SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

42,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis — Intel Core i5-13500E

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S), fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. Its die measures 215 mm². The core configuration splits into performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact P-core/E-core ratio. The base clock is 2.40 GHz, boosting up to 4.60 GHz — a 2.2 GHz delta that indicates strong single-thread headroom for bursty workloads. The 24 MB shared L3 cache is substantial for a mid-range part, while L1 is 80 KB per core and L2 is 1.25 MB per core. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support enabled — a rare feature for a consumer-class chip. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though it is not a gaming solution.

Benchmark results show a balanced profile. Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 22,772, while single-core scores 3,214. The ratio between them (about 7.1x) reflects the scaling across 14 cores. Cinebench R20 shows 9,564 multi-core and 1,349 single-core, while R15 shows 2,295 and 323 respectively. The average benchmark score is 6,586. The percentile versus all CPUs is 62, meaning this processor outperforms 62% of all CPUs in the database — a solid mid-tier placement. Nearest rivals include the Intel Atom x7405C (avg score 6,568, 0.3% ahead), the Intel Core i9-10940X (avg score 6,605, 0.3% behind), the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (6,605, 0.3% behind), and the Intel Core i9-12900E (6,611, 0.4% behind). The near-tie with the i9-10940X is telling: a modern mid-range chip matches an older high-end HEDT processor in aggregate performance, though the i9-10940X likely has more cores while the i5-13500E benefits from newer architecture and higher IPC.

For real workloads, the combination of 14 cores and a 4.60 GHz boost suggests strong multi-threaded throughput for compilation, rendering, and batch processing, while the high single-core score supports snappy UI responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for the performance on offer, implying efficient power scaling. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not an option; users must rely on turbo boost behavior. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, which places it in the LGA 1700 ecosystem. The release date is January 3, 2023, and the part number is SRMFW. Production status is Active.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 6,586, placing it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs. This is a respectable position, though not top-tier. The nearest rivals are within 0.4% — the Intel Atom x7405C (6,568, +0.3%), the Intel Core i9-10940X (6,605, -0.3%), the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (6,605, -0.3%), and the Intel Core i9-12900E (6,611, -0.4%). The tight clustering means the i5-13500E is functionally tied with these parts in aggregate CPU performance, despite very different core counts and architectures. The Pentium Gold G6405 is a dual-core part, so the near-equal average score highlights how benchmark averages can obscure workload-specific differences; the i5-13500E will vastly outperform it in multi-threaded tasks.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE, delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,109. Its average benchmark score is 42,723, placing it at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs — notably higher than the CPU's 62nd percentile. Nearest GPU rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (43,223, -1.2%), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (43,262, -1.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (43,268, -1.3%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43,301, -1.3%). The RX 7650 GRE is within 1.3% of these parts, meaning it trades blows with an RTX 4070 SUPER in aggregate GPU benchmarks — a strong result for a card in this class.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73, indicating that the system outperforms 73% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The GPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers, which shapes the system's character. The CPU is adequate, but the GPU carries the performance banner. The combined picture is a desktop build where GPU-bound workloads (gaming, rendering) will shine, while CPU-bound tasks (compilation, heavy multitasking) will be merely competent. The 20-thread CPU is not a bottleneck for most games, but the 62nd percentile suggests it is not the system's standout feature.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13500E support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The FACT PACK lists eccMemory as true, making this a distinguishing feature for workstation or small server builds where data integrity is paramount.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE sits at the 83rd percentile, outperforming 83% of all GPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 42,723.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-12900E?

A: The i5-13500E has an average benchmark score of 6,586, while the i9-12900E scores 6,611. The delta is -0.4%, meaning the i9-12900E is marginally ahead but functionally equivalent in aggregate performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RX 7650 GRE?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, using 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RX 7650 GRE?

A: The launch MSRP is 279 USD. No pricing information is available for the CPU in the FACT PACK.

Q: Does the CPU have an unlocked multiplier for overclocking?

A: No. The multiplierUnlocked field is false, so the i5-13500E cannot be overclocked via multiplier adjustments. Users must rely on the automatic boost to 4.60 GHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile of the CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 73, meaning this system outperforms 73% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile while the CPU is at the 62nd. This 21-point gap means the GPU is the dominant component. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions or GPU rendering, the RX 7650 GRE will be the limiting factor, and the CPU will have headroom to spare. In CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation, AI inference on CPU, or heavily threaded office workflows, the i5-13500E will be the constraint. The combined percentile of 73 sits between the two individual percentiles, weighted toward the GPU, which suggests the pairing is designed for graphics-first workloads.

The nearest rival comparisons reinforce this. The CPU is within 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-12900E, meaning the CPU is not a weak link by absolute standards — it is a modern mid-range part that holds its own against older high-end silicon. The GPU is within 1.2% of the RTX 4070 SUPER, a high-end card. The system's FPS scaling, however, cannot be directly measured because the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame data for this exact combination. The dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all FPS discussion must be framed as estimates from the benchmark scores. Given the GPU's 83rd percentile and the CPU's 62nd percentile, the system should be GPU-limited in most gaming scenarios, meaning the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU at typical settings. The bottleneck will appear in CPU-heavy scenarios — large-scale physics, strategy game AI turns, or streaming while gaming — where the 20 threads are spread thin.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the LGA 1700 platform. Memory support is dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, giving builders flexibility on cost versus performance — though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum speeds or capacities. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU bandwidth, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU has ECC memory support, a feature typically found in workstation platforms, making this a viable low-cost entry point for error-tolerant computing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a diagnostic or backup display, but it is not a gaming solution.

The GPU's TDP is 170 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. The CPU's TDP is 65 W. The combined system draw is well within a 450 W PSU's capacity, leaving headroom for drives, fans, and peripherals. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is dual-slot, with dimensions of 204 mm length and 115 mm height — compact for a modern card. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier CPU on the same LGA 1700 socket, since the platform is Active and supports DDR5. Alternatively, a future GPU upgrade would be constrained by the 450 W PSU suggestion; a more power-hungry card would require a PSU upgrade. The PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes ensure the platform is not a bottleneck for next-generation storage or GPUs, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame data. DataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not laboratory measurements. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 and its 83rd percentile suggest strong 1080p and 1440p performance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,214 indicates sufficient single-thread performance for most game engines, which typically rely on 1-4 cores for game logic. The multi-core score of 22,772 ensures that background tasks or streaming overlays will not starve the game of CPU resources.

At 1080p, the system should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the GPU being the primary limiter. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle most games at high settings, though texture-heavy titles may approach the VRAM limit. At 4K, the GPU is likely to fall below 60 FPS in demanding titles, given its mid-range class. The RTX 4070 SUPER comparison, where the RX 7650 GRE trails by only 1.2% in aggregate benchmarks, suggests the card can approach the performance of a high-end GPU in rasterized workloads. Ray tracing performance is not directly measured, but the GPU has 32 dedicated RT cores, indicating hardware acceleration is present. These estimates should be treated with caution; the lack of measured FPS data means real-world results may vary.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize GPU performance over CPU headroom. The 83rd percentile GPU and 62nd percentile CPU indicate a graphics-first build. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p will benefit most, as the GPU is the stronger component and will drive high frame rates in most titles. Content creators working with GPU-accelerated rendering (e.g., video editing, 3D rendering) will also find the balance appealing, as the GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates many creative workloads. The CPU's 14 cores and 20 threads handle multitasking and compilation well enough, but the system is not optimized for CPU-bound tasks like large-scale software builds or complex physics simulations.

Software developers will appreciate the ECC memory support and 20 threads for parallel builds, though the 62nd percentile CPU means compile times will be mid-pack. Students and small business workstations can benefit from the system's efficiency (65 W CPU, 170 W GPU) and the GPU's compute capabilities for data visualization or CAD. The CPU's integrated graphics provide a fallback if the GPU is removed or fails. This is not a system for extreme overclockers (locked CPU multiplier) or for 4K gaming enthusiasts (8 GB VRAM is limiting). It is a balanced desktop for high-refresh 1080p gaming, GPU-accelerated creative work, and reliable workstation tasks.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build (buildClass: "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i5-13500E with the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake part on LGA 1700, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 card with 8 GB GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile is 73, placing the system above 73% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The individual percentiles — CPU at 62, GPU at 83 — show a GPU-skewed balance. The system's overall tier is mid-to-upper mainstream, where the GPU punches above its class (within 1.2% of an RTX 4070 SUPER) and the CPU holds its own against older high-end parts (within 0.4% of a Core i9-12900E). The build is Active in production status for both components, with the CPU released on January 3, 2023, and the GPU on February 6, 2025. The GPU's launch MSRP is 279 USD. This pairing is designed for users who want strong graphics performance without a flagship CPU.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 83rd percentile and 2,336 Steel Nomad score indicate it can drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU's 3,214 R23 single-core score ensures game logic is not a bottleneck. Estimated FPS should be high, though no measured data exists.

Streaming: The CPU's 20 threads (14 cores) provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The 65 W TDP means thermal headroom is available. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM handles game rendering, while the CPU handles the stream encoding without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The GPU's 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and exports. The CPU's 22,772 R23 multi-core score handles timeline scrubbing and multi-track editing. This is a capable combo for 1080p and 1440p editing.

3D rendering: GPU rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles) will leverage the 2,048 shading units and 32 RT cores. CPU rendering will use the 14 cores. The GPU is the stronger component, so GPU-accelerated renderers will show the best performance.

Software development: The 20 threads and ECC memory support are valuable for large codebases and long-running builds. The 62nd percentile CPU means compile times are mid-pack, not class-leading. The GPU is largely idle during development, so this scenario underutilizes the system's strength.

Student and office work: The 65 W CPU and 170 W GPU make this an efficient system for productivity. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback if the GPU is disabled. The 8 GB GPU memory is overkill for office tasks but future-proofs for occasional creative work.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," using TSMC's 6 nm process. The Navi 33 chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It features 32 dedicated RT cores for ray tracing, though no tensor cores are listed — the FACT PACK shows tensorCores as null, meaning AI acceleration relies on standard shader hardware. The clock speeds are 1720 MHz base, 2350 MHz game, and 2695 MHz boost. Memory is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute performance is notable: FP32 is 22.08 TFLOPS, and FP16 matches at 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration. Pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The card is dual-slot, 204 mm long and 115 mm high, with a single 8-pin power connector. The TDP is 170 W, and the suggested PSU is 450 W. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is half the bandwidth of a full x16 slot but sufficient for this class of card.

Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,336 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,109. The average benchmark score is 42,723, placing the GPU at the 83rd percentile. The nearest rivals are all within 1.3%: the RTX 4070 SUPER (-1.2%), Quadro M6000 24 GB (-1.2%), RTX 5050 Mobile (-1.3%), and Quadro M6000 (-1.3%). This clustering means the RX 7650 GRE delivers performance equivalent to an RTX 4070 SUPER in aggregate benchmarks, which is remarkable for a card with 8 GB VRAM and a 128-bit bus. The 204 mm length makes it suitable for compact cases. The release date is February 6, 2025, with a launch MSRP of 279 USD. The predecessor is Navi II, and the successor is Navi IV. Production status is Active. For rendering workloads, the 22.08 TFLOPS FP32 and 32 RT cores provide solid rasterization and moderate ray tracing performance, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit texture-heavy scenes.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500E

AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds