SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

This desktop pairing combines a 10-core Raptor Lake CPU with an 8 GB Ada Lovelace GPU, landing at the 71st percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 61st percentile against all GPUs. This is a balanced mid-range configuration where the processor carries more relative strength than the graphics card, making it better suited for CPU-intensive tasks than for pushing maximum frame rates at high resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, this system can plausibly deliver high frame rates in most titles, though the GPU's 61st percentile position means it will not sustain maximum refresh rates in the most demanding games. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1002 in 3DMark single-thread and 3211 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensures the processor will not bottleneck frame generation in esports titles. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p high-refresh gaming, but the 128-bit memory bus limits headroom for texture-heavy titles.

Streaming: The GPU's Ada Lovelace architecture includes 96 tensor cores and 24 RT cores, which support hardware-accelerated encoding and AI-based upscaling. The CPU's 16 threads provide ample capacity for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding. PassMark multithread score of 26569 indicates strong parallel throughput, while the 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 shows sustained multi-core capability. This combination can handle a game plus encoding workload without severe frame drops, though the GPU's 8 GB memory may constrain encoding quality in VRAM-heavy scenes.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 places it in the upper tier for desktop processors, enabling smooth timeline scrubbing and export acceleration for 1080p and moderate 4K projects. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects rendering and color grading, while its 96 tensor cores support AI-assisted editing tools. PassMark floating point math score of 60273 confirms robust numerical processing for video filters and transitions. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for most editing suites but may limit complex multi-layer compositions.

3D rendering: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads with 24 MB shared L3 cache deliver strong viewport performance and CPU-based rendering. Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9553 and PassMark integer math score of 83723 indicate solid geometry processing. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 and 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate accelerate GPU-accelerated renderers, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will cap texture sizes and scene complexity. This is a capable entry-level rendering workstation, not a high-end production node.

Software development: The CPU's balanced single-thread score of 3828 in PassMark and multicore score of 26569 handle compilation, testing, and containerized workloads efficiently. The 24 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequent code access patterns. PassMark data compression score of 328397 shows rapid build artifact handling, while data encryption score of 17902 supports secure development workflows. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks but accelerates UI rendering and local testing of graphics applications.

Student and office work: This system is substantially overqualified for document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking ensures responsive multitasking across dozens of browser tabs and office applications. The GPU's 1037 PassMark G2D score provides smooth 2D desktop rendering. The 65 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP keep power consumption moderate for a dorm room or small office. The lack of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which this build includes.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4060 uses the AD107 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1830 MHz and boosts to 2460 MHz, with memory running at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is paired with a 128-bit bus, yielding 272.0 GB/s bandwidth. This memory configuration is the primary limiting factor for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

The GPU contains 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, 48 raster output units, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. The 24 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 96 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-based rendering features. The FP32 compute throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS (with matching FP16 at 1:1 ratio) supports both gaming and compute workloads. Pixel rate of 118.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 236.2 GTexel/s define the rasterization throughput.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 2302, placing it well below the top-tier cards but above entry-level options. Geekbench OpenCL score of 95057 and Vulkan score of 48643 show compute and graphics API performance respectively. PassMark G3D score of 19545 places the GPU at the 61st percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at a 0.2% lower score. The PassMark GPU compute score of 9213 indicates moderate compute throughput for non-graphics workloads.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p textures, but 4K texture packs and complex scenes will exceed capacity. The 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth to 272.0 GB/s, which constrains fill-rate-bound scenarios. The RT cores accelerate ray-traced effects, but the modest 15.11 TFLOPS compute means ray tracing comes with a noticeable performance cost. The tensor cores enable DLSS upscaling, which can offset ray tracing overhead. The dual-slot, 240 mm length design fits most mid-tower cases, and the single 12-pin power connector requires a 300 W suggested PSU.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 28185, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, scores 28128 — a 0.2% difference. The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065 (0.4% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE scores 28054 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Core i9-11950H scores 28332 (0.5% higher). This places the i5-13490F in a tight cluster of similarly performing processors.

In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 7556 with 16 threads, 1959 with 2 threads, 3552 with 4 threads, 5731 with 8 threads, 7550 with max threads, and 1002 single-thread. The near-identical scores between 16-thread (7556) and max-thread (7550) tests confirm the 16-thread limit is fully utilized. Cinebench results show R15 multicore of 2292 and single-core of 323, R20 multicore of 9553 and single-core of 1348, and R23 multicore of 22747 and single-core of 3211.

PassMark tests reveal workload-specific strengths: data compression at 328397, data encryption at 17902, extended instructions at 20837, prime number finding at 114, floating point math at 60273, integer math at 83723, multithread at 26569, physics at 1915, random string sorting at 34042, and single thread at 3828.

The GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 17639, placing it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666 (0.2% higher). The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509 (0.7% lower). The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 19545 is notably higher than its average score, indicating strong rasterization relative to its compute performance.

The combined percentile of 71 indicates this pairing outperforms 71% of all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU's 80th percentile significantly exceeds the GPU's 61st percentile, revealing an imbalance where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. This means the GPU will typically be the limiting factor in gaming and graphics workloads, while the CPU will excel in productivity and compute tasks.

FAQ

Q: Does this system support DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-13490F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 has 272.0 GB/s bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435?

A: The i5-13490F scores 28185 on average, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen AI 5 435's 28128.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: No, the i5-13490F has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU is required for display output.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The RTX 4060 has 24 RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing with DirectX 12 Ultimate support.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the RTX 4060 is end-of-life, with the GeForce 50-series as its successor.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p with high refresh rates will find this pairing well-matched, though those seeking 1440p or 4K performance should look to GPUs above the 61st percentile. The CPU's 80th percentile ensures no processor bottleneck at 1080p, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth handle contemporary titles at medium-high settings. Esports players benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1002 in 3DMark, which drives high minimum frame rates.

Content creators working with 1080p or moderate 4K video will appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22747 for export times. The GPU's 96 tensor cores accelerate AI-based editing tools, while 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 handles effects. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate but not generous for large compositing projects. Software developers gain from the 24 MB L3 cache and 16 threads, with PassMark data compression score of 328397 speeding up build pipelines.

Students in engineering or computer science programs benefit from the CPU's balanced performance across single-threaded (3828 PassMark) and multithreaded (26569 PassMark) workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps thermals manageable in shared living spaces. Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, and light CAD will find this system responsive, with the GPU accelerating any visualization tasks. The lack of integrated graphics means this build is not suitable for ultra-low-power or passively cooled office systems.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Based on the GPU's 61st percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2302, this system is estimated to deliver smooth 1080p gaming at high settings in most titles, with frame rates typically ranging from 60 to 100+ FPS depending on the game's optimization. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1002 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures it can feed the GPU adequately at 1080p, where CPU-bound scenarios are more common. At 1440p, frame rates are estimated to drop by 20-30% as the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors.

In esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, the high single-thread score (3828 PassMark) and 16 threads suggest the CPU can push frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with low-to-medium settings. The GPU's 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 and 118.1 GPixel/s pixel rate handle the rendering load without bottlenecking. For AAA single-player titles, the 8 GB VRAM may cause texture pop-in or reduced quality settings at 1440p, but 1080p high settings should be comfortable.

Ray-traced gaming is possible but comes with significant performance cost. The 24 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but the modest FP32 throughput means enabling ray tracing could halve frame rates in demanding titles. DLSS via the 96 tensor cores can recover some performance, potentially bringing ray-traced frame rates back to playable levels. The 128-bit memory bus limits the effectiveness of high-resolution DLSS modes.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The die size is 215 mm², and it uses Intel Socket 1700. The CPU is not multiplier-unlocked, meaning overclocking is limited to BCLK adjustments. It was released on February 9, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $235.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. This substantial L3 cache helps with gaming and productivity workloads by reducing memory access latency. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though memory bandwidth figures are not specified. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage.

Benchmark results show strong scaling from 2 threads (1959 in 3DMark) to 16 threads (7556), with 8 threads scoring 5731. The single-thread score of 1002 in 3DMark and 3828 in PassMark indicates excellent per-core performance for lightly threaded applications. Cinebench R23 scores of 22747 multicore and 3211 single-core confirm this processor excels at both parallel and sequential workloads. The PassMark physics score of 1915 suggests good game physics performance, while integer math at 83723 and floating point at 60273 cover a broad range of compute tasks.

The 80th percentile ranking places this CPU ahead of 80% of all processors. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, is only 0.2% slower on average. The Intel Core i9-11950H, a mobile chip, is 0.5% faster, showing this desktop part competes well against older flagship mobile silicon. The CPU's production status is active, ensuring availability for new builds.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i5-13490F (10 cores, 16 threads, Raptor Lake) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (8 GB GDDR6, Ada Lovelace). The CPU launched at $235 MSRP, while the GPU launched at $299 USD. The combined system ranks at the 71st percentile among all CPU+GPU pairings, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of desktop builds.

The CPU brings strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multicore of 22747) and excellent single-thread capability (3211 in the same test), making it a versatile workhorse. The GPU contributes solid 1080p gaming performance and hardware ray tracing via its 24 RT cores, alongside 96 tensor cores for DLSS and AI workloads. The GPU is end-of-life, so buyers should consider this when planning long-term upgrades.

This pairing is best described as a balanced mid-range desktop system with a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart. The 65 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP keep cooling requirements modest, and the GPU's 240 mm length fits most cases. The suggested 300 W PSU is a reasonable minimum, though users with additional drives or peripherals may want more headroom. The system supports PCIe Gen 5 on the CPU but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance: the CPU sits at the 80th percentile while the GPU rests at the 61st percentile. This means the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads, including gaming at 1080p and above. The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 7556 provides ample compute headroom that the GPU's 2302 Steel Nomad score cannot fully utilize in gaming scenarios.

In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and data processing, the system will perform closer to the CPU's 80th percentile capability. The PassMark multithread score of 26569 and data compression score of 328397 indicate strong parallel throughput. However, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions, the system's effective performance will align more closely with the GPU's 61st percentile, creating a situation where the CPU is underutilized.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this analysis. At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (1002 in 3DMark single-thread) can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 272.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will cap maximum frame rates in demanding titles. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more heavily loaded, and the CPU's advantage diminishes further. The 128-bit memory bus is a notable bottleneck, limiting texture throughput and high-resolution performance.

For productivity workloads, the CPU carries the load while the GPU assists in compute tasks. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 9213 and 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 provide acceleration for rendering and AI workloads, but the CPU's 22747 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles most compute tasks efficiently. Users should expect the GPU to bottleneck gaming and graphics workloads, while the CPU will bottleneck only in extremely parallel compute scenarios. This configuration favors users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity over maximum gaming frame rates.