SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500T

28,670 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500T and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop-class build with an 89th combined percentile, pairing an 80th-percentile CPU with a 98th-percentile GPU. The benchmark data defines the relationship between the two components, and all gaming conclusions in this analysis are estimates drawn from those scores.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK’s measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty and dataIsMeasured is false, so there are no game-specific or resolution-specific FPS figures to report. The usable evidence is the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 175286, its Vulkan score of 194041, and the component percentiles.

The CPU’s strongest gaming-related signal is single-thread throughput: Cinebench R23 single-core 1754 and PassMark single_thread 3580. Those scores suggest the processor can keep a game’s main simulation thread fed in many titles, but the CPU’s 80th overall percentile places it below the GPU’s 98th percentile. In graphically heavy scenes, the GPU should become the dominant contributor, since it carries more rendering headroom and a 32 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 576 GB/s bandwidth. In lighter scenes, the CPU’s 80th percentile is the lower-positioned component and would likely be the limiting factor when chasing very high frame rates.

At lower resolutions, the CPU’s role grows because the GPU is not under as much rendering pressure. At higher resolutions, the GPU’s 98th percentile, 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, and large memory pool become more important. This is an estimate rather than a measured FPS ranking, so no single game can be declared faster than another from this data.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 1754, PassMark single_thread 3580) enable strong per-core responsiveness, while the GPU’s 98th percentile provides the rendering throughput. The pairing should be capable of high frame rates in easily renderable scenes, but the CPU’s 80th percentile suggests refresh-rate chasing will eventually run into a processor limit.

Streaming: The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads, backed by Cinebench R23 multicore 11028 and PassMark multithread 22654, give the system parallel headroom for running a game and a streaming workload at the same time. Streaming is not directly benchmarked, but the multi-thread scores point to enough CPU throughput for simultaneous workloads.

Video editing: Video editing would draw on both halves: the CPU’s 20 threads for timeline and compression tasks, and the GPU’s 32 GB GDDR6 memory and 576 GB/s bandwidth for effects and preview buffers. The GPU’s 98th percentile makes it the stronger contributor in this pairing.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32, 100 RT cores, and 400 tensor cores make it the clear render engine. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore 11028 is secondary, supporting scene preparation and data processing while the GPU handles the heavy compute.

Software development: PassMark integer math 84427, extended instructions 16599, and data encryption 15543 are relevant for compilation, code analysis, and encryption-heavy work. With 20 threads and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, the processor can keep build tasks moving while the GPU remains available for other jobs.

Student and office work: The 35 W TDP CPU and integrated UHD Graphics 770 mean the system can handle everyday desktop workloads without relying on the discrete GPU. The integrated graphics handles display output, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation stays reserved for heavier tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 28670, placing it in the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its detailed results include Cinebench R15 multicore 1945 and single-core 247, Cinebench R20 multicore 8011 and single-core 1130, Cinebench R23 multicore 11028 and single-core 1754, Geekbench multicore 8888 and single-core 2279, and PassMark multithread 22654 and single_thread 3580.

Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered. The Intel Core i5-12600 has an average score of 28646 and is 0.1% behind. The AMD EPYC 7203P scores 28583 and is 0.3% behind. The Intel Core 5 220H scores 28574 and is 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS scores 28549 and is 0.4% behind. This shows the i5-13500T is essentially on par with a broad set of competitors rather than standing clearly above them.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 184664, placing it in the 98th percentile among all GPUs. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 175286 and its Vulkan score is 194041. Its nearest rivals are also high-end accelerators: the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183725 and is 0.5% behind, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187147 and is 1.3% ahead of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182109 and is 1.4% behind, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178050 and is 3.7% behind.

The combined percentile is 89. That places the full pairing above most desktop systems, driven primarily by the GPU’s exceptional standing relative to all GPUs.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at the lower end of the resolution spectrum who favor high frame rates over raw resolution will benefit from the GPU’s 98th percentile, but they should expect the CPU’s 80th percentile to set the ceiling in lightly threaded games. Content creators who need large GPU memory for texture-heavy video work are a natural fit because the GPU has 32 GB GDDR6 and 576 GB/s bandwidth. 3D artists and simulation users can use the 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores for ray-traced and tensor-heavy workloads. Software developers working on parallel builds can use the CPU’s 20 threads, PassMark multithread 22654, and integer math 84427. Students and office workers get a low-power desktop with integrated graphics for basic display, and small business workstations can use the same pairing for mixed productivity and rendering tasks. None of these recommendations are based on measured game FPS; they are directly tied to the benchmark scores and percentiles in the data.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500T is a Raptor Lake-S desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die. The chip has 14 cores and 20 threads, a base clock of 1600 MHz, a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, does not support ECC memory, and exposes PCIe Gen5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. It also includes UHD Graphics 770, and its multiplier is not unlocked.

The benchmark results describe a processor that is well-rounded but not a performance leader. Cinebench R23 multicore 11028 and Geekbench multicore 8888 show solid parallel throughput, while Cinebench R23 single-core 1754, Geekbench single-core 2279, and PassMark single_thread 3580 show respectable per-core performance. The PassMark sub-tests add more texture: data compression 271348, data encryption 15543, extended instructions 16599, integer math 84427, floating point math 61640, random string sorting 28893, physics 1112, and prime numbers 73. In real workloads, the CPU is strongest in multi-threaded productivity and integer-heavy tasks, and its 35 W TDP marks it as a restrained desktop part.

Balance and Bottleneck

The most telling data point is the percentile split: the CPU is at the 80th percentile while the GPU is at the 98th percentile. That means the graphics card is far more exceptional relative to its market than the processor. In workloads where the GPU is the active render engine, the GPU’s 98th percentile and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput dominate. In workloads where scene complexity is low or where per-thread CPU speed matters, the CPU becomes the limiting part.

Without game-specific FPS rows, there is no measured FPS scaling to compare across resolutions or titles. The benchmark positions are enough to say the CPU is the lower-positioned component. The GPU’s nearest rivals are all high-end accelerators clustered within 3.7% or less, while the CPU’s nearest rivals are clustered within 0.4% and span Intel and AMD parts. For frame-rate-driven gaming, the CPU would likely limit maximum FPS in light scenes; for rendering and compute, the GPU sets the pace. This is the central imbalance of the pairing.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is built on the AD102 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The GPU has 12800 shading units, 400 TMUs, 176 ROPs, 100 RT cores, and 400 tensor cores. Its base clock is 1155 MHz, its boost clock is 2550 MHz, and its memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective transfer. Memory is 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 576 GB/s bandwidth.

The rendering specifications are substantial: a pixel rate of 448.8 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 1,020.0 GTexel/s, FP32 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput of 65.28 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The card is dual-slot, has a 250 W TDP, uses one 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 600 W. It connects through PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results confirm its position: Geekbench OpenCL 175286, Geekbench Vulkan 194041, and an average benchmark score of 184664 at the 98th percentile. For rendering, the equal FP16 and FP32 throughput and the 576 GB/s bandwidth are useful for large data sets. The 32 GB frame buffer allows large scenes, and the 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide specialized parallel paths for ray-traced and tensor-heavy workloads. The GPU is the dominant component in this build.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 89.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500T is in the 80th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28670.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is in the 98th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184664.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the i5-13500T includes UHD Graphics 770.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with no ECC support.

Q: How much GPU memory does the RTX 5000 Ada Generation have?

A: It has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: No, the multiplierUnlocked field is false.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The processor uses Intel Socket 1700. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so the platform’s Gen5 lanes are available for storage or other devices without displacing the graphics card. DDR4 and DDR5 support means the memory upgrade path depends on which memory type the motherboard implements. ECC memory is not supported.

The CPU multiplier is not unlocked, so manual frequency tuning is not an open path. The suggested PSU is 600 W, the GPU TDP is 250 W, and the CPU TDP is 35 W, leaving power headroom for the rest of the system. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-percentile CPU on the same socket to better match the GPU’s 98th percentile. The GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth mean it is already a high-end component and is not the primary bottleneck in this pairing.

Build Overview

The Intel Core i5-13500T and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop-class build, as indicated by buildClass. The CPU’s launch MSRP is $232. The pairing combines a 14-core, 20-thread processor with a 250 W dual-slot workstation GPU. Its combined percentile is 89, with the CPU at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 98th percentile. This is a pairing where the GPU is the elite component and the CPU is competent but not exceptional. The data describes an active production desktop combination suited to GPU-heavy rendering, video work, high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions, and mixed productivity, with the caveat that all gaming conclusions are estimates because no measured FPS data exists for the exact pairing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds