SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

CPU Bottleneck

CPU

77%

GPU

99%

Your CPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a faster processor to better utilize your GPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

CPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500E and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation form a desktop pairing that leans heavily toward professional workloads. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part on Intel Socket 1700, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel and carries a 65 W TDP. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace workstation card built on TSMC’s 5 nm node, featuring 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. The combination sits at the 80th percentile overall, which places it well above the median desktop build, but the character of that performance is distinctly split between a solidly mid-range CPU and a top-tier GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Core i5-13500E delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 and a single-core score of 3214. Those numbers tell a clear story: this is a capable multi-threaded processor that also holds its own in lightly threaded tasks. The R20 results reinforce the picture, with 9564 multi-core and 1349 single-core. The R15 scores of 2295 multi-core and 323 single-core are consistent with the newer tests. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 6586, which puts it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs — meaning it beats the majority of processors but is not a flagship part.

The architecture is Raptor Lake-S, with an L3 cache of 24 MB shared across the cores. Each core has 80 KB of L1 and 1.25 MB of L2. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and ECC memory is supported, which matters for workstation stability. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present, though in this build it will be secondary to the discrete RTX 5000 Ada.

Looking at the nearest rivals clarifies the positioning. The i5-13500E’s average score of 6586 is 0.3% above the Intel Atom x7405C (6568) and 0.3% below the Intel Core i9-10940X (6605). It is also 0.3% below the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (6605) and 0.4% below the Intel Core i9-12900E (6611). The delta percentages are tiny, meaning the i5-13500E sits in a performance band where the differences between these CPUs are negligible in aggregate. However, the i5-13500E’s real advantage is its core count and thread count relative to those rivals — the Pentium Gold is a low-core part, and the i9-10940X is an older HEDT chip. The benchmark averages cluster them together, but the workload behavior will differ.

For real workloads, the R23 multi-core score of 22772 indicates strong rendering and compilation throughput. The single-core score of 3214 ensures that everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications like web browsing or office suites will not feel sluggish. The 65 W TDP means cooling requirements are modest, and the 10 nm process keeps power density reasonable. This is a CPU that punches above its class in multi-threaded tasks but does not compete with the highest-end 24-core parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of this pairing is 80, which suggests a system that is well above average but not uniformly elite. The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 98th percentile. That gap is the defining characteristic of this build: the GPU is dramatically more capable than the CPU in relative terms. In GPU-bound workloads — rendering, ray tracing, compute — the RTX 5000 Ada will be the star, and the i5-13500E will have headroom to feed it. In CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation or certain compilation steps, the i5-13500E will be the limiting factor.

The benchmark data supports this. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 184664, while the CPU’s is 6586. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183725, 0.5% lower), the A100 SXM4 40 GB (187147, 1.3% higher), the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182109, 1.4% lower), and the GeForce RTX 4090 D (178050, 3.7% lower). These are all flagship or near-flagship parts, which puts the RTX 5000 Ada in rarefied air. The CPU, by contrast, is competing with mid-range and older HEDT parts.

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so frame expectations from the scores. In gaming, the GPU will rarely be the bottleneck at reasonable resolutions, but the CPU’s 62nd percentile position means that at lower resolutions or with very high frame rates, the i5-13500E could limit performance in CPU-heavy titles. The FPS scaling will be typical of a high-end GPU paired with a mid-range CPU: excellent at 4K, still strong at 1440p, and occasionally CPU-limited at 1080p in esports titles. For professional applications, the balance is better — the GPU does the heavy lifting in rendering, and the CPU handles orchestration and data preparation.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5000 Ada is a 98th percentile GPU, so it can drive high frame rates at high resolutions. The i5-13500E’s single-core score of 3214 in R23 is sufficient for most titles, but at 1080p with a very high refresh monitor, the CPU may hold back the GPU in some scenarios. Expect strong performance at 1440p and above.

Streaming: The GPU’s Ada Lovelace architecture includes dedicated encoder hardware, and the CPU’s 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding overhead. The 32 GB VRAM is overkill for streaming but ensures no memory pressure. The CPU’s multi-core score of 22772 in R23 means simultaneous gaming and encoding will not cause stutters.

Video editing: The combination of 14 cores and a 12800-shader GPU is well suited to timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU’s 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerate effects and color grading. The CPU’s 24 MB L3 cache helps with decode and encode pipelines. Exports will be fast, though the CPU is not the absolute fastest available.

3D rendering: This is where the pairing shines. The GPU’s 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores, combined with 32 GB VRAM, handle complex scenes with ease. The CPU’s multi-core performance ensures that scene preparation and physics simulations do not bottleneck the render. The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking puts it ahead of nearly all other cards.

Software development: The 20 threads and 65 W TDP make this a strong compile machine. The R23 multi-core score of 22772 indicates fast parallel builds. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running builds. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks but will accelerate any CUDA-based workloads.

Student and office work: This is massive overkill for this category. The i5-13500E alone is more than sufficient, and the RTX 5000 Ada is wasted on spreadsheets and web browsing. The system will be silent and cool, but the cost and power are unjustified for basic tasks.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional who needs workstation-class GPU compute and a solid multi-threaded CPU. The 98th percentile GPU performance and 32 GB VRAM make this ideal for 3D artists, video editors working with high-resolution footage, and engineers running CUDA-based simulations. The CPU’s 62nd percentile position means it will not embarrass the GPU in most professional tasks, but it is not the bottleneck in rendering — the GPU is the workhorse.

Gamers at 4K resolution will find the GPU exceptional, but the CPU will limit frame rates at lower resolutions. Content creators who prioritize GPU acceleration — such as DaVinci Resolve or Blender Cycles — will see near-best-in-class performance. Developers working on large C++ or Rust codebases will appreciate the 20 threads. Students and small business users should look elsewhere unless they have specific GPU compute needs; the system is built for heavy lifting, not light work.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which leaves room for future high-bandwidth devices. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 slots — the GPU will run at Gen 4 speeds, which is sufficient for its bandwidth.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 250 W TDP. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 600 W, so a 650 W or higher power supply is a sensible baseline. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not an option; any performance gains will come from memory tuning or platform upgrades. The next sensible upgrade would be a higher-core-count Raptor Lake CPU on the same socket, such as a Core i9 part, which would close the gap between the CPU and GPU percentiles. The GPU itself is near the top of its class, so an upgrade would only be necessary for future workloads that exceed 32 GB VRAM.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 98th percentile ranking and the CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking suggest a system that is GPU-dominant. At 4K resolution, the RTX 5000 Ada will deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU rarely being the limiting factor. At 1440p, performance will still be excellent, but some CPU-bound games may show reduced scaling. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance of 3214 in R23 will cap frame rates in esports titles, potentially leaving GPU performance on the table.

The GPU’s 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate strong rasterization throughput. The 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate ensures high-resolution textures do not cause stutters. The 32 GB VRAM is more than any game currently requires, so texture quality settings will never be limited by memory. The 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is ample for 4K textures. Realistically, this is a gaming monster at high resolutions, but the CPU will be the weak link at lower resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation GPU based on the AD102 chip, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The transistor density is 125.3M per mm². It has 12800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The RT cores number 100, and the tensor cores number 400. The base clock is 1155 MHz, with a boost clock of 2550 MHz. Memory runs at 2250 MHz, with 18 Gbps effective speed.

The 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FP32 performance is 65.28 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. The card is dual-slot, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and has a 250 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 600 W. Display output is four DisplayPort 1.4a ports.

In Geekbench, the GPU scores 175286 in OpenCL and 194041 in Vulkan. Its average benchmark score is 184664, placing it at the 98th percentile. The nearest rivals are the A100 SXM4 80 GB (0.5% lower), A100 SXM4 40 GB (1.3% higher), RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (1.4% lower), and RTX 4090 D (3.7% lower). This GPU is firmly in the top tier. For rendering, the 100 RT cores accelerate ray tracing, and the 400 tensor cores accelerate DLSS and AI workloads. The 32 GB VRAM is critical for large scenes, high-res textures, and multi-GPU rendering setups.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and does it support DDR5?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500E uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Ada have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: It has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU good for multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 22772, which is strong for a 14-core, 20-thread part.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada sits at the 98th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184664.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i5-13500E supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation stability.

Q: What power supply is recommended for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5000 Ada is 600 W.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this exact CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this combination; all gaming performance figures are estimates from benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are consistent across Cinebench versions. In R15, it scores 2295 multi-core and 323 single-core. In R20, it scores 9564 multi-core and 1349 single-core. In R23, it scores 22772 multi-core and 3214 single-core. The average benchmark score is 6586, placing it at the 62nd percentile. The nearest rival is the Intel Atom x7405C at 6568, just 0.3% lower, and the Intel Core i9-10940X at 6605, 0.3% higher. The Pentium Gold G6405 also scores 6605, 0.3% higher, and the Core i9-12900E scores 6611, 0.4% higher.

The GPU scores 175286 in Geekbench OpenCL and 194041 in Geekbench Vulkan. The average benchmark score is 184664, placing it at the 98th percentile. The closest rival is the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB at 183725, 0.5% lower. The A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187147, 1.3% higher. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182109, 1.4% lower, and the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178050, 3.7% lower.

The combined picture is a system at the 80th percentile overall. The GPU is the dominant component, outperforming nearly all other GPUs, while the CPU is a solid mid-range performer. In professional workloads that leverage the GPU, this system will compete with much more expensive builds. In CPU-bound tasks, it will perform admirably but not exceptionally. The 32 GB VRAM and 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance make this a serious compute platform, while the CPU’s 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache ensure it can keep up with data preparation and orchestration. This is a workstation-first pairing with gaming capabilities that exceed most dedicated gaming rigs, though the CPU will be the limiting factor in high-refresh 1080p scenarios.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500E

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds