SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500E

6,586 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

19,765 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

FAQ

Q: What CPU and GPU are analyzed in this build?

A: This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13500E (a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture) with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT (a Navi 23 chip from the Radeon RX 6000 series, based on RDNA 2.0 architecture).

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500E has an average benchmark score of 6586, placing it at the 62nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Atom x7405C, which scores 6568, making the i5-13500E just 0.3% faster. It is also 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i9-10940X and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405 (both scoring 6605), and 0.4% faster than the Intel Core i9-12900E (scoring 6611).

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and average score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has an average benchmark score of 19765, ranking at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla K40m, which scores 19885, meaning the RX 6650 XT trails by 0.6%. It also leads the AMD FirePro D300 by 0.7% and the AMD Quadro K5200 by 0.8%.

Q: What are the key memory specifications of the GPU?

A: The RX 6650 XT comes with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2190 MHz, which translates to 17.5 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500E supports ECC memory. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types over a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the GPU’s launch MSRP?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT has a launch MSRP of 399 USD.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. All FPS discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

---

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this desktop build is 64, indicating that the pairing sits above the majority of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database. The CPU alone, with an average benchmark score of 6586, lands at the 62nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU, with an average score of 19765, reaches the 65th percentile of all GPUs. This near-equal standing suggests a well-matched pair where neither component dramatically overshadows the other in raw compute potential.

Looking at the CPU’s benchmark results, the multi-core scores are particularly strong. In Cinebench R23, the i5-13500E scores 22772 in multi-core and 3214 in single-core. The Cinebench R20 results show 9564 multi-core and 1349 single-core, while Cinebench R15 yields 2295 multi-core and 323 single-core. These figures indicate a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads, with single-core performance that remains respectable but not class-leading. The average benchmark score of 6586 places it in a tight cluster with rivals such as the Intel Core i9-10940X and the Intel Pentium Gold G6405, both of which score 6605, meaning the i5-13500E trails them by a negligible 0.3%.

For the GPU, the benchmark suite reveals a mixed profile across different APIs. The Passmark G3D score of 17166 is the standout, reflecting strong overall rasterization performance. However, the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 62 is notably low, while DirectX 11 scores 169 and DirectX 9 scores 215. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 further suggests that the GPU’s performance in modern DirectX 12 titles may be less impressive than its legacy API performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 10111 and Vulkan score of 81306 show that compute workloads via OpenCL are moderate, while Vulkan performance is robust. The Geekbench Metal score of 97969 is high, but that is less relevant for a Windows-based desktop build.

The combined picture is one of a balanced mid-range system: the CPU delivers strong multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU offers solid overall graphics performance with some variability depending on the API used. The 62nd and 65th percentiles reinforce this as a pairing that outperforms the average desktop but does not reach the upper echelons of performance.

---

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the database contains no rows for measuredFpsUltraByGame. Consequently, all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay testing. The dataIsMeasured flag is explicitly false, so these figures should be treated as informed projections.

Based on the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 17166 and its 65th percentile ranking, the RX 6650 XT is positioned as a capable 1080p gaming card. The 8 GB VRAM and 280.3 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for most titles at this resolution with high settings. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3214 and multi-core score of 22772 indicate that the i5-13500E will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios, particularly in CPU-intensive titles where its 14 cores and 20 threads provide ample headroom.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the estimated FPS for demanding AAA titles would likely fall in the 60-90 range, based on the GPU’s overall performance level relative to the 65th percentile. Less demanding esports titles could see significantly higher frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS, given the strong single-core performance of the CPU. At 1440p, the frame rates would drop, with estimates in the 45-70 range for AAA games, as the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus become more limiting factors. At 4K, the RX 6650 XT would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in most modern titles, with estimates below 40 FPS.

The low Passmark DirectX 12 score of 62 is a concern for games that rely heavily on this API, suggesting that some modern titles may underperform relative to expectations. However, the strong Vulkan score of 81306 indicates better performance in games using Vulkan. Overall, the estimated gaming experience is solid for 1080p and acceptable for 1440p in less demanding titles, but the GPU is not suited for 4K gaming.

---

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of the i5-13500E’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3214 and the RX 6650 XT’s Passmark G3D score of 17166 supports high-refresh gaming at 1080p. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance ensures that frame times remain consistent, while the GPU can push frame rates above 144 FPS in esports titles. However, the low DirectX 12 score of 62 means that some modern AAA games may not reach such high frame rates, capping the experience at around 90-120 FPS.

Streaming: The i5-13500E’s 14 cores and 20 threads are well-suited for streaming workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 indicates that the CPU can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant performance degradation. The GPU’s compute performance, with a Passmark GPU compute score of 7532 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 10111, provides additional hardware acceleration options, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means the CPU will likely handle most encoding tasks.

Video editing: In video editing, the CPU’s multi-core performance is the primary driver, and the i5-13500E excels here with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772. This allows for smooth timeline scrubbing and faster export times. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 performance assist with effects and color grading, though the 280.3 GB/s bandwidth may limit handling of very high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: For 3D rendering, the CPU’s 14 cores and 20 threads deliver strong performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9564. The GPU’s 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 and 21.59 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance make it useful for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support OpenCL, as indicated by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 10111. However, the low Passmark DirectX 12 score of 62 suggests that DirectX 12-based renderers would perform poorly.

Software development: The i5-13500E’s 14 cores and 20 threads are ideal for compilation tasks, where the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 translates to faster build times. The CPU’s support for ECC memory adds reliability for long-running build processes. The GPU’s compute capabilities are less critical here, though the Geekbench Vulkan score of 81306 indicates good performance for Vulkan-based development workloads.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic student and office tasks, but the performance headroom is beneficial. The CPU’s single-core score of 3214 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 65W TDP keeps power consumption modest. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and dual-slot design are more than sufficient for productivity applications, though the 176W TDP means the system is not as energy-efficient as a lighter office machine.

---

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the i5-13500E and the RX 6650 XT is largely even, as reflected by their similar percentiles (62nd for CPU, 65th for GPU). However, the nature of the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulations or heavy multitasking, the i5-13500E’s performance is the limiting factor. Its average benchmark score of 6586 places it just 0.3% ahead of the Intel Atom x7405C, indicating that its raw compute is not exceptionally high. For gaming, the CPU’s single-core performance is adequate, but the low Passmark DirectX 12 score of 62 on the GPU suggests that the GPU becomes the bottleneck in modern games that use DirectX 12.

In GPU-bound workloads, such as 4K gaming or heavy graphical rendering, the RX 6650 XT is clearly the limiting component. Its 65th percentile ranking, while respectable, means that it trails the 66th percentile and above. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is a potential bottleneck in high-resolution textures, and the 128-bit memory bus delivering 280.3 GB/s is narrower than many competitors, limiting memory bandwidth in data-intensive scenes. The FPS scaling, though estimated, would show diminishing returns as resolution increases, with the GPU struggling to maintain frame rates at 1440p and above.

The CPU’s strong multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 22772, ensures that it does not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios at 1080p. However, in CPU-heavy games that rely on single-thread performance, the i5-13500E’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3214 is not exceptional, potentially capping FPS in such titles. Overall, the system is balanced for 1080p gaming and general productivity, but the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions.

---

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT is built on the Navi 23 chip using TSMC’s 7 nm process, with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. The GPU features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also includes 32 ray tracing cores, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. The base clock is 2055 MHz, with a boost clock of 2635 MHz and a game clock of 2410 MHz. Memory runs at 2190 MHz, delivering 17.5 Gbps effective over an 8 GB GDDR6 interface on a 128-bit bus, resulting in a bandwidth of 280.3 GB/s.

In terms of compute performance, the RX 6650 XT delivers 10.79 TFLOPS FP32 and 21.59 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The pixel rate is 168.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 337.3 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The TDP is 176W, requiring a 450W suggested PSU and a 1x 8-pin power connector.

The benchmark scores reveal a GPU that performs well in legacy and compute workloads but struggles with DirectX 12. The Passmark G3D score of 17166 is strong, while the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 62 is exceptionally low, suggesting poor optimization or driver issues with this API. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1859 confirms this weakness. In contrast, the Geekbench Vulkan score of 81306 is high, indicating that Vulkan-based games and applications will perform well. For rendering, the GPU’s OpenCL score of 10111 suggests moderate compute capability, which is adequate for basic rendering tasks but not for professional-grade workloads. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming and light content creation but is a limiting factor for 4K or heavy texture loads.

---

Who Should Build It

This build is best suited for gamers who primarily play at 1080p resolution. The RX 6650 XT’s 65th percentile ranking and strong Passmark G3D score of 17166 indicate that it can handle most titles at high settings with playable frame rates. The i5-13500E’s 14 cores and 20 threads ensure that the CPU will not be a bottleneck in gaming, while its 62nd percentile ranking provides enough headroom for background tasks.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772. The GPU’s compute capabilities, evidenced by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 10111, are sufficient for acceleration in OpenCL-based applications. Software developers will appreciate the CPU’s 14 cores for compilation and its ECC memory support for stability. Students and small business workstations will find this build more than capable for office tasks, though the 176W GPU TDP makes it less energy-efficient than lighter alternatives. The build is not recommended for 4K gaming or professional-grade rendering, where the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and DirectX 12 weaknesses would become apparent.

---

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i5-13500E with the AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread processor from Intel’s Core 13th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture, released on 2023-01-03. The GPU is an AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT from the RX 6000 series, based on RDNA 2.0 architecture, released on 2022-05-09. The combined percentile for this pairing is 64, placing it in the upper third of all desktop builds in the database.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 6586 (62nd percentile) and the GPU’s average score of 19765 (65th percentile) indicate that this is a mid-range to upper-mid-range system. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 64, suggests that this build outperforms the majority of desktop configurations but does not reach the top tier. It is a balanced pairing suitable for 1080p gaming and general productivity, with the CPU providing strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU offering solid rasterization capabilities. The build class is desktop, confirming that this is intended as a stationary workstation or gaming rig.

---

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500E is a desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process. It features 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The CPU has a TDP of 65W and uses the Intel Socket 1700. Its architecture is Raptor Lake, with the codename Raptor Lake-S, and it is built on a 215 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus and includes ECC memory support. It also features integrated graphics in the form of UHD Graphics 770 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The multiplier is locked, meaning overclocking is not supported.

Benchmark results show the CPU’s strengths in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22772 is particularly strong, reflecting the benefit of 14 cores and 20 threads. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 9564 and R15 multi-core score of 2295 corroborate this. Single-core performance, while not class-leading, is respectable, with Cinebench R23 single-core scoring 3214, R20 scoring 1349, and R15 scoring 323. The average benchmark score of 6586 places the CPU at the 62nd percentile, with its nearest rival being the Intel Atom x7405C at 6568 (0.3% slower). The CPU’s 14 cores make it well-suited for video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while the 20 threads ensure smooth multitasking. The 24 MB L3 cache aids in gaming performance by reducing memory latency. Overall, the i5-13500E is a solid mid-range CPU that excels in multi-threaded tasks while providing adequate single-thread performance for gaming.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500E + AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13500E

AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds