores and 82.58 TFLOPS FP32 compute dwarf most other GPUs. Software developers writing parallel code can leverage the 20 threads, but the low TDP may throttle sustained all-core workloads. Students and small business workstations will find the CPU’s ECC support and low power draw appealing, and the GPU, while overkill for office tasks, provides future-proofing for AI or video workloads. However, the 450 W GPU TDP requires a case with excellent airflow and a robust power supply, making this a poor choice for ultra-compact builds. The data does not support this build for budget-conscious users; it is a high-end system where the GPU dominates the cost and performance profile.

Benchmark Performance

The RTX 4090’s benchmark results are exceptional. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 9223. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 255416, and the Vulkan score is 271631, indicating strong compute performance in cross-platform APIs. The Passmark G3D score is 38194, with a GPU compute score of 26613. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 60347, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Arc Pro A60 (60326, 0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (60140, 0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61896, 2.5% behind), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (58657, 2.9% ahead). The 4090 is essentially tied with these professional-grade GPUs in the database, which is an anomaly given the 4090’s consumer positioning, but the data shows it clusters with workstation parts.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are moderate. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17294 and single-core of 2441 are solid for a 35 W part. The combined percentile for the build is 74, which is above the median but far from the top 10%. The data shows a system that is top-tier for GPU compute but mid-tier for CPU compute. In a combined picture, the 4090 will dominate any GPU-accelerated task, but the 13500TE will keep the system from being a top-tier all-rounder. The GPU’s Passmark DirectX scores are oddly low (224 for DX10, 326 for DX11, 150 for DX12, 397 for DX9), but these are likely misreported or specific to a legacy test; the G3D score of 38194 is the more reliable indicator of gaming performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p or 1440p, the RTX 4090 can output frame rates far beyond what the 13500TE can feed in CPU-bound titles. The data shows the CPU is in the 59th percentile, which is average, so expect the CPU to limit maximum FPS in e-sports games. At 4K, the GPU’s 88th percentile ranking takes over, and the system will deliver excellent frame rates in demanding titles.

Streaming: The 4090’s NVENC encoder is not detailed in the spec pack, but its compute power (82.58 TFLOPS) can handle encoding. The CPU’s 20 threads can manage streaming software and game logic simultaneously. This is a capable streaming rig, though the CPU may struggle with heavy multitasking while gaming.

Video editing: The 24 GB VRAM and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth on the GPU accelerate timeline effects and exports. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17294 supports 4K video decoding and rendering, but it is not a top-tier editor CPU. The data suggests a smooth experience for 1080p and 1440p editing, with 4K exports taking longer than on a higher-core CPU.

3D rendering: The 4090 excels here, with 128 RT cores and 82.58 TFLOPS FP32, making it one of the fastest GPU renderers. The CPU’s 14 cores will handle scene preparation and physics simulation, but the render time is dictated by the GPU, which is excellent.

Software development: The 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache handle compilation and virtualization well. The CPU’s average score is 5002, similar to a Ryzen 5 PRO, so build times will be moderate. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity in long-running builds.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 35 W TDP makes it efficient for all-day use, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 can drive multiple monitors. The GPU is entirely unnecessary for this workload, but it does not detract from basic tasks. The system is overkill for office tasks, but it will handle any spreadsheet or document with ease.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The build is based on Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but the motherboard choice will determine which type is used. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU provides 16 lanes, which is more than enough for the RTX 4090’s PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 850 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 35 W, so there is headroom for additional drives or cards, but the 450 W GPU TDP dominates the power budget.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the 13500TE with a higher-core Raptor Lake CPU on the same socket, as the platform supports it. The data does not specify which CPUs are compatible, but the socket and architecture suggest a drop-in upgrade path. The GPU is end-of-life, with a successor in the GeForce 50 series, so upgrading the GPU would require a new purchase, not a platform change. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means users can choose a board based on budget or performance, but the CPU’s performance is not limited by memory type in the data. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes are forward-looking, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build classified as a high-end gaming and workstation hybrid. The CPU is a 14-core Raptor Lake part with a 35 W TDP, and the GPU is an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 with a 450 W TDP. The combined percentile is 74, which places the system above the majority of builds in the database. The GPU is in the 88th percentile, while the CPU is in the 59th percentile, indicating a lopsided configuration. The RTX 4090 is the clear centerpiece, offering top-tier rasterization and compute performance, while the 13500TE provides adequate, though not exceptional, CPU performance. This is not a balanced build; it is a GPU-first system where the CPU is chosen for efficiency rather than raw speed.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this build, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores. The RTX 4090’s 88th percentile ranking and 24 GB of GDDR6X memory indicate it will deliver extremely high frame rates at 4K resolution in most games. The CPU’s 59th percentile ranking suggests that at 1080p, the 13500TE will be the limiting factor in CPU-bound titles, potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU can achieve. At 1440p, the balance shifts more toward the GPU, and at 4K, the GPU is almost always the bottleneck. The data does not provide specific FPS figures, but the GPU’s performance in 3DMark Steel Nomad (9223) and its massive bandwidth suggest it is one of the fastest gaming GPUs available. Users should expect playable frame rates at 4K ultra settings in most titles, with the caveat that very CPU-heavy simulations or strategy games may see lower performance due to the 13500TE’s moderate single-core speed.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds