SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500E pairs with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 to form a desktop configuration aimed at professional workloads rather than pure consumer gaming. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die. The GPU, in contrast, is an older Turing-architecture workstation card based on the TU104 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm node with a 545 mm² die and 13,600 million transistors. This is a workstation-oriented pairing where the CPU carries modern multi-threading muscle while the GPU brings certified driver support and professional rendering features, though its raw gaming performance is dated. The data shows a combined percentile of 62, indicating the system sits above the median of all tracked configurations, but the lack of measured FPS data means all gaming conclusions must be drawn from the synthetic benchmark scores rather than direct game tests.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E delivers a strong balance of single-threaded responsiveness and multi-threaded throughput. With 14 cores and 20 threads, the processor leverages the Raptor Lake hybrid architecture, combining performance and efficiency cores to handle both lightly-threaded tasks and heavily parallel workloads. The 24 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core provide ample data locality for compute-heavy applications, while the dual-channel memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, offering flexibility for platform builders. The 65 W TDP is notably modest for a 14-core part, suggesting efficient power delivery that keeps thermal requirements manageable in compact workstation builds.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of the CPU's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 22772 points in multi-core and 3214 points in single-core, indicating strong sustained performance across all cores and respectable single-thread speed for legacy applications. The Cinebench R20 scores of 9564 multi-core and 1349 single-core reinforce this trend, as does the R15 result of 2295 multi-core and 323 single-core. The average benchmark score of 6586 places the CPU in the 62nd percentile among all processors, meaning it outperforms roughly six out of ten CPUs in the database. Compared to its nearest rivals, the i5-13500E is effectively tied with the Intel Atom x7405C (0.3% faster), the Intel Core i9-10940X (0.3% slower), the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (0.3% slower), and the Intel Core i9-12900E (0.4% slower). This clustering suggests the 13500E sits in a performance band where incremental gains between competing parts are minimal, but its real advantage lies in the combination of modern architecture and lower power draw rather than raw score dominance.

For real workloads, the 13500E excels in video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering tasks that can use all 20 threads. The single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 indicates snappy UI responsiveness and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications like spreadsheets or web browsing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output capability, though the system will rely on the discrete Quadro GPU for any meaningful graphics work. The 10 nm process node and 215 mm² die size suggest Intel has prioritized efficiency here, making the 13500E a solid foundation for a quiet, power-conscious workstation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is shared across 12th and 13th generation Core processors. This socket provides a degree of upgrade flexibility, allowing users to move to higher-tier 13th-gen parts without changing the motherboard, provided the BIOS supports the newer silicon. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, which is forward-looking for high-bandwidth storage and graphics, though the Quadro RTX 4000 in this configuration runs on PCIe 3.0 x16, so the full Gen 5 bandwidth remains unused with the current GPU. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and the platform supports ECC memory, a critical feature for error-sensitive scientific computing or financial modeling workloads.

The system's power requirements are moderate. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU lists a 160 W TDP, and the suggested PSU for the graphics card is 450 W. This leaves substantial headroom for a system with a single GPU, several drives, and standard peripherals, though it does not account for extreme overclocking or multi-GPU configurations. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, which is common on modern power supplies. A sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake processor on the same socket, such as an i7 or i9 part, which would boost multi-threaded scores without requiring a motherboard change. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU to a newer workstation card would improve graphics compute performance, but the current CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures it will not bottleneck future high-end graphics adapters.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a professional workstation GPU built on the Turing architecture, featuring 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The card includes 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like denoising and DLSS, though these capabilities are more geared toward professional rendering and scientific visualization than consumer gaming. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s, which is substantial for handling large textures and complex 3D scenes at high resolutions. The base clock runs at 1005 MHz with a boost clock of 1545 MHz, while the memory operates at 13 Gbps effective.

The benchmark scores reveal a GPU that is competitive in compute but modest in rasterization. The Passmark G3D score of 15117 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 indicate strong general-purpose compute performance, while the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 shows the card can handle modern DirectX 12 workloads at moderate settings. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 78844 suggests good cross-API performance for Linux or Vulkan-based applications. The FP32 compute rate of 7.119 TFLOPS and FP16 rate of 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1) provide a measure of raw throughput for scientific simulations and machine learning inference. The texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s indicate the card can sustain high fill rates, though it is not a gaming-focused part.

The 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs places the RTX 4000 in the upper-middle tier, but its nearest rivals highlight its age. The Quadro RTX 4000 is only 0.7% faster than the AMD Radeon HD 7790, 0.9% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, 1.1% faster than the AMD Radeon 780M, and 1.4% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 560. These tight deltas suggest that the RTX 4000's performance is roughly on par with modern mid-range consumer GPUs and even some integrated graphics solutions, which is surprising for a card that once had a launch MSRP of 899 USD. The 12 nm process node and 545 mm² die size mean the card is physically large and power-hungry relative to its performance, though the single-slot form factor and 160 W TDP make it manageable in workstation chassis.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 4000 is not suited for high-refresh gaming at 1080p or higher resolutions. The Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 and DirectX 11 score of 128 indicate weak rasterization performance for modern game engines, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 suggests the card will struggle to maintain high frame rates above 60 FPS in demanding titles. This configuration is better reserved for productivity tasks.

Streaming: The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video streams while gaming, but the GPU's older Turing architecture and limited driver optimization for consumer streaming software make this an awkward fit. The tensor cores could offload some AI-based filtering, but the overall gaming performance bottleneck negates this advantage.

Video editing: The 13500E's strong multi-core score of 22772 in Cinebench R23 translates to quick timeline rendering and export times in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 4K footage reasonably well, though the 12 nm process and 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 rate are modest by modern standards. This is a capable editing rig for 1080p and light 4K work.

3D rendering: This is the system's strongest suit. The CPU's 20 threads accelerate CPU-based renderers, while the GPU's RT cores enable hardware ray tracing in compatible applications like Blender or V-Ray. The 288 tensor cores also support AI denoising, which can significantly reduce render times. The 3DMark score of 1873 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 indicate the GPU can handle complex scenes, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit extremely large assets.

Software development: The 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache make this an excellent choice for compiling large codebases, running multiple virtual machines, or containerized development environments. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long builds, and the 65 W TDP keeps power costs low for always-on workstations.

Student and office work: The 13500E's single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy performance in office suites and web browsers, while the modest 65 W TDP keeps the system quiet and cool. The Quadro GPU is overkill for this use case, but it provides headroom for future engineering or design courses that require CAD software, which benefits from certified workstation drivers.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores. The data indicates that the Quadro RTX 4000 will deliver playable performance at 1080p in esports titles and older games, but it will struggle with modern AAA releases at high settings. The Passmark DirectX 9 score of 205 suggests strong performance in legacy games, while the DirectX 12 score of 52 indicates significant degradation in modern titles. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 places the GPU in a range where 1080p medium-to-low settings are realistic for demanding games, with frame rates likely in the 40-60 FPS range depending on the title. At 1440p, the 8 GB VRAM and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough memory bandwidth, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 rate will limit performance to low or medium settings. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern games, making it unsuitable for high-resolution gaming. The CPU's strong single-core performance ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU's age is the primary limiting factor for gaming.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets professionals who need certified graphics drivers and reliable compute performance rather than gamers seeking high frame rates. The primary audience includes 3D artists and animators using software like Autodesk Maya or Cinema 4D, where the RT cores and tensor cores accelerate rendering and denoising tasks. Engineers and architects using CAD applications like SolidWorks or Revit will benefit from the Quadro's optimized drivers and the CPU's multi-threaded performance for simulation and analysis. Data scientists running machine learning workloads can leverage the GPU's 288 tensor cores for inference tasks, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit larger models. Students in engineering or design programs will find this system capable of handling coursework, while small business workstations requiring ECC memory and stable multi-threaded performance for database management or financial modeling will appreciate the CPU's capabilities. The system is less suitable for gamers, but for professionals who need a quiet, power-efficient, and reliable workstation, this combination offers a balanced platform.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data shows a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck for graphics-intensive tasks, while the CPU provides ample headroom for compute-heavy workloads. The CPU's 62nd percentile ranking among all processors is matched by the GPU's 61st percentile, indicating a balanced overall system, but the nature of the workloads matters. In 3D rendering tasks that use both CPU and GPU, the 13500E's 20 threads will accelerate CPU-based calculations while the RTX 4000 handles GPU-accelerated ray tracing, creating a complementary partnership. However, in gaming scenarios, the GPU's low DirectX 12 score of 52 will limit frame rates, and the CPU's strong single-core performance cannot compensate for the GPU's weak rasterization. The FP32 throughput of 7.119 TFLOPS on the GPU is the limiting factor for compute-heavy graphics, while the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 20 threads ensure it can feed data to the GPU without becoming a bottleneck. For video editing, the CPU's multi-core score of 22772 in Cinebench R23 ensures smooth timeline scrubbing, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM may limit the use of heavy effects. The suggested PSU of 450 W and the combined TDP of 65 W (CPU) and 160 W (GPU) indicate that power delivery is not a concern, allowing both components to operate at full boost without throttling.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 62, meaning it outperforms 62% of all tracked desktop configurations.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13500E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for error-sensitive workloads like scientific computing or financial modeling.

Q: How does the Quadro RTX 4000 compare to the GeForce RTX 4060?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has an average benchmark score of 17789, which is 0.9% higher than the GeForce RTX 4060's score of 17639, making them virtually identical in overall performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 has a memory bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500E has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz across its 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this configuration?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 4000 is 450 W, which provides sufficient headroom for a system with this CPU and a single graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system that is capable but not exceptional by modern standards. The CPU's average benchmark score of 6586 places it in the 62nd percentile, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 and single-core score of 3214. The GPU's average benchmark score of 17789 places it in the 61st percentile, with notable results including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540, and a Passmark G3D score of 15117. The CPU's nearest rival is the Intel Atom x7405C, which is 0.3% slower, while the GPU's nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which is 0.7% slower. The combined percentile of 62 indicates that this system sits comfortably in the upper-middle range of all desktop configurations, making it a solid choice for professional workstations where reliability and compute performance are prioritized over gaming frame rates. The data shows a balanced pairing where neither component drastically outperforms the other, but the GPU's age and limited DirectX 12 performance (score of 52 in Passmark) suggest that any gaming ambition should be tempered with realistic expectations at lower settings and resolutions.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500E

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds