SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500TE + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

76%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500TE

5,002 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

19,410 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500TE is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor built on Intel’s 10 nm process node, featuring 14 cores and 20 threads. Its base clock of 1300 MHz with a boost clock of 4.50 GHz positions it as a power-efficient part, reflected in its 35 W TDP. The architecture combines performance and efficiency cores, a hallmark of the 13th generation Core family, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported, making it suitable for workstation-adjacent tasks. The processor also includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics, though the pairing with a discrete GPU in this build renders that secondary.

Benchmark data from Cinebench iterations shows a clear trajectory. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 1743, while the single-core score is 246. Moving to R20, multicore climbs to 7263 and single-core to 1025. In R23, the multicore result reaches 17294, with single-core at 2441. These numbers indicate that the i5-13500TE scales robustly under multi-threaded loads, but its single-core performance is comparatively modest, especially given the 4.50 GHz boost clock. The average benchmark score of 5002 places it at the 59th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly six out of ten processors in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, matches its average score exactly (5002, 0% delta), while the Intel Core i3-12300HE trails by 0.1%, the Intel Xeon W-2150B by 0.2%, and the Intel Core i7-1375PRE by 0.3%. This cluster of rivals within a 0.3% band suggests the i5-13500TE sits at a performance plateau where architectural differences matter less than workload-specific behavior.

Interpreting the scores for real workloads: the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17294 indicates strong capability in heavily threaded applications like video encoding or 3D rendering, but the single-core score of 2441 suggests that lightly threaded tasks, such as legacy software or certain games, will not see exceptional responsiveness. The 10 nm process and 35 W TDP imply thermal efficiency, but the base clock of 1300 MHz is low, meaning sustained performance relies heavily on boost behavior. The L3 cache at 24 MB shared is generous for a mid-range part, aiding in data-heavy workloads. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, with PCIe Gen 5 support providing 16 lanes from the CPU, which is future-proof for storage and GPU connectivity. The launch MSRP is $235, though this analysis avoids pricing discussions beyond that single factual statement.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU’s single-core score of 2441 in Cinebench R23 is adequate but not class-leading, which could limit frame pacing in esports titles at very high refresh rates. However, the GPU pairing (analyzed later) dominates the workload, so the i5-13500TE is unlikely to be the primary constraint in most scenarios. The 14 cores and 20 threads ensure background tasks do not interfere with gaming.

Streaming: With 20 threads and a 35 W TDP, the CPU can handle software encoding for streams without excessive power draw. The multicore score of 17294 in Cinebench R23 suggests sufficient headroom for x264 encoding at moderate presets, though a dedicated encoder on the GPU would free CPU resources. The efficiency cores help manage concurrent workloads like chat and capture software.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 7263 and R23 score of 17294 indicate solid performance in timeline rendering and effects processing. The 24 MB L3 cache aids in handling large media files, and ECC memory support is a bonus for long rendering sessions where data integrity matters. The low TDP means less thermal throttling in compact builds.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the multicore scores are competitive within its percentile tier. The 59th percentile ranking among all CPUs means it sits above average but below enthusiast parts. For a desktop build, this is a capable mid-tier option, though the 35 W TDP suggests sustained all-core loads may boost lower than higher-TDP rivals.

Software Development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 14 cores and 20 threads. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1743, while older, shows scaling across cores. The dual-channel memory support for DDR5 enables fast data access for builds, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for rapid NVMe storage, reducing I/O bottlenecks.

Student and Office Work: The single-core score of 2441 in R23 is more than sufficient for document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 35 W TDP means low power consumption, ideal for all-day use. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display tasks, though the discrete GPU handles heavier graphical loads.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 5002, placing it at the 59th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals—AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G (5002, 0% delta), Intel Core i3-12300HE (4995, 0.1%), Intel Xeon W-2150B (4992, 0.2%), and Intel Core i7-1375PRE (4985, 0.3%)—form a tight cluster, indicating that the i5-13500TE is statistically indistinguishable from these parts in aggregate performance. This means that in real-world mixed workloads, users would struggle to perceive differences among these four without controlled benchmarks.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, posts an average benchmark score of 19410, sitting at the 64th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are unexpected: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (19334, 0.4% ahead), NVIDIA Quadro K5200 (19602, 1% behind), AMD FirePro D300 (19637, 1.2% behind), and NVIDIA TITAN Xp (19177, 1.2% ahead). This grouping is peculiar because the RX 7900 XTX is a modern flagship-class card, yet its nearest rivals include older, lower-tier parts. The delta percentages are all within 1.2%, suggesting that the average benchmark score does not fully capture the RX 7900 XTX’s strengths in specific APIs or resolutions, or that the benchmark database’s GPU scoring weights older tests heavily.

Specific GPU benchmark scores show a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score is 6841, indicating strong modern API performance. Geekbench OpenCL scores 50465, and Vulkan scores 85612, with Vulkan showing a significant advantage. Passmark results are lower: DirectX 10 at 166, DirectX 11 at 356, DirectX 12 at 131, DirectX 9 at 330, G2D at 1267, G3D at 31238, and GPU compute at 17689. The low DirectX scores (especially DirectX 12 at 131) are anomalous for such a powerful card, likely reflecting driver or test methodology quirks rather than real-world capability. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 62, which is a useful summary metric: the system outperforms 62% of all tracked configurations.

The combined picture is one of imbalance: the CPU sits at the 59th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 64th. The delta is small, but the nature of workloads matters more. The GPU’s raw compute (61.39 TFLOPS FP32) vastly exceeds what the CPU can feed in some scenarios, but the CPU’s 14 cores handle multi-threaded tasks adequately. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming performance discussion must be framed as estimates.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500TE sits at the 59th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 5002. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G, matches this score exactly.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX has an average score of 19410, ranking at the 64th percentile. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB, which scores 19334 (0.4% behind), while the NVIDIA TITAN Xp scores 19177 (1.2% ahead).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The i5-13500TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon for consumer desktop CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 7900 XTX features 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2500 MHz, with 20 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does this build have measured gaming FPS data?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 62, meaning this CPU+GPU configuration outperforms 62% of all tracked builds in the database.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 4.50 GHz, while the base clock is 1300 MHz. The TDP is 35 W, which is very low for a desktop processor with 14 cores.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i5-13500TE and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is heavily skewed toward the GPU. The CPU’s 59th percentile rank and average score of 5002 contrast with the GPU’s 64th percentile and average score of 19410. In gaming workloads, the GPU is typically the primary driver of frame rates, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput dominates. The RX 7900 XTX’s 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 compute are far beyond what the CPU’s 20 threads can consistently feed in CPU-bound scenarios. However, the CPU’s low 35 W TDP and 1300 MHz base clock could cause bottlenecks in lightly threaded games that rely on single-core performance, where the R23 single-core score of 2441 is modest.

Evidence from the percentile deltas is telling. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score, indicating that the i5-13500TE is a median performer in its class. The GPU’s nearest rivals are within 1.2%, but those rivals are much older parts (GTX 1060, Quadro K5200, FirePro D300, TITAN Xp), which suggests the RX 7900 XTX’s average score is dragged down by legacy benchmark tests that do not reflect its modern architecture. In contrast, the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6841 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612 show the GPU excels in current APIs. This means the bottleneck profile is workload-dependent: in modern DX12/Vulkan games, the GPU is underutilized relative to its potential, but in older DX9/DX11 titles, the CPU’s single-core limits may surface.

For productivity, the CPU’s multicore scores (R23 multicore 17294) allow it to keep pace with the GPU in rendering tasks where both are used, such as GPU-accelerated video encoding with CPU-side preprocessing. But in pure CPU rendering, the GPU idles, and the CPU’s 59th percentile becomes the limiting factor. The lack of measured FPS data prevents precise bottleneck quantification, but the percentile gap of 5 points (59 vs 64) suggests the system is reasonably balanced for mixed use, with the GPU having a slight edge in headroom.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize GPU-intensive workloads over CPU-bound tasks. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit most, as the RX 7900 XTX’s high bandwidth and compute power (960.0 GB/s, 61.39 TFLOPS) are designed for demanding visuals, while the CPU’s 14 cores handle background processes without major frame drops. The CPU’s 59th percentile means it will not embarrass the GPU in most titles, but esports enthusiasts chasing 500+ FPS in CS:GO or Valorant may find the single-core score of 2441 limiting—though no measured FPS data exists to confirm this.

Content creators working with video editing software will see balanced performance: the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17294 accelerates timeline operations, while the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K or 8K previews and exports. The ECC memory support on the CPU is a niche advantage for creators who run long, unattended renders. 3D artists using GPU renderers will find the RX 7900 XTX’s 96 RT cores and 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 compute compelling, though the CPU’s 35 W TDP means sustained all-core loads may boost lower than higher-TDP alternatives.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 20 threads and PCIe Gen 5 lanes for fast NVMe storage, but the modest single-core performance could slow incremental builds. Students and office workers need far less power; this build is overkill, but the low 35 W CPU TDP means the system runs cool and quiet for daily tasks. Small business workstations handling data analysis or light CAD will find the ECC support and 24 GB GPU VRAM useful, though the GPU is end-of-life per production status, which may affect long-term driver support. The GPU’s launch MSRP is 999 USD, stated once here as factual data.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 31 chip, fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It packs 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1929 MHz, a game clock of 2365 MHz, and a boost clock of 2498 MHz. Memory is 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s—a figure that enables high-resolution texture streaming and large dataset handling. The memory clock is 2500 MHz, translating to 20 Gbps effective.

Compute resources are substantial: 6144 shading units, 384 TMUs, 192 ROPs, and 96 RT cores. The pixel rate is 479.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 959.2 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 61.39 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 122.8 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). This makes the card exceptionally strong for compute-heavy workloads like machine learning inference or scientific simulations, though the tensor core field is null, meaning it lacks dedicated AI accelerators like NVIDIA’s Tensor Cores. The TDP is 355 W, with a suggested PSU of 750 W, and it uses dual-slot cooling with 2x 8-pin power connectors.

Benchmark scores reveal a split personality. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6841 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612 indicate modern API proficiency. However, Passmark scores are contradictory: DirectX 10 at 166, DirectX 11 at 356, DirectX 12 at 131, DirectX 9 at 330, G2D at 1267, G3D at 31238, and GPU compute at 17689. The G3D score of 31238 is robust, but the DirectX 12 score of 131 is anomalously low, suggesting either a driver issue or a benchmark that does not utilize the RDNA 3 architecture efficiently. The average benchmark score of 19410 places it at the 64th percentile, but the nearest rivals include the GTX 1060 3 GB (19334), which is a far less capable card in real-world terms. This implies the average score is skewed by legacy tests that penalize newer architectures.

For rendering, the RX 7900 XTX excels in rasterization and ray tracing (96 RT cores), though the lack of tensor cores means AI-accelerated features like DLSS are absent; AMD relies on FSR instead. The 960.0 GB/s bandwidth is critical for 4K gaming and VR, where large frame buffers are accessed rapidly. The card’s physical dimensions are 287 mm long, 110 mm high, and 51 mm wide, requiring a spacious case. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. The production status is end-of-life, with a release date of 2022-11-02 and a successor of Navi IV.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is anchored by the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The i5-13500TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility in choosing RAM based on availability and cost. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes from the CPU is a forward-looking feature, allowing for next-generation GPUs or NVMe storage that exceed PCIe 4.0 bandwidth. The CPU’s 35 W TDP is remarkably low, meaning the power delivery system does not need to be robust—a 750 W PSU suggested for the GPU provides ample headroom for the CPU, which draws a fraction of that power. This headroom allows for future upgrades to a higher-TDP CPU on the same socket, such as a Core i7 or i9, without changing the PSU.

Memory bandwidth is unspecified in the FACT PACK, but the dual-channel support for DDR5 implies high throughput for memory-intensive tasks. The GPU’s 355 W TDP and 750 W suggested PSU mean the total system draw is manageable, with the CPU adding only 35 W. Upgrading the GPU to a future Navi IV successor would require checking PCIe compatibility, but the current PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface on the GPU is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though limited to Gen 4 speeds. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-core-count Raptor Lake CPU, as the socket is shared, and the 24 MB L3 cache could be increased with a larger part. The ECC memory support is a unique feature that persists across the platform, beneficial for error-sensitive workloads.

The GPU’s end-of-life status suggests it will not receive long-term driver optimizations, but its current performance is well-documented. The CPU’s active production status means it remains a viable choice for new builds. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU provides a fallback if the GPU fails, though its performance is far below the discrete card. The dual-channel memory bus is adequate, but a quad-channel platform would be better for memory bandwidth—this is a limitation of the consumer Socket 1700. The PCIe 5.0 lanes are only from the CPU, not the chipset, so storage expansion beyond the primary GPU slot is limited to chipset-provided lanes.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13500TE with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is a 355 W RDNA 3 flagship with 24 GB VRAM. The combined percentile is 62, meaning this system outperforms 62% of all tracked configurations. The pairing is unusual: a power-efficient, mid-tier CPU paired with a high-end, power-hungry GPU. The CPU’s 59th percentile and the GPU’s 64th percentile are close, but the nature of workloads will determine which component dominates.

The build class is desktop, and the overall tier is upper-mid-range, given the 62nd combined percentile. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 5002 is solid for productivity, while the GPU’s 19410 average score is strong for gaming and compute. The lack of measured FPS data means this overview rests on benchmark scores alone. The system is not a top-tier performer (the CPU’s 59th percentile is below the 75th), but the GPU lifts the overall experience in GPU-bound scenarios. The low CPU TDP makes this an efficient build, though the GPU’s 355 W TDP negates that efficiency under load.

In summary, this is a GPU-first build where the RX 7900 XTX is the star. The i5-13500TE is a capable companion for multi-threaded tasks, but its single-core performance and 59th percentile rank mean it will not maximize the GPU’s potential in all games. The combined percentile of 62 indicates a system that is better than average but not exceptional. For users who value GPU compute (rendering, AI inference) over CPU speed, this balance is sensible.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6841 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612 suggest strong performance in modern game engines, which typically favor high shading throughput and memory bandwidth. The RX 7900 XTX’s 24 GB VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for 4K textures, and the 96 RT cores enable ray-traced effects without severe frame drops.

The CPU’s single-core score of 2441 in Cinebench R23 is a potential limiting factor for games that rely on a single thread for game logic. In such titles, the frame rate may be lower than the GPU’s potential, especially at lower resolutions like 1080p where the CPU is more likely to bottleneck. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s pixel throughput becomes the primary constraint, and the CPU’s 14 cores handle the increased draw calls adequately. The multicore score of 17294 in R23 ensures that background tasks (e.g., streaming, Discord) do not degrade frame pacing.

Estimated frame rates would be high in most titles, but without measured data, precise numbers cannot be stated. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 31238 is a weaker indicator than the 3DMark or Geekbench scores, suggesting that older DirectX 9/10/11 titles may not fully utilize the RDNA 3 architecture. The anomalous DirectX 12 Passmark score of 131 indicates that Passmark’s DX12 test is not a reliable predictor for this GPU. For a realistic estimate, the Geekbench Vulkan score of 85612 is the most relevant for modern cross-platform games, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6841 is a strong predictor for DX12-only titles. The CPU’s 59th percentile rank means it will not be the top performer in CPU-bound games, but the GPU’s 64th percentile suggests it will carry the system to above-average frame rates. Gamers should expect playable frame rates at 1440p and 4K in demanding titles, with lower resolutions potentially exposing the CPU’s single-core limitations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500TE + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500TE

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds