SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i5-13490F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
88%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i5-13490F

28,185 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i5-13490F is a 10-core, 16-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S die. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The chip operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is a substantial frequency range for handling both lightly-threaded and fully-loaded workloads. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not supported, but the 65 W TDP keeps thermal and power requirements modest for a 10-core part.

Cache configuration is generous for the class: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps with gaming and productivity tasks where repeated data access patterns benefit from a big high-speed buffer. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, giving builders flexibility to reuse older memory or jump to newer platforms. Notably, ECC memory is not supported, which limits its appeal for error-sensitive workstation builds but is irrelevant for mainstream gaming and content creation. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, so the latest high-bandwidth storage and GPUs have room to operate without bottlenecking at the interface level.

Benchmark data shows a well-rounded performer. In 3DMark threaded tests, the CPU scores 7556 with 16 threads and 7550 with max threads, indicating strong scaling when all cores are engaged. The 8-thread score is 5731, while the 4-thread score drops to 3552. Single-thread performance is 1002 in 3DMark, which is competitive for a chip in this tier. Cinebench results reinforce this: R23 multicore hits 22747, while R23 singlecore reaches 3211. The R20 numbers are 9553 multicore and 1348 singlecore, and R15 shows 2292 multicore and 323 singlecore. These figures place the i5-13490F in the 80th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the majority of processors on the market while remaining far from the top-tier HEDT and flagship parts.

PassMark tests add another dimension. Multithread score is 26569, single-thread is 3828, and integer math reaches 83723. Floating-point math scores 60273, while data compression hits 328397 and encryption reaches 17902. Extended instructions score 20837, and random string sorting achieves 34042. Physics simulation scores 1915, and prime number finding is a modest 114. These numbers indicate that the chip excels in integer-heavy and compression workloads, while physics and prime-number tests show more moderate performance, likely due to the frequency and architecture characteristics. For real-world use, this translates to snappy application responsiveness, fast compile times, and quick file compression, though not class-leading in every synthetic test.

# Benchmark Performance

Looking at the aggregate benchmark score, the Intel Core i5-13490F averages 28185 across all tests. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28128 with a delta of 0.2%, meaning the Intel chip is essentially tied with it. The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065, just 0.4% behind. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE is at 28054, a 0.5% deficit. On the other side, the Intel Core i9-11950H scores 28332, which is 0.5% higher. This is a dense pack of competitors, and the i5-13490F sits right in the middle, within a fraction of a percent of each rival. For users, this means that any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance, and the choice should be driven by platform features, price, or availability rather than raw speed.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT presents a more complex picture. Its average benchmark score is 13745, but the distribution of results is unusual. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields 5623, while Geekbench Vulkan reaches 71068 and OpenCL scores 12756. PassMark tests show G3D at 29009, GPU compute at 16828, and G2D at 1232. DirectX 10, 11, and 12 scores are 158, 340, and 110 respectively, while DirectX 9 scores 322. The percentileVsAllGpus is 55, meaning the GPU outperforms just over half of all GPUs in the database. This is surprisingly low for a card with 20 GB of VRAM and a 320-bit bus, but the average score is dragged down by the DirectX legacy tests, which may not reflect modern workload performance.

The nearest rivals for the RX 7900 XT are also unusual. The AMD Radeon 660M scores 13812, a 0.5% delta, and the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile scores 13821, also 0.5% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 570X scores 13871, 0.9% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT scores 13543, which is 1.5% lower. These are not direct competitors in the traditional sense — the 660M is an integrated GPU, and the RTX A2000 Mobile is a laptop part. This suggests that the RX 7900 XT's benchmark profile is being compared against a wide range of hardware, and its percentile is lower than its raw compute capabilities would imply. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 68, placing the build in the upper third of all configurations.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than verified results. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3211 in Cinebench R23 singlecore and 1002 in 3DMark single-thread) suggests it can handle gaming workloads where per-core speed matters. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 and PassMark G3D score of 29009 indicate solid rasterization power for modern titles.

At 1080p resolution, the RX 7900 XT is likely to push very high frame rates in most games, as the GPU has ample compute throughput with 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The CPU should keep up with the GPU in most scenarios, given its high boost clock and 24 MB of L3 cache. However, at lower resolutions, the CPU may become the limiting factor in esports titles where frame rates exceed 200 FPS, as 10 cores with a 4.80 GHz boost can still bottleneck a GPU of this class in extremely CPU-bound scenarios.

At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the RX 7900 XT should deliver smooth performance in AAA titles with high settings. The 20 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for modern textures and future-proofing. At 4K, the GPU is the dominant factor, and the CPU's role diminishes further. Expect playable frame rates in most games, though the highest-fidelity ray tracing settings may require compromises, as the RT cores are present but not as strong as the rasterization hardware.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i5-13490F uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. This gives builders a choice: use existing DDR4 modules to save money or adopt DDR5 for higher bandwidth. The dual-channel memory bus is standard for the platform. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes means the board can run a modern GPU at full bandwidth, and Gen 5 NVMe drives are supported on boards that have the necessary slots.

The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is modest for a 10-core part. This means a capable air cooler is sufficient for most workloads, and power delivery requirements are not extreme. The GPU, however, has a 300 W TDP and requires a 700 W suggested PSU. The card needs 2x 8-pin power connectors and is a dual-slot design. Its dimensions are 276 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 51 mm in width, so case compatibility should be checked for clearance, but most mid-tower and full-tower cases will accommodate it.

For a sensible next upgrade, the platform offers room to move to a higher-core-count Raptor Lake processor if more CPU throughput is needed later. Memory can be upgraded to faster DDR5 kits, and storage can be expanded with Gen 5 NVMe drives. The GPU is already near the top of the Radeon RX 7000 series, so the next meaningful GPU upgrade would be to a newer generation when it becomes available. The 700 W PSU headroom is adequate for the current configuration, but a more power-hungry GPU in the future would necessitate a PSU upgrade as well.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this pairing is 68, which places it above the majority of desktop builds. The CPU sits at the 80th percentile, while the GPU is at the 55th percentile. This imbalance suggests that the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this pairing, meaning the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads.

In gaming, the bottleneck depends on resolution and settings. At 1080p, the CPU is strong enough to feed the GPU in most titles, but in highly CPU-bound games or at very high frame rates, the 10-core i5 may hold back the RX 7900 XT. At 1440p and above, the GPU takes over as the primary constraint, and the CPU's extra headroom becomes less relevant. For productivity, the CPU's 80th percentile indicates it can handle multi-threaded tasks well, while the GPU's compute performance (16828 in PassMark GPU compute) is adequate but not exceptional relative to its class.

The FPS scaling picture is not available from measured data, but based on the benchmark scores, the CPU's strong single-thread performance should support high frame rates in less demanding games, while the GPU's raw rasterization power will drive higher resolutions. For users who prioritize maximum frame rates at 1080p, the CPU may need a stronger single-threaded part, but for most gaming at 1440p or 4K, the balance is acceptable.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the Navi 31 chip using the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Plum Bonito. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 109.1 million per mm². The GPU has 5376 shading units, 336 TMUs, and 192 ROPs, along with 84 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration. It does not have dedicated tensor cores, relying instead on the RDNA 3.0 compute units for AI and compute workloads, which is a distinction from NVIDIA's tensor-based approach.

Memory configuration is substantial: 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2500 MHz, or 20 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is more than enough for high-resolution textures and compute tasks that require large data sets. The base clock is 1387 MHz, the boost clock is 2394 MHz, and the game clock is 2025 MHz, which represents the expected clock speed during typical gaming loads.

Compute performance is impressive on paper: FP32 is 51.48 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 103.0 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. These figures suggest strong rasterization throughput and good compute capability for rendering and content creation. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support but does not bottleneck the GPU in practice.

The GPU's benchmark scores are mixed. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 is a modern test that reflects current gaming API performance. Geekbench Vulkan at 71068 is high, while OpenCL at 12756 is moderate. PassMark G3D at 29009 is decent, but the legacy DirectX tests (DX9 at 322, DX10 at 158, DX11 at 340, DX12 at 110) are low and likely drag down the average. The percentileVsAllGpus of 55 means the GPU is in the middle of the pack overall, but this is skewed by the inclusion of older and integrated GPUs in the database. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M and NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile, which are not comparable in gaming performance, indicating that the benchmark average is not representative of the GPU's true gaming capability.

# FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-13490F support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, so the CPU cannot be overclocked. It runs at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz out of the box.

Q: What memory types can I use with this CPU?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode. This gives builders the option to use either memory generation, depending on the motherboard and budget.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7900 XT have, and is it enough for 4K gaming?

A: The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus with 800.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is more than sufficient for 4K gaming and high-resolution textures.

Q: What power supply do I need for this configuration?

A: The GPU has a 300 W TDP and the suggested PSU is 700 W. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, so the combined system power draw is well within that range.

Q: Is the RX 7900 XT good for ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 84 RT cores, but it does not have dedicated tensor cores like NVIDIA parts. Ray tracing performance is present but not the primary strength of this card, as indicated by the mixed benchmark results.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-13490F is in the 80th percentile, meaning it outperforms 80% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 28185.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing. All gaming performance estimates are based on benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i5-13490F with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The CPU is a 10-core, 16-thread Raptor Lake part with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz and a 65 W TDP, placing it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a RDNA 3.0 flagship with 20 GB of VRAM, 5376 shading units, and a 300 W TDP, though its benchmark percentile is only 55 due to the inclusion of legacy tests that skew the average. The combined percentile is 68, which puts this build in the upper third of all desktop configurations.

The pairing is unusual because the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in percentile terms. This means the system is well-suited for CPU-heavy productivity tasks like compilation, compression, and multi-threaded rendering, while the GPU is capable of handling modern gaming at high resolutions, even if it is not the absolute top-tier performer in its own right. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, and memory can be DDR4 or DDR5.

Overall, this is a balanced desktop system for a builder who wants strong multi-threaded CPU performance and a high-end GPU for 1440p or 4K gaming, without chasing the absolute highest GPU benchmark scores. The 700 W PSU requirement and dual-slot, 276 mm GPU length are practical considerations for case and power supply selection.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a versatile desktop for both productivity and gaming. The CPU's 80th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore of 22747, PassMark multithread of 26569) make it suitable for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and programming. The 10 cores and 16 threads handle parallel workloads well, and the 24 MB L3 cache helps with data-intensive applications.

For gamers, the RX 7900 XT with 20 GB of VRAM is well-suited for 1440p and 4K gaming, where the GPU's rasterization power (51.48 TFLOPS FP32) can be put to use. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 singlecore of 3211) ensures that most games will not be CPU-bound, though at 1080p with very high frame rates, the CPU may become a limiting factor. This build is not ideal for those who prioritize ray tracing performance, as the RT cores are present but the GPU's benchmark profile suggests rasterization is its strength.

Developers and students working on software projects, data analysis, or machine learning can benefit from the CPU's compute capabilities (PassMark integer math of 83723, floating-point math of 60273). The GPU's compute score of 16828 in PassMark is adequate for light GPU-accelerated tasks, though not class-leading. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded office applications, database queries, or financial modeling would also find this build responsive, thanks to the CPU's high multithreaded scores and the GPU's large memory buffer for data-heavy tasks.

Users who are building a new system and want to reuse DDR4 memory will appreciate the CPU's dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 support, which can save on initial costs. The 65 W CPU TDP means a moderate cooler is sufficient, and the 700 W PSU requirement is standard for a high-end GPU. This build is not for users who want the absolute fastest GPU on the market, as the RX 7900 XT's percentile suggests there are faster options, but it is a solid choice for balanced desktop performance.