SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500H + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
85%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500H

22,468 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13500H + AMD Radeon 860M: A Mobile Hybrid Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 12-core Raptor Lake-H mobile processor with AMD's latest RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics, creating a laptop configuration that sits in the 74th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU pairings. The data reveals an interesting asymmetry: the CPU lands in the 75th percentile among all processors, while the GPU achieves the 72nd percentile among all graphics solutions, suggesting a balanced but not identical performance ceiling. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this configuration shows genuine potential despite lacking a discrete GPU. The Radeon 860M's Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 places it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and 0.3% of the RTX 5060 in average benchmark scores, indicating it can plausibly drive esports titles at competitive frame rates. The CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 967 and 2-thread score of 1887 provide the per-core headroom needed to feed the GPU in CPU-bound scenarios, though users should temper expectations for demanding AAA titles at maximum settings.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's 16 threads and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14081 demonstrates substantial parallel processing capability for encoding tasks, while the PassMark data encryption score of 14938 suggests hardware-accelerated encryption can handle stream protection overhead. The 3dmark max-threads score of 6160 indicates the processor maintains strong scaling beyond 8 threads, which is critical when simultaneous gaming and encoding demands coexist.

Video editing represents a strong use case for this pairing. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7464 and PassMark floating-point math score of 52123 provide the computational muscle for timeline rendering and effect processing. The Radeon 860M's 512 shading units with 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate GPU-accelerated effects in editing suites, while the 8 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable modern render pipelines. The 16 GB of shared memory bandwidth (system dependent) may become a limiting factor for 4K multi-stream timelines.

3D rendering workloads will favor the CPU heavily. The PassMark multi-thread score of 21366 and integer math score of 72724 indicate strong CPU-based rendering performance for applications like Blender's Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, while modest, can assist with viewport rendering and interactive previews. The 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs provide adequate texture throughput for moderate scene complexity, but the system-shared memory architecture means large scenes may suffer from bandwidth constraints.

Software development tasks align well with this configuration. The PassMark single-thread score of 3397 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1775 deliver responsive compilation for incremental builds, while the 12 cores and 16 threads handle parallel build systems effectively. The 3dmark 8-thread score of 4550 shows strong mid-range threading performance, and the data compression score of 254661 indicates efficient handling of source archives and build artifacts. The 10 nm process node and 45 W TDP suggest sustained performance for long compile sessions.

Student and office workloads are comfortably served by this pairing. The 3dmark 4-thread score of 3385 and 2-thread score of 1887 provide ample responsiveness for productivity suites, web browsing with dozens of tabs, and document processing. The integrated Iris Xe Graphics 80EU in the CPU complements the Radeon 860M for display output tasks, and the broad memory support (DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, LPDDR5X) allows system integrators to optimize for battery life or performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 22468 places it in the 75th percentile of all processors, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i7-1270P at 22502 (a 0.2% delta). The AMD Ryzen 5 220 trails at 22289 (0.8% behind), while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135U and Core i5-12500H sit at 22618 and 22625 respectively (both 0.7% ahead). This clustering indicates the i5-13500H sits in a highly competitive mid-range mobile segment where performance differences between generations are minimal.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 26401 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, scores 26421 (0.1% ahead), while the RTX 5060 scores 26331 (0.3% behind). The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553 (0.6% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 leads at 26683 (1.1% ahead). This tight grouping around the 26400-26700 range suggests the Radeon 860M delivers performance comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs from several generations.

The combined picture shows a 74th percentile pairing, indicating that neither component dramatically bottlenecks the other in most workloads. The CPU's 75th percentile and GPU's 72nd percentile are closely aligned, suggesting balanced performance for mixed workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 22759 and Vulkan score of 30043 for the GPU demonstrate that compute-oriented tasks will see better scaling than pure graphics workloads, which is typical for integrated graphics solutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500H features 12 cores and 16 threads based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The base clock of 2.60 GHz boosts to 4.70 GHz, providing a wide frequency range that supports both efficiency and peak performance. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3, which is substantial for a mobile processor and helps explain the strong multi-threaded benchmark results.

The 3dmark benchmark progression reveals the threading characteristics: single-thread score of 967, 2-thread score of 1887, 4-thread score of 3385, 8-thread score of 4550, 16-thread score of 6099, and max-threads score of 6160. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads (4550 to 6099, a 34% improvement) indicates efficient utilization of the additional threads, while the small gap between 16-thread and max-threads scores (6099 to 6160) confirms the 16-thread ceiling is well-implemented. This pattern suggests the hybrid architecture (likely a mix of performance and efficiency cores) delivers consistent scaling without significant scheduling overhead.

Cinebench results reinforce the multi-core strength: R15 multi-core score of 2304, R20 multi-core score of 7464, and R23 multi-core score of 14081. The R23 single-core score of 1775 is competitive for mobile processors, and the ratio of multi-core to single-core (14081/1775, approximately 7.9x) indicates excellent parallel scaling. The PassMark results show strong integer math (72724), floating-point math (52123), and extended instructions (14872), with data compression (254661) and random string sorting (27955) demonstrating real-world productivity performance. The find prime numbers score of 74 is notably low, suggesting this workload may not be optimized for the architecture.

The processor supports dual-channel memory across DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, and LPDDR5X, providing system integrators flexibility in memory selection. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 8 CPU lanes enables fast NVMe storage and discrete GPU connectivity if needed. The 45 W TDP is typical for high-performance mobile processors, and the active production status with a January 2023 release date indicates this is a mature, well-supported platform.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p esports titles at medium to high settings will find this configuration viable. The GPU's benchmark scores near the MX550 suggest playable frame rates in competitive titles like CS:GO, Valorant, and Rocket League, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates. For 1440p gaming, the 860M's 3.072 TFLOPS and 16 ROPs will likely struggle with modern AAA titles, making 1080p the practical ceiling for demanding games.

Content creators working with 1080p video timelines will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14081 and PassMark multi-thread score of 21366 indicate efficient rendering and export times for 1080p projects. The GPU's OpenCL score of 22759 supports GPU-accelerated effects, though 4K workflows may require proxy workflows or patience with render times.

Software developers building and testing applications will appreciate the CPU's balance of single-thread and multi-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 3397 and data encryption score of 14938 support fast compilation and secure development practices. The 16 threads handle parallel test suites effectively, and the 18 MB L3 cache reduces context-switching overhead in large codebases.

Students and small business users need a laptop that handles productivity, web research, and light creative work. This pairing delivers that with headroom: the CPU's 75th percentile ensures responsiveness across office suites and browser workloads, while the GPU's 72nd percentile handles presentation graphics and basic photo editing. The 45 W TDP suggests reasonable battery life for all-day academic use, though actual endurance depends on system design.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 74th combined percentile versus the CPU's 75th and GPU's 72nd percentiles indicates a well-balanced pairing where neither component dramatically limits the other. The 1-percentage-point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles suggests that in CPU-bound workloads (compilation, rendering, data processing), the processor will be the primary driver, while in graphics-bound tasks (gaming, GPU compute), the Radeon 860M becomes the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated, points to the GPU as the bottleneck in gaming scenarios. The GPU's 72nd percentile versus the CPU's 75th percentile means that in most games, the 860M will reach its performance ceiling before the i5-13500H's processing capacity is exhausted. The CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 967 and 2-thread score of 1887 are sufficient for feeding the GPU in most titles, but games with heavy physics or AI simulation may become CPU-bound at lower resolutions.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the clear bottleneck. The GPU's compute capabilities (3.072 TFLOPS FP32, 22759 OpenCL score) are secondary to the CPU's 16 threads and 18 MB cache for tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and data analysis. The PassMark multi-thread score of 21366 represents the practical ceiling for these workloads, and the GPU's system-shared memory architecture means it cannot compensate for CPU limitations in memory-intensive tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay measurements. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26401 and 72nd percentile position suggest performance comparable to entry-level discrete GPUs, which typically handle 1080p gaming at medium settings in modern titles.

For esports titles at 1080p, the Radeon 860M's Vulkan score of 30043 indicates strong API-level performance that should translate to high frame rates in competitive shooters and MOBAs. The CPU's 3dmark 4-thread score of 3385 ensures these games have sufficient CPU headroom to maintain high FPS. Players can expect 60-100+ FPS in titles like Counter-Strike 2, Valorant, and League of Legends at competitive settings, though these figures are estimates.

For AAA titles at 1080p, the GPU's 512 shading units and 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will likely deliver 30-60 FPS at medium settings in games from 2020-2023. The 8 RT cores support ray tracing, but the modest compute throughput suggests RT should be disabled for playable frame rates. The 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs provide adequate pixel and texture throughput for 1080p, but the system-shared memory bandwidth (system dependent) may cause stuttering in texture-heavy scenes.

At 1440p, this configuration will struggle with modern titles. The GPU's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s are insufficient for high-resolution gaming at high settings. Users should expect 25-45 FPS in less demanding titles and sub-30 FPS in AAA games at 1440p, making 1080p the recommended resolution for this pairing.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 8 dedicated ray tracing cores. The base clock of 600 MHz boosts to 3000 MHz, delivering 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and matching FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio. The memory subsystem is entirely system-shared, with bandwidth dependent on the host system's memory configuration.

The GPU's Geekbench scores reveal its compute characteristics: OpenCL score of 22759 and Vulkan score of 30043. The 32% advantage for Vulkan over OpenCL suggests the architecture is well-optimized for modern graphics APIs, which bodes well for DirectX 12 and Vulkan-based games. The 12 Ultimate (12_2) DirectX support and Vulkan 1.4 compliance ensure compatibility with current and near-future game titles.

The 8 RT cores provide entry-level ray tracing capability, sufficient for hybrid rendering techniques that combine rasterization with selective ray tracing. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest by discrete GPU standards but respectable for integrated graphics, positioning the 860M between entry-level and mid-range discrete solutions. The 15 W TDP is remarkably efficient, enabling this performance level within the thermal constraints of thin-and-light laptops.

The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 26401 place it in the same performance tier as the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421, 0.1% ahead) and RTX 5060 (26331, 0.3% behind). The near-identical scores to these discrete GPUs are notable, suggesting the 860M can effectively replace entry-level discrete graphics in many scenarios. The 4 nm process node and RDNA 3.5 architecture deliver this performance at a fraction of the power consumption of discrete solutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The pairing achieves a 74th combined percentile across all CPU-GPU configurations, with the CPU at the 75th percentile and the GPU at the 72nd percentile.

Q: How does the Radeon 860M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550?

A: The Radeon 860M has an average benchmark score of 26401, while the MX550 scores 26421, representing a 0.1% difference in favor of the NVIDIA GPU.

Q: What memory types does the Intel Core i5-13500H support?

A: The processor supports DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: Does the Radeon 860M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 8 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in compatible games.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500H has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 5 220?

A: The i5-13500H has an average benchmark score of 22468, while the Ryzen 5 220 scores 22289, putting the Intel processor 0.8% ahead.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The Radeon 860M delivers 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with matching FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs Intel's Core i5-13500H mobile processor with AMD's Radeon 860M integrated graphics in a laptop form factor. The CPU, based on the Raptor Lake architecture with 12 cores and 16 threads, represents the 75th percentile of all processors. The GPU, based on RDNA 3.5 with 512 shading units and 8 RT cores, represents the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Together, they achieve a 74th combined percentile, indicating a well-matched mid-range mobile platform.

The 45 W TDP of the CPU and 15 W TDP of the GPU suggest this configuration is designed for performance-oriented laptops that balance processing power with thermal efficiency. The CPU's 10 nm process and the GPU's 4 nm process represent different manufacturing generations, but both are current production parts. The system supports PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU's 8 lanes and PCIe 4.0 x8 for the GPU, providing modern connectivity standards.

This pairing sits in a competitive segment where the CPU rivals include the Intel Core i7-1270P (0.2% difference) and Core i5-12500H (0.7% difference), while the GPU rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (0.1% difference) and RTX 5060 (0.3% difference). The tight performance clustering suggests this configuration offers performance within a narrow band of its direct competitors, making it a solid choice for users seeking balanced mobile performance without discrete graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform that does not support CPU upgrades. The 45 W TDP and Raptor Lake architecture are fixed at the time of system purchase, meaning users cannot swap processors. The memory support spans DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR4, LPDDR4X, LPDDR5, and LPDDR5X in dual-channel configuration, providing flexibility for system integrators but limiting user-upgradeability since memory is typically soldered in thin-and-light laptops.

The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 8 CPU lanes enables high-bandwidth storage devices and potential discrete GPU connectivity through external enclosures. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is standard for integrated graphics and does not present a bottleneck for the 860M's performance level. The 15 W TDP of the GPU and 45 W TDP of the CPU suggest a combined thermal budget that most laptop cooling solutions can handle, leaving headroom for system integrators to implement robust thermal solutions.

For users seeking performance improvements, the primary upgrade path is system-level rather than component-level. The memory configuration (system-dependent bandwidth for the GPU) can significantly impact graphics performance, so systems with faster LPDDR5X memory will see better GPU results. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives can improve load times and data-intensive workloads. The absence of a suggested PSU and the laptop form factor mean power delivery is fixed by the system design, so users should focus on memory and storage optimization rather than component swaps.

The active production status of both the CPU (released January 2023) and GPU (released February 2025) indicates this is a current-generation platform. The GPU's predecessor, Navi II IGP, suggests AMD's integrated graphics have evolved significantly, and the 860M's performance near discrete MX550 levels indicates that integrated graphics have become a viable alternative for budget-conscious laptop buyers. For users needing more graphics performance, the upgrade path would involve selecting a different laptop configuration with a discrete GPU rather than modifying this platform.