SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

88%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. This is a desktop-class GPU with a 285 W TDP, positioned at the 84th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly five out of six alternatives in the database. Its average benchmark score of 44795 places it within a tight competitive cluster: it trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile by 0.8% and the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT by 1.3%, while leading the NVIDIA RTX A6000 by 1.6%. The near-identical scores across these four products indicate that the RTX 4070 Ti sits at a performance plateau where architectural differences matter less than workload-specific optimization.

Memory configuration is substantial: 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus delivers 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1313 MHz, with an effective data rate of 21 Gbps. This bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution texture streaming and large scene geometry, though the 192-bit bus width means the card relies on its cache hierarchy and compression efficiency to maintain throughput in memory-intensive tasks. For 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads, 12 GB of VRAM is adequate, but the data shows no headroom for extreme texture packs at 4K with ray tracing enabled simultaneously.

The compute configuration is robust: 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, 60 ray tracing cores, and 240 tensor cores. This yields a pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s, and a FP32 throughput of 40.09 TFLOPS, with FP16 operating at the same rate (1:1 ratio). The 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting and DLSS-based upscaling, respectively. In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 5024 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 176953 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 213808 in Geekbench Vulkan. Passmark results show 31624 in G3D and 18396 in GPU compute, indicating strong rasterization and compute capability. The DirectX 12 score of 116 (Passmark) is notably lower relative to other API tests, but this reflects the specific test methodology rather than real-world DX12 performance.

For rendering workloads, the 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 throughput accelerates viewport manipulation and preview renders. The tensor cores enable AI-accelerated denoising and DLSS frame generation, which reduces render times for final frames. The 60 RT cores handle ray-traced effects, but the 12 GB VRAM cap may force texture streaming for large scenes. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern render engines. The dual-slot design and 285 mm length require a spacious case, and the single 16-pin power connector demands a compatible PSU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F scores 7556 in 3DMark 16-thread and 7550 in max-thread tests. Its average benchmark score is 28185, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (28128) and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500T (28065), but 0.5% behind the Intel Core i9-11950H (28332).

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4070 Ti have and what bandwidth does it provide?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The memory runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance?

A: The i5-13490F scores 1002 in 3DMark single-thread, 323 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1348 in Cinebench R20 single-core, 3211 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 3828 in Passmark single-thread.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core configuration?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores. These enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS, with FP16 compute at 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Q: What power supply is recommended for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W, based on the GPU's 285 W TDP. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so combined power draw is manageable for a quality 600 W unit.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, indicating the build outperforms 82% of all configurations in the database. This is a high-tier desktop pairing.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, based on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename). It uses Intel's 10 nm process node, features a 215 mm² die size, and fits the Intel Socket 1700. The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and the TDP is 65 W — a modest figure that indicates efficient power consumption for a modern desktop CPU. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, but ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), enabling high-bandwidth connectivity to GPUs and NVMe storage.

Benchmark scores reveal a balanced performance profile. In Cinebench, the CPU scores 2292 in R15 multicore, 323 in R15 single-core, 9553 in R20 multicore, 1348 in R20 single-core, 22747 in R23 multicore, and 3211 in R23 single-core. The R23 multicore score of 22747 is impressive for a 65 W part, suggesting strong sustained multi-threaded throughput. 3DMark results show 7556 in 16-thread, 1959 in 2-thread, 3552 in 4-thread, 5731 in 8-thread, 7550 in max-thread, and 1002 in single-thread. The scaling from 2-thread (1959) to 4-thread (3552) and 8-thread (5731) shows near-linear gains, indicating efficient thread utilization. The max-thread score (7550) is nearly identical to the 16-thread score (7556), confirming that the 16 threads are the primary parallelization target.

Passmark scores provide workload-specific insights. The CPU achieves 328397 in data compression, 17902 in data encryption, 20837 in extended instructions, 114 in find prime numbers, 60273 in floating point math, 83723 in integer math, 26569 in multithread, 1915 in physics, 34042 in random string sorting, and 3828 in single-thread. The high integer math score (83723) and floating point score (60273) indicate strong general-purpose compute. Data compression (328397) is exceptionally high, making the CPU well-suited for archiving, database operations, and file servers. The lower prime number score (114) reflects the test's sensitivity to specific arithmetic patterns rather than a general weakness.

The average benchmark score is 28185, placing the CPU at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28128 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065 (0.4% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054 (0.5% behind). The Intel Core i9-11950H scores 28332, which is 0.5% ahead. This means the i5-13490F is competitively positioned against both current-gen and previous-gen processors, with no single rival holding a decisive advantage. For real workloads, the CPU excels at multi-threaded productivity tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while its single-thread performance (3828 in Passmark) handles everyday responsiveness and gaming adequately.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i5-13490F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game or resolution. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not direct measurements. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, so treat these as projections with appropriate caution.

Based on the GPU's 84th percentile ranking and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024, the RTX 4070 Ti is positioned for high-refresh 1440p gaming and playable 4K in most titles. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking and single-thread score of 3828 (Passmark) ensure it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The combined percentile of 82 reinforces this pairing as a high-end gaming platform.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (1002 in 3DMark single-thread) is sufficient to feed the GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS compute throughput, so frame rates will likely be GPU-limited in graphically intensive games. Expect very high frame rates in esports titles, with the GPU's 208.8 GPixel/s pixel rate handling even the most demanding scenes. At 1440p, the sweet spot for this GPU, the 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-quality textures and effects. Frame rates should exceed 100 FPS in most AAA titles at ultra settings, with ray tracing enabled potentially reducing this to 60-80 FPS due to the 60 RT cores' workload.

At 4K, the 12 GB VRAM becomes a limiting factor for the most demanding texture packs, and the 192-bit bus width constrains memory bandwidth. The GPU's 31624 Passmark G3D score suggests strong rasterization performance, but 4K ultra settings may require DLSS to maintain 60 FPS in modern titles. The tensor cores (240) enable DLSS upscaling, which can effectively boost frame rates by rendering at a lower internal resolution. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 213808 indicates robust API-level performance, benefiting Vulkan-based games. Overall, this pairing delivers excellent 1440p gaming and capable 4K with upscaling, though these are estimates pending actual measured data.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility to reuse existing DDR4 modules or invest in faster DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel, and while no specific bandwidth figure is provided, DDR5 offers higher bandwidth than DDR4. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is forward-compatible with next-generation GPUs and NVMe drives, though the RTX 4070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

The GPU's TDP is 285 W, and the suggested PSU is 600 W. The CPU's TDP is 65 W, so combined power draw leaves substantial headroom within a 600 W unit for other components like drives, fans, and RGB lighting. The GPU requires a single 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must include this connector or an adapter. The dual-slot GPU is 285 mm long, 112 mm high, and 42 mm wide, so case compatibility is essential — most mid-tower cases accommodate this, but compact builds may struggle.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the workload. For gaming, the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU at 1440p, so a GPU upgrade (e.g., to a higher-tier Ada Lovelace card) would provide the most benefit when frame rates drop. For productivity, the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 10 cores are sufficient for most tasks, but moving to a higher-core-count 13th Gen CPU (e.g., i7 or i9) on the same socket would boost multi-threaded scores like Cinebench R23. The locked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, so upgrades must come from a new CPU or GPU rather than manual tuning.

Memory is a key upgrade lever: moving from DDR4 to DDR5 (if not already adopted) can improve bandwidth-sensitive workloads. The platform's dual-channel memory bus supports both, so the choice depends on the motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes future-proof storage and GPU connectivity, though current GPUs like the RTX 4070 Ti use PCIe 4.0. For storage, a Gen 5 NVMe drive would leverage the full CPU lane bandwidth, but this is a marginal upgrade for gaming. In summary, the platform supports incremental upgrades — a GPU swap or memory speed increase — without changing the motherboard, making it a flexible foundation.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

This build targets users who need strong 1440p gaming performance and moderate multi-threaded productivity, as indicated by the CPU's 80th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile rankings. Gamers at 1440p resolution will benefit most, as the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handle high-quality settings, while the CPU's single-thread score of 3828 (Passmark) ensures responsive frame times. For 4K gaming, the build requires DLSS for demanding titles, but it is capable with adjustments.

Content creators editing video will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 sufficient for 4K timeline scrubbing and export, while the GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates effects and color grading. 3D artists and architects using ray-traced renderers benefit from the 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which speed up final-frame renders and AI denoising. The 12 GB VRAM supports moderate scene sizes but may require proxy workflows for very large projects.

Software developers compiling code will appreciate the 10 cores and 16 threads, with the 83723 Passmark integer math score indicating strong compilation throughput. Students in engineering or computer science can use this build for simulations, data analysis (data compression score of 328397), and machine learning experiments using the tensor cores. Small business workstations running databases or virtualization can leverage the high multithread score (26569 in Passmark) and dual-channel memory for efficient operation.

The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power costs low, while the 285 W GPU TDP requires a 600 W PSU, making this a mid-to-high power consumption build. It is not ideal for ultra-compact cases due to the GPU's 285 mm length, but it fits standard mid-tower cases. Overall, the build suits enthusiasts and professionals who want a balance of gaming and productivity without compromising on either.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 28185, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (28128, 0.2% behind), Intel Core i5-14500T (28065, 0.4% behind), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28054, 0.5% behind), and Intel Core i9-11950H (28332, 0.5% ahead). The CPU's key scores include Cinebench R23 multicore 22747, Cinebench R23 single-core 3211, 3DMark 16-thread 7556, and Passmark single-thread 3828. These indicate strong multi-threaded throughput and competent single-thread performance, with the 24 MB L3 cache aiding data-heavy workloads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 44795, placing it at the 84th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45152, 0.8% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384, 1.3% ahead), NVIDIA RTX A6000 (44075, 1.6% behind), and Intel Arc A730M (45592, 1.7% ahead). The GPU's key scores include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 5024, Geekbench OpenCL 176953, Geekbench Vulkan 213808, Passmark G3D 31624, and Passmark GPU compute 18396. These show strong rasterization and compute performance, with the 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores providing dedicated acceleration for ray tracing and AI tasks.

The combined percentile is 82, indicating the pairing outperforms 82% of all configurations in the database. The CPU at 80th percentile and GPU at 84th percentile are well-matched, with neither component dramatically outperforming the other. The combined average benchmark score (not directly provided but implied by the percentiles) suggests a high-tier desktop build. The deltaPct values among rivals are all within ±1.7%, indicating that this pairing competes closely with other high-end configurations. The data shows no significant bottleneck from either component, as their percentile positions are within 4 points of each other.

The combined picture is a balanced high-end desktop system. The CPU's 80th percentile ensures it does not hold back the GPU's 84th percentile in most workloads. The GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth complement the CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 65 W TDP. For gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (3828 Passmark) supports high frame rates, while the GPU's 12 GB VRAM handles modern textures. For productivity, the CPU's 22747 Cinebench R23 multicore and GPU's 18396 Passmark compute work together for rendering and encoding.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

This build pairs the Intel Core i5-13490F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti in a desktop configuration (buildClass: desktop). The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace card with a 285 W TDP, requiring a 600 W suggested PSU. The combined percentile of 82 places this build in the top 18% of all configurations, marking it as a high-tier system.

The CPU's 80th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile indicate both components are above-average, with the GPU slightly stronger. The combined percentile (82) is between the two individual percentiles, reflecting a balanced pairing. This is not a budget build — the GPU's launch MSRP is $799 USD — but it represents a mainstream-to-high-end desktop for gaming and productivity.

The platform uses Intel Socket 1700 with DDR4/DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes, making it current-generation. The GPU is end-of-life (productionStatus: End-of-life, successor: GeForce 50), but its performance remains competitive. The build is a desktop-class system designed for stationary use, not portable. Overall, it is a high-tier desktop build suitable for enthusiasts who want strong 1440p gaming and capable multi-threaded productivity without stepping into extreme flagship territory.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU operates at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 84th percentile, a 4-point gap that indicates a well-balanced pairing. In gaming, the GPU is typically the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU may limit at lower resolutions. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handle 1440p textures, but at 4K, the 192-bit bus and 12 GB capacity can become a constraint, reducing frame rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 3828 (Passmark) is sufficient for 1440p, but at 1080p with a high-refresh monitor, the CPU's 1002 3DMark single-thread score may cap frame rates in CPU-bound titles.

In multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU's 22747 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU's 18396 Passmark compute score work together. The CPU is not a bottleneck for the GPU's FP32 throughput (40.09 TFLOPS) in most rendering tasks, but the 12 GB VRAM can limit scene sizes. For video editing, the CPU's 10 cores handle encoding, while the GPU's tensor cores accelerate effects; the balance is favorable.

The absence of measured FPS data means bottleneck analysis relies on percentiles. The GPU at 84th percentile slightly outperforms the CPU at 80th, suggesting the CPU may be the limiting factor in GPU-bound scenarios like high-refresh gaming at 1080p. However, the 4-point gap is small, so the bottleneck is minor. In compute-heavy workloads, the CPU's 65 W TDP and 10 cores may throttle under sustained load, but the benchmark scores (Cinebench R23 22747) indicate efficient sustained performance. The combined percentile of 82 confirms no severe bottleneck exists.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 84th percentile and CPU's 80th percentile support high frame rates at 1440p. The GPU's 31624 Passmark G3D score and CPU's 3828 single-thread score enable 100+ FPS in most titles, though ray tracing may reduce this.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and GPU's tensor cores (240) handle encoding simultaneously. The CPU's 7556 3DMark 16-thread score provides headroom for game capture while maintaining frame rates.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore 22747 accelerates timeline rendering, while the GPU's 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 speeds up effects. The 12 GB VRAM supports 4K previews, but long timelines may need proxies.

3D rendering: The GPU's 60 RT cores and 18396 Passmark compute score accelerate ray-traced renders. The CPU's 24 MB L3 cache and 10 cores handle scene preparation, with 22747 Cinebench R23 multicore aiding CPU-based renderers.

Software development: The CPU's 83723 Passmark integer math and 328397 data compression scores speed up compilation and data processing. The 16 threads handle parallel builds, while the GPU's compute capability supports testing and simulation.

Student and office work: The CPU's 65 W TDP keeps power low, and the 3828 single-thread score ensures responsive everyday use. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is overkill for office tasks, but the build handles data analysis and light rendering for coursework.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i5-13490F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds