SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500H

22,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile represent a mainstream high-performance laptop pairing, placing in the 71st percentile overall. The data available for this combination comes entirely from synthetic CPU and GPU benchmarks, with no measured frame rates for the pair. Consequently, while the individual component scores provide a strong analytical foundation, all gaming performance discussions are estimates derived from those scores rather than direct measurements. This analysis interprets those benchmark results to understand the balance between the processor and graphics card and their implications for real-world use.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance between the Intel Core i5-13500H and the RTX 4060 Mobile is defined by the 75th percentile ranking of the CPU and the 67th percentile ranking of the GPU. This indicates that the processor sits higher in its respective performance hierarchy than the graphics card does in its own, suggesting the CPU is the more capable component relative to its peers. The data implies that in many workloads, particularly those that are graphically intensive, the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor. The processor has sufficient headroom to feed the graphics card in most scenarios, but the GPU's lower percentile position suggests it will cap frame rates in gaming before the CPU becomes saturated.

Examining the CPU's multi-threaded scaling provides further insight into this balance. The benchmark scores show a progression from 1887 in the 3dMark 2-thread test to 6099 in the 16-thread test. The scaling from 8 threads to 16 threads is not linear—4550 to 6099—which indicates that the CPU's performance gains diminish as more threads are utilized, a common characteristic of hybrid architectures where not all cores are created equal. In a gaming context, this means that while the CPU has ample single-thread performance for game logic, its ability to handle heavily multi-threaded background tasks alongside a game might be less robust than a fully homogeneous core design.

The GPU's compute performance, as measured by Passmark, shows a score of 6816 for GPU compute versus 17469 for the G3D (graphics) test. This disparity is significant. It suggests that while the RTX 4060 Mobile is well-tuned for traditional 3D graphics rendering, its raw compute throughput for non-graphics tasks like physics calculations or certain compute shaders is less formidable. For a gaming laptop, this reinforces the notion that the GPU is specialized for frame generation and visual output, and tasks that require general-purpose compute might shift the bottleneck back to the CPU, which has a higher Passmark multithread score of 21366.

The data suggests a system that is well-matched for its intended purpose, but the bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the primary constraint in gaming. The CPU's 75th percentile ranking means it is unlikely to hold back the GPU in most titles, except perhaps in scenarios with very high frame rates at lower resolutions where CPU overhead becomes more prominent. However, the lack of measured FPS data for this pair makes it impossible to identify a specific resolution where this shift occurs. The combined 71st percentile ranking, which sits between the CPU and GPU percentiles, further supports the idea of a balanced system where neither component is drastically overpowered or underpowered relative to the other.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13500H demonstrates strong benchmark performance, with an average benchmark score of 22468. This places it at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms a significant majority of processors. The data shows it is a close competitor to other mobile chips, with a negligible 0.2% performance difference compared to the Intel Core i7-1270P and a 0.7% difference versus the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U and Core i5-12500H. It also holds a slight 0.8% advantage over the AMD Ryzen 5 220. These tight margins indicate that the i5-13500H is firmly in the upper-midrange tier of mobile processors, competing directly with the previous generation's i7 parts.

In specific CPU benchmark tests, the processor shows distinct strengths. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14081 highlights substantial multi-threaded capability, while the single-core score of 1775 shows solid per-thread performance. The Passmark tests reveal specific workload characteristics: a very high integer math score of 72724 and a floating-point score of 52123 suggest proficiency in general computation. However, the data compression score of 254661 is notably high. The relatively lower score in the find prime numbers test at 74 is interesting, suggesting that this specific workload is not a strength of the architecture.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile achieves an average benchmark score of 22729, placing it at the 67th percentile among all GPUs. The benchmark data indicates it is comparable to desktop graphics cards from the previous generation, with a 0.7% difference from the RTX 2080 and a 1.3% difference from the Intel Arc B580. It also performs slightly better than the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT by 0.8% and the newer RTX 5060 Mobile by 1.3%. This data suggests the mobile 4060 delivers desktop-class performance from the prior generation, which is a strong result for a laptop component.

The combined picture is one of a capable, balanced platform. The CPU's average score of 22468 and the GPU's average score of 22729 are remarkably similar, which is an interesting coincidence. This similarity in raw average benchmark numbers does not mean they are equal in performance, as they are measured by different tests, but it does underscore that neither component is a clear outlier in terms of its overall benchmark standing. The CPU's higher percentile rank (75 vs 67) is the key differentiator, suggesting that relative to their respective markets, the processor is the stronger component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500H is a mobile processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. It features a hybrid core design with a total of 12 cores and 16 threads, combining performance and efficiency cores to balance power and throughput. The processor has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, allowing for significant single-thread performance when needed. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 18 MB L3 cache, which is a substantial pool for a mobile chip.

The benchmark scores provide a detailed view of its capabilities. The 3dMark single-thread score of 967 and the Passmark single-thread score of 3397 indicate strong per-core performance, which is crucial for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The progression of multi-threaded scores from 1887 in the 2-thread test to 6160 in the max-thread test shows good scaling, though the incremental gains from 8 threads (4550) to 16 threads (6099) and max threads (6160) are modest. This suggests that the efficiency cores contribute to multi-threaded workloads but do not scale as effectively as the performance cores.

In real-world workloads, the data suggests this CPU is a versatile performer. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14081 is indicative of strong performance in video encoding and 3D rendering tasks that can utilize all 16 threads. The Passmark multithread score of 21366 reinforces this. Conversely, the high single-core scores ensure that tasks like web browsing, office applications, and legacy software that relies on fewer threads will run smoothly. The data encryption score of 14938 and extended instructions score of 14872 show balanced performance in security and SIMD-oriented workloads, while the floating-point math score of 52123 is solid for scientific and engineering applications. The CPU's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5, as well as LPDDR variants, provides system integrators with flexibility, although the specific impact of memory type on performance is not detailed in the data.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 4060 Mobile's 67th percentile and benchmark scores comparable to a desktop RTX 2080 suggest it is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p gaming. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 3397 in Passmark ensures it can keep up with the GPU in most titles. However, the GPU's lack of measured FPS data means performance at specific refresh rates must be considered an estimate, with the GPU being the likely bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU's hybrid architecture with 12 cores and 16 threads is well-equipped for the multitasking demands of game streaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14081 indicates sufficient headroom to handle game encoding alongside gameplay. The high Passmark multithread score of 21366 further supports its capability to manage simultaneous tasks, making it a capable platform for live streaming.

Video Editing: For video editing, this pairing is strong. The CPU's multicore performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 score of 14081, will accelerate timeline operations and export times. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and compute score of 6816 will aid in effects processing and rendering, though it is not a top-tier compute part. The combination is suitable for 1080p and some 4K editing workflows.

3D Rendering: In 3D rendering, the balance shifts towards the CPU. The processor's 14081 score in Cinebench R23 is the primary driver for CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 24 RT cores will accelerate GPU-accelerated renderers, but its lower Passmark compute score relative to its graphics score suggests it is a secondary engine for this workload.

Software Development: The CPU's balanced performance is ideal for software development. The high integer math score of 72724 indicates strong performance in code compilation. The 16 threads provide ample parallelism for build tools, while the strong single-thread performance ensures a responsive IDE. The system's memory support for DDR5 allows for fast data access, which is beneficial for large projects.

Student and Office Work: For students and office professionals, this configuration is overkill but highly responsive. The Passmark single-thread score of 3397 ensures snappy application launches and fluid multitasking in spreadsheets, documents, and web browsers. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU provides a fallback that can handle basic display tasks, potentially saving power when the dedicated GPU is not needed.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-13500H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is 71, placing it in the upper tier of laptop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 22468, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-1270P and 0.7% lower than both the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U and the Core i5-12500H. It is 0.8% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 220.

Q: How does the GPU's performance compare to a desktop-class card?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 22729 is 0.7% lower than the desktop NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, indicating it delivers comparable performance to that previous-generation desktop card.

Q: Is there measured gaming data for this specific CPU and GPU pairing?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores.

Q: What are the key specifications of the GPU's memory subsystem?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the processor's architecture and core configuration?

A: The CPU is based on the Raptor Lake architecture and features 12 cores and 16 threads. It has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support the latest PCIe standard?

A: Yes, the CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK explicitly states that there are no measured FPS rows for the Intel Core i5-13500H + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile combination. Therefore, any discussion of gaming performance is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components. The dataIsMeasured field is false, confirming that these are not empirical frame rates.

Based on the GPU's benchmark scores, which are comparable to a desktop RTX 2080, the RTX 4060 Mobile is expected to deliver strong 1080p gaming performance. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 17469 and its 67th percentile ranking suggest it is capable of running most modern titles at high settings with playable frame rates. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for current games at 1080p, though it may become a limiting factor for texture-heavy titles at higher resolutions or with maximum settings.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3397, ensures it can keep pace with the GPU's frame output in most gaming scenarios. The high boost clock of 4.70 GHz is particularly beneficial for gaming, as most game engines rely heavily on a few high-performance threads. However, the lack of measured data means that specific FPS figures cannot be provided. The estimates suggest that this pairing is optimized for high-refresh 1080p gaming, where the GPU is likely to be the primary bottleneck, while the CPU has sufficient headroom to handle game logic and background tasks without causing significant frame drops.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is designed for gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p gaming, as the GPU's performance is estimated to be a strong fit for that resolution and the CPU provides ample support. The data suggests it is a versatile platform for content creators who work with video and 3D models, given the CPU's strong multicore performance in Cinebench R23. Software developers will benefit from the CPU's high integer math score and thread count for compilation tasks.

Students in engineering, computer science, or media production fields would find this configuration capable of handling demanding coursework, such as running virtual machines, compiling code, or rendering 3D projects. For small business workstations, this pairing is overkill for standard office tasks, but it would be well-suited for roles that require occasional heavy compute, such as data analysis or CAD work. The 71st combined percentile indicates it is a high-tier system that can handle a broad range of professional and entertainment workloads without significant compromise.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop configuration centered on the Intel Core i5-13500H processor and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile graphics card. The buildClass is explicitly defined as "laptop," indicating a mobile platform. The pairing represents a mainstream high-performance tier, with the CPU at the 75th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile among their respective categories. The combined percentile of 71 places this system in a strong position for a wide variety of tasks, from gaming to content creation, though it is not at the absolute top tier of mobile performance.

The CPU is a 12-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake processor with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace-based chip with 8 GB of VRAM. The similarity in their average benchmark scores—22468 for the CPU and 22729 for the GPU—is a notable data point, suggesting a harmonious pairing where the processing and graphics capabilities are in close alignment. The absence of measured FPS data for this pair means that its gaming performance is an analytical estimate, but the component scores indicate a well-balanced system for its class.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500H is built for the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a mobile platform, meaning the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and not upgradeable. This is a critical limitation for any future upgrade path. The platform supports a wide range of memory types, including DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, and LPDDR5X, in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 8 lanes for direct CPU-attached devices, while the GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The CPU has a TDP of 45 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 115 W, with no suggested PSU listed, as this is a mobile platform.

Given the BGA socket, the only meaningful upgrades for a laptop of this class are typically the memory and storage, which are not specified in the data. The GPU is also soldered and cannot be swapped. The data suggests that the "next upgrade" for a user of this system would be a new laptop entirely, rather than a component swap. The platform's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 is a point of flexibility for the original system builder, but it has no bearing on end-user upgrades. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU is forward-looking, but the GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface is the current standard for graphics cards.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is based on the AD107 chip and utilizes the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU contains 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It is equipped with 24 RT cores for ray tracing and 96 tensor cores for AI-accelerated features. The GPU has a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz. Its memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

The benchmark data for the GPU shows a clear picture of its performance. The Passmark G3D score of 17469 is its strongest result, placing it at the 67th percentile and making it comparable to a desktop RTX 2080. This indicates excellent traditional rasterization performance for a mobile chip. The Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 89420 and 89569, respectively, are also strong, suggesting good API-agnostic compute and graphics performance. The RT and tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though their specific impact is not quantified in the provided scores. The GPU's compute performance, as measured by Passmark, is 6816, which is significantly lower than its G3D score, indicating it is more specialized for graphics rendering than for general-purpose compute tasks.

The FP32 performance of 11.61 TFLOPS and the texture rate of 181.4 GTexel/s provide a basis for understanding its raw capabilities. The pixel rate of 90.72 GPixel/s is sufficient for high-resolution output. The 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die represent a dense, power-efficient design. For rendering, the combination of its high G3D score and dedicated RT cores suggests it is well-suited for modern games with ray tracing enabled, though the 8 GB VRAM may be a constraint at very high resolutions or with heavy texture packs.