SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500T

28,670 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13500T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090: A Lopsided Powerhouse

This pairing combines a 35-watt efficiency-focused 14-core Intel processor with NVIDIA's flagship 32 GB Blackwell GPU, creating a system where the graphics card operates at a completely different performance tier than the CPU. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all frame rate discussions below are estimated from the benchmark scores of each component rather than verified game testing. The data paints a clear picture: the RTX 5090 is the dominant element, with a 92nd percentile standing among all GPUs, while the i5-13500T sits at the 80th percentile among CPUs — a notable gap that shapes every workload outcome.

Gaming Performance

Without measured FPS data for this specific pairing, frame rates must be inferred from the synthetic benchmark scores. The RTX 5090's PassMark G3D score of 39,650 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 18,355 place it in the top 8% of all GPUs, indicating exceptional rasterization throughput. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,754 and Geekbench single-core result of 2,279 suggest adequate per-thread performance for gaming, but the 80th percentile CPU standing versus the GPU's 92nd percentile creates a substantial imbalance.

At 1080p resolution, the CPU would likely constrain frame rates in esports titles where high FPS depends heavily on single-thread performance. The i5-13500T's PassMark single-thread score of 3,580 trails what top-tier gaming CPUs achieve, so competitive shooters might see lower average FPS than the GPU alone could deliver. The RTX 5090's 176 ROPs and 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are more than sufficient for 1080p, but the processor becomes the limiting factor in CPU-bound scenes.

At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU. The RTX 5090's 1.79 TB/s memory bandwidth and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute handle higher resolutions with ease, while the CPU's workload per frame diminishes. The 14-core, 20-thread configuration with a 4.6 GHz boost clock provides enough headroom for most titles at this resolution, though frame pacing in heavily populated scenes could suffer from the 35 W TDP's thermal constraints.

At 4K, the RTX 5090 fully asserts dominance. The GPU's 32 GB GDDR7 memory and 512-bit bus width eliminate any capacity or bandwidth bottlenecks at ultra settings, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score suggests 4K ultra gaming is well within reach. The CPU's influence on average FPS shrinks considerably at this resolution, making the pairing more sensible for 4K than for lower resolutions. The data indicates 4K ultra settings represent the best-case scenario for this combination, where the GPU's massive compute resources are fully utilized.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is mismatched for high-refresh 1080p or 1440p play. The RTX 5090's PassMark G3D score of 39,650 could drive very high frame rates, but the i5-13500T's 80th percentile CPU standing and PassMark single-thread score of 3,580 would likely bottleneck at refresh rates above 144 Hz. The system can deliver high FPS, but the CPU caps the ceiling.

Streaming: The RTX 5090's 680 tensor cores and Blackwell architecture provide robust hardware encoding capabilities, offloading stream encoding from the CPU. The i5-13500T's 20 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,028 handle concurrent gaming and encoding workloads, though the 35 W TDP limits sustained multi-threaded performance during simultaneous tasks.

Video editing: The GPU's 32 GB VRAM and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 compute accelerate effects, color grading, and timeline rendering significantly. The CPU's Geekbench multi-core score of 8,888 and PassMark multi-thread score of 22,654 provide adequate processing for codec-heavy workflows, but the low TDP means export times will not match higher-wattage processors.

3D rendering: The RTX 5090's 21,760 shading units and 680 tensor cores excel at GPU-accelerated rendering, while the CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8,011 handles CPU-based rendering tasks. The 32 GB VRAM allows large scenes to fit entirely in GPU memory, a significant advantage. The CPU becomes the bottleneck for CPU-render engines, but GPU rendering sees minimal CPU influence.

Software development: The i5-13500T's 14 cores and 20 threads with a 4.6 GHz boost clock provide solid compilation performance, evidenced by the PassMark integer math score of 84,427. The RTX 5090 accelerates CUDA-based workloads like machine learning training and inference, though its power draw of 575 W TDP may be excessive for development-focused builds.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively over-provisioned for document editing, spreadsheet work, and web browsing. The i5-13500T's UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU alone could handle these tasks, and the RTX 5090's 1,999 USD launch MSRP adds cost without benefit for typical student workloads. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 271,348 indicates snappy responsiveness, but the GPU is entirely unnecessary here.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 28,670 places it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-12600 with a score of 28,646 (0.1% ahead), the AMD EPYC 7203P at 28,583 (0.3% ahead), the Intel Core 5 220H at 28,574 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS at 28,549 (0.4% behind this chip). The deltaPct values show the i5-13500T sits in a tightly clustered performance band, with less than 1% separating it from rivals. Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,028 and single-core of 1,754 confirm balanced performance across threaded and single-threaded workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 79,842 places it at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB at 79,605 (0.3% behind), the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79,396 (0.6% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78,940 (1.1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X at 80,959 (1.4% ahead). The RTX 5090's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728 demonstrate top-tier graphics compute. The combined percentile of 86 reflects the overall system standing, though this metric masks the significant disparity between the CPU's 80th and GPU's 92nd percentile positions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the CPU as the primary constraint in most workloads. The i5-13500T's 80th percentile CPU standing versus the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile GPU standing creates a 12-percentage-point gap that manifests as CPU-bound performance in gaming and compute tasks. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,580 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,754 indicate moderate per-core performance, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 39,650 shows overwhelming graphics capability.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts with resolution. At lower resolutions where frame rates are high, the CPU's per-thread performance limits FPS. At 4K, the GPU's workload increases dramatically, and the RTX 5090's massive compute resources become the primary driver of frame rates. The FPS scaling pattern suggests the CPU constraint diminishes as resolution increases, making 4K the most balanced scenario.

In compute workloads, the bottleneck depends on the task's nature. GPU-accelerated rendering, machine learning, and video processing leverage the RTX 5090's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 680 tensor cores, with the CPU playing a supporting role. CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation, compilation, and data compression rely on the i5-13500T's 14 cores, where the PassMark physics score of 1,112 and multi-thread score of 22,654 show moderate capability. The 35 W TDP limits sustained boost clocks, so long-running CPU workloads will see performance degradation as thermal headroom diminishes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory selection. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring full bandwidth for the RTX 5090. The platform is current and active, with the CPU's production status listed as active.

The RTX 5090's 575 W TDP and suggested PSU of 950 W represent significant power requirements. The i5-13500T's 35 W TDP is minimal by comparison, meaning the power supply must be sized for the GPU rather than the CPU. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector and occupies dual slots, measuring 304 mm in length, so case compatibility is a consideration.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the CPU. Moving to a higher-TDP Socket 1700 processor with better single-thread performance would reduce the bottleneck in CPU-bound gaming and compute workloads. The platform's DDR5 support allows memory bandwidth improvements, though the dual-channel configuration remains a constraint for memory-intensive tasks. Alternatively, the GPU could be retained for future platform upgrades, as PCIe 5.0 ensures compatibility with next-generation systems. The CPU's unlocked multiplier is false, so overclocking is not an option for improving performance within the current socket.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize GPU compute above all else. Gamers playing at 4K ultra settings will see the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile performance fully utilized, with the CPU's limitations minimized at that resolution. Content creators working with large video files or 3D scenes benefit from the 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth, which allows entire projects to reside in GPU memory.

Developers building CUDA-accelerated applications or training machine learning models will leverage the RTX 5090's 680 tensor cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance. The CPU's 20 threads handle data preprocessing and orchestration, though the 35 W TDP means sustained CPU workloads will throttle. Small business workstations requiring GPU rendering or simulation capabilities could use this configuration, but the power requirements and GPU cost suggest specialized rather than general-purpose use.

Students and office workers should avoid this build. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU handles everyday tasks, and the RTX 5090 adds cost and power draw without tangible benefit for document-centric workloads. The system makes sense only when the GPU's capabilities are the primary requirement, and the CPU is accepted as a secondary component.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 features 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU's 21,760 shading units, 680 texture mapping units, and 176 ROPs provide massive rasterization throughput, evidenced by a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s. The 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores support ray tracing and AI acceleration, with the Blackwell 2.0 architecture offering 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and matching FP16 performance.

The GPU's benchmark results confirm its top-tier positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D score of 39,650 place it at the 92nd percentile, with nearest rivals within 1.4% in either direction. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 334,370 and Vulkan score of 376,728 demonstrate strong compute API performance. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 341 and DirectX 12 score of 185 show robust API utilization, while the DirectX 9 score of 395 indicates backward compatibility.

For rendering workloads, the 32 GB VRAM eliminates memory capacity concerns for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The 1.79 TB/s bandwidth supports rapid data transfer between GPU memory and compute units. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates traditional rendering, while the 680 tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based rendering techniques. The GPU's 5 nm process node from TSMC, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, represents a dense, high-performance design. The 575 W TDP and suggested 950 W PSU reflect the power required for this level of performance, and the dual-slot form factor with a single 16-pin connector simplifies installation in compatible cases.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-13500T sufficient for the RTX 5090?

A: The data indicates a significant performance gap. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile while the GPU is at the 92nd percentile, meaning the CPU will limit performance in CPU-bound scenarios, particularly at lower resolutions and high frame rates.

Q: What resolution is best for this pairing?

A: 4K gaming represents the most balanced scenario. At 4K, the GPU's workload increases substantially, reducing the CPU's influence on frame rates. The RTX 5090's 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth support ultra settings at this resolution.

Q: How much power does this system require?

A: The RTX 5090 has a 575 W TDP, and the suggested PSU is 950 W. The i5-13500T has a 35 W TDP, so the GPU dominates power consumption. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Can the CPU handle video editing with this GPU?

A: Yes, but with caveats. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 GB VRAM accelerate effects and rendering, while the CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,028 handle codec processing. The 35 W TDP limits sustained CPU performance during long exports.

Q: Does the RTX 5090 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores in the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 and PassMark G3D score of 39,650 indicate strong ray tracing and rasterization performance.

Q: What memory types does this CPU support?

A: The i5-13500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This provides flexibility in memory selection, though dual-channel bandwidth may limit memory-intensive workloads.

Q: Is this build suitable for machine learning?

A: The RTX 5090's 680 tensor cores and 104.8 TFLOPS FP16 performance make it highly capable for AI workloads. The 32 GB VRAM accommodates large models, though the CPU's 80th percentile standing may bottleneck data preprocessing tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500T features 14 cores and 20 threads based on the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node from Intel. The CPU has a base clock of 1.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 35 W TDP that emphasizes efficiency over sustained performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output. The launch MSRP is $232.

Benchmark results show the CPU's balanced performance profile. Cinebench R23 scores of 11,028 multi-core and 1,754 single-core, Geekbench scores of 8,888 multi-core and 2,279 single-core, and PassMark multi-thread score of 22,654 with single-thread score of 3,580 all point to mid-range capability. The PassMark integer math score of 84,427 and floating point math score of 61,640 demonstrate solid compute throughput, while the data encryption score of 15,543 and extended instructions score of 16,599 show adequate security and SIMD performance.

The 80th percentile standing places this CPU in a tight competitive cluster. The nearest rivals — Intel Core i5-12600, AMD EPYC 7203P, Intel Core 5 220H, and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS — all score within 0.4% of the i5-13500T, indicating no meaningful performance differentiation among these processors. The 35 W TDP is the defining characteristic, enabling compact cooling solutions and low power draw, but limiting sustained boost clocks under load. For real workloads, this means the CPU handles bursty tasks like application launches and compilation well, but sustained multi-threaded rendering or encoding will see clock reduction as thermal limits are reached. The CPU's 14 cores provide ample parallelism for modern productivity software, and the 20 threads support virtualization and concurrent workloads, but the efficiency focus makes it better suited for always-on systems than performance-critical builds.