SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500T + NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500T

28,670 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

135,218 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500T paired with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a desktop build that sits at the 88th combined percentile, indicating a high-tier configuration for professional workloads and demanding applications. The CPU delivers strong multi-threaded performance with an 80th percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 95th percentile, making it the dominant component in this pairing. Benchmark data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming discussion is estimated from the computed scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500T is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a base clock of 1600 MHz and a boost clock of 4.6 GHz, with a thermal design power of 35 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics come in the form of UHD Graphics 770, and the socket is Intel Socket 1700.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11028 places this chip in a competitive position, with the single-core score of 1754 indicating solid per-thread performance for a low-power part. Geekbench scores show 8888 multicore and 2279 single-core, reinforcing the balance between multi-threaded throughput and responsive single-threaded tasks. The Passmark multithread score of 22654 and single-thread score of 3580 further characterize the CPU's capability across mixed workloads.

The average benchmark score of 28670 puts the i5-13500T at the 80th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i5-12600 at a delta of 0.1%, the AMD EPYC 7203P at 0.3%, and the Intel Core 5 220H at 0.3%. These tiny deltas mean the i5-13500T is statistically indistinguishable from those processors in average performance, though the specific workload distribution differs. For real-world tasks, the Passmark data shows strong integer math at 84427 and floating-point math at 61640, indicating good arithmetic throughput for scientific or financial simulations. Data encryption scores 15543, while extended instructions hit 16599, showing capable vector processing for multimedia codecs.

The 35 W TDP is remarkably low for a 14-core design, which means sustained multicore loads will be thermally efficient, but the 4.6 GHz boost is modest compared to higher-tier Raptor Lake parts. The architecture employs a hybrid layout typical of the generation, with performance and efficiency cores working together. The L3 cache of 24 MB shared across all cores is adequate for most applications but not exceptional. For content creation, the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 8011 suggests this CPU can handle video encoding and 3D rendering tasks, though it will trail higher-power desktop chips in prolonged all-core workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the AD104 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 2175 MHz, with a TDP of 130 W. Memory consists of 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The GPU features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores for accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads.

Pixel rate reaches 139.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance at 26.73 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The card uses a single-slot design with one 16-pin power connector, and the suggested PSU is 300 W. It interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Dimensions are 245 mm in length and 112 mm in height, making it a compact workstation card.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 place this GPU at the 95th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 135218. Nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A10M at 0% delta, the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at -0.1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo at -0.4%. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation essentially ties with the A10M in raw compute, which is notable given the newer architecture. The 20 GB VRAM is substantial for large datasets, and the 360.0 GB/s bandwidth supports heavy texture streaming and complex scenes. The 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while 192 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-driven features. For rendering, the FP32 throughput of 26.73 TFLOPS is significant for a 130 W card, making it suitable for professional 3D applications, simulation, and machine learning inference.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The build sits at the 88th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 95th percentile among all components.

Q: How much L3 cache does the Intel Core i5-13500T have?

A: The CPU has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4000 Ada Generation?

A: The GPU provides 360.0 GB/s of bandwidth through 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus.

Q: What is the TDP of the Intel Core i5-13500T?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is notably low for a 14-core processor.

Q: How does the RTX 4000 Ada Generation compare to the NVIDIA A10M in average benchmark score?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has an average score of 135218, which is 0% different from the NVIDIA A10M's 135230, making them effectively equal in compute performance.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is shared with other 13th Gen and 12th Gen processors. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in choosing between older and newer memory standards. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU means future storage devices and accelerators can take advantage of higher bandwidth, though the GPU itself runs on PCIe 4.0 x16. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a TDP of 130 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W. This leaves substantial headroom for additional components, as the CPU's 35 W TDP is minimal. A system with this pairing could comfortably run with a single 300 W power supply, and upgrading to a higher-power CPU in the same socket would still fit within typical PSU capacities. The GPU uses a single 16-pin connector, which is standard for modern workstation cards. The single-slot design at 245 mm length means it fits in most desktop cases without clearance issues. The four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups, which is common for professional workstations.

For a sensible next upgrade, moving to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake CPU on the same socket would improve multicore performance without changing the motherboard. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking suggests it is the stronger component, so CPU upgrades would be the primary path to balance the system further. Memory upgrades to faster DDR5 kits could improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads, though the CPU's memory controller handles dual-channel configurations. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU allow for future Gen 5 NVMe SSDs, which would complement the existing platform.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing. The GPU's 95th percentile ranking and FP32 performance of 26.73 TFLOPS indicate strong rasterization capability, while the CPU's 80th percentile and single-thread score of 3580 in Passmark suggest sufficient gaming responsiveness. The 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

Based on the compute scores, this pairing should deliver high frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions in most titles, given the GPU's performance tier. The CPU's 4.6 GHz boost clock and 14 cores handle modern game engines that utilize multiple threads, though the 35 W TDP may limit sustained all-core boost under heavy gaming loads. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 48 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the 192 tensor cores support DLSS, which can boost performance in supported games. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 123842 indicates strong API-level performance for modern graphics titles.

The absence of measured FPS data means these expectations are qualitative estimates. The GPU's 95th percentile versus the CPU's 80th percentile suggests that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU may become a limiting factor, while at 4K, the GPU will dominate the rendering pipeline. For esports titles with low graphical demands, the CPU's single-core performance should sustain high refresh rates. For AAA single-player games with heavy effects, the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will drive frame rates, and the 20 GB memory buffer prevents VRAM capacity issues even with maxed-out settings.

Who Should Build It

This desktop configuration targets users who need a strong GPU with professional compute capability and a power-efficient CPU. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 20 GB VRAM and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it suitable for 3D rendering, video editing, and scientific computing. The 95th GPU percentile indicates it outperforms the vast majority of graphics cards, so professionals in architecture, engineering, and media production would benefit. The CPU's 80th percentile and 14-core design handle multi-threaded tasks like compiling code, batch image processing, and data analysis.

Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will find the GPU's 360.0 GB/s bandwidth and 48 RT cores valuable for fast previews and final renders. Developers who run virtual machines or build large software projects can leverage the 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache. Students in computer graphics or data science programs would benefit from the tensor cores for machine learning experiments. Small business workstations that require reliability and low power draw will appreciate the CPU's 35 W TDP and the GPU's 130 W TDP, which keeps cooling and electricity costs manageable.

The GPU's 95th percentile versus the CPU's 80th percentile means this build is GPU-centric, so users whose workloads are primarily GPU-bound will see the most benefit. Tasks like real-time ray tracing, GPU-accelerated simulation, and AI inference will perform exceptionally well. The 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor setups for trading, monitoring, or design work. The single-slot design makes it ideal for dense workstation builds where space is limited, and the 300 W suggested PSU keeps system requirements modest.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13500T achieves an average benchmark score of 28670, placing it at the 80th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12600, scores 28646, a delta of 0.1%, meaning the two are effectively tied. The AMD EPYC 7203P at 28583 is 0.3% behind, and the Intel Core 5 220H at 28574 is also 0.3% behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS at 28549 trails by 0.4%. These margins are negligible, so the i5-13500T's performance profile is competitive with those chips despite its low TDP.

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation posts an average benchmark score of 135218, ranking at the 95th percentile of all GPUs. The NVIDIA A10M scores 135230, a 0% delta, showing identical aggregate performance. The AMD Radeon PRO W6800 at 135396 is -0.1% ahead, and the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo at 135774 is -0.4% ahead. The AMD Radeon PRO V620 at 136472 leads by -0.9%. The GPU's 95th percentile is substantially higher than the CPU's 80th percentile, confirming the GPU is the performance driver in this build.

The combined percentile of 88 reflects a high-tier desktop system. The CPU's specific scores include a Cinebench R23 multicore of 11028 and single-core of 1754, with Geekbench multicore at 8888 and single-core at 2279. The Passmark suite shows multithread at 22654 and single-thread at 3580. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 146593 and Vulkan score of 123842 demonstrate strong compute capability. Together, these numbers suggest a system that excels in GPU-heavy workloads while maintaining competent CPU performance for general tasks.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13500T with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, creating a system that ranks at the 88th combined percentile. The CPU, from the Core 13th Gen series, is a 14-core processor with a 35 W TDP and a 4.6 GHz boost clock. The GPU, from the GeForce 40-series workstation lineup, is a 130 W single-slot card with 20 GB of GDDR6 memory and 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The pairing is unusual because the GPU is significantly more powerful than the CPU, with the GPU at the 95th percentile versus the CPU at the 80th.

The build class is desktop, indicating a stationary workstation or gaming PC rather than a laptop. The overall tier is high, given the 88th combined percentile and the GPU's near-top-tier ranking. The CPU's low power draw of 35 W makes this an energy-efficient system for its performance level, while the GPU's 130 W TDP adds modest power consumption. The 300 W suggested PSU confirms the system does not require an oversized power supply, making it accessible for standard desktop cases.

The architecture pairing of Raptor Lake CPU and Ada Lovelace GPU represents a recent generation of hardware, with the CPU released on 2023-01-03 and the GPU on 2023-08-08. The CPU has a launch MSRP of $232, though the GPU has no listed launch MSRP. The production status for both is active, meaning they are currently available. This build targets users who need professional-grade GPU performance without sacrificing CPU efficiency, making it a balanced choice for workstation applications where GPU compute is the primary bottleneck.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data clearly shows the GPU is the stronger component, with a 95th percentile ranking compared to the CPU's 80th percentile. This 15-percentage-point gap indicates that the GPU will be the performance ceiling in most workloads, particularly those that are graphics-intensive or GPU-compute-bound. For gaming, this means frame rates will be limited by the CPU in CPU-bound scenarios, such as low-resolution or high-refresh-rate gaming, where the GPU has excess headroom. At higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU's 26.73 TFLOPS FP32 performance will dominate, and the CPU will be less of a constraint.

In rendering and compute tasks, the GPU's 146593 OpenCL score and 123842 Vulkan score demonstrate significant parallel processing power, while the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11028 shows competent but not exceptional multi-threaded throughput. The CPU's Passmark integer math of 84427 and floating-point math of 61640 are adequate for general processing, but the GPU's FP32 of 26.73 TFLOPS is several orders of magnitude higher for parallel workloads. Therefore, the GPU will accelerate tasks like ray tracing, neural network inference, and video encoding, while the CPU handles serial tasks and system management.

The FPS scaling evidence is not available since no measured FPS rows exist, but the percentile difference suggests that in gaming, the CPU may bottleneck the GPU at 1080p, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide enough parallelism for modern games, but the low 35 W TDP and modest 4.6 GHz boost clock mean it cannot sustain high single-thread performance indefinitely. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 360.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure that texture-heavy games will not stall, making the GPU the clear performance leader. For users who upgrade, focusing on a higher-performance CPU would balance the system, though the GPU's 95th percentile means it will remain the dominant component for the foreseeable future.