SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

78 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 22% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
77%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score
Top 23% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i5-13500E and AMD Radeon RX 7400 represent a desktop pairing where the processor’s computational strength is matched with a graphics card designed for efficiency rather than raw frame rates. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussion must be framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU holds a 62nd percentile position among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 17th percentile, indicating a significant imbalance where the processor vastly outclasses the graphics adapter in relative performance. This pairing is best suited for tasks that leverage the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, with gaming being a secondary consideration due to the GPU’s modest standing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming is not a practical target for this build. The GPU’s 17th percentile ranking places it in the lower tier of all graphics cards, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce 710M and Intel HD Graphics 610, which are historically low-performance parts. The RX 7400’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 points suggests it can handle esports titles at lower settings, but the CPU’s high single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3214 will not compensate for the graphics bottleneck at high refresh rates. Users seeking 144Hz or 240Hz experiences would need a significantly more powerful GPU.

Streaming is a mixed scenario where the CPU excels but the GPU may struggle. The i5-13500E’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and broadcasting software, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 indicating strong parallel processing capability. However, the RX 7400’s limited shader count of 1792 and its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44 suggest that rendering game scenes while encoding simultaneously could overwhelm the GPU. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for streaming overlays, but the overall frame delivery would be constrained by the GPU’s low percentile.

Video editing benefits primarily from the CPU’s performance. The i5-13500E’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9564 and R15 multi-core score of 2295 indicate robust rendering times for timelines and effects. The GPU’s Passmark GPU Compute score of 5152 provides some acceleration for effects and color grading, but its 17th percentile ranking means GPU-accelerated previews may be sluggish. Export times will be dominated by the CPU, which is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Atom x7405C in average benchmark score, showing the i5 is a mid-pack performer despite its high core count.

3D rendering is the strongest workload for this pairing. The CPU’s multi-core scores are exceptional for its class, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 22772 and R20 multi-core at 9564, indicating it can handle complex scenes and ray tracing calculations efficiently. The GPU’s 28 ray accelerators and FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS provide some support for GPU-accelerated renders, but its 17th percentile position means it will not be the primary driver. For CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles, this build would perform admirably, but GPU-based renderers would see limited benefit.

Software development is where the CPU shines and the GPU is largely irrelevant. The i5-13500E’s 20 threads and 24 MB of shared L3 cache provide excellent compilation times and parallel build performance. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3214 ensures responsive IDE interactions and fast code navigation. The GPU’s low performance is not a factor for text editing, terminal use, or web browsing, making this a suitable workstation for developers who prioritize CPU throughput over graphical capabilities.

Student and office work is entirely satisfactory with this build. The CPU’s integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output, though the discrete RX 7400 would be used for any light graphical tasks. The 8 GB VRAM is more than enough for spreadsheet rendering and document processing, and the CPU’s 62nd percentile ensures smooth multitasking across office suites. The GPU’s Passmark G2D score of 1209 and G3D score of 11897 indicate it handles 2D interfaces without issue, making this a reliable system for academic and administrative tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 places it in the lower percentile of graphics cards, and its Passmark DirectX 11 score of 97 and DirectX 12 score of 44 confirm it is not designed for demanding titles. At 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA games would likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates, with the GPU’s 17th percentile suggesting performance comparable to entry-level integrated graphics from several generations ago.

The RX 7400’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8040S, which scores 1.1% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, which scores 1.4% lower. These comparisons indicate the GPU is in a performance band that is 1.9% above the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M, a mobile part from a decade ago. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 9 score of 176 suggests it can handle these older APIs reasonably well, potentially achieving 60 FPS at medium settings. However, the CPU’s high single-core performance of 3214 in Cinebench R23 would not be the limiting factor; the GPU would cap frame rates well below what the processor could deliver.

At 1440p or 4K, the RX 7400 would be severely constrained. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory are insufficient for high-resolution textures in modern titles. The texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 147.2 GPixel/s are modest figures that would result in sub-30 FPS at these resolutions in most games. The CPU’s 14 cores would be idle, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck. Users interested in gaming should treat this as a 1080p-oriented system for older or less demanding titles, with the understanding that the GPU’s 17th percentile ranking means frame rates will be lower than any modern gaming-focused discrete GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this build. The i5-13500E’s 62nd percentile among all CPUs indicates it is a solid mid-range processor, while the RX 7400’s 17th percentile places it firmly in the low-end category. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the bottleneck in virtually every scenario, as the CPU’s FPS potential is far higher than what the GPU can deliver. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 is roughly 199 times the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 44, though these are different benchmarks, but the relative percentile gap of 45 points (62 vs 17) clearly shows where the limitation lies.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts entirely to the CPU. For tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering that rely on multi-threaded processing, the GPU’s contribution is minimal, and the CPU’s 20 threads and 24 MB L3 cache drive performance. The GPU’s Passmark Compute score of 5152 provides some acceleration for compute-heavy tasks, but its low overall percentile means it cannot match the CPU’s processing capability. The combined percentile of 40 for this pairing reflects the GPU’s drag on the overall system performance.

The FPS scaling evidence from the benchmarks shows that the GPU’s performance does not scale well with resolution increases. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 is a DX12 test that stresses the GPU, and its low score indicates that increasing resolution would exponentially increase the bottleneck. The CPU’s ability to feed frames is not the issue; the GPU’s rendering capabilities are simply too limited. For any workload that requires both CPU and GPU, the GPU will consistently be the limiting factor, whereas CPU-only workloads will showcase the processor’s full potential.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU-intensive productivity tasks and have minimal gaming or graphics requirements. Software developers would benefit from the i5-13500E’s 14 cores and 20 threads, which provide fast compilation times and parallel build capabilities, with the GPU handling basic display output without issue. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9564 indicates strong performance for code analysis and testing environments.

Content creators working primarily in CPU-based rendering or video encoding would find this build adequate. The i5-13500E’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 supports long-form video exports and batch rendering, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM can handle previewing and simple effects. However, creators using GPU-accelerated effects would be disappointed by the RX 7400’s 17th percentile ranking.

Students studying computer science, engineering, or data science would find this system capable for coursework. The CPU’s 62nd percentile ensures smooth operation of IDEs, virtual machines, and data processing scripts, while the GPU’s modest performance is sufficient for MATLAB plots, basic CAD, and presentation software. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and web applications would also perform well, with the CPU’s 20 threads providing headroom for multitasking and the GPU’s low power draw of 43 W keeping operational costs minimal.

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations for older or less demanding titles could consider this build, but the GPU’s 17th percentile means they would face limitations. The CPU’s single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 ensures that games relying on CPU physics or AI would run smoothly, but the GPU would cap frame rates. Users seeking a system for high-refresh gaming or modern AAA titles should look elsewhere, as this pairing is not designed for that purpose.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are consistently strong across all tests. Cinebench R15 multi-core yields 2295, R20 multi-core yields 9564, and R23 multi-core yields 22772, with single-core scores of 323, 1349, and 3214 respectively. These figures place the i5-13500E at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6586. Its nearest rival, the Intel Atom x7405C, scores 0.3% higher, while the Intel Core i9-10940X and Intel Pentium Gold G6405 both score 0.3% lower, and the Intel Core i9-12900E is 0.4% lower.

The GPU’s benchmark scores are much weaker. Passmark G3D yields 11897, which is its highest score, but the DirectX-specific tests tell a different story: DirectX 9 scores 176, DirectX 10 scores 59, DirectX 11 scores 97, and DirectX 12 scores 44. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 and Passmark GPU Compute score of 5152 round out the results. The RX 7400’s average benchmark score is 2467, placing it at the 17th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 8040S, scores 1.1% higher, while the NVIDIA GeForce 710M is 1.4% higher, and the Intel HD Graphics 610 is 1.8% higher.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU performs at a mid-range level, approximately 0.3% above the Intel Atom x7405C, while the GPU performs at a low-end level, approximately 1.1% below the AMD Radeon 8040S. The combined percentile of 40 reflects the GPU’s significant drag on the system’s overall standing. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6586 is more than 2.6 times the GPU’s average score of 2467, indicating that the processor is the dominant component in this pairing.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the Intel Core i5-13500E and AMD Radeon RX 7400 pairing is 40, reflecting the GPU’s low individual percentile of 17 dragging down the CPU’s stronger 62nd percentile.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i5-13500E has an average benchmark score of 6586, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Atom x7405C’s score of 6568, and 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i9-10940X and Intel Pentium Gold G6405, both scoring 6605.

Q: What is the GPU’s strongest benchmark result?

A: The RX 7400’s strongest benchmark result is its Passmark G3D score of 11897, though its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 and Passmark Compute score of 5152 are also notable.

Q: Does this build support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU features 28 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), indicating ray tracing capability, though its 17th percentile performance suggests limited practical use for this feature.

Q: What is the CPU’s memory support?

A: The i5-13500E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The RX 7400 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: What are the CPU’s core and thread counts?

A: The i5-13500E has 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node, featuring a die size of 215 mm². It contains 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support enabled, and connects via Intel Socket 1700 with PCIe Gen 5 support at 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show the CPU excels in multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 and R20 multi-core score of 9564 indicate strong parallel processing capability, while single-core scores of 3214 (R23) and 1349 (R20) demonstrate solid per-thread performance. The 62nd percentile ranking places it in the mid-range of all CPUs, with its average benchmark score of 6586 being 0.3% above the Intel Atom x7405C. For real workloads, this translates to fast compilation times, efficient video encoding, and responsive multitasking, though the 65 W TDP indicates a power-conscious design.

The processor’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide a balance between physical cores and hyper-threading, making it suitable for workloads that scale well with thread count. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with data-heavy applications, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a basic display output option. The CPU’s production status is active, with a release date of January 3, 2023, and its multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported. The architecture’s efficiency is reflected in its 62nd percentile, which is close to the performance of the Intel Core i9-10940X, a higher-tier chip that scores only 0.3% higher.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i5-13500E uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for future GPUs or NVMe storage devices. The 65 W TDP means the system can run with a modest power supply, though the GPU’s suggested PSU of 200 W indicates the overall system power requirement is low. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 7400 with a more powerful GPU, as the CPU’s 62nd percentile has significant headroom for graphics performance. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a modern high-end GPU would not be bandwidth-limited. The 8 GB VRAM on the current GPU is adequate for entry-level use, but users seeking higher frame rates or resolutions would benefit from a GPU with more memory and higher compute throughput.

The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or faster DDR5 memory. The dual-channel memory bus ensures adequate bandwidth for the CPU’s 20 threads. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for workstation use, though it requires compatible memory modules. The 65 W TDP allows for a wide range of CPU coolers, with the processor’s boost clock of 4.60 GHz requiring adequate cooling for sustained performance. The socket’s compatibility with Raptor Lake processors provides a clear upgrade path within the same generation, though the locked multiplier limits overclocking potential.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13500E desktop processor with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 graphics card, creating a system that is primarily CPU-focused. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 40 places it in the lower-middle tier of overall system performance. The CPU’s 62nd percentile and the GPU’s 17th percentile highlight the significant performance disparity, with the processor being the clear dominant component.

The system is best described as a productivity-focused desktop that can handle light gaming. The CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads provide excellent multi-threaded performance for rendering, encoding, and development tasks, while the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and RDNA 3.0 architecture offer basic graphics capabilities. The 43 W TDP of the GPU and 65 W TDP of the CPU indicate an efficient system that does not require high-end cooling or power delivery.

The overall tier from the percentiles suggests this is an entry-level to mid-range desktop, with the GPU being the primary limiting factor for gaming and graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU’s performance is competitive with higher-tier processors, as shown by its 0.3% difference from the Intel Core i9-10940X, but the GPU’s performance is comparable to decade-old mobile parts like the NVIDIA GeForce 710M. This is a system for users who need CPU power and are willing to compromise on graphics performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 28 ray accelerators. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The base clock is 1452 MHz, with a game clock of 2200 MHz and a boost clock of 2300 MHz, while memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Benchmark results show the GPU’s performance is limited. Its Passmark G3D score of 11897 is its highest, but the DirectX scores are low: DirectX 9 scores 176, DirectX 10 scores 59, DirectX 11 scores 97, and DirectX 12 scores 44. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1103 and Passmark Compute score of 5152 round out the results. The GPU’s 17th percentile ranking is consistent with these figures, placing it near the AMD Radeon 8040S (1.1% higher) and NVIDIA GeForce 710M (1.4% higher).

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s provide some compute capability, but the 28 ray accelerators are limited for modern ray tracing demands. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but may be insufficient for high-resolution assets. The GPU’s power efficiency is notable, with a TDP of 43 W and a suggested PSU of 200 W, making it suitable for small form factor builds. The display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, supporting modern monitors. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current APIs.