SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits in the upper-midrange tier of the benchmark database. The CPU, a Raptor Lake-S part on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, combines 14 cores with 20 threads, a configuration that delivers strong multi-threaded throughput for a 65 W TDP part. The GPU, built on the Ampere architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory, provides a balanced high-resolution gaming and rendering experience. The combined percentile for this pairing is 69, indicating it outperforms the majority of recorded desktop configurations while remaining short of the top-tier enthusiast class.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 13th-generation desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process node from Intel. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, a configuration that leverages a hybrid design to balance high-performance and efficiency demands. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, allowing the processor to scale up significantly under load. The chip is built on a 215 mm² die and is manufactured by Intel, with a production status marked as active.

Cache hierarchy is substantial: the L1 cache is 80 KB per core, the L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core, and the shared L3 cache totals 24 MB. This cache structure supports the processor’s ability to handle complex workloads with reduced memory latency. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, and ECC memory is supported, a feature that appeals to workstation and small business environments where data integrity is critical. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe lanes, 16 lanes from the CPU itself, which enables high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and storage devices.

Benchmark results place the i5-13500E at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 22772, while the single-core score is 3214. These figures indicate a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks such as video rendering, software compilation, and complex simulations. The R20 multi-core score of 9564 and R15 multi-core score of 2295 reinforce this strength. The average benchmark score is 6586, placing it in close competition with the Intel Core i9-10940X, which scores 6605, a delta of -0.3%. It also sits near the Intel Core i9-12900E, which scores 6611, a delta of -0.4%. The nearest rival above it is the Intel Atom x7405C, which scores 6568, a delta of 0.3%. This indicates that the i5-13500E is positioned in a dense performance cluster where small score differences separate processors.

For real workloads, the multi-core performance suggests the CPU can handle demanding productivity tasks without bottlenecking. The 20 threads allow for efficient parallel processing in applications like 3D rendering and video encoding. The single-core performance, while lower than the top-tier desktop parts, remains sufficient for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The 65 W TDP is notable for a chip with this core count, indicating efficient power management that keeps thermal output manageable in standard desktop builds.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this CPU and GPU pairing is defined by the individual benchmark scores and their percentile positions. The CPU sits at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for the pairing is 69, suggesting that the system as a whole outperforms a majority of recorded configurations but does not reach the top tier.

The GPU benchmarks show strong results across several tests. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 3070 Ti scores 3478. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 119718, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 139541. The Passmark G3D score is 23356, with a Passmark GPU Compute score of 11601. The average benchmark score for the GPU is 29945. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, which scores 29928, a delta of 0.1%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800, which scores 30095, a delta of -0.5%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 29783, a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 scores 30433, a delta of -1.6%. These deltas indicate that the RTX 3070 Ti is competitive with these cards, performing within a narrow margin of each.

The CPU and GPU scores together suggest a system capable of handling high-refresh gaming at 1440p and 4K resolutions, as well as content creation tasks like video editing and 3D rendering. The CPU’s multi-core strength supports rendering workloads, while the GPU’s compute and graphics scores handle the visual output. The data shows a balanced pairing where neither component drastically overshadows the other, though the GPU holds a higher percentile position, indicating it is relatively stronger in the broader market.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is a mature socket that supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The dual-channel memory bus means that users can choose between the two memory types depending on their motherboard and budget, though the benchmark data does not specify which type was used in testing. The CPU supports ECC memory, a feature that is uncommon in consumer processors and adds value for small business workstations or data-sensitive environments.

The platform provides Gen 5 PCIe connectivity with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for a modern GPU and high-speed NVMe storage. The RTX 3070 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, ensuring no bandwidth bottleneck. The GPU has a suggested PSU requirement of 600 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 65 W. This combined power draw is modest for a high-performance system, leaving headroom for additional components like extra storage or fans. The GPU’s TDP is 290 W, and it uses a 1x 12-pin power connector, which may require an adapter for older power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be a higher-core-count processor within the same socket, such as a Core i9 series part, though the benchmark data does not list specific models beyond the i9-12900E. The socket supports the 13th generation, so users could also consider a higher-tier 13th-gen chip if their workloads demand more cores. On the GPU side, the RTX 3070 Ti is end-of-life, and its successor is the GeForce 40 series, but the benchmark data does not provide specific upgrade performance figures. The platform’s support for DDR5 and Gen 5 PCIe ensures that it remains relevant for future component upgrades without requiring a full rebuild.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a balance of CPU and GPU performance for a mix of gaming and productivity. The GPU’s 75th percentile ranking makes it suitable for gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions, where the 8 GB of GDDR6X memory and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient headroom for high-detail textures. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking supports this with strong multi-core performance for background tasks like streaming or recording while gaming.

Content creators will benefit from the CPU’s 20 threads and the GPU’s compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 indicates the CPU can handle video editing timelines and 3D rendering tasks, while the GPU’s Passmark GPU Compute score of 11601 accelerates effects and rendering in compatible applications. Software developers will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance useful for compilation and testing, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Students and small business workstations will appreciate the platform’s efficiency. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power consumption low, and the memory support for DDR4 or DDR5 allows for flexible builds. The system is not a budget option, but the data suggests it is a capable all-rounder for users who require a single machine for work and play without sacrificing performance in either area.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is close, but the GPU holds a higher percentile position, indicating it is relatively stronger in the benchmark database. In gaming workloads, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at higher resolutions, where the 8 GB memory capacity and pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s determine frame rates. The CPU’s single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3214, is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios, but in CPU-heavy games with many physics or AI calculations, the CPU could become the bottleneck.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the primary driver. The multi-core score of 22772 in Cinebench R23 shows that rendering and encoding tasks scale well with the 20 threads. In these scenarios, the GPU plays a supporting role, accelerating specific tasks like video effects or GPU-accelerated rendering. The data does not show a significant bottleneck in either direction, but the percentile difference suggests that users seeking higher gaming performance should look to the GPU first, while those seeking faster rendering should consider a CPU upgrade.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 and Passmark G3D score of 23356 indicate strong DirectX 12 performance, which is relevant for modern titles. The RTX 3070 Ti’s 8 GB of GDDR6X memory and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle high-resolution textures at 1440p and 4K, though the 8 GB capacity may require settings adjustments in the most demanding games.

The CPU’s single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 supports high frame rates in games that are not heavily multi-threaded. At 1080p, the CPU is likely sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU, allowing the GPU’s full potential to be realized. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary determinant of frame rates, and the scores suggest it can deliver playable performance in most titles with high or ultra settings. The estimates indicate a system capable of high-refresh gaming at 1440p, with 4K performance varying by title and settings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using an 8 nm process node from Samsung. The chip, designated GA104, contains 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 44.4 million per mm². The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting and AI-based features like DLSS.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. The memory clock is 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1575 MHz, with a boost clock of 1770 MHz. The GPU’s compute capabilities are strong: FP32 performance is 21.75 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is also 21.75 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s.

The GPU is rated at a TDP of 290 W, with a suggested PSU of 600 W. It is a dual-slot card with a length of 267 mm and a height of 112 mm. It uses a 1x 12-pin power connector, which may require an adapter. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting modern monitors. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with a predecessor in the GeForce 20 series and a successor in the GeForce 40 series.

The benchmark scores reflect a capable rendering GPU. The Passmark G3D score of 23356 places it at the 75th percentile, and the average benchmark score of 29945 is competitive with the RTX 5070 Mobile and RX 6800. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3478 indicates strong DirectX 12 performance for gaming. For rendering workloads, the 192 tensor cores accelerate AI denoising, and the 48 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, making it suitable for 3D rendering and visualization tasks.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13500E with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, creating a desktop configuration that targets the upper-midrange tier. The CPU’s 62nd percentile and the GPU’s 75th percentile combine for a system percentile of 69. This indicates a build that outperforms the majority of desktop systems in the database, with the GPU providing the stronger relative performance.

The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an 8 GB GDDR6X card with a 290 W TDP. The system is best suited for high-refresh 1440p gaming and productivity tasks like video editing and 3D rendering. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, and the Gen 5 PCIe lanes ensure future compatibility with newer components. The overall tier is solidly mid-high, offering a balanced experience without the extreme costs associated with top-tier parts.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, indicating the system outperforms 69% of recorded desktop configurations.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13500E support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for data-sensitive environments like small business workstations.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the RTX 3070 Ti have?

A: The GPU has 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth, provided by 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: What is the suggested power supply requirement for the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, which is sufficient for the GPU’s 290 W TDP and the CPU’s 65 W TDP.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 22772, indicating strong multi-threaded performance.

Q: Which GPU is a close rival to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is a close rival, with an average score of 30095, a delta of -0.5% from the RTX 3070 Ti’s 29945.

Q: What is the process node for the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The GPU is built on an 8 nm process node from Samsung.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 3070 Ti’s 75th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3478 suggest it can drive high frame rates at 1440p, while the CPU’s single-core score of 3214 ensures minimal bottleneck in most titles.

For streaming, the CPU’s 20 threads and multi-core score of 22772 handle encoding and broadcasting overhead, while the GPU’s tensor cores can offload AI-based encoding tasks, providing a smooth experience.

For video editing, the CPU’s multi-core performance accelerates timeline rendering and effects processing, and the GPU’s 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance assists with GPU-accelerated effects and exports.

For 3D rendering, the CPU’s 24 MB of L3 cache and 20 threads handle geometry and scene complexity, while the GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores accelerate ray-tracing and denoising in compatible render engines.

For software development, the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads reduce compilation times, and the support for ECC memory adds stability for long-running test suites and builds.

For student and office work, the 65 W CPU TDP keeps the system efficient, and the memory support for DDR4 or DDR5 allows for flexible build options. The GPU’s capabilities are overkill for basic tasks, but the system can handle occasional photo editing or light 3D work without issue.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds