SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM form a desktop pairing that sits squarely in the mid-range tier of the benchmark database. The combined percentile of 60 indicates that this configuration outperforms the majority of recorded systems, yet it does not push into enthusiast territory. The data reveals a system where the CPU’s substantial multi-core muscle is held back by a GPU that, while capable, anchors the overall experience in 1080p gaming and entry-level creative work. This analysis explores the balance between the components, their individual benchmark standings, and the real-world implications for various user profiles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance ceiling of this build is overwhelmingly defined by the graphics card rather than the processor. The RTX 3050 OEM’s average benchmark score of 15199 places it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, while the Core i5-13500E’s average score of 6586 places it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs. The 5-percentage-point gap in favor of the processor suggests that in gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary constraint, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the limiting factor. The CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU without becoming the bottleneck in most titles, but the inverse is not true: the GPU will frequently max out before the CPU does.

This imbalance is further illustrated by the CPU’s nearest rivals. The Core i5-13500E sits just 0.3% above the Intel Atom x7405C and 0.3% below the Intel Core i9-10940X, showing that its processing power is competitive with older high-end desktop chips. However, the GPU’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, is only 0.2% faster, while the integrated AMD Radeon 680M is 0.5% slower. This clustering indicates that the RTX 3050 OEM is a solid but not exceptional performer, and it will struggle to leverage the full potential of the 14-core CPU in frame-rate-limited scenarios.

In multi-threaded workloads like rendering or video encoding, the balance shifts decisively toward the CPU. The i5-13500E’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 is a strong result, and the GPU’s compute capabilities, while present, are secondary. The data suggests that a user could comfortably run a CPU-bound task like software compilation while the GPU handles lighter graphical output without significant contention. Conversely, in a high-refresh-rate gaming scenario, the GPU’s 57th percentile ranking means it will likely deliver playable but not exceptional frame rates, and the CPU’s extra cores will remain largely idle.

Benchmark Performance

The Core i5-13500E delivers a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 22772, which is a robust figure for a 65-watt processor, and a single-core score of 3214, indicating strong per-thread performance for everyday tasks. In Cinebench R20, the CPU scores 9564 multi-core and 1349 single-core, while in the older R15 test, it achieves 2295 multi-core and 323 single-core. These numbers paint a picture of a chip that excels in parallel workloads, with the multi-core scores being roughly seven times higher than their single-core counterparts, a ratio that reflects the presence of 14 cores and 20 threads.

The GPU’s benchmark suite shows a more mixed profile. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 60740, and in Vulkan, it scores 57103, which are respectable figures for a card of its class. However, the Passmark results reveal a peculiar pattern: DirectX 11 scores 86, while DirectX 12 scores only 58, and DirectX 9 scores 137. This suggests that the card is optimized for older APIs and may not scale perfectly with modern DirectX 12 titles, potentially impacting performance in the latest games. The Passmark G3D score of 11857 is the most representative of overall gaming prowess, and the G2D score of 973 indicates adequate 2D desktop performance.

The combined picture is one of a balanced mid-range system where the CPU is arguably overqualified for the GPU. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU’s 57th, and the average benchmark score of 6586 for the CPU versus 15199 for the GPU shows that while the GPU has a higher raw number, it competes in a field where the top performers score much higher. The data implies that benchmark results will show strong CPU performance in productivity tasks, but gaming frame rates will be capped by the GPU’s capabilities.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65-watt TDP that makes it suitable for standard desktop cooling solutions. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache, which is ample for gaming and productivity workloads. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation-class chips.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that punches above its weight class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 is indicative of a chip that can handle heavy rendering tasks, video encoding, and software compilation with ease. For context, the CPU’s average benchmark score of 6586 places it near the Intel Core i9-10940X, which has a deltaPct of -0.3%, meaning the i5-13500E is nearly identical in performance to that older high-end processor. This reflects the efficiency of the Raptor Lake architecture, which delivers high multi-threaded throughput without the power draw of previous generation flagships.

The single-core scores are equally important for real-world responsiveness. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3214 ensures that everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light photo editing will feel snappy. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz is the key driver here, and the data suggests that the CPU can maintain high frequencies under load for short bursts. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic display output, but it is not a gaming solution, and the presence of PCIe Gen 5 lanes for the CPU means the system is future-proofed for high-speed storage and expansion cards.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh-rate gaming, the RTX 3050 OEM is the limiting factor. The GPU’s 57th percentile ranking and Passmark G3D score of 11857 suggest that it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, but achieving 144Hz or higher frame rates in demanding titles will require lowering graphical presets. The CPU’s strong single-core performance ensures that it will not be a bottleneck in this scenario, but the GPU will cap the frame rate.

Streaming is a mixed bag. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads are more than sufficient for encoding a stream using x264, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 confirms that it can handle the extra load without impacting game performance. The GPU’s NVENC encoder is not detailed in the data, but the card’s RT cores and tensor cores suggest it supports hardware encoding, which would offload the work from the CPU. The overall experience will be smooth, but the GPU’s gaming performance will still limit the in-game frame rate.

Video editing in software like Premiere Pro will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core muscle. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9564 indicates that timeline playback and export times will be reasonable, and the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing with effects. The GPU’s compute score of 5779 in Passmark suggests it can accelerate effects and color grading, but the CPU will do the heavy lifting for most tasks.

3D rendering in applications like Blender will favor the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 is strong for a mid-range chip, and the GPU’s 8.087 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest. For CPU-based rendering engines, the i5-13500E will perform admirably, but GPU-based renderers like Cycles will see slower performance compared to higher-end cards.

Software development is a sweet spot for this build. The 14 cores and 20 threads handle compilation tasks efficiently, and the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2295 shows that even older benchmark tests see strong performance. The CPU’s support for ECC memory is a bonus for developers who value data integrity, and the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support allows for flexible memory configurations.

Student and office work is more than adequately served. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3214 ensures that spreadsheet calculations, document editing, and web browsing are responsive. The GPU is overkill for this scenario, but it provides the option for light gaming or content consumption during downtime. The system’s 65-watt CPU TDP and 130-watt GPU TDP mean it will run quietly and efficiently in a standard office environment.

Who Should Build It

The target user for the Intel Core i5-13500E and RTX 3050 OEM combination is a gamer who primarily plays at 1080p resolution. The GPU’s 57th percentile ranking and the lack of measured FPS data suggest that it will handle most titles at medium to high settings, and the CPU’s 62nd percentile ensures that there will be no CPU-induced stuttering. This build is not aimed at 4K gamers or those seeking maximum refresh rates, but it is a solid choice for entry-level esports and AAA gaming.

Content creators who work with video editing or 3D modeling will find value in the CPU’s multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 is a strong indicator of rendering capability, and the GPU’s 8 GB of VRAM is enough for most 1080p and 1440p projects. This is a system for creators who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads over GPU-accelerated rendering.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s thread count and ECC memory support. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9564 shows that compilation times will be short, and the PCIe Gen 5 support allows for fast NVMe storage, which is essential for large codebases. The GPU is secondary for this use case, but it provides a capable display output.

Students and small business users will find this build to be a dependable workstation. The CPU’s single-core performance ensures smooth multitasking, and the GPU’s modest power draw (130 W) means the system can be paired with a 300 W power supply. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, adding a layer of reliability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is based on the Ampere architecture, built on Samsung’s 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1515 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, with the memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The card includes 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, 32 ROPs, 18 RT cores, and 72 tensor cores, which are the key hardware blocks for ray tracing and DLSS.

The benchmark scores for the GPU are a mixed bag. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 is a strong result, but the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 58 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 86. This suggests that the card may not be fully optimized for modern APIs, which could lead to inconsistent performance in newer games. The FP32 compute rating of 8.087 TFLOPS is adequate for general compute tasks, and the pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s indicate that it can handle 1080p rendering without difficulty.

The presence of 18 RT cores means the GPU can perform ray tracing, but the modest compute power will limit the quality settings at which it can be used. The 72 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported games by rendering at a lower resolution and upscaling. The memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s is sufficient for 1080p gaming, but it may become a bottleneck at higher resolutions or with heavy texture loads. The card’s 130-watt TDP and 300-watt suggested PSU make it an efficient choice for a mid-range build.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of the Intel Core i5-13500E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 11857 and its 57th percentile ranking suggest that it is a capable 1080p card, but the lack of specific game data means these figures are speculative.

The CPU’s strong single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 3214, indicates that it will not be a bottleneck in most games. The estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would likely be in the range of 60 to 80 FPS for older titles, while newer AAA games might struggle to maintain 60 FPS without lowering settings. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 58 is concerning, as it suggests that performance in modern titles may be lower than expected.

At 1440p, the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s will be a limiting factor, and frame rates are estimated to drop below 60 FPS in demanding games. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most games at this resolution, but high-resolution textures may cause stuttering. The RTX 3050 OEM is not a card for high-refresh-rate gaming, and users should expect to rely on DLSS to achieve playable frame rates in supported titles.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-13500E and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is 60, indicating it outperforms 60% of recorded desktop systems.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10940X?

A: The Core i5-13500E has an average benchmark score of 6586, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i9-10940X’s score of 6605, making them nearly identical in overall CPU performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has a memory bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may limit performance at higher resolutions or with heavy texture loads.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500E supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU, and what power supply is suggested?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 watts, and the GPU has a TDP of 130 watts. The suggested power supply for the GPU is 300 watts.

Q: Are there measured frame rate data for this specific build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has a percentile ranking of 57, meaning it outperforms 57% of all GPUs in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500E uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 12th and 13th generation Core processors. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, allowing users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a significant upgrade path for high-speed storage devices and future graphics cards.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is fully compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The card requires a single 8-pin power connector and a 300-watt power supply, which is a modest requirement for a mid-range build. The GPU is dual-slot and measures 242 mm in length, making it compatible with most mid-tower cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 3050 OEM with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ranking and its performance parity with the Core i9-10940X mean that it can support a much faster graphics card without becoming a bottleneck. Upgrading to a GPU with a higher percentile ranking would unlock higher frame rates and enable 1440p or 4K gaming. Alternatively, adding more memory or faster storage would benefit productivity workloads, but the GPU is the clear limiting factor in gaming scenarios.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13500E, a 14-core desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, a desktop graphics card from the GeForce 30-series. The CPU is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, features 20 threads, and has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The GPU is based on the Ampere architecture, features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, and has a boost clock of 1755 MHz.

The combined percentile of 60 places this system in the upper mid-range tier, suitable for 1080p gaming and entry-level creative work. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6586 and the GPU’s average score of 15199 indicate a balanced but CPU-favored system. The data shows that the CPU is the stronger component, with a 62nd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 57th, and the build class is confirmed as desktop. This is a system that prioritizes multi-threaded productivity while offering a competent, if not exceptional, gaming experience.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500E

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds