SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The chip features a hybrid cache layout with 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration positions it as a strong mainstream option for users who need a balance of single-thread responsiveness and multi-thread capacity.

The benchmark data tells a clear story about the processor's capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the chip scores 22,747 points in multi-core and 3,211 points in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly strong, indicating that the 10-core/16-thread arrangement handles heavily threaded workloads with authority. The single-core score of 3,211 demonstrates that the 4.80 GHz boost clock translates into excellent responsiveness for lightly threaded tasks. In 3DMark CPU tests, the progression from 1,959 points at 2 threads to 7,550 points at max threads shows strong scaling as more threads are utilized, though the gain from 8 threads (5,731) to 16 threads (7,550) is modest, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 threads for this workload.

PassMark results reinforce the chip's versatility. The multi-thread score of 26,569 and single-thread score of 3,828 place it comfortably in the upper tier of desktop processors. The integer math score of 83,723 and floating-point math score of 60,273 indicate robust general-purpose compute capability. Data compression (328,397) and encryption (17,902) scores show the chip handles data-intensive tasks efficiently. The processor sits at the 80th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28,185. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (0.2% ahead), Intel Core i5-14500T (0.4% ahead), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (0.5% ahead), and Intel Core i9-11950H (0.5% behind). These margins are tight, meaning the i5-13490F trades blows with these competitors rather than dominating them.

For real workloads, the 65 W TDP with a 4.80 GHz boost clock suggests the chip can sustain high performance without requiring extreme cooling solutions. The 24 MB L3 cache is substantial, benefiting gaming and productivity applications that rely on data locality. However, the absence of integrated graphics means a discrete GPU is mandatory, which is expected given the "F" designation.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i5-13490F achieves an average benchmark score of 28,185, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435, scores 28,128 (0.2% higher), while the Intel Core i9-11950H scores 28,332 (0.5% higher). These deltas are within noise, indicating the i5-13490F performs at parity with these alternatives. The chip's 3DMark scores range from 1,002 in single-thread to 7,556 in 16-thread tests, while Cinebench R20 shows 9,553 multi-core and 1,348 single-core results.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, paired with this CPU, delivers an average benchmark score of 29,945, placing it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile (0.1% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6800 (0.5% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (0.5% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 6700 (1.6% behind). The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 23,356 and G2D score of 1,055 indicate strong rasterization performance. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the card scores 3,478 points, reflecting modern API efficiency. Geekbench results show 119,718 in OpenCL and 139,541 in Vulkan, demonstrating solid compute throughput.

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion must therefore be framed as estimated from the benchmark scores. The combined percentile for this pairing is 78, indicating it outperforms roughly three-quarters of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's 80th percentile and GPU's 75th percentile suggest a balanced pairing, though the GPU sits slightly lower in relative performance. This means the CPU has a small edge in headroom, but neither component dramatically overshadows the other.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13490F uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, but the FACT PACK does not specify maximum memory bandwidth. The processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. ECC memory is not supported, which may matter for certain workstation users.

The CPU's 65 W TDP is modest, meaning most mainstream motherboards with adequate VRM cooling can handle it. The GPU, however, has a 290 W TDP and requires a 600 W suggested power supply. The RTX 3070 Ti uses a single 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height. This means builders need to ensure their cases have sufficient clearance and their PSUs have the appropriate connectors.

A sensible next upgrade path would involve either upgrading the GPU or CPU independently. Since the CPU sits at the 80th percentile and the GPU at the 75th, either component could be improved without creating a severe imbalance. Moving to a higher-tier GPU would leverage the CPU's 16-thread capacity and PCIe Gen 5 support, while upgrading the CPU would require a motherboard swap due to the Socket 1700 platform's lifecycle. The platform supports DDR5, so users building new systems can opt for faster memory, though DDR4 is also viable for cost-conscious builds.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets desktop users who need strong all-around performance without venturing into high-end workstation territory. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolution will benefit from the RTX 3070 Ti's 75th percentile GPU performance, while the CPU's 80th percentile ensures minimal bottlenecking in CPU-bound titles. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's 22,747 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's compute capabilities.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the 10-core/16-thread configuration useful, with the PassMark integer math score of 83,723 indicating strong throughput for build tasks. Students and small business users running office productivity suites will find the system overqualified, but the headroom ensures longevity. The CPU's 65 W TDP makes it suitable for compact builds, though the GPU's 290 W TDP and 267 mm length require a mid-tower case at minimum.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with a die size of 392 mm² and 17,400 million transistors. The chip, designated GA104, features 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. It includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1,575 MHz and a boost clock of 1,770 MHz, with memory running at 1,188 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, delivering 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This is substantial for 1440p gaming and adequate for 4K with adjusted settings. The pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s indicate strong fill-rate performance. The GPU delivers 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16 (1:1) compute, which is competitive for rendering tasks.

Benchmark results show the RTX 3070 Ti at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 29,945. Its PassMark G3D score of 23,356 reflects solid rasterization, while the GPU compute score of 11,601 indicates moderate compute throughput. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,478 suggests the card handles modern DirectX 12 workloads efficiently. In Geekbench, the OpenCL score of 119,718 and Vulkan score of 139,541 show strong API-level performance.

For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM may become a limitation in high-resolution texture-heavy scenes, but the 608.3 GB/s bandwidth mitigates this somewhat. The 48 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, though performance will vary by title. The tensor cores enable DLSS, which can significantly boost frame rates in supported games.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of the i5-13490F and RTX 3070 Ti pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78, meaning this pairing outperforms approximately 78% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435?

A: The i5-13490F scores 28,185 on average, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28,128, a delta of 0.2%. This is within statistical noise, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 Ti have, and what type is it?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and what socket does it use?

A: The i5-13490F has a 65 W TDP and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported on the i5-13490F.

Q: What power supply is suggested for the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: A 600 W power supply is suggested for the GPU, which has a 290 W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 29,945, placing it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 80th percentile and GPU's 75th percentile indicate a reasonably balanced pairing, with the CPU holding a slight advantage. In CPU-bound workloads such as physics simulations or data compression, the i5-13490F will be the limiting factor. The PassMark physics score of 1,915 and data compression score of 328,397 show strong but not class-leading performance. In GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming or ray tracing, the RTX 3070 Ti will be the constraint, particularly given its 8 GB VRAM capacity.

The CPU's 16 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks during gaming, so streaming or recording is unlikely to cause significant FPS drops. However, the GPU's 75th percentile means it will saturate before the CPU in most graphically demanding scenarios. At 1080p with low settings, the CPU may bottleneck in high-refresh scenarios, given its single-thread score of 3,211 in Cinebench R23. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes the primary constraint.

The estimated FPS picture, derived from benchmark scores rather than measured data, suggests that 1440p high-refresh gaming is the sweet spot. The CPU's 80th percentile ensures it can feed the GPU adequately, while the GPU's 75th percentile delivers smooth frame rates at this resolution. At 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 75th percentile positioning will limit performance, making medium-to-high settings more realistic than ultra.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13490F with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. The CPU, from the Core 13th Gen series, is a 10-core/16-thread Raptor Lake part with a 65 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with a 290 W TDP. The combined percentile of 78 places this build in the upper tier of desktop systems, though not at the very top.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 28,185 and the GPU's 29,945 combine to create a system that excels at both productivity and gaming. The 80th percentile CPU and 75th percentile GPU mean neither component is a weak link, though the GPU is the closer of the two to being the limiting factor. This is a well-matched pairing for users who want strong 1440p gaming and capable content creation performance without stepping up to high-end components.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1440p, the RTX 3070 Ti's 75th percentile performance and 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth can drive high refresh rates in most titles. The CPU's 80th percentile and 4.80 GHz boost clock ensure frames are delivered smoothly, with minimal CPU-side bottlenecks.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and 65 W TDP provide ample headroom for encoding and background tasks while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 26,569 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous gaming and streaming workloads without significant performance degradation.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22,747 and the GPU's compute capabilities accelerate export and rendering tasks. The 8 GB VRAM may limit timeline preview at very high resolutions, but the 608.3 GB/s bandwidth keeps scrubbing responsive.

3D rendering: The CPU's 10 cores and 16 threads deliver solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute accelerates GPU-accelerated renderers. The 48 RT cores provide ray tracing support, though 8 GB VRAM may constrain complex scenes.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 83,723 and data encryption score of 17,902 indicate strong compile and cryptographic performance. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 24 MB L3 cache reduces latency for frequently accessed code.

Student and office work: This system is overqualified for typical student and office workloads, but the 80th percentile CPU ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity suites. The 65 W CPU TDP and 600 W suggested PSU mean the system is relatively energy-efficient for its performance class.