SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
96%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500H

22,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

43,667 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a study in contrast—a mid-range, efficiency-focused processor matched with NVIDIA’s flagship mobile graphics solution. The data in this benchmark database paints a clear picture of a system built for maximum graphical throughput, where the GPU is the undisputed star and the CPU serves as a capable, though not spectacular, supporting actor. This analysis breaks down the architecture, performance metrics, and practical implications of this specific combination, using only the data provided.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is the centerpiece of this configuration, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process node. The chip, designated AD103, contains a substantial 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. This hardware foundation translates into formidable specifications: 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation pipelines. For ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, the GPU is equipped with 76 dedicated RT cores and 304 tensor cores, making it a powerhouse for both real-time ray tracing and DLSS-style upscaling techniques.

Memory bandwidth is a critical factor for high-resolution gaming and content creation, and this GPU does not disappoint. It pairs 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock is rated at 2250 MHz, with an effective data rate of 18 Gbps. This configuration ensures that the massive compute power of the GPU can be fed without creating a severe bottleneck in texture streaming or large data set manipulation.

In terms of raw throughput, the RTX 4090 Mobile delivers 32.98 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 32.98 TFLOPS of FP16 compute, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The pixel fill rate is 189.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 515.3 GTexel/s. These numbers suggest that the GPU is capable of handling 4K rendering with high fidelity settings, as the pixel fill rate is high enough to drive a large number of pixels while the texture rate ensures detailed surfaces remain sharp.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU's elite status. In PassMark's G3D test, it scores 27,212, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. More tellingly, its average benchmark score of 43,667 places it in close competition with professional workstation cards. Specifically, it sits just 0.9% above the NVIDIA RTX A6000, a professional-grade card known for its massive VRAM and compute capabilities. It also outperforms the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile by 0.9% and the Quadro M6000 by 0.8%, while being 0.8% behind the Quadro M6000 on average score. This indicates that the RTX 4090 Mobile is not just a gaming GPU; its compute power rivals dedicated workstation parts, making it suitable for rendering, simulation, and other professional tasks. The Geekbench scores further corroborate this, with an OpenCL score of 180,831 and a Vulkan score of 170,774, showing strong performance across different API environments.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is defined by the Intel Core i5-13500H processor, which uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket. This is a mobile-specific, soldered socket, meaning the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense. The platform supports a wide range of memory types, including DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, and LPDDR5X, all in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows system integrators to balance cost and performance, though the soldered nature of the CPU limits the long-term upgrade path to the GPU or storage.

For expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This distinction is important; the GPU has access to a full x16 link, ensuring it can communicate with the rest of the system without bandwidth constraints. The CPU's Gen 5 lanes are likely reserved for future high-speed storage devices, such as NVMe SSDs, but the current implementation is standard for mobile platforms.

Power delivery is a key consideration for a system with this performance disparity. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 120 W. The database does not list a suggested PSU wattage, but the combined thermal envelope suggests a robust power delivery system is required, typical of a high-end gaming laptop. The system is likely to rely on a proprietary power brick rather than a user-replaceable PSU, and the "IGP" slot width for the GPU indicates it is soldered onto the mainboard. Given that the CPU is soldered and the GPU is integrated, the most sensible "upgrade" for a user would be to maximize RAM capacity and storage speed at the time of purchase, as these are the only components that can be easily swapped later.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500H is a 12-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H variant. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. The core configuration is a hybrid design, though the fact pack does not specify the exact P-core/E-core split. The base clock is 2.60 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 18 MB L3 cache. This memory hierarchy is designed to reduce latency and improve performance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads.

Benchmark scores for the CPU show a mixed profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 1,775 points in single-core and 14,081 points in multi-core. The multi-core score is respectable for a 45 W mobile part, indicating it can handle demanding productivity tasks without throttling excessively. In 3DMark's CPU tests, it scales from 967 points in single-thread to 6,160 points in max-threads, with a notable jump from 4,550 points at 8 threads to 6,160 at max threads, showing that its multi-threading capabilities are well-utilized beyond 8 cores.

The PassMark scores provide additional context. The multi-thread score is 21,366, and the single-thread score is 3,397. However, the more specialized tests reveal its strengths and weaknesses. The data compression score is 254,661, which is very high, but the extended instructions score is 14,872, and the floating-point math score is 52,123, while integer math is 72,724. Interesting, the "find prime numbers" score is only 74, which is quite low, suggesting that while the CPU has high throughput for standard integer and floating-point operations, it may not be optimized for specific, unpredictable branching workloads.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 22,468, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tight cluster of performance. It is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i7-1270P, 0.7% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U, and 0.7% behind the Intel Core i5-12500H. It is 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 220. This indicates that the i5-13500H is a solid mid-range performer, but it is not a class leader. For real workloads, this means it can handle compiling code, rendering videos, and multitasking efficiently, but it won't be the primary driver of performance in a system where the GPU is doing the heavy lifting.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The RTX 4090 Mobile sits in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, while the i5-13500H sits in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. While both are above average, the GPU is substantially more powerful relative to its peers than the CPU. This creates a scenario where the GPU will almost certainly be the limiting factor in frame rates at lower resolutions, but the CPU could become a bottleneck in specific scenarios.

In gaming, the CPU is responsible for preparing frames and sending draw calls to the GPU. At lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3,397 in PassMark) may struggle to keep up with the GPU's ability to render frames. This means that in esports titles or less demanding games, the CPU could limit the FPS to a level below what the GPU could theoretically achieve. However, the GPU's 32.98 TFLOPS of compute power and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth are so high that at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU will be the primary constraint, and the CPU will have ample headroom.

The benchmark scores support this analysis. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 967 is moderate, suggesting it is not a top-tier performer in lightly-threaded tasks. Conversely, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 27,212 is exceptional. In a mixed workload, such as gaming while streaming, the CPU's 12 cores and 16 threads will handle the encoding and streaming overhead, but the game's main thread will still rely on the CPU's single-core speed. The data suggests that the system is best balanced for GPU-intensive scenarios, such as high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, where the CPU's multi-threaded score of 14,081 in Cinebench R23 can feed the GPU efficiently.

Gaming Performance

Please note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as such.

Based on the GPU's performance markers, this system is built for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and solid 4K gaming. The RTX 4090 Mobile's 27,212 score in PassMark's G3D test and its 84th percentile ranking indicate it will easily exceed 60 FPS in most modern titles at 1440p with ultra settings. The 16 GB of VRAM is more than sufficient for current games at 4K, including those with high-resolution texture packs.

For competitive shooters like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,397 in PassMark will be the primary factor. The system should achieve very high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p, but the CPU might not allow the GPU to reach its absolute maximum potential in these low-fidelity scenarios. The bottleneck will shift to the CPU, as the GPU is so powerful that it can render frames faster than the CPU can issue draw calls.

For AAA titles at 4K, the GPU will dominate. The 32.98 TFLOPS of compute power and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth will allow for maximum settings with ray tracing enabled, though DLSS might be necessary to maintain high frame rates in the most demanding titles. In this scenario, the CPU's 12 cores will provide ample support for the game's simulation and physics threads, ensuring a smooth experience. The estimated performance is that this system will deliver playable, high-fidelity 4K gaming, and excellent high-refresh 1440p gaming.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is not for a generalist; it is a specialized tool for users who prioritize GPU performance above all else. The target user is a gamer who wants to play the latest titles at 4K with maximum detail settings without compromise. The 16 GB of VRAM and the GPU's compute power make it future-proof for the next several years of game releases. The high percentile ranking (84th) ensures that this system will be at the top of the graphics performance chart.

Beyond gaming, this is a compelling option for content creators and professionals who require massive GPU acceleration. The GPU's average benchmark score of 43,667, which rivals the NVIDIA RTX A6000, makes it suitable for 3D rendering, video editing with heavy effects, and complex simulations. The 16 GB of VRAM is critical for loading large 3D scenes or 8K video timelines. While the CPU is not top-tier, its 12 cores and 16 threads are sufficient for the data preparation and asset management tasks that accompany these workloads.

Alternatively, this could be a powerful workstation for small businesses or developers working with machine learning models. The 304 tensor cores and 32.98 TFLOPS of FP16 compute make it ideal for AI inference and training smaller models. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 14,938 also suggests it can handle secure data processing tasks. This is a machine for those who need a mobile desktop-replacement-class GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 22,468, placing it in the 75th percentile of all CPUs. Its best performance comes in multi-threaded tasks, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,081 and a 3DMark max-threads score of 6,160. Its single-thread performance is lower, with a Cinebench R23 score of 1,775 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,397. It is closely matched with several rivals, sitting within 1% of the Core i7-1270P, Core Ultra 5 135U, Core i5-12500H, and Ryzen 5 220.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 43,667, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its standout result is a PassMark G3D score of 27,212. In Geekbench, it scores 180,831 in OpenCL and 170,774 in Vulkan. The GPU is 0.8% ahead of the Quadro M6000, 0.9% ahead of the RTX 5050 Mobile, and 0.9% ahead of the Quadro M6000 24 GB, but 0.9% behind the RTX A6000.

The combined picture is one of extreme graphical dominance with competent, but not exceptional, CPU performance. The combined percentile for this build is 80, reflecting the high GPU score pulling up the average. The data suggests that in a combined workload, the system will excel where the GPU is the bottleneck, but will show its limitations in CPU-bound scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance gap between the CPU and GPU?

A: The GPU sits in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 75th percentile. The GPU's average benchmark score of 43,667 is nearly double the CPU's average score of 22,468, highlighting a substantial performance discrepancy.

Q: How does the GPU compare to professional workstation cards?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile's average benchmark score of 43,667 is only 0.9% behind the NVIDIA RTX A6000, indicating it is competitive with high-end workstation GPUs for compute tasks.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU is based on the Raptor Lake architecture with 12 cores and 16 threads. Its Cinebench R23 scores of 1,775 single-core and 14,081 multi-core suggest it is capable for productivity, but its single-thread performance may limit high-FPS gaming in CPU-bound titles.

Q: Is the GPU's memory sufficient for 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for current 4K game assets and high-resolution texture packs.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: Yes, the GPU's 32.98 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 76 RT cores make it highly capable for 3D rendering. Its performance is within 1% of the NVIDIA RTX A6000, a professional rendering card.

Q: What are the upgrade limitations of this platform?

A: The CPU is soldered to the Intel BGA 1744 socket, and the GPU also has an "IGP" slot width, indicating it is not user-replaceable. The primary upgrade paths are limited to memory and storage.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its rivals?

A: The CPU's average score of 22,468 is 0.2% behind the Core i7-1270P and 0.7% behind the Core Ultra 5 135U. It is 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 220.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: In this scenario, the system is overqualified. The GPU's 27,212 PassMark G3D score can easily drive frame rates beyond 144 FPS at 1440p. However, the CPU's single-thread score of 3,397 might become a limiting factor in esports titles, preventing the system from reaching its maximum theoretical FPS at 1080p.

Streaming: The 12-core, 16-thread CPU is well-suited for this task. The CPU can handle the encoding workload via x264, while the GPU's 304 tensor cores can also assist with NVENC encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 21,366 indicates sufficient headroom for gaming and encoding simultaneously.

Video Editing: This is a prime use case. The GPU's 32.98 TFLOPS of FP32 compute will accelerate effects rendering and timeline scrubbing in software like Premiere Pro. The 16 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 4K and even 8K timelines with color correction and effects layers.

3D Rendering: The GPU rivals the RTX A6000, being only 0.9% behind in average benchmark score. This makes it excellent for GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane. The 76 RT cores will speed up ray-traced renders significantly.

Software Development: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,081 is adequate for compiling code, but not class-leading. The PassMark data compression score of 254,661 is beneficial for build artifacts and source control operations. The GPU can be used for CUDA-based development.

Student and Office Work: This is overkill. The CPU's single-thread performance is strong for spreadsheet and browser tasks, but the GPU is entirely unnecessary. The high power draw of the components would reduce battery life, making this a poor choice for a student who needs portability and endurance.