SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500HX

29,270 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500HX paired with the AMD Radeon 740M represents a laptop configuration with a stark performance asymmetry. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor, sitting at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a modest integrated solution that lands at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs. This pairing creates a system where processor-heavy tasks will excel, but graphics-intensive workloads will be constrained by the iGPU. The data confirms this is a platform designed for productivity, multitasking, and compute-heavy applications rather than high-end gaming, and the absence of measured FPS data means all gaming assessments are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500HX is a 14-core, 20-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture and manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that positions it as a performance-oriented mobile chip. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which is a key asset for workloads that repeatedly access large datasets. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, which is a notable feature for professional and data-integrity-sensitive environments.

Benchmark data paints a clear picture of a processor with exceptional multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 18,334 in multi-core and 1,730.5 in single-core, demonstrating a roughly 10.6x scaling from single to multi-threaded performance. The 3DMark benchmarks show a similar trend: the score scales from 972 in single-thread to 7,885 in max-threads, with intermediate results of 1,899 for 2 threads, 3,607 for 4 threads, 5,712 for 8 threads, and 7,307 for 16 threads. This scaling curve suggests strong thread utilization efficiency, meaning applications that can leverage multiple cores will see significant throughput gains. PassMark results reinforce this, with a multithread score of 27,753 versus a single-thread score of 3,582.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 29,270 places it at the 81st percentile, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the database. Its nearest rivals in this metric include the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 at 29,245 (0.1% slower), the AMD EPYC 9654 at 29,409 (0.5% faster), the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X at 29,123 (0.5% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X at 29,447 (0.6% faster). This cluster of scores means the i5-13500HX is effectively neck-and-neck with a range of desktop and server-class chips from different generations, which is remarkable for a mobile processor. The 81st percentile ranking confirms that the CPU is the dominant component in this build, capable of handling demanding computational tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering with considerable headroom.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its closest rivals?

A: The i5-13500HX scores 27,753 in PassMark multithread and 18,334 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its average benchmark score of 29,270 is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (29,123) and the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 (29,245), with deltas of 0.5% and 0.1% respectively. It is slightly behind the AMD EPYC 9654 (29,409) by 0.5%.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500HX supports ECC memory. This feature makes it suitable for workstations where data corruption is unacceptable, such as financial modeling, scientific computing, or long-running server-like tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon 740M uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM. Its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," and its bandwidth is "System Dependent," so performance will vary based on the system's RAM speed and configuration.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 580?

A: The Radeon 740M has an average benchmark score of 12,870, which is 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 580's score of 12,928. This places the integrated GPU within striking distance of an older discrete graphics card, indicating it can handle light gaming and basic rendering tasks.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and what memory does it use?

A: The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What are the GPU's API capabilities?

A: The Radeon 740M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with modern game engines and graphics APIs.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, which allows for overclocking. However, as a mobile BGA part, the practical overclocking headroom is often limited by thermal and power constraints of the laptop chassis.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units, and 8 raster operation units, along with 4 dedicated ray tracing cores. Its clock speeds are listed as 800 MHz base and 2800 MHz boost, with a pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 44.80 GTexel/s. The compute performance is rated at 2.867 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), which is a modest figure for modern graphics work. The GPU has a 45 W TDP, but since it is an IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor), it draws power from the CPU package and has no dedicated power connectors.

The benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10,172 and a Vulkan score of 15,568. These scores yield an average benchmark score of 12,870, placing the GPU at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs. This is a mid-pack performance tier, meaning it is neither a bottom-tier part nor a high-performance solution. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 (12,847, 0.2% slower), the AMD Radeon Pro 455 (12,831, 0.3% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (12,830, 0.3% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 580 (12,928, 0.4% faster). The fact that an integrated GPU is trading blows with legacy discrete cards like the GTX 590 and RX 580 reflects the efficiency of the RDNA 3.0 architecture, but it also highlights the hard ceiling on its performance.

The inclusion of 4 RT cores means the GPU supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the raw compute power is limited. The System Shared memory configuration is a significant bottleneck; the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory bandwidth, and performance will be heavily dependent on the system's RAM. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures feature-level compatibility with modern games, but the rendering resolution and detail settings will need to be modest. For non-gaming tasks like video decoding, desktop compositing, and light 3D workloads, the Radeon 740M is sufficient, but it is not designed for heavy rendering or high-refresh gaming.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is heavily constrained by the GPU. With no measured FPS data, estimates are based on the Radeon 740M's 53rd percentile ranking. The GPU's performance is comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 580, suggesting it can handle esports titles at lower settings, but achieving high refresh rates in modern AAA games is unlikely. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3,582 in PassMark and 1,730.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing will be stable, but the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads are well-suited for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,334 and PassMark multithread score of 27,753 indicate that the i5-13500HX can handle the x264 encoding workload without significant frame drops. However, the Radeon 740M's limited graphics capability means the gaming side of the stream will likely be restricted to less demanding titles or lower resolutions.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The high multi-threaded scores suggest excellent performance in rendering timelines and exporting final videos. The PassMark floating point math score of 70,885 and integer math score of 96,195 indicate robust processing of video codecs and effects. The GPU can assist with hardware acceleration for effects, but its 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest, so complex GPU-accelerated effects may cause slowdowns.

3D Rendering: The CPU excels here, with its 81st percentile ranking and scores that rival desktop parts like the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and AMD EPYC 9654. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 18,334 shows strong potential for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The GPU's 4 RT cores can accelerate ray-traced previews, but the limited compute power means final GPU renders will be slow compared to discrete solutions.

Software Development: The 14-core/20-thread configuration is ideal for compilation tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 331,896 and random string sorting score of 36,373 show efficiency in data handling. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running build processes. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking ensures that code compilation, running virtual machines, and managing containers will be responsive.

Student and Office Work: This scenario is easily handled by the hardware. The CPU's single-thread performance (3,582 in PassMark) ensures snappy application launches and smooth multitasking in office suites. The integrated GPU is more than adequate for document editing, spreadsheet management, and web browsing. The high core count provides future-proofing against increasingly complex web applications and collaboration tools.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a dominant processor. The Cinebench R23 scores of 18,334 multi-core and 1,730.5 single-core place it in a high-performance tier. The 3DMark scaling from 972 (single-thread) to 7,885 (max-threads) shows excellent parallel efficiency. The PassMark scores are equally impressive, with 27,753 in multithread and 3,582 in single-thread. The CPU's average benchmark score of 29,270 positions it at the 81st percentile, meaning it is faster than 81% of all CPUs in the database.

The GPU's benchmark performance is comparably modest. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 10,172 and Vulkan score of 15,568 result in an average score of 12,870. This places the Radeon 740M at the 53rd percentile, meaning it is squarely in the middle of the GPU performance distribution. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 580, which is only 0.4% faster, showing that the integrated GPU can occasionally match a legacy discrete card from a higher tier.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is a mid-range integrated solution. The combined percentile for this build is 67, which reflects the CPU's high standing pulling up the GPU's lower standing. Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, all gaming performance is estimated. The data suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, this system will perform admirably, but in GPU-bound scenarios, performance will be limited to the 53rd percentile tier.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else, but who are constrained to a laptop form factor. The primary audience is software developers and engineers who need the 14 cores and 20 threads for compiling code, running simulations, and managing virtualized environments. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and ECC memory support make it a credible platform for professional development work.

Content creators focusing on video editing and 3D modeling will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded might. The Cinebench R23 score of 18,334 and PassMark multithread score of 27,753 indicate that timeline rendering and effects processing on the CPU will be fast. However, creators who rely heavily on GPU-accelerated effects or GPU rendering will find the Radeon 740M's 53rd percentile performance limiting.

Students in computer science, engineering, or data science fields will find this build capable of handling their workload. The CPU can manage complex calculations, and the GPU is sufficient for basic visualization tasks. For small business workstations, this pairing offers robust data processing capabilities for tasks like financial modeling, database management, and document processing, where the CPU's high integer math score of 96,195 and data encryption score of 19,267 are valuable assets.

Gamers targeting 1080p at medium settings in less demanding titles may find the GPU acceptable, as its performance is within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 580. However, for high-refresh gaming or modern AAA titles, this build is not recommended.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry in this build is pronounced. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 53rd percentile ranking indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU has far more compute headroom than the GPU can feed, meaning that in games, the frame rate will be dictated by the Radeon 740M's rendering capabilities, not the i5-13500HX's processing speed.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and data analysis, the bottleneck shifts. The GPU's limited role means the CPU can operate at near-peak efficiency. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,334 shows the CPU can sustain heavy loads, and the GPU will not interfere since most of these tasks rely on the CPU cores and memory subsystem.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, supports this imbalance. With no measured FPS data, the assessment relies on the benchmark scores. The GPU's performance tier (53rd percentile) suggests that even with a less powerful CPU, gaming frame rates would be similar, as the GPU is the limiting factor. Conversely, reducing the CPU's performance would have a negligible impact on gaming FPS but a significant impact on productivity tasks. The system's memory bandwidth is also a shared constraint, as the GPU relies on System Shared memory, which can throttle performance in memory-intensive scenarios.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system combining the Intel Core i5-13500HX with the AMD Radeon 740M. The CPU is a high-performance mobile processor based on the Raptor Lake-HX architecture, designed for gaming laptops and mobile workstations. The GPU is an integrated RDNA 3.0 solution that shares system memory, making it a low-power graphics option.

The overall tier of this build is defined by its combined percentile of 67. This places it in the upper-mid range of all systems, but the disparity between components is significant. The CPU is in the top 19% of processors, while the GPU is in the middle 53% of graphics cards. This means the system's overall performance is heavily skewed toward CPU-centric tasks. The build class is "laptop," confirming the mobile form factor, and the processor's BGA 1964 socket means it is not a user-upgradeable part.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is defined by the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-only socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded. The memory support includes dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, offering flexibility in choosing RAM, though the maximum capacity is not listed. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface for connecting fast NVMe SSDs and other peripherals, though the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

The GPU has no suggested PSU, as it is an IGP and draws power from the system's main power delivery. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, which is higher than typical mobile processors, suggesting the laptop needs a robust cooling solution to sustain boost clocks of 4.70 GHz. The power connectors for the GPU are listed as "None," confirming it relies entirely on motherboard power.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to maximize the memory configuration, as the GPU's performance is directly tied to system memory speed and bandwidth. Upgrading to faster DDR5 memory could yield tangible gains in GPU-bound tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures that future high-speed storage devices will be compatible. However, the integrated GPU cannot be upgraded without replacing the entire motherboard, which is impractical in a laptop. The platform's longevity is tied to the CPU's 81st percentile performance, which ensures it will remain relevant for CPU-intensive tasks for several years, even if the GPU becomes outdated.