SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13500 + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13500

31,510 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13500 is a 14-core, 20-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen family, uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, and features a base clock of 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The chip carries a 24 MB shared L3 cache, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 80 KB L1 per core. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. An integrated UHD Graphics 770 unit is present, and the processor is not multiplier-unlocked.

Benchmark data places this CPU in the 82nd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 31,510. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H scores 31,508 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31,495 (0% delta), the Intel Core 7 240H scores 31,483 (0.1% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 scores 31,473 (0.1% delta). This indicates the i5-13500 sits at the top of a very dense performance band, where a single point of percentage separates it from four other capable processors. The practical takeaway is that in multi-threaded workloads, these five chips are effectively interchangeable, and any performance differences will be within noise.

Looking at specific workload scores, the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 14,573 and single-core result of 1,780 reveal a processor that balances thread-heavy productivity with strong per-core responsiveness. The Geekbench multicore score of 14,116 and single-core score of 2,188 reinforce this pattern. The 3DMark thread-scaling results show a clear progression: 1,984 for 2 threads, 3,799 for 4 threads, 6,204 for 8 threads, 8,309 for 16 threads, and 9,014 for max threads. This scaling curve demonstrates that the processor gains substantial performance as more threads are utilized, but the incremental gains diminish beyond 16 threads—the jump from 16 to max threads adds only 705 points, suggesting the hybrid core arrangement (performance cores plus efficiency cores) reaches its practical limit around that point.

The PassMark suite provides further granularity. Integer math scores 108,320, floating-point math scores 80,198, and extended instructions score 23,956. Data compression scores 391,249 while data encryption scores 22,333. These numbers indicate strong throughput for compute-heavy tasks like scientific simulation and financial modeling, with the integer and floating-point results being particularly robust. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,865 and the multithread score of 31,285 show a roughly 8:1 ratio between multithreaded and single-threaded performance, which is consistent with a 14-core design that relies on both high-frequency performance cores and additional efficiency cores for parallel workloads.

The 65 W TDP is notable for a chip with this level of performance. It suggests the processor can be adequately cooled by mainstream air coolers, and the power envelope is modest enough for small form factor builds or office desktops. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,005, while not directly comparable to other benchmarks, reinforces that the chip's single-core performance is competitive for everyday responsiveness.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1,780 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,984 indicate strong per-thread performance that games rely on for frame pacing and physics calculations. This CPU can feed a high-end GPU without being the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, though the exact frame rates depend on the GPU pairing.

Streaming: The 20 threads and 14 cores provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. The PassMark multithread score of 31,285 suggests the CPU can handle software encoding workloads alongside the game itself, though a dedicated encoder on the GPU would offload this more efficiently. The 24 MB L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency in streaming workflows.

Video editing: Cinebench R20 multicore score of 10,990 and R15 multicore score of 2,405 position this CPU for 1080p and 1440p video timelines with moderate effects stacks. The Geekbench multicore score of 14,116 indicates solid performance in timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and export tasks. For 4K multi-layer timelines, the processor will handle basic edits but may slow down with heavy color grading or motion graphics.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,573 is the key metric here. This represents a capable mid-range rendering performance for single-frame renders in Blender, Cinema 4D, or similar applications. For animation or complex scenes with many lights and objects, render times will be longer than with higher-core-count workstation chips, but the 14 cores still deliver respectable throughput for freelance or small-studio work.

Software development: The PassMark data encryption score of 22,333 and integer math score of 108,320 indicate strong performance for code compilation, particularly for parallel builds. The 20 threads allow simultaneous compilation of multiple modules, and the single-thread performance of 3,865 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interactions and quick incremental builds. The 24 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases that exceed typical cache sizes.

Student and office work: The single-core Geekbench score of 2,188 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,865 are more than sufficient for web browsing, document editing, spreadsheet calculations, and video conferencing. The 65 W TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output without needing a discrete GPU. This CPU is overkill for basic office tasks, but the headroom means it will remain responsive for years as software demands grow.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, using the AD102 chip fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, with a transistor density of 125.3 million per mm². The GPU features 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, 176 render output units, 100 ray tracing cores, and 400 tensor cores. The base clock runs at 1155 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz, while memory operates at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration is substantial: 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a workstation-class memory allocation that supports large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-GPU rendering workloads. The pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s, both indicating strong fill-rate performance. FP32 compute reaches 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning the GPU does not sacrifice half-precision performance for full-precision.

The GPU occupies the 98th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184,664. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB (183,725, 0.5% delta), the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB (187,147, -1.3% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell (182,109, 1.4% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D (178,050, 3.7% delta). This places the RTX 5000 Ada Generation in the top 2% of all GPUs, outperforming the A100 80 GB by 0.5% and trailing the A100 40 GB by 1.3%. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell trails by 1.4%, and the RTX 4090 D trails by 3.7%. The GPU is 3.7% ahead of the RTX 4090 D in average benchmark score, which is notable because the RTX 4090 D is a consumer flagship.

Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and Vulkan score of 194,041 show strong compute and graphics API performance. The Vulkan score being higher than OpenCL suggests the GPU excels in modern graphics workloads that leverage Vulkan's lower overhead. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, including denoising, DLSS, and machine learning inference.

The GPU supports PCIe 4.0 x16, has a 250 W TDP, requires a 600 W suggested power supply, and uses a single 16-pin power connector. It is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height, with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s is particularly important for workstation tasks like 8K video editing, large-scale 3D scene manipulation, and AI model training, where data movement often becomes the bottleneck.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals and prosumers who need both strong CPU multi-threading and elite GPU compute capability. The CPU's 82nd percentile and the GPU's 98th percentile create a combined 90th percentile system, meaning this build outperforms 90% of all tracked configurations. Gamers at 1440p and 4K resolutions will benefit from the GPU's top-tier rasterization and ray tracing performance, while the CPU ensures no bottleneck in most titles. Content creators working with 4K video, complex After Effects compositions, or Blender cycles renders will find the 20-thread CPU and 32 GB GPU memory sufficient for demanding projects. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 14 cores and 20 threads for parallel builds, while the GPU accelerates machine learning training and inference tasks. Students in engineering, architecture, or data science programs can handle CAD, simulation, and visualization workloads without compromise. Small business workstations for architectural visualization, product design, or scientific computing will benefit from the ECC memory support on the CPU side and the workstation-class driver support on the GPU side.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 98th percentile indicate a GPU-heavy system where the graphics card is the dominant component. In gaming workloads, the RTX 5000 Ada Generation will be the primary driver of frame rates, and the CPU will only become a limiting factor in CPU-bound scenarios like extremely high frame rate esports titles or heavily simulated games. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6,204 and max-thread score of 9,014 suggest the CPU can feed the GPU adequately in most modern games. However, in compute-heavy workstation tasks like 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,573 will determine render times, and the GPU's compute power will only be utilized if the software supports GPU rendering. In such cases, the CPU becomes the bottleneck for CPU-based renderers, while GPU-based renderers will be limited by the GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The 576.0 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth and 32 GB capacity mean the GPU will rarely be memory-constrained, but the CPU's dual-channel memory support could limit performance in memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the CPU side with 16 lanes provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, so no bottleneck exists there. Overall, this is a balanced system for GPU-accelerated workloads, with the CPU as the secondary component.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing.

Based on the GPU's 98th percentile ranking and its average benchmark score of 184,664, which is 3.7% higher than the RTX 4090 D, this system should deliver elite-level gaming performance. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 100 RT cores indicate it can handle 4K gaming at high settings with ray tracing enabled in most titles. The 32 GB VRAM ensures no texture memory limitations even with maximum-quality texture packs and high-resolution display outputs. The CPU's single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,005 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,780, is sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck at 4K resolution, where GPU load dominates. At 1440p, the CPU will be more involved but should still maintain high frame rates in most games. For competitive esports titles at 1080p with low settings, the CPU's 2-thread and 4-thread performance (1,984 and 3,799 in 3DMark) will support frame rates well above 144 Hz, though the exact figures depend on the game engine and optimization. In GPU-intensive scenarios like 4K with ultra settings and DLSS enabled, the 400 tensor cores will accelerate upscaling and frame generation, potentially delivering playable frame rates in even the most demanding titles. The 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution textures without stuttering.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 90, meaning this system outperforms 90% of all tracked configurations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13500 has an average benchmark score of 31,510, which is 0% delta from the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (31,508), 0% delta from the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (31,495), 0.1% delta from the Intel Core 7 240H (31,483), and 0.1% delta from the Intel Core Ultra 3 205 (31,473).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s and memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13500 includes ECC memory support, which is valuable for workstation reliability in scientific and financial computing.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, and the GPU has a 250 W TDP with a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 4090 D?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada Generation has an average benchmark score of 184,664, which is 3.7% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 D's score of 178,050.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i5-13500 with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace card with 32 GB VRAM and a 250 W TDP. The combined percentile of 90 places this system in the top 10% of all tracked configurations. The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 98th percentile indicate a GPU-dominant system where the graphics card provides the majority of the compute power. This is a high-end workstation build suitable for professional 3D rendering, AI workloads, and high-resolution content creation, with the added benefit of strong gaming performance due to the GPU's elite tier. The system requires a 600 W power supply and uses a single 16-pin GPU power connector. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, providing ample bandwidth for data transfer.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 31,510, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 90. Key CPU benchmarks include Cinebench R23 multicore at 14,573 and single-core at 1,780, Geekbench multicore at 14,116 and single-core at 2,188, and 3DMark max threads at 9,014. Key GPU benchmarks include Geekbench OpenCL at 175,286 and Geekbench Vulkan at 194,041. The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, scores 183,725 (0.5% delta), while the A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187,147 (-1.3% delta). The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, scores 31,508 (0% delta). The combined picture shows a system where the GPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is relative to its peers. This means the GPU will be the star of the show in GPU-accelerated workloads, while the CPU provides solid but not exceptional multi-threaded performance. For users who primarily run GPU-rendered or GPU-accelerated applications, this is an ideal balance. For CPU-bound workloads, the system will perform at a mid-high tier but not at the absolute top.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13500 uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The system's memory bandwidth is determined by the dual-channel memory bus, and users can choose between DDR4 and DDR5 depending on their motherboard and budget. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, while the GPU has a 250 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 600 W. This leaves headroom for additional components like storage drives, fans, and peripherals within the 600 W budget. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height, requiring a case with adequate clearance. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must support this connector type.

For future upgrades, the socket 1700 platform supports 13th Gen Intel Core processors, and the user could potentially move to a higher-core-count chip in the same generation if CPU performance becomes the bottleneck. The GPU, being in the 98th percentile, is already near the top of the performance hierarchy, and the next upgrade would be to a Blackwell PRO W-class GPU, which is the successor to this Ada Generation card. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface on the GPU means it is backward compatible with older motherboards, but the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures forward compatibility with next-generation GPUs that may leverage the higher bandwidth. The 32 GB VRAM on the GPU is substantial, and users working with very large datasets may benefit from the successor's expected memory increases. The 600 W suggested PSU provides some headroom for minor upgrades, but a significant GPU upgrade would likely require a higher-wattage power supply. The dual-channel memory architecture is a potential upgrade point; moving to higher-speed DDR5 modules could improve memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads. Overall, the platform is mature and stable, with the CPU being the more likely upgrade candidate in the long term, while the GPU is already at the top of its class.